南京林业大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2014, Vol. 57 ›› Issue (06): 141-145.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.06.027

• 研究论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

采用低温微波法和电加热法再生载甲苯活性炭

冒海燕1,2,周定国1*,Zaher Hashisho2,汪孙国3,陈 恒2   

  1. 1.南京林业大学材料科学与工程学院,江苏 南京 210037;
    2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2W2, Canada;
    3. Nova Green Inc.,Killam Alberta T0B 2L0, Canada
  • 出版日期:2014-12-31 发布日期:2014-12-31
  • 基金资助:
    收稿日期:2013-11-08 修回日期:2014-08-05
    基金项目:南京林业大学优秀博士学位论文创新基金项目; 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD); 江苏省自然科学青年基金项目(BK20130975,BK20130966); 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31100417,31300482); 加拿大Infrastructure and Instruments Grants from Canada Foundation for Innovation(CFI), NSERC资助项目
    第一作者:冒海燕,讲师,博士。*通信作者:周定国,教授。E-mail:dgzhou@njfu.com.cn。
    引文格式:冒海燕,周定国,Zaher Hashisho,等. 采用低温微波法和电加热法再生载甲苯活性炭[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2014,38(6):141-145.

Regeneration of activated carbon loaded with toluene using low temperature microwave and conductive heating methods

MAO Haiyan1,2, ZHOU Dingguo1*, Zaher Hashisho2, WANG Sunguo3, CHEN Heng2   

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China;
    2.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB T6G 2W2, Canada;
    3. Nova Green Inc.,Killam Alberta T0B 2L0, Canada
  • Online:2014-12-31 Published:2014-12-31

摘要: 采用低温微波法(60、120、180 W)和电加热法对载甲苯松木活性炭进行再生。比较了这两种再生方法下活性炭的再生效率、升温速率、能耗,并分析了再生前后活性炭的物理化学性能。结果表明:经过5次吸附—微波辐射再生之后,活性炭吸附量基本保持原有吸附量的45%。随着微波功率从60 W 升高到120 W,再生时间从60 min降低到22 min,再生效率从1.7%/min增加到4.5%/min。而传统电加热再生法再生时间为180 min, 是微波法的3~6倍; 功率为60 W的微波加热法的升温速率为178 ℃/min,而电加热法升温速率只有9 ℃/min; 从能耗角度看,微波再生法的能耗为29.7 kJ/g,而电加热法的能耗则为74.3 kJ/g; 并且经检测微波法再生后活性炭的孔隙结构和官能团未发生改变。

Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of low temperature microwave(three types of microwave power were 60, 120, 180 W)and conductive heating methods for the regeneration of activated carbon loaded with toluene in terms of desorption rate, heating time, energy consumption and chemistry properties. The results showed that the regeneration time decreased from 60 to 22 min, with the increase of microwave power from 60 to 120 W, while the regeneration rate increased from 1.7% to 4.5%/min. The time of conductive heating was 180 min, which was 3-6 times longer than that of microwave heating. The temperature rising rate for the microwave heating method with a constant power of 60 W was approximately 187 ℃/min, while the temperature rising rate for the conductive heating was only 9 ℃/min. The energy consumption of microwave heating was only 29.7 kJ/g in comparison with 74.3 kJ/g of conductive heating. Moreover, the pore structure and FTIR results of the microwave regenerated activated carbon was consistent with those results of the original activated carbon.

中图分类号: