抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203002

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 175-182.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203002

抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导

程方¹^,²(), 孙婷玉¹(), 叶建仁¹^,^*()

1.南京林业大学林草学院,南方现代林业协同创新中心,江苏南京 210037
2.广东象头山国家级自然保护区管理局,广东惠州 516001

收稿日期:2022-03-01 修回日期:2023-07-04 出版日期:2023-11-30 发布日期:2023-11-23
通讯作者: *叶建仁(jrye@njfu.edu.cn),教授。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2021YFD1400900)

Induction of embryogenic callus from immature zygotic embryos of Pinus elliottii resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola)

CHENG Fang¹^,²(), SUN Tingyu¹(), YE Jianren¹^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Forestry and Grassland, Nanjing Forest University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Guangdong Xiangtoushan National Nature Reserve Administration, Huizhou 516001, China

Received:2022-03-01 Revised:2023-07-04 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】建立高效实用的抗松针褐斑病湿地松优良无性系的离体快繁体系,为湿地松优良种苗的商业化应用提供技术基础。【方法】以福建官庄林场采集的抗松针褐斑病家系湿地松未成熟合子胚为外植体,分析影响湿地松胚性愈伤组织诱导的主要因素:对外植体材料的预处理进行研究,利用单因素实验筛选适合湿地松未成熟球果的采集及冷藏时间;对培养基中影响胚性愈伤组织诱导的主要添加物中的碳源(麦芽糖、蔗糖和葡萄糖)、肌醇和抗坏血酸进行单因素实验,对α-酮戊二酸和丙酮酸进行双因素实验分析;最后对影响胚性愈伤组织诱导的主要激素,如生长素(2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸)和细胞分裂素(6-苄基氨基嘌呤和激动素)进行随机组合分析。【结果】①未成熟湿地松球果体胚最佳诱导时间为6月底至7月中上旬;②1 000 mg/L肌醇和30 g/L麦芽糖最适宜湿地松胚性愈伤组织的诱导;③抗坏血酸质量浓度为0、1、2、3 mg/L时,对湿地松胚性愈伤组织诱导的影响区别不大;但同时添加α-酮戊二酸和丙酮酸时明显促进了湿地松愈伤组织的诱导;④湿地松最佳诱导培养基与激素组合为基本培养基LP+2 mg/L 2,4-二氯苯氧乙酸(2,4-D)+2 mg/L 6-苄基氨基嘌呤(6-BA)+2.5 mg/L激动素(KT)。【结论】通过对湿地松球果的预处理,获得了适合湿地松愈伤组织诱导的材料,并且确定了适合胚性愈伤组织诱导的合子胚发育阶段,即2~4阶段,以及合适的采集期。另外,对诱导培养基中主要添加物和激素进行研究,筛选出了1种较优的湿地松愈伤组织诱导的培养基,确定了适合湿地松胚性愈伤组织诱导的主要条件,可为提高湿地松胚性愈伤组织诱导率、促进湿地松体胚发生提供参考。

关键词: 湿地松, 松针褐斑病, 合子胚, 体细胞胚胎发生, 胚性愈伤组织诱导

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to establish an efficient and practical in vitro rapid propagation system for excellent clones of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola), and provided a technical basis for the commercial application of excellent seedlings of P. elliottii. 【Method】Immature zygotic embryos of P. elliottii from the resistant families were used as explants to explore the main factors affecting embryogenic callus induction. First, the pre-treatment of the explant material was investigated, using single-factor tests to screen for the appropriate collection of P. elliottii immature cones and the time of refrigeration of pine cones. Furthermore, single-factor tests were performed on the carbon sources (maltose, sucrose and glucose), inositol, and ascorbic acid in the main additions to the medium affecting the induction of embryogenic callus, as well as two-factor tests for α-ketoglutaric acid and pyruvic acid. Finally, random combination probability analysis was performed for auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and cytokinins (6-benzylaminopurine and kinetin). 【Result】(1) The best time for embryogenic tissue induction for immature P. elliottii cones was in late June to early mid-July in Guanzhuang Forest Farm, Fujian Province; (2) the addition of 30 g/L maltose and 1 000 mg/L inositol were the most suitable for the induction of P. elliottii embryogenic callus; (3) ascorbic acid (0, 1, 2, 3 mg/L) had little effect on callus induction of P. elliottii; however, the addition of α-ketoglutarate and pyruvate added simultaneously obviously promoted callus induction in P. elliottii; (4) the best induction medium and hormone combination of P. elliottii were LP(lobbly pine) media supplemented with 2 mg/L 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), 2 mg/L 6-benzylaminopurine (6-BA) and 2.5 mg/L kinetin (KT).【Conclusion】We obtained a better material for P. elliottii embryogenic tissue induction by pretreatment of P. elliottii cones and identified suitable zygotic embryo developmental stages, i.e., stages 2-4, for embryonic tissue induction. To study the main additives and hormones in the induction medium, we obtained a better callus induction medium for P. elliottii and determined the main conditions suitable for the induction of embryonic calli, thus providing a basis for improving the embryogenic callus induction rate and promoting the development of P. elliottii somatic embryogenesis.

