黄山常绿阔叶林甜槠群落优势种种间关联分析

许宝坤; 许晓岗; 李垚; 李小东; 陈水飞; 丁晖; 蒋晓辉; 苟凌晨; 方炎明

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201810038

许宝坤,许晓岗,李垚,李小东,陈水飞,丁晖,蒋晓辉,苟凌晨,方炎明

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04) : 77-84.

PDF(5563187 KB)

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

PDF(5563187 KB)

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2019, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (04) : 77-84. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201810038

研究论文

黄山常绿阔叶林甜槠群落优势种种间关联分析

许宝坤¹,许晓岗¹,李垚¹,李小东¹,陈水飞²,丁晖²,蒋晓辉³,苟凌晨³,方炎明^1*

作者信息 +

Interspecific association analysis of Castanopsis eyrei community in evergreen broad-leaved forests in Huangshan, Anhui Province

XU Baokun¹, XU Xiaogang¹,LI Yao¹, LI Xiaodong¹, CHEN Shuifei²,DING Hui², JIANG Xiaohui³, GOU Lingchen³,FANG Yanming^1*

Author information +

文章历史 +

摘要

【目的】探讨黄山常绿阔叶林的物种组成、群落结构以及种间关联性。【方法】以黄山常绿阔叶林10.24 hm²动态监测样地为对象,在样地调查基础上,通过重要值排序确定了14个优势种,基于2×2列联表,采用方差比率法、χ²检验、联结系数(AC)和Pearson相关系数分析优势种在3个不同径级下的种间关联和相关关系。【结果】方差比率法检验显示,优势种在整体、中径级尺度呈相对独立关系,小径级尺度呈显著正关联,大径级尺度呈显著负关联; χ²检验显示,种对间呈显著关联与极显著关联,对数之和在整体、小、中、大径级下依次为29、29、30、25; AC联结系数检验显示,正负关联比在整体、小、中、大径级下依次为0.915、1.263、1.023、0.717; Pearson相关系数检验显示,正负相关比在整体、小、中、大径级下依次为0.896、1.275、0.936、0.542。【结论】黄山常绿阔叶林不同径级下的种对间关联关系存在明显差异; 种间正负关联比随着径级变大而减小,样地内种间竞争随着径级变大而增多及增强。

Abstract

【Objective】We aimed to clarify species composition, community structure and interspecific associations of broad-leaved evergreen forests at Huangshan.【Method】We calculated the importance value of species using the survey data of the forest dynamics plot with an area of 10.24 hectares, and screened out 14 dominant species by their important value. By means of variance analysis, χ² test, AC index, and Pearson correlation coefficient based on the 2×2 contingency table, we investigated the interspecific association of 14 dominant species at three different diameter classes.【Result】The variance analysis showed that weak interspecific associations occur at both the whole community level and the medium diameter class, whereas a significantly positive association was found under the small diameter class, and a significantly negative association was found under the large diameter class. The χ² test showed that total number of species pairs with significant and extremely significant associations under the whole, small, medium and large diameter classes were 29, 29, 30 and 25, respectively. The AC index test shows that the positive-negative association ratio under whole, small, medium and large diameter classes were 0.915, 1.263, 1.023 and 0.717, respectively. Pearson correlation coefficient test showed that the positive-negative correlation ratio under whole, small, medium and large diameter classes were 0.896, 1.275, 0.936 and 0.542, respectively.【Conclusion】There is a significant difference in interspecific associations among species of different diameter classes. Ratio of the positive to negative associations of species pairs was found to be decreased with higher diameter classes, while interspecific competition in the plot intensifies with higher diameter classes.

引用本文

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

导出引用

许宝坤,许晓岗,李垚,李小东,陈水飞,丁晖,蒋晓辉,苟凌晨,方炎明. 黄山常绿阔叶林甜槠群落优势种种间关联分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）. 2019, 43(04): 77-84 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201810038

XU Baokun, XU Xiaogang,LI Yao, LI Xiaodong, CHEN Shuifei,DING Hui, JIANG Xiaohui, GOU Lingchen,FANG Yanming. Interspecific association analysis of Castanopsis eyrei community in evergreen broad-leaved forests in Huangshan, Anhui Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2019, 43(04): 77-84 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201810038

