南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (1): 37-45.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202303049
所属专题: 专题报道:松材线虫病绿色防控研究
• 专题报道:松材线虫病绿色防控研究(执行主编 叶建仁 骆有庆) • 上一篇 下一篇
收稿日期:
2023-03-30
修回日期:
2023-05-25
出版日期:
2025-01-30
发布日期:
2025-01-21
通讯作者:
* 朱丽华(lhzhu@njfu.com.cn),教授。作者简介:
陈友梅(1328078459@qq.com)。
基金资助:
CHEN Youmei(), XIA Xinrui, YE Jianren, ZHU Lihua*(
)
Received:
2023-03-30
Revised:
2023-05-25
Online:
2025-01-30
Published:
2025-01-21
摘要:
【目的】建立马尾松(Pinus massoniana)愈伤组织抗松材线虫(Bursaphelenchus xylophilus)病评价体系,筛选抗性马尾松细胞系。【方法】以马尾松不同胚性愈伤组织为试验材料,以黑松(P. thunbergii)和湿地松(P. elliottii)胚性愈伤组织作对照,接种无菌松材线虫,从接种线虫后愈伤组织外观形态、细胞结构和细胞活力变化以及线虫繁殖量4个方面探讨马尾松胚性愈伤组织对松材线虫的抗性。【结果】马尾松不同细胞系胚性愈伤组织之间抗病性差异显著。细胞系GX19-1-2和GX20-3-3显示出最高的抗性,接种无菌松材线虫10 d后外观轻微黄化,TTC染色结果为红色,显示其细胞保持较好活力;再分离线虫数量分别为(4 200±306)条和(5 933±1 392)条,显著低于湿地松2个细胞系(1907-9和1927-1),抗病性高于湿地松的1907-9和1927-1;GX20-3-8次之,线虫数量为(11 133±2 728)条;细胞系GX20-1-1接种无菌松材线虫后严重褐化、水渍化,TTC染色结果显示其细胞已完全失去活力,再分离线虫数量为(24 800±2 411)条,易感程度介于黑松细胞系1337和36-2之间。【结论】构建了基于愈伤组织的松树抗松材线虫评估体系,并筛选出2个具有较高抗性水平的马尾松细胞系GX19-1-2和GX20-3-3。这不仅为大规模筛选抗松材线虫病新种质奠定了基础,还为深入探究寄主松树-病原松材线虫之间相互作用的机制提供了新的研究平台。
中图分类号:
陈友梅,夏馨蕊,叶建仁,等. 马尾松胚性愈伤组织对松材线虫的抗性评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(1): 37-45.
CHEN Youmei, XIA Xinrui, YE Jianren, ZHU Lihua. An in vitro evaluation of the resistance traits to pine wood nematode (Bursaphelenchus xylophilus) in Pinus massoniana embryogenic callus[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 49(1): 37-45.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202303049.
[1] | 理永霞, 张星耀. 松材线虫入侵扩张趋势分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2018, 37(5):1-4. |
LI Y X, ZHANG X Y. Analysis on the trend of invasion and expansion of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. For Pest Dis, 2018, 37(5):1-4.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0886.2018.05.001. | |
[2] | 胡龙娇, 吴小芹. 松树抗松材线虫病机制研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2018, 30(6):659-666. |
HU L J, WU X Q. Research progress on the mechanism of pine response to the infection of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Chin Bull Life Sci, 2018, 30(6):659-666.DOI: 10.13376/j.cbls/20180601. | |
[3] | 张旭, 赵京京, 闫峻, 等. 2017年中国大陆松材线虫病灾害经济损失评估[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(10):96-106. |
ZHANG X, ZHAO J J, YAN J, et al. Economic loss assessment of pine wilt disease in mainland China in 2017[J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2020, 42(10):96-106. | |
[4] | 叶建仁. 松材线虫病在中国的流行现状、防治技术与对策分析[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(9):1-10. |
YE J R. Epidemic status of pine wilt disease in China and its prevention and control techniques and counter measures[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(9):1-10.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20190901. | |
[5] | 李计顺, 潘佳亮, 刘超, 等. 2020年全国松材线虫病疫情流行情况分析[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2021, 40(4):1-4. |
LI J S, PAN J L, LIU C, et al. Analysis of the epidemic situation of pine wilt disease in China in 2020[J]. For Pest Dis, 2021, 40(4):1-4.DOI: 10.19688/j.cnki.issn1671-0886.20210017. | |
[6] | 徐六一, 章健, 高景斌, 等. 安徽省松材线虫病抗性育种研究进展[J]. 安徽林业科技, 2013, 39(2):8-10,14. |
XU L Y, ZHANG J, GAO J B, et al. Research progress on resistance breeding to pinewood nematodiasis in Anhui Province[J]. Anhui For Sci Technol, 2013, 39(2):8-10,14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0152.2013.02.002. | |
[7] | MORI Y, MIYAHARA F, TSUTSUMI Y, et al. Relationship between resistance to pine wilt disease and the migration or proliferation of pine wood nematodes[J]. Eur J Plant Pathol, 2008, 122(4):529-538.DOI: 10.1007/s10658-008-9321-2. |