Key words: Pinus elliottii, brown spot needle blight(pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola), zygotic embryos, somatic embryogenesis, embryogenic callus initiation

中图分类号:

S763

程方,孙婷玉,叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 175-182.

CHENG Fang, SUN Tingyu, YE Jianren. Induction of embryogenic callus from immature zygotic embryos of Pinus elliottii resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola)[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(6): 175-182.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203002.

图/表 5

图1

图2

表1

表2

表3

参考文献 25

[1]	李传道, 韩政敏, 叶建仁, 等. 松针褐斑病在湿地松幼林中的发展[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1987, 11(1): 1-7.
	LI C D, HAN Z M, YE J R, et al. Development of brown-spot needle blight in slash pine plantations[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1987, 11(1):1-7. DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1987.01.001.
[2]	何月秋. 湿地松抗病家系组培繁殖技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2003.
	HE Y Q. Studies on technology about tissue culture propagation of resistance families of slash pine (Pinus elliottii)[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2003.
[3]	王章荣. 我国林木良种繁育基地建设发展形势及可持续发展策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5): 1-8.
	WANG Z R. The current scenario and sustainable developmental strategies for genetically improved tree seed production bases in China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202005016.
[4]	叶建仁, 韩政敏, 李传道, 等. 湿地松、火炬松种源抗褐斑病试验和抗病优树选择[J]. 南京林学院学报, 1986, 10(2):27-36.
	YE J R, HAN Z M, LI C D, et al. Resistance to brown spot disease of geographic seed sources of slash pine and loblolly pine and selection of resistant phenotypes of slash pine individual trees[J]. J Nanjing Inst For, 1986, 10(2):27-36.DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1986.02.004.
[5]	叶建仁, 韩正敏, 李传道, 等. 湿地松抗褐斑病无性系种子园营建技术研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1991, 15(2):23-29.
	YE J R, HAN Z M, LI C D, et al. Establishment technique of resistance clones seed orchard of slash pine to brown spot disease[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1991, 15(2):23-29.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1991.02.05.
[6]	朱丽华, 张艺, 吴小芹. 湿地松的组织培养及植株再生[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(6):47-51.
	ZHU L H, ZHANG Y, WU X Q. Tissue culture and plant regeneration of Pinus elliottii[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2004, 28(6):47-51.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2004.06.012.
[7]	吴丽君. 湿地松、火炬松离体培养植株再生技术的研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008.
	WU L J. In vitro culture and plantlet regeneration of slash pine and loblolly pine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
[8]	PULLMAN G S, GUPTA P K, TIMMIS R, et al. Improved Norway spruce somatic embryo development through the use of abscisic acid combined with activated carbon[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2005, 24(5):271-279.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-005-0933-0.
[9]	SUN T Y, WANG Y L, ZHU L H, et al. Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis in Pinus thunbergii resistant to the pine wood nematode[J]. Can J For Res, 2019, 49(12):1604-1612.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2018-0522.
[10]	MOHAN JAIN S, DONG N, NEWTON R J. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii) from immature embryos cultured in vitro[J]. Plant Sci, 1989, 65(2):233-241.DOI: 10.1016/0168-9452(89)90070-8.
[11]	YANG F, XIA X R, KE X, et al. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.):improving initiation of embryogenic tissues and maturation of somatic embryos[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2020, 143(1):159-171. DOI: 10.1007/s11240-020-01905-3.
[12]	唐巍, 欧阳藩, 郭仲琛. 湿地松体细胞胚胎发生和植株再生[J]. 植物资源与环境, 1997, 6(2):8-11.