中图分类号： S718

参考文献

[1] OFOMATA V C, OVERHOLT W A, HUIS A, et al. Niche overlap and interspecific association between Chilo partellus and Chilo orichalcociliellus on the Kenya coast[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis Et Applicata, 1999, 93(2): 141-148. DOI:10.1046/j.1570-7458.1999.00572.x.
[2] 黄云鹏. 武夷山米槠林主要树种种间关联性[J]. 山地学报, 2008, 26(6): 692-698. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2008.06.007. HUANG Y P. Studies on the relationship of dominant species in the Castanopsis carlesii forest in Wuyishan Scenery District[J]. Journal of MountainScience, 2008, 26(6): 692-698.
[3] 罗清虎, 孙凡, 崔羽. 蒋家沟泥石流频发流域失稳性坡面主要植物种间关联性分析[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2018(4): 1-11. LUO Q H, SUN F, CUI Y. Interspecific association analysis of main plant species in the unstable slope of the area with high-frequency debris flow[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology, 2018(4): 1-11.
[4] HAUKISALMI V, HENTTONEN H. Analysing interspecific associations in parasites: alternative methods and effects of sampling heterogeneity[J]. Oecologia, 1998, 116(4): 565-574. DOI:10.1007/s004420050622.
[5] 金毅, 陈建华, 米湘成, 等. 古田山24 ha森林动态监测样地常绿阔叶林群落结构和组成动态:探讨2008年冰雪灾害的影响[J]. 生物多样性, 2015, 23(5): 610-618. DOI:10.17520/biods.2015051. JI Y, CHEN J H, MI X C, et al. Impacts of the 2008 ice storm on structure and composition of an evergreen broad-leaved forest community in eastern China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2015, 23(5): 610-618.
[6] NGUYEN H H, URIA-DIEZ J, WIEGAND K. Spatial distribution and association patterns in a tropical evergreen broad-leaved forest of north-central Vietnam[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2016, 27(2): 318-327. DOI:10.1111/jvs.12361.
[7] 杨庆松. 常绿阔叶林的种间关联格局及其形成机制[D]. 上海: 华东师范大学, 2014. YANG Q S. Species associations and their formation mechanisms in an evergreen broadleaved forest[D]. Shanghai:East China Normal University,2014.
[8] 马志波, 黄清麟, 庄崇洋, 等. 基于分层的典型中亚热带天然阔叶林的种间关联性[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(12): 10-16. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170182. MA Z B, HUANG Q L, ZHUANG C Y, et al. Study on interspecific associations of typicalmid-subtropical natural broadleaved forest based on stratification[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(12): 10-16.
[9] 余鑫, 许崇华, 朱永一, 等. 北亚热带常绿阔叶林凋落物生产量及其与林分因子的关系[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2016, 33(6): 991-999. DOI:10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2016.06.010. YU X, XU C H, ZHU Y Y, et al. Litterfall production and its relation to stand structural factors in a subtropical evergreen broadleaf forest[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2016, 33(6): 991-999.
[10] STERNER R W, RIBIC C A, SCHATZ G E. Testing for life historical changes in spatial patterns of four tropical tree species[J].The Journal of Ecology, 1986, 74(3): 621-633. DOI:10.2307/2260386.
[11] WIEGAND T, MARTíNEZ I, HUTH A. Recruitment in tropical tree species: revealing complex spatial patterns[J].The American Naturalist, 2009, 174(4): E106-E140. DOI:10.1086/605368.
[12] 刘金福, 洪伟, 樊后保, 等. 天然格氏栲林乔木层种群种间关联性研究[J]. 林业科学, 2001, 37(4): 117-123. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2001.04.019. LIU J F, HONG W, FAN H B,et al. Study on the inter-specific association of species in the vegetation laver in Castanopsis kawakamii forest[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2001, 37(4): 117-123. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2001.04.019.
[12] 胡文强, 黄世能, 李家湘, 等. 南岭石坑崆山顶矮林乔木优势种群的种间关联性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(10): 2665-2671. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2013.0289. HU W Q, HUANG S N, LI J X, et al. Interspecific associations among dominant tree populations in an elfin forest community in Shikengkong of Nanling Mountains, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013,32(10): 2665-2671.