[8] | 郝焰平, 姜春武, 陈雪莲, 等. “皖抗6号” 等六个抗松材线虫病马尾松无性系选育[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2021, 40(3):14-20. |
HAO Y P, JIANG C W, CHEN X L, et al. Breeding of six clones of Pinus massoniana resistant to pine wilt disease including “Wankang No.6”[J]. For Pest Dis, 2021, 40(3):14-20.DOI: 10.19688/j.cnki.issn1671-0886.20210009. | |
[9] | 刘进平, 郑成木. 体外选择与体细胞无性系变异在抗病育种中的应用[J]. 遗传, 2002, 24(5):617-630. |
LIU J P, ZHENG C M. Application of in vitro selection and somaclonal varation in improvement of disease resistance[J]. Hereditas(Beijing), 2002, 24(5):617-630.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9772.2002.05.023. | |
[10] | XIA X R, YANG F, KE X, et al. Somatic embryogenesis of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana):initiation,maturation and genetic stability analysis at SSR loci[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2021, 145(3):667-677.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-021-02036-z. |
[11] | YANG F, XIA X R, KE X, et al. Somatic embryogenesis in slash pine (Pinus elliottii Engelm):improving initiation of embryogenic tissues and maturation of somatic embryos[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult (PCTOC), 2020, 143(1):159-171.DOI: 10.1007/s11240-020-01905-3. |
[12] | 陈婷婷, 叶建仁, 吴小芹, 等. 抗松材线虫病马尾松体胚发生与植株再生条件的优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(3):1-8. |
CHEN T T, YE J R, WU X Q, et al. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of disease-resistant Pinus massoniana Lamb[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(3):1-8.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201806005. | |
[13] | 季孔庶, 王潘潘, 王金铃, 等. 松科树种的离体培养研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):142-148. |
JI K S, WANG P P, WANG J L, et al. Review on in vitro culture of tree species in Pinaceae[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(1):142-148.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.001. | |
[14] | 吴静, 朱丽华, 许建秀, 等. 抗松材线虫病赤松胚性愈伤组织的诱导及增殖[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):17-21. |
WU J, ZHU L H, XU J X, et al. Induction and proliferation of embryogenic callus in nematode-resistant Pinus densiflora[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(1):17-21.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.01.001. | |
[15] | 李淼, 檀根甲, 承河元, 等. 植物抗病性研究现状与前景展望[J]. 江西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002, 24(5):731-736. |
LI M, TAN G J, CHENG H Y, et al. Present condition and prospect of research on plant disease resistance[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2002, 24(5):731-736.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2286.2002.05.038. | |
[16] | 张立钦, 李传道. 用组织培养方法鉴别植物的抗病性[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 1989, 6(3):88-95. |
ZHANG L Q, LI C D. Expression of plant disease resistance in tissue culture[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 1989, 6(3):88-95. | |
[17] | THORPE T A. History of plant tissue culture[J]. Mol Biotechnol, 2007, 37(2):169-180.DOI: 10.1007/s12033-007-0031-3. |
[18] | LIN P, ZHANG M Y, WANG M Y, et al. Inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus modulates defense-related genes expression in banana seedlings susceptible to wilt disease[J]. Plant Signal Behav, 2021, 16(5):1884782.DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2021.1884782. |
[19] | KUMAR P, CHAND R, SINGH V, et al. In vitro screening of calli of mungbean to cercosporin,a photoactivated toxin[J]. Indian J Exp Biol, 2017, 55(2):113-121. |
[20] | STROUD E A, RIKKERINK E H A, JAYARAMAN J, et al. ActigardTM induces a defence response to limit Pseudomonas syringae pv.actinidiae in Actinidia chinensis var.chinensis ‘Hort16A’ tissue culture plants[J]. Sci Hortic, 2022, 295:110806.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110806. |
[21] | MURAKISHI H H, HARTMANN J X, BEACHY R N, et al. Growth curve and yield of tobacco mosaic virus in tobacco callus cells[J]. Virology, 1971,43(1):62-68.DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(71)90224-8. |
[22] | 张立钦, 李传道, 黄敏仁. 杨树组织培养愈伤组织对水泡型溃疡病的抗性[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1989, 13(4):9. |
ZHANG L Q, LI C D, HUANG M R. A study on the resistance to botryosphaeria dothidea in callus tissues of poplar clones[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 1989, 13(4):9. | |
[23] | CHAND R, SEN D, PRASAD K D, et al. Screening for disease resistance in barley cultivars against Bipolaris sorokiniana using callus culture method[J]. Indian J Exp Biol, 2008, 46(4):249-253. |
[24] | 林雪坚, 吴光金, 程淑华, 等. 桉树愈伤组织抗病性的测定及其快速繁殖研究[J]. 中南林学院学报, 2003, 23(6):117-120. |
LIN X J, WU G J, CHENG S H, et al. Studies of the quick-propagation of Eucalyptus and the determination of its callus disease resistance[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2003, 23(6):117-120.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-923X.2003.06.029. | |
[25] | 高立宏, 汉丽萍, 辛树权. 稻瘟病菌粗毒素对水稻成熟胚愈伤组织诱导的影响及抗性筛选[J]. 长春师范学院学报(自然科学版), 2007, 26(5):72-76. |
GAO L H, HAN L P, XIN S Q. The infention of mature embryo callus’s induction by the crude toxin of phyricularis oryzae.cav and blast-resistant mutant-screening[J]. J Changchun Norm Univ, 2007, 26(5):72-76.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-178X-B.2007.05.022. | |
[26] | CARLSON P S, MURAKISHI H H. Evidence on the clonal versus non-clonal origin of dark green islands in virus infected tobacco leaves[J]. Plant Sci Lett, 1978,13(4):377-381.10.1016/0304-4211(78)90215-8. |
[27] | DIEZ J, GIL L. Influence of Ophiostoma novo-ulmi culture filtrates on callus of elms with different susceptibility to Dutch Elm Disease[J]. For Syst, 2002, 11(1):67-76.DOI: 10.5424/759. |
[28] | JANG J C, TAINTER F H. Optimum tissue culture conditions for selection of resistance to Phytophtora cinnamomi in pine callus tissue[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 1991, 9(9):488-491.DOI: 10.1007/BF00232102. |
[29] | OSTRY M E, WARD K T. Field performance of Populus expressing somaclonal variation in resistance to Septoria musiva[J]. Plant Sci, 2003, 164(1):1-8.DOI: 10.1016/s0168-9452(02)00282-0. |
[30] | BAIRU M W, AREMU A O, VAN STADEN J. Somaclonal variation in plants:causes and detection methods[J]. Plant Growth Regul, 2011, 63(2):147-173.DOI: 10.1007/s10725-010-9554-x. |
[31] | 林丽, 周蕾, 潘珺, 等. 无菌和带菌松材线虫对赤松的致病性[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(5):82-87. |
LIN L, ZHOU L, PAN J, et al. Pathogenicity of aseptic and germ-carrying Bursaphelenchus xylophilus on Pinus densiflora[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2017, 53(5):82-87.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170510. | |
[32] | 朱丽华, 季锦衣, 吴小芹, 等. 一种制备无菌松材线虫的方法[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(6):65-67,71. |
ZHU L H, JI J Y, WU X Q, et al. A method for obtaining aseptic pine wood nematode[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2011, 39(6):65-67,71.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2011.06.021. | |
[33] | 刘华, 梅兴国. TTC法测定红豆杉细胞活力[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2001, 37(6):537-539. |