	TANG W, OUYANG F, GUO Z C. Plantlet regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in slash pine[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 1997, 6(2):8-11.DOI:CNKI:SUN:ZWZY.0.1997-02-001.
[13]	程子珊, 易敏, 宋才玲, 等. 湿地松体细胞胚胎发生胚性愈伤组织诱导条件优化[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2021, 43(5):1054-1064.
	CHENG Z S, YI M, SONG C L, et al. Optimization of embryogenic callus induction conditions for somatic embryogenesis of Pinus elliottii[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2021, 43(5):1054-1064.DOI: 10.13836/j.jjau.2021114.
[14]	胡继文, 郭文冰, 邓乐平, 等. 湿地松及其杂种的体细胞胚胎发生与植株再生[J]. 华南农业大学学报, 2019, 40(1):107-115.
	HU J W, GUO W B, DENG L P, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration in Pinus elliottii and its hybrids[J]. J South China Agric Univ, 2019, 40(1):107-115.DOI: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.201804001.
[15]	张彩云, 朱丽华, 谈家金, 等. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松体细胞胚胎发生与植株再生[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2016, 44(6):17-22.
	ZHANG C Y, ZHU L H, TAN J J, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of disease-resistant slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm.) to brown spot needle blight[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2016, 44(6):17-22.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20160510.011.
[16]	PULLMAN G S, JOHNSON S, PETER G, et al. Improving loblolly pine somatic embryo maturation:comparison of somatic and zygotic embryo morphology,germination,and gene expression[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2003, 21(8):747-758.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-003-0586-9.
[17]	COKE. Basal nutrient medium for in vitro cultures of loblolly pines:United States,5534433[P]. 1996-07-06.
[18]	吴静, 朱丽华, 许建秀, 等. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的诱导及增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):17-21.
	WU J, ZHU L H, XU J X, et al. Induction and proliferation of embryogenic callus in nematode-resistant Pinus densiflora[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(1):17-21.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.001.
[19]	MARUYAMA T E, HOSOI Y. Progress in somatic embryogenesis of Japanese pines[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10:31.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00031.
[20]	IZUNO A, MARUYAMA T E, UENO S, et al. Genotype and transcriptome effects on somatic embryogenesis in Cryptomeria japonica[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(12):e0244634.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244634.
[21]	孙婷玉, 叶建仁, 吴小芹, 等. 抗松材线虫病黑松胚性愈伤组织诱导[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(9):96-99.
	SUN T Y, YE J R, WU X Q, et al. Induction of embryonic callus from Pinus thunbergii for resistance to pine wilt disease[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2015, 43(9):96-99.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2015.09.019
[22]	郑志亮, 陈力耕. 柑桔胚状体发生的诱导及其调控研究进展[J]. 福建果树, 1993(3):13-17.
	ZHENG Z L, CHEN L G. Research progress on induction and regulation of Citrus embryogenesis[J]. Fujian Fruits, 1993(3):13-17.DOI:CNKI:SUN:FJGS.0.1993-03-003.
[23]	LI F Q, YAO J B, HU L F, et al. Multiple methods synergistically promote the synchronization of somatic embryogenesis through suspension culture in the new hybrid between Pinus elliottii and Pinus caribaea[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2022, 13:857972.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.857972.
[24]	黄健秋, 卫志明, 许智宏. 马尾松成熟合子胚的体细胞胚胎发生和植株再生[J]. 植物学报, 1995, 37(4):289-294.
	HUANG J Q, WEI Z M, XU Z H. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration from callus of mature zygotic embryos of Masson pine[J]. Acta Bot Sin, 1995, 37(4):289-294.DOI:10.1007/BF02007173
[25]	黄健秋, 卫志明, 许智宏. 云南松成熟胚的体细胞胚胎的发生研究[J]. 实验生物学报, 1995, 28(4):371-379.
	HUANG J Q, WEI Z M, XU Z H. Somatic embryogenesis from callus of mature Yunnan pine embryos[J]. Acta Biol Exp Sin, 1995, 28(4):371-379.

