转为生态用地的中国搬迁地时空演变及其分布格局研究

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 263-271.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202007

转为生态用地的中国搬迁地时空演变及其分布格局研究

张桂莲(), 易扬, 张浪()

上海市园林科学规划研究院,城市困难立地生态园林国家林业和草原局重点实验室,国家林业和草原局城市困难立地绿化造林国家创新联盟,上海城市困难立地绿化工程技术研究中心,上海 200232

收稿日期:2022-02-13 修回日期:2022-06-15 出版日期:2023-11-30 发布日期:2023-11-23
通讯作者: *张浪(zl@shsyky.com),教授级高级工程师。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3802601);国家自然科学基金项目(32171569);上海市科委项目(22YF1444000);上海市绿容局项目(G220201)

Spatial and temporal evolution and distribution pattern of China’s relocation land converted to ecological land

ZHANG Guilian(), YI Yang, ZHANG Lang()

Shanghai Academy of Landscape Architecture Science and Planning,Key Laboratory of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Ecological Landscaping of Challenging Urban Sites, National Innovation Alliance of National Forestry and Grassland Administration on Afforestation and Landscaping of Challenging Urban Sites, Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Landscaping on Challenging Urban Sites, Shanghai 200232, China

Received:2022-02-13 Revised:2022-06-15 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】城市化的快速发展使土地资源日益紧缺,城市园林绿化活动多在工业等搬迁地上开展。系统全面了解搬迁地的时空演变特征及其分布格局,可为城市生态空间规划与可持续管理提供重要支撑。【方法】基于GlobeLand30地表覆盖数据,采用叠加分析、空间自相关分析、方向分布分析和景观格局指数等方法,对近20年来我国333个地级行政区内人造地表变更为生态用地的搬迁地(下文简称搬迁地)数量变化进行分析,并对其空间分布格局进行研究。【结果】我国搬迁地的热点区域主要集中在华中、华南和东北地区,且其空间分布呈现显著的自相关关系;搬迁地的热点和冷点区域都有明显的方向性,热点区域逐渐向东北地区迁移,冷点区域逐渐向北方偏移;搬迁地局部空间自相关关系呈现HH(高值-高值)聚集、LL(低值-低值)聚集、LH(低值-高值)异常和HL(高值-低值)异常4种类型,以HH聚集和LL聚集为主,均有连片趋势,而LH异常零星分布在HH聚集周边,HL异常较少;搬迁地的斑块所占景观面积比例(PLAND)增加且斑块平均面积(MPS)逐渐减小,说明搬迁地逐渐以小斑块的形式增加。【结论】量化分析了我国地级行政区内搬迁地面积和比例,搬迁地分布多集中在中东部和南部等经济发达城市所在区域,搬迁地冷点区域主要集中在西南地区。

关键词: 搬迁地, 空间格局, 时空变化, 生态用地, GlobeLand30

Abstract:

【Objective】 The distribution and change in relocated areas are signs and footprints of human activities, reflecting human disturbance to the natural ecological environment. This study systematically examined the temporal and spatial evolutionary characteristics of the relocation area. The data provide a theoretical basis for the improvement of ecological space quality and function. 【Method】Based on GlobeLand30 surface coverage data, superposition, spatial autocorrelation, and directional distribution analyses, and a landscape pattern index were used to study the change in quantity and spatial distribution characteristics of relocation land that was changed to ecological land in prefecture-level administrative regions of China in the past 20 years. 【Result】Relocation areas in China were mainly concentrated in central China, south China, and northeast China. Their spatial distribution displayed a significant autocorrelation. The hot and cold spots in the relocation area exhibited obvious directionality. The hotspot area gradually moved northeast and the cold spot area gradually moved north. There were four types of local spatial autocorrelations in the relocation area, including High-High (HH), Low-Low (LL), Low-High (LH), and High-Low (HL) aggregations. HH and LL were the main types, HH and LL showed a continuous trend, LH was scattered around HH, and HL was less common. The proportion of lanscape area are occupied by patches (PLAND) in the relocated area increased and the average area(MPS) gradually decreased, indicating that the relocated area gradually increased in the form of small patches. 【Conclusion】This study quantified the area and proportion of relocation area in prefecture-level administrative regions of China. Most of the relocation areas were located in economically developed cities, such as the central and eastern regions and southern regions. This study provides data that will support urban planning and development.