[14] 马克平. 森林动态大样地是生物多样性科学综合研究平台[J]. 生物多样性, 2017, 25(3): 227-228. DOI:10.17520/biods.2017113. MA K P. Forest dynamics plot is a crosscutting research platform for biodiversity science[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2017, 25(3): 227-228.
[15] 中国科学院中国植物志编辑委员会. 中国植物志.第二十二卷.被子植物门:双子叶植物纲 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
[16] 魏识广, 李林, 许睿, 等. 井冈山植物群落优势种空间分布格局与种间关联[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(1): 74-80. DOI:10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2015.01.011. WEI S G, LI L, XU R, et al. Spatial pattern and interspecific relationship of dominant species in plant community injinggang mountain[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2015, 23(1): 74-80.
[17] 徐永华, 喻家龙. 黄山生理气候与旅游[J]. 安徽师大学报(自然科学版), 1990, 13(3): 82-88. DOI:10.14182/j.cnki.1001-2443.1990.03.016. XU Y H, YU J L. Physiologicalclimate and tourism of Huangshan Mountain[J]. Journal of Anhui Normal University(Natural Science), 1990, 13(3): 82-88.
[18] 巩劼, 陆林, 晋秀龙, 等. 黄山风景区旅游干扰对植物群落及其土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5): 2239-2251. DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.008. GONG J, LU L, JIN X L, et al. Impacts of tourist disturbance on plant communities and soil properties in Huangshan Mountain scenic area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(5): 2239-2251.
[19] 胡嘉琪,梁师文. 黄山植物[M]. 上海: 复旦大学出版社, 1996.
[20] CONDIT R. The CTFS and the standardization of methodology[M]//Tropical Forest Census Plots. Heidelbergm, Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998: 3-7.
[21] 丁晖, 方炎明, 杨新虎, 等. 黄山亚热带常绿阔叶林的群落特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2016, 24(8): 875-887. DOI:10.17520/biods.2016108. DING H, FANG Y M, YANG X H, et al. Community characteristics of a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest in Huangshan, Anhui Province, East China[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2016, 24(8): 875-887.
[22] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3): 998-1005. DOI:10.2307/1938071.
[23] 吉颖, 许强, 张钦弟, 等. 山西五鹿山自然保护区木贼麻黄群落优势种的种间关联性分析[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017,37(5): 1004-1011. DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2017.05.1004. JI Y, XU Q, ZHANG Q D, et al. Interspecific association analysis of dominant species in Ephedra equisetana communities in Wulu Mountain Nature Reserve, Shanxi Province of China[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2017,37(5): 1004-1011.
[24] 薛鸥, 魏天兴. 鹫峰国家森林公园低效人工林林下植物种间关联[J]. 植物研究, 2016, 36(1): 34-42.DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2016.01.005. XUE O, WEI T X. Interspecific association among understory species of the low-efficiency plantation in the Jiufeng National Forest Park[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2016, 36(1): 34-42.
[25] ZHANG J, MA K. Spaa: an R package forcomputing species association and niche overlap[C/OL]//(2018-10-20).https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273695636.2013.
[26] 杨海裕, 张宋智, 刘小林, 等. 秦岭西段天然落叶阔叶林乔木种间关联性[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10): 2513-2520. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0387. YANG H Y, ZHANG S Z, LIU X L, et al. Interspecific associations among tree species in natural deciduous broadleaved forests in western Qinling,Northwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(10): 2513-2520.
[27] 王伯荪, 彭少麟. 南亚热带常绿阔叶林种间联结测定技术研究——Ⅰ.种间联结测式的探讨与修正[J]. 植物生态学与地植物学丛刊, 1985, 9(4): 274-285. WANG B S, PENG S L. Studies on the measuring techniques ofinterspecific association of lower-subtropical evergreen-broadleaved forests:Ⅰ. the exploration and the revision on the measuring formulas of interspecific association[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 1985, 9(4): 274-285.
[28] 李刚, 朱志红, 王孝安, 等. 子午岭辽东栎群落乔木种间联结与取样面积[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(5): 689-696. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2008.0175. LI G, ZHU Z H, WANG X A, et al. Interspecific association of trees species in Quercus wutaiensis communities in Ziwu Mountain related to quadrat size[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(5): 689-696.