LIU H, MEI X G. Examining cell viability of Taxus chinensis with TTC (2,3,5-triphenyl-2H-tetrazolium chloride)[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2001, 37(6):537-539. | |
[34] | 理永霞, 王璇, 刘振凯, 等. 松材线虫致病机理研究进展[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2022, 41(3):11-20. |
LI Y X, WANG X, LIU Z K, et al. Research advance of pathogenic mechanism of pine wood nematode[J]. For Pest Dis, 2022, 41(3):11-20.DOI: 10.19688/j.cnki.issn1671-0886.20220015. | |
[35] | 叶建仁, 吴小芹. 松材线虫病研究进展[J]. 中国森林病虫, 2022, 41(3):1-10. |
YE J R, WU X Q. Research progress of pine wilt disease[J]. For Pest Dis, 2022, 41(3):1-10. | |
[36] | ZHU L H, YE J R, NEGI S, et al. Pathogenicity of aseptic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(5):e38095.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038095. |
[37] | TAMURA H. Pathogenicity of aseptic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus and associated bacteria to pine seedlings[J]. Jpn J Nematol, 1983, 13:1-5.DOI: 10.14855/JJN1972.13.1. |
[38] | ZHAO H, CHEN C, LIU S, et al. Aseptic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus does not reduce the mortality of young pine tree[J]. For Pathol, 2013, 43(6):444-454.DOI: 10.1111/efp.12052. |
[39] | FARIA J M S, SENA I, VIEIRA DA SILVA I, et al. In vitro co-cultures of Pinus pinaster with Bursaphelenchus xylophilus:a biotechnological approach to study pine wilt disease[J]. Planta, 2015, 241(6):1325-1336.DOI: 10.1007/s00425-015-2257-9. |
[40] | KAWAZU K, KANEKO N. Asepsis of the pine wood nematode isolate OKD-3 causes it to lose its pathogenicity[J]. Jpn J Nematol, 1997, 27(2):76-80.DOI: 10.3725/jjn1993.27.2_76. |
[41] | HAN Z M, HONG Y D, ZHAO B G. A study on pathogenicity of bacteria carried by pine wood nematodes[J]. J Phytopathol, 2003, 151(11/12):683-689.DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0434.2003.00790.x. |
[42] | 朱丽华, 章欣月, 夏馨蕊, 等. 无细菌松材线虫对马尾松的致病性[J]. 林业科学, 2020, 56(7):63-69. |
ZHU L H, ZHANG X Y, XIA X R, et al. Pathogenicity of aseptic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus on Pinus massoniana[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2020, 56(7):63-69.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200707. | |
[43] | 王华光, 李良, 巨云为, 等. 鞭毛蛋白毒素导致的黑松超微结构病理学变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(6):137-144. |
WANG H G, LI L, JU Y W, et al. Pathological changes in ultrastructure of the Pinus thunbergii due to flagellin toxin[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(6):137-144.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201803047. | |
[44] | THAKUR M, SHARMA D, SHARMA S. In vitro selection and regeneration of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) plants resistant to culture filtrate of Fusarium oxysporum f.sp.dianthi[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2002, 20(9):825-828.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-001-0412-1. |
[45] | YERZHEBAYEVA R S, ABEKOVA A M, BERSIMBAEVA G H, et al. In vitro cell selection of sugar beet for resistance to culture filtrate of the fungus Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Cytol Genet, 2019, 53(4):307-314.DOI: 10.3103/S0095452719040042. |
[46] | ZHU L H, CHU X F, SUN T Y, et al. Micropropagation of Pinus densiflora and the evaluation of nematode resistance of regenerated microshoots in vitro[J]. J For Res, 2019, 30(2):519-528.DOI: 10.1007/s11676-018-0681-y. |
[47] | 张艺, 吴小芹, 王钰, 等. 抗松材线虫病赤松家系的抗性测定及组织病理学观察[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 31(4):110-114. |