Key words: relocation of construction land, spatial pattern, space-temporal change, ecological land, GlobeLand30

中图分类号:

张桂莲,易扬,张浪. 转为生态用地的中国搬迁地时空演变及其分布格局研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 263-271.

ZHANG Guilian, YI Yang, ZHANG Lang. Spatial and temporal evolution and distribution pattern of China’s relocation land converted to ecological land[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2023, 47(6): 263-271.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202007.

图/表 9

图1

图2

图3

图4

表1

图5

表2

图6

表3

参考文献 47

[1]	吴子璇, 张强, 宋长青, 等. 珠三角城市化对气温时空差异性影响[J]. 地理学报, 2019, 74(11): 2342-2357.
	WU Z X, ZHANG Q, SONG C Q, et al. Impacts of urbanization on spatio-temporal variations of temperature over the Pearl River Delta[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2019, 74(11):2342-2357.DOI: 10.11821/dlxb201911011.
[2]	高艳丽, 刘世伟, 李书鹏. 城市化引发的污染场地问题详解与分析:看污染场地修复这十年[J]. 世界环境, 2013 (2):40-41.
	GAO Y L, LIU S W, LI S P. Problems and analysis on contaminated sites caused by urbanization[J]. World Environ, 2013(2):40-41.DOI: 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2016.04.021.
[3]	任婉侠, 薛冰, 马志孝, 等. 老工业搬迁区土壤重金属污染特征及潜在生态风险-以沈阳铁西老工业区为例[J]. 可持续发展, 2012(2): 159-166.
	REN W X, XUE B, MA Z X, et al. Characters and potential ecological risks of heavy metals in soil of Chinese brownfield redevelopment site:case of Tiexi old industrial area, Shenyang city[J]. Sustain Dev, 2012(2): 159-166. DOI:10.12677/SD.2012.24021.
[4]	徐盛洪, 程全国, 刘景琦, 等. 基于GIS的老工业搬迁区用地类型变化分析[J]. 新疆环境保护, 2021, 43(2): 43-50.
	XU S H, CHENG Q G, LIU J Q, et al. Analysis of land types changes in old industrial relocation area based on GIS[J]. Environ Prot Xinjiang, 2021, 43(2):43-50.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2301.2021.02.007.
[5]	谢学锦. “化学定时炸弹”与可持续发展:早日制定治理延缓性地球化学灾害的长期战略[J]. 中国青年科技, 2000(11):30-31,34.
	XIE X J. “Chemical ticking time bomb” and sustainable development: early formulation of a long term strategy to cure delayed Geochemical disasters[J]. Sci China Youth Technol, 2000(11):30-31,34.
[6]	ROHR J R, FARAG A M, Cadotte M W, et al. Transforming ecosystems: when,where, and how to restore contaminated sites[J]. Integr Environ Assess Manag, 2016, 12(2):273-283. DOI: 10.1002/ieam.1668.
[7]	ARIAS E V A, RODRIGUEZ P A R, BARDOS P, et al. Contaminated land in Colombia: a critical review of current status and future approach for the management of contaminated sites[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2018, 618:199-209. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.245.
[8]	林雅洁. 搬迁企业遗留场地土壤修复研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2020, 32(8): 254-254,256.
	LIN Y J. Study on the soil restoration of the site left over by the relocated enterprises[J]. Environ Dev, 2020, 32(8):254-254,256.DOI:10.16647/j.cnki.cn15-1369/X.2020.08.147.
[9]	郑思俊, 张浪, 薛建辉, 等. 滨海城镇生活垃圾填埋场植被重建生态技术研究[J]. 中国园林, 2016, 32(8):25-30.
	ZHENG S J, ZHANG L, XUE J H, et al. A study on ecological technology for vegetation restoration on landfill site of municipal solid waste in coastal town[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2016, 32(8):25-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.06.149.
[10]	ZHONG Q C, ZHANG L, ZHU Y, et al. A conceptual framework for ex ante valuation of ecosystem services of brownfield greening from a systematic perspective[J]. Ecosyst Health Sustain, 2020, 6(1):1743206.DOI: 10.1080/20964129.2020.1743206.
[11]	冯长红, 贺康宁, 任宝俊, 等. 河北省京津风沙源区困难立地植被恢复主要模式与技术[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2009(1):52-56.