处理 treatment		不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate					出愈率/% initiation rate
处理 treatment		Ⅰ、Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅴ	Ⅵ	出愈率/% initiation rate
采集时间(月-日) collection time n=50	06-15	0	31.7	2.8	38.9	26.6	34.5
	06-22	0	33.5	3.2	50.9	12.4	36.7
	06-28	0	58.4	6.8	32.5	2.3	65.2
	07-04	0	64.3	11.3	22.6	1.8	75.6
	07-13	0	76.8	12.1	9.8	1.3	88.9
	07-28	0	12.3	2.2	34.6	51.9	14.5
	08-03	0	13.6	0	32.5	53.9	13.6
家系号 family trees code n=35	9	0	68.5	12.1	14.1	5.3	80.6
	8	0	59.9	7.9	28.6	3.6	67.8
	34	0	65.6	15.6	15.9	2.9	81.2
	2	0	66.8	12.8	18.6	1.8	79.6
	23	0	72.4	13.4	14.2	0	85.8
	39	0	68.9	7.8	19.5	17.2	76.7
	11	0	70.5	10.0	14.6	4.9	80.5
	25	0	70.7	11.7	12.5	4.9	82.4
球果冷藏时间/d cone refrigeration time n=32	0	0	58.9	19.6	12.8	8.7	78.5
	5	0	55.8	24.8	13.6	5.8	80.6
	15	0	51.3	24.5	10.3	13.9	75.8
	30	0	53.8	16.6	16.9	12.7	70.4
	60	0	52.5	16.2	20.5	10.8	68.7

处理 treatment			不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate												出愈率/% initiation rate
处理 treatment			Ⅰ		Ⅱ		Ⅲ		Ⅳ		Ⅴ		Ⅵ		出愈率/% initiation rate
糖种类及质量浓度/(g·L^-1) sugar type and concentration n=35	S1		0		0		65.4		5.1		22.5		7.0		70.5
	S2		0		0		70.2		8.4		19.8		1.2		78.6
	S3		0		0		55.4		8.2		25.8		10.6		63.6
	S4		0		0		48.6		11.1		30.5		9.8		59.7
	S5		0		0		48.4		7.6		25.5		18.5		56.0
	S6		0		0		47.8		9.5		22.7		10.0		57.3
肌醇质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) inositol concentration n=35	0		0		0		33.5		12.3		40.2		14.0		45.8
	100		0		0		32.7		14.0		44.6		8.7		46.7
	300		0		0		35.6		8.3		45.8		10.3		43.9
	500		0		0		38.9		9.7		45.7		5.7		48.6
	1 000		2.9		0		25.5		7.0		35.8		8.8		35.4
	2 000		0		0		30.5		11.8		38.7		19.0		42.3
抗坏血酸质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) ascorbic acid concentration n=35		0		0		0		58.5		18.4		18.6		4.5	76.9
		1		0		0		55.5		15.1		18.2		11.2	70.6
		2		0		0		52.0		20.5		17.5		10.0	72.5
		3		0		0		56.0		22.1		16.0		5.9	78.1
α-酮戊二酸和丙酮酸质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) alpha-ketoglutaric acid and pyruvate concentration n=40		A		0		0		45.5		25.3		20.6		8.6	70.8
		B		0		0		48.8		27.5		16.3		7.4	76.3
		C		0		0		53.3		22.6		14.8		9.3	75.9
		D		0		0		66.0		19.8		8.5		5.7	85.8