[29] MüLLER B,BARTELHEIMER M. Interspecific competition in Arabidopsis thaliana: root hairs are important for competitive effect, but not for competitive response[J]. Plant and Soil, 2013, 371(1/2): 167-177. DOI:10.1007/s11104-013-1675-3.
[30] 徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24): 8224-8233. DOI:10.5846/stxb201505311092. XU M H, LIU M,ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(24): 8224-8233.
[31] COHEN J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences[M]. Hillsdale: L Erlbaum Associates, 1988: 19-74.
[32] BUDA A, JARYNOWSKI A. Life time of correlations and its applications[M]. ABRASCO-Associacao Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva, 2010: 459-470.
[33] MORISITA M. Measuring of interspecific association and similarity between communities[J]. Memoirs of the Faculty of Science Kyushu University, 2017.
[34] REJMáNEK M, LEP J, REJMANEK M, et al. Negative associations can reveal interspecific competition and reversal of competitive hierarchies during succession[J]. Oikos, 1996, 76(1): 161. DOI:10.2307/3545758.
[35] LIU Y Y, LI F R, JIN G Z. Spatial patterns and associations of four species in an old-growth temperate forest[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2014, 9(1): 745-753. DOI:10.1080/17429145.2014.925146.
[36] CHAI Z Z, SUN C L, WANG D X, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant tree populations in a virgin old-growth oak forest in the Qinling Mountains, China[J]. Botanical Studies, 2016, 57: 23. DOI:10.1186/s40529-016-0139-5.
[37] 张明霞, 王得祥, 康冰, 等. 秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J]. 林业科学, 2015, 51(1): 12-21. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20150102. ZHANG M X, WANG D X, KANG B, et al. Interspecific associations of dominant plant populations in secondary forest of Pinus armandii in Qinling Mountains[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2015, 51(1): 12-21.
[38] 申文辉, 李志辉, 欧芷阳, 等. 桂西南蚬木群落乔木层优势种的种间关联性分析[J]. 南方农业学报, 2016, 47(2): 256-262. DOI:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.02.256. SHEN W H, LI Z H, OU Z Y, et al. Analysis on association between dominant species in tree layer of Excentrodendron hsienm community[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2016, 47(2): 256-262. DOI:10.3969/j:issn.2095-1191.2016.02.256.
[39] 燕亚媛, 金一兰, 刘思齐, 等. 内蒙古草原优势种群种间关联特征分析[J]. 内蒙古大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 47(6): 617-624. DOI:10.13484/j.nmgdxxbzk.20160610. YAN Y Y, JIN Y L, LIU S Q, et al. Interspecific association characteristics of the dominant population in inner Mongolia grassland[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University(Natural Science Edition), 2016, 47(6): 617-624.
[40] 石福习, 赵成章, 高福元, 等. 祁连山北坡自然恢复林地灌木层物种多样性及种间关联动态[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(9): 2177-2183. SHI F X, ZHAO C Z, GAO F Y, et al. Dynamics of species diversity and interspecific association in shrub layer of naturally restored woodland on northern slope of Qilian Mountains, Northwest China[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2012, 31(9): 2177-2183.
[41] 张庆费, 陈小勇, 吴化前, 等. 安徽黄山甜槠种群的结构与分布格局[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 1997(4): 35-39. ZHANG Q F, CHEN X Y, WU H Q, et al.Structure and distribution pattern of Castanopsis eyrei population in Huangshan Mountain, Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 1997(4): 35-39.
[42] 张博, 石子俊, 陈晓宁, 等. 森林鼠类对秦岭南坡3种壳斗科植物种子扩散的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(21): 6750-6757. DOI:10.5846/stxb201503050428. ZHANG B, SHI Z J, CHEN X N, et al. Seed dispersal of three sympatric oak species by forest rodents in the south slope of Qinling Mountains,China[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2016, 36(21): 6750-6757.

基金

收稿日期:2018-10-21 修回日期:2019-01-21基金项目:中央级科学事业单位修缮购置专项(2010001219); 国家自然科学基金项目(31770699); 环境保护部事业费项目(2039005); 江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目(PAPD)。第一作者:许宝坤(345282670@qq.com)。*通信作者:方炎明(jwu4@njfu.com.cn),教授,ORCID(0000-0003-2320-9539)。