	FENG C H, HE K N, REN B J, et al. Major models and techniques for vegetation rehabilitation on deteriorated lands in Beijing-Tianjin sandy and windy sources’ regions in Hebei Province[J]. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2009(1):52-56.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2009.01.017.
[12]	王林. 不同树种对华北石质山区困难立地水分限制的响应[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
	WANG L. Response of different tree species to water restriction in difficult sites in rocky mountainous areas of north China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2013.
[13]	付梅臣, 吴淦国, 周伟. 矿山关闭及其生态环境恢复分析[J]. 中国矿业, 2005, 14(4):28-31.
	FU M C, WU G G, ZHOU W. Analysis of mines closure and ecological environment reroration[J]. China Min Mag, 2005, 14(4):28-31.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-4051.2005.04.009.
[14]	韩继刚, 李刚, 张维维, 等. 城市绿地土壤健康质量问题与对策[J]. 应用生态学报, 2022, 33(1):268-276.
	HAN J G, LI G, ZHANG W W, et al. Problems and countermeasures of soil health quality in urban green space[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2022, 33(1): 268-276. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202201.009.
[15]	于全波, 张浪, 黄绍敏, 等. 城镇搬迁地土壤厚度划分与案例研究[J]. 土壤, 2021, 53(5):1081-1086.
	YU Q B, ZHANG L, HUANG S M, et al. Soil thickness partition in urban relocation and case studies[J]. Soils, 2021, 53(5):1081-1086. DOI:10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2021.05.025.
[16]	陈平, 张浪, 李跃忠, 等. 基于园林绿化用途城市搬迁地土壤质量评价的思考[J]. 园林, 2019(8):78-82.
	CHEN P, ZHANG L, LI Y Z, et al. Thoughts on soil quality evaluation of urban relocation sites in landscaping[J]. Landsc Archit, 2019(8):78-82.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0283.2019.08.017.
[17]	刘家霖, 朱义, 张群, 等. 基于绿化用途的长三角区域主要城市困难立地空间识别[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(2):2-6.
	LIU J L, ZHU Y, ZHANG Q, et al. Extractions on regenerated green spaces in Yangtze River Delta’s typical urban challenging[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 38(2):2-6.DOI: 10.12193/j.laing.2021.02.0002.001.
[18]	李晓策, 郑思俊, 张浪. 上海城市困难立地识别及分布特征[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(2):7-12.
	LI X C, ZHENG S J, ZHANG L. Identification and distribution characteristics of challenging urban sites of Shanghai[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 38(2):7-12.DOI:10.12193/j.laing.2021.02.0007.002.
[19]	郑晓笛, 付泉川, 吴熙. 资源衰退型城市“城-棕-绿”空间格局研究:以湖北省黄石市为例[J]. 园林, 2021, 28(2):28-33.
	ZHENG X D, FU Q C, WU X. Spatial pattern of “city-brown-green” in resource-exhausted cities:a case study of Huangshi city,Hubei Province[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 28(2):28-33.DOI: 10.14085/j.fjyl.2021.02.0028.06.
[20]	杨博, 殷明, 郑思俊. 人工型城市困难立地对高密度城市公园绿地系统的典型增益作用研究:以上海市中心城为例[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(2):19-24.
	YANG B, YIN M, ZHENG S J. A study on the typical promotion effect of the artificial urban difficult sites to the green space system in high-density city: example of the central city of Shanghai[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 38(2):19-24.DOI: 10.12193/j.laing.2021.02.0019.004.
[21]	王梓璇, 邢汉发, 张焕雪, 等. 基于众源地理数据的GlobeLand30人造地表数据精度验证[J]. 地理信息世界, 2021, 28(4):100-105.
	WANG Z X, XING H F, ZHANG H X, et al. Employing crowdsourced geographic information for GlobeLand30 artificial surface validation[J]. Geomat World, 2021, 28(4):100-105.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1586.2021.04.017.
[22]	李子杰, 高沪宁, 丁琪洵, 等. 基于Moran’s I的安徽省太湖县耕地质量时空格局分析[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(3):350-356.