ZHANG Y, WU X Q, WANG Y, et al. Resistance determination and histopathological observation of induced Pinus densiflora families from Japan to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2007, 31(4):110-114.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.04.025. | |
[48] | 李清清, 叶建仁, 朱丽华, 等. 抗松材线虫病赤松组培苗的抗病性测定1)[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2013, 41(7):45-47. |
LI Q Q, YE J R, ZHU L H, et al. Resistance determination of wilt-resistant Pinus densiflora tissue culture seedling to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2013, 41(7):45-47.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2013.07.011. | |
[49] | 吴小芹, 张艺, 陈蔚诗, 等. 黑松13个抗病家系对松材线虫的抗性反应及组织病理学观察[J]. 植物病理学报, 2008, 38(1):44-50. |
WU X Q, ZHANG Y, CHEN W S, et al. Resistance and histopathological observation of wilt-resistant Pinus thunbergii families from Japan to Bursaphelenchus xylophilus[J]. Acta Phytopathol Sin, 2008, 38(1):44-50.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0412-0914.2008.01.008. | |
[50] | DIEZ J, GIL L. Effects of Ophiostoma ulmi and Ophiostoma novo-ulmi culture filtrates on elm cultures from genotypes with different susceptibility to Dutch elm disease[J]. Eur J For Pathol, 1998, 28(6):399-407.DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.1998.tb01194.x. |
[51] | 徐福元, 葛明宏, 张培, 等. 不同马尾松种源对松材线虫病的抗病性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 24(4):85-88. |
XU F Y, GE M H, ZHANG P, et al. Studies on resistance mechanisms of Masson pine provenance resistance to pine wood nematode (PWN)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2000, 24(4):85-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2000.04.021. |
[1] | 王俊伟, 胡龙娇, 吴小芹. 不同抗性松树家系中松材线虫致病力和繁殖力比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(1): 21-27. |
[2] | 缪聪林, 刘亚敏, 姚虹宇, 刘玉民, 纪雨薇, 李峻安. 3种有机酸对铝毒下马尾松幼苗抗氧化系统调控效应评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 49(1): 112-118. |
[3] | 武文杰, 吴朝明, 朱骊, 王琳棋, 戈禹, 张潭, 刘自强. 南方丘陵区典型混交林树种水分来源对降水的适应性[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(6): 121-128. |
[4] | 武燕, 黄青, 刘讯, 郑睿, 岑佳宝, 丁波, 张运林, 符裕红. 西南喀斯特地区马尾松人工林林龄对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(3): 99-107. |
[5] | 范明阳, 胡萌, 杨园, 方炎明. 中国东部地区马尾松与黄山松群落分类及群落结构和物种多样性特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 48(1): 47-58. |
[6] | 王章荣, 季孔庶, 徐立安, 邹秉章, 林能庆, 林景泉. 马尾松实生种子园营建技术、现实增益及多世代低成本经营新模式探讨[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 9-16. |
[7] | 王宇, 易艳灵, 刘海, 文晓晨, 李天一, 尹海锋, 李贤伟, 范川. 两种采伐方式对马尾松人工林林分空间结构的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(5): 138-146. |
[8] | 竹磊, 徐军亮, 章异平, 罗鹏飞, 师志强, 候佳玉, 翟乐鑫. 河南洛阳马尾松树干液流昼夜变化特征及其影响因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(1): 92-100. |
[9] | 孙薇, 王斌, 楚秀丽, 王秀花, 张东北, 吴小林, 周志春. 马尾松容器苗生长和养分性状对磷添加和接种菌根菌的响应及关联[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(1): 226-233. |
[10] | 季孔庶, 徐立安, 王登宝, 倪州献, 王章荣. 中国马尾松遗传改良研究历程与成就[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(6): 10-22. |
[11] | 丁晓磊, 张悦, 林司曦, 叶建仁. 基于高通量测序技术的松材线虫研究进展[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 1-7. |
[12] | 韦鹏飞, 理永霞, 冯宇倩, 刘振凯, 张星耀. 松材线虫性别决定基因Bx-sex-1表达特征和生物学功能分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 15-20. |
[13] | 汪青桐, 丁晓磊, 叶建仁, 史秀峰. 基于SNP分子标记的华东地区松材线虫种群遗传分化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 21-28. |
[14] | 王立超, 苏胜荣, 陈凤毛, 董晓燕, 田成连, 王洋. 黄山马尾松林天牛及携带线虫种类初步调查[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 29-35. |
[15] | 王磊, 叶建仁, 史丽娜. 利用腐生线虫加速替代疫木中松材线虫种群数量研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(4): 36-44. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||