处理号 treatment code	激素质量浓度/(mg·L^-1) hormone concentration			不同类型愈伤组织诱导率/% callus initiation rate						出愈率/% initiation rate
处理号 treatment code	2,4-D	6-BA	KT	Ⅰ	Ⅱ	Ⅲ	Ⅳ	Ⅴ	Ⅵ	出愈率/% initiation rate
Ⅰ-26	2	2.0	2.5	0	2.9	52.3	23.7	15.4	5.7	78.9
Ⅰ-36	2	4.0	2.5	0	0	55.4	30.3	10.1	4.2	85.7
Ⅰ-40	4	0.5	1.5	0	0	51.6	32.2	12.6	3.6	83.8
Ⅰ-127	10	2.0	4.0	0	0	49.3	31.2	13.0	6.5	80.5
Ⅰ-128	10	3.0	0	1.8	0	56.9	31.7	7.5	2.1	90.4
Ⅰ-129	10	3.0	0.5	0	0	45.3	30.4	15.9	8.4	75.7
Ⅰ-130	10	3.0	1.5	0	0	48.6	29.8	16.0	5.6	78.4
Ⅰ-14	2	0.5	0.5	0	0	15.5	4.1	47.9	32.5	19.6
Ⅰ-16	2	0.5	2.5	0	0	23.6	9.0	43.1	24.3	32.6
Ⅰ-17	2	0.5	4.0	0	0	24.3	5.1	46.8	23.8	29.4
Ⅰ-18	2	1.0	0	0	0	19.2	8.3	40.4	32.1	27.5
Ⅰ-20	2	1.0	1.5	0	0	18.5	7.7	48.1	25.7	26.2
Ⅰ-38	4	0.5	0.5	0	0	15.7	4.7	47.1	32.5	20.4
Ⅰ-39	4	0.5	1.5	0	0	14.2	11.1	35.8	38.9	25.3

抗松针褐斑病湿地松未成熟合子胚胚性愈伤组织的诱导

Induction of embryogenic callus from immature zygotic embryos of Pinus elliottii resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola)

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	国颖, 杨港归, 吴雨涵, 何杰, 何玉洁, 廖浩然, 薛良交. DNA甲基化调控植物组织培养过程的分子机制研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 1-8.
[2]	贾婷, 宋武云, 关新贤, 魏智文, 陈涵, 易敏, 熊启慧, 张露. 湿地松针叶功能性状及其对磷添加的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 65-71.
[3]	丁显印, 陶学雨, 刁姝, 栾启福, 姜景民. Pilodyn和Resistograph对湿地松活立木基本密度的评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 142-148.
[4]	易敏, 张露, 雷蕾, 程子珊, 孙世武, 赖猛. 湿地松转录组SSR分析及EST-SSR标记开发[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(2): 75-83.
[5]	赵奋成,郭文冰,林昌明,李福明,吴惠姗,钟岁英,李义良,司徒荣贵,廖仿炎. 不同近交程度对湿地松结实与生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 43(01): 9-17.
[6]	董京,施季森,徐进. 柳杉种子合子胚的愈伤组织诱导及植株再生[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(06): 181-186.
[7]	丛建民,陈凤清,沈海龙2,4*,李玉花3,4,张鹏2,4,杨玲2,4. 水曲柳胚后熟时期MSAP分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(03): 39-44.
[8]	吴静,朱丽华,许建秀,吴小芹,叶建仁. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的诱导及增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 39(01): 17-21.
[9]	张扬,曾丽琼,叶建仁,吴小芹,张林平. 接种外生菌根真菌对湿地松林促生效应及根际微生物数量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 38(05): 57-61.
[10]	许业洲,杜超群,许秀环,杨代贵,涂俊杰. 湿地松针叶束水培无性系生长特性遗传分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(05): 25-30.
[11]	唐艳龙，杨清培，王丽娜，温小遂*，施明清. 萧氏松茎象发生与林下植物的种间联结性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(05): 87-90.
[12]	安会翠,叶建仁,吴小芹,侯亮,朱丽华. 湿地松子代组培苗对松针褐斑病的抗性测定[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(03): 9-12.
[13]	程方,安会翠,刘戈,叶建仁. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培再生植株生长性状观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(02): 69-72.
[14]	安会翠,叶建仁*,吴小芹,刘戈,朱丽华. 抗松针褐斑病湿地松组培苗生根条件的优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(06): 59-62.
[15]	江荣翠，彭方仁*，谭鹏鹏，郝明灼. 楸树体细胞胚胎发生的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2010, 34(02): 15-18.