	LI Z J, GAO H N, DING Q X, et al. Analysis on temporal and spatial patterns of cultivated land quality based on Moran’s I in Taihu County,Anhui Province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 41(3):350-356.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-3504.2019.04.015.
[23]	郭向阳, 穆学青, 明庆忠, 等. 长江经济带快速交通系统对城市旅游生产率的影响效应分析[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(12):213-222.
	GUO X Y, MU X Q, MING Q Z, et al. Impact effect of rapid transport system on urban tourism productivity in the Yangtze River economic belt[J]. Econ Geogr, 2021, 41(12):213-222.DOI: 10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2021.12.023.
[24]	张世文, 宁汇荣, 高会议, 等. 基于各向异性的区域土壤有机碳三维模拟与空间特征分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(16):115-124.
	ZHANG S W, NING H R, GAO H Y, et al. Three-dimensional simulation and spatial characteristics of soil organic carbon based on anisotropy in region[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2016, 32(16):115-124.DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.16.017.
[25]	YI Y, SHI M C, LIU C J, et al. On landscape patterns in typical mountainous counties middle reaches of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2021, 18(8):4000.DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18084000.
[26]	YI Y, WANG B, SHI M C, et al. Variation in vegetation and its driving force in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River in China[J]. Water, 2021, 13(15):2036.DOI: 10.3390/w13152036.
[27]	YI Y, SHI M C, LIU C J, et al. Changes of ecosystem services and landscape patterns in mountainous areas:a case study in the Mentougou district in Beijing[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(10):3689.DOI: 10.3390/su10103689.
[28]	PEDIADITI K, DOICK K J, MOFFAT A J. Monitoring and evaluation practice for brownfield,regeneration to greenspace initiatives[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2010, 97(1):22-36.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.04.007.
[29]	ALKER S, JOY V, ROBERTS P, et al. The definition of brownfield[J]. J Environ Plan Manag, 2000, 43(1):49-69.DOI: 10.1080/09640560010766.
[30]	冯宇. 试论污染场地土壤环境的管理与修复对策[J]. 科技创新与应用, 2016(29):157.
	FENG Y. Discussion on management and remediation countermeasures of soil environment in contaminated sites[J]. Technol Innov A, 2016(29): 157.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3865.2014.11.001.
[31]	JONES A J. Methods for assessing soil quality[J]. Sci Hortic-amsterdam, 1996(4): 355-356. DOI:10.1016/S0304-4238(97)00090-3.
[32]	任丽静. 搬迁企业遗留典型有机污染场地土壤修复研究[D]. 南京: 南京大学, 2012.
	REN L J. Study on soil remediation of typical organic contaminated sites left by relocated enterprises[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing University, 2012.
[33]	张冬梅, 林奕成, 张浪, 等. 城市搬迁地适生绿化树种生长模型构建:以上海为例[J]. 上海农业科技, 2021(1):84-87.
	ZHANG D M, LIN Y C, ZHANG L, et al. Construction of growth model of suitable greening tree species in urban relocation area:a case study of Shanghai[J]. Shanghai Agric Sci Technol, 2021(1):84-87.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0106.2021.01.037.
[34]	张浪. 聚焦城市困难立地营造韧性生态之城[J]. 园林, 2021, 38(2):1.
	ZHANG L. Focus on urban difficult sites and build a resilient ecological city[J]. Landsc Archit, 2021, 38(2):1.
[35]	张浪. 城市困难立地概念及其分类辨析[J]. 上海建设科技, 2020(3):107-109.
	ZHANG L. Concept and classification of urban difficult sites[J]. Shanghai Constr Sci Technol, 2020(3):107-109.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6637.2020.03.034.
[36]	张浪. 谈新时期城市困难立地绿化[J]. 园林, 2018(1):2-7.
	ZHANG L. Talking about the greening of urban difficult sites in the new period[J]. Landsc Archit, 2018(1):2-7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-0283.2018.01.003.
[37]	张浪, 朱义, 薛建辉, 等. 转型期园林绿化的城市困难立地类型划分研究[J]. 现代城市研究, 2017, 32(9):114-118.
	ZHANG L, ZHU Y, XUE J H, et al. Classification study of challenging urban sites in landscape gardening during urban transition period[J]. Mod Urban Res, 2017, 32(9):114-118.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6000.2017.09.016.
[38]	易扬, 信忠保, 覃云斌, 等. 生态植被建设对黄土高原农林复合流域景观格局的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(19):6277-6286.
	YI Y, XIN Z B, QIN Y B, et al. Impact of ecological vegetation construction on the landscape pattern of a Loess Plateau Watershed[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(19):6277-6286.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306071389.
[39]	YI Y, ZHAO Y Y, DING G D, et al. Effects of urbanization on landscape patterns in a mountainous area:a case study in the Mentougou district,Beijing,China[J]. Sustainability, 2016, 8(11):1190.DOI:10.3390/su8111190.
[40]	YI Y, ZHANG C, ZHANG G L, et al. Effects of urbanization on landscape patterns in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River region[J]. Land, 2021, 10(10):1025.DOI:10.3390/land10101025.
[41]	易扬, 胡昕利, 史明昌, 等. 基于MODIS NDVI的长江中游区域植被动态及与气候因子的关系[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(19):7796-7807.
	YI Y, HU X L, SHI M C, et al. Vegetation dynamics and its relationship with climate factors in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River based on MODIS NDVI[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(19):7796-7807.DOI:10.5846/stxb202007251953.
[42]	YI Y, SHI M C, LIU J L, et al. Spatial distribution of precise suitability of plantation:a case study of main coniferous forests in Hubei Province,China[J]. Land, 2022, 11(5):690.DOI:10.3390/land11050690.
[43]	马坤, 唐晓岚, 王燕燕, 等. 长江中游流域水资源禀赋特征及其与自然保护地的空间关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(3):21-30.
	MA K, TANG X L, WANG Y Y, et al. Research on the characteristics of water resources endowments and its spatial relationship with natural protected areas in the middle Yangtze River basin[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(3):21-30. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.2020110007.
[44]	许浩, 金婷, 刘伟. 苏锡常都市圈蓝绿空间规模与格局演变特征[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(1):219-226.
	XU H, JIN T, LIU W. Study on the scale and landscape pattern evolution characteristics of blue-green space in Suzhou-Wuxi-Changzhou metropolitan area, China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(1):219-226. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101037.
[45]	YI Y, ZHANG C, ZHANG G L, et al. Effects of urbanization on landscape patterns in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River region[J]. Land, 2021, 10(10):1025.DOI: 10.3390/land10101025.
[46]	丁宇, 张雷, 马昕琳. 山地城镇化与资源环境承载力耦合协调发展的时空演变[J]. 环境科学研究, 2022, 35(2):592-600.
	DING Y, ZHANG L, MA X L. Temporal and spatial evolution of coupling coordination of mountainous urbanization and its resource and environment carrying capacity[J]. Res Environ Sci, 2022, 35(2):592-600.DOI:10.13198/j.issn.1001-6929.2021.11.27.
[47]	吴英迪, 蒙吉军. 中国自然资源生态服务重要性评价与空间格局分析[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(1):17-33.
	WU Y D, MENG J J. Quantifying the spatial pattern for the importance of natural resource ecosystem services in China[J]. J Nat Resour, 2022, 37(1):17-33.DOI:10.31497/zrzyxb.20220102.

年份 year	Moran’s I	期望值 expected value	Z	P
2000—2010	0.595	-0.003	43.490	<0.001
2010—2020	0.778	-0.003	57.374	<0.001

区域 region	年份 year	周长/km perimeter	面积/km² area	中心点X center point X	中心点Y center point Y	X轴长度 X-axis length	Y轴长度 Y-axis length	方向角度/(°) direction angle
热点 hot spots	2000—2010	33.68	80.28	116.70	35.56	3.81	6.71	37.16
	2010—2020	32.91	82.34	117.54	34.85	4.30	6.10	31.93
冷点 cold spots	2000—2010	52.53	211.50	110.93	29.76	7.00	9.62	61.54
	2010—2020	54.13	224.03	117.54	34.85	7.17	9.95	60.97

年份 year	类型 type	P_LAND/ %	I_LP/%	I_LS	P_AFRAC	I_cohesion/ %	S_MP/ km²
	HH	8.93	0.03	652.07	1.42	52.47	17.10
2000—2010	LL	2.54	0.02	140.90	1.41	49.75	16.60
	LH	3.85	0.08	52.12	1.37	52.61	19.60
2010—2020	HH	12.50	0.01	632.80	1.43	54.12	16.60
	LL	10.87	0.09	90.09	1.43	46.88	15.70
	LH	4.60	0.30	33.43	1.37	58.43	18.30
	HL	11.92	0.42	17.58	1.43	77.82	41.80

转为生态用地的中国搬迁地时空演变及其分布格局研究

Spatial and temporal evolution and distribution pattern of China’s relocation land converted to ecological land

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 47

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	左壮, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 火烧对兴安落叶松林土壤氮形态和含量的初期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 147-154.
[2]	石淞, 李文, 翟育涔, 林晓鹏, 丁一书. 中国东北虎豹国家公园植被NDVI时空变化及原因探究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 31-41.
[3]	崔志华, 吕言洁, 杨昕雨. 南京市都市区声景观的城乡梯度演变分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(3): 199-206.
[4]	余红红, 杨加猛. 我国森林生态效率测算及时空演变分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 167-177.
[5]	李广洋, 寇卫利, 陈帮乾, 吴志祥, 张希财, 云挺, 马俊, 孙瑞, 李莹. 近30年海南岛橡胶林时空变化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 189-198.
[6]	费文君, 赵梦琴. 基于MSPA的南京市绿色基础设施网络构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 50-56.
[7]	邱凤婷, 过志峰, 张宗科, 魏显虎, 李俊杰, 吕争. 大湄公河次区域植被覆盖时空变化特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 187-195.
[8]	赵青, 黄菲, 陈晓辉, 林玉英, 邱荣祖, 巫志龙, 胡喜生. 乔木林丧失的时空变化及驱动力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 227-235.
[9]	赵梦蕾, 姚正阳, 毛达. 基于i2SFCA的新乡市主城区公园绿地空间步行可达性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 227-232.
[10]	时珍, 邢露华, 郑琳琳, 穆博, 田国行. 城市公园绿地游憩供需协同度评价及优化策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 197-204.
[11]	周司涵, 张韫, 崔晓阳. 兴安落叶松林火烧迹地土壤速效钾时空动态分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(5): 141-147.
[12]	车通, 罗云建. 量化社会经济发展对城市景观破碎化的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 154-162.
[13]	韩会庆,罗绪强,蔡广鹏. 山地城市园地时空变化及对生态服务价值的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(01): 103-108.
[14]	薛岑,刘茂松,康昕,郑阿宝,侯嫦英,关庆伟,徐驰. 苏南丘陵山区典型次生森林群落的点格局分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 59(02): 107-112.
[15]	杨强,王涛. 榆林地区土地利用/覆盖时空变化及其对生态脆弱性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 58(02): 79-83.