不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903004

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (3): 81-88.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903004

不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究

汤文华¹(), 窦全琴²(), 潘平平¹, 季艳红¹, 谢寅峰¹()

^1.南京林业大学, 南方现代林业协同创新中心，南京林业大学生物与环境学院，江苏南京 210037
^2.江苏省林业科学研究院，江苏南京 210014

收稿日期:2019-03-01 修回日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2020-05-30 发布日期:2020-06-11
通讯作者: 窦全琴,谢寅峰
作者简介:汤文华（1481971986@qq.com）。
基金资助:
国家林业局“948”项目(2015-4-01);江苏省农业科技自主创新资金项目（CX（18）2032）;江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目

Photosynthetic characteristics of grafted plants of different Carya illinoinensis varieties

TANG Wenhua¹(), DOU Quanqin²(), PAN Pingping¹, JI Yanhong¹, XIE Yinfeng¹()

^1.Co -Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
^2.Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2019-03-01 Revised:2019-08-26 Online:2020-05-30 Published:2020-06-11
Contact: DOU Quanqin,XIE Yinfeng

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目的

探讨6个薄壳山核桃品种‘Forket’、‘Western’、‘Cape Fear’、‘Moore’、‘Sioux’、‘Apache’的光合特性差异，为薄壳山核桃优良品种的选育与推广应用提供依据。

方法

利用Li-6400便携式光合作用测定仪等，测定6个品种的光合日变化、光响应曲线和相关荧光参数，并进行关联度及相关性分析。

结果

除‘Moore’的光合日变化趋势为双峰型以外，其他5个品种均为单峰型，其光合午休的原因主要是非气孔因素的限制，‘Western’的净光合速率（P_n）峰值和日均值显著高于其他品种；灰色关联分析表明，影响6个品种P_n的主要生理因子是气孔导度（G_s）和蒸腾速率（T_r）, 首要环境因子皆为大气温度（T_a）。‘Western’ 的最大净光合速率（P_n,max) 和光饱和点（L_sp）显著高于其他品种，对强光适应性最优，‘Forket’次之；‘Forket’的光补偿点（L_cp）显著低于其他品种；‘Western’和‘Forket’两个品种的表观量子效率（A_QY）和暗呼吸速率（R_d）均较优，对弱光适应性较强；荧光参数PSⅡ最大光化学量子产量（F_v/F_m）和潜在光化学活性（F_v/F₀）均以‘Western’为最高，‘Forket’次之，而‘Moore’显著低于其他品种；相关性分析表明，荧光参数与光响应特征参数存在较强相关性，F_v/F_m和F_v/F₀均与P_n,max呈显著正相关，能较好地反映不同品种的光合效率特征。

结论

不同品种薄壳山核桃的光合性能亦存在一定差异，‘Western’的光合性能最优，‘Forket’次之，其他4个品种表现一般，‘Western’和‘Forket’光适应范围广，光合效率高，推广应用潜力较大。

关键词: 薄壳山核桃, 光合日变化, 光响应曲线, 叶绿素荧光

Abstract: Objective

To provide scientific basis for the selection and popularization of Carya illinoinensis varieties, an experiment was conducted to investigate the photosynthetic characteristics of six C. illinoinensis varieties, including ‘Forket’, ‘Western’, ‘Cape Fear’, ‘Moore’, ‘Sioux’ and ‘Apache’.

Method

The Li-6400 portable photosynthetic system and other equipment were used in the study. The photosynthetic physiological characteristics of the six varieties including diurnal variation of photosynthesis, light response curves, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were analyzed. The gas exchange and fluorescence parameters were analyzed together so that the photosynthetic physiological characteristics of the six varieties could be more comprehensively understood and identified. While analyzing the diurnal variation of photosynthesis, the reasons for midday depression in photosynthesis were investigated. The extent of the influence of physiological and ecological factors on the net photosynthetic rate (P_n) was explored by grey relational analysis. Through grey relational analysis, the main factors that affected the P_n could be clearly found and understood, based on which accurate and appropriate measures could be taken to change certain factors to improve the photosynthetic capacity of the varieties. Correlation analysis was also used to analyze the light response and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters. The light response parameters were able to reflect the photosynthetic capacity of plants under ideal conditions in some ways and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters could reflect the photosynthetic potential of plants, and hence, they were recognized as molecular probes for photosynthetic analysis. The results of the correlation analysis could be used to understand the correlation between the fluorescence and light response parameters and to explore the internal cause of high light efficiency of the varieties from the perspective of photosynthetic mechanism.

Result

The diurnal variation of photosynthesis of ‘Moore’ was unimodal and the diurnal variation of the other five varieties was imodal. Limitation of non-stomatal factors was considered as the main reason for midday depression in photosynthesis in ‘Moore’. The peak values and average values of the P_n of ‘Western’ were significantly higher than those of the other five varieties. Through grey relational analysis, it was found that the diurnal variation of the P_n and grey relational analysis was different for different varieties. The varieties with poor diurnal variation in the P_n were more susceptible to physiological and ecological factors. The main physiological factors that affected the P_nof the six varieties were stomatal conductance (G_s) and transpiration rate (T_r), and the environmental factor that affected the P_nof the six varieties was atmospheric temperature (T_a). The results of the analysis of light response parameters revealed that the maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_{n, max}) and light saturation point (L_sp) of ‘Western’ were significantly higher than those of the other varieties, which meant that its adaptability to strong light was the best, followed by ‘Forket’. The light compensation point (L_cp) of ‘Forket’ was significantly lower than that of the other varieties, followed by ‘Western’. The results of the analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters revealed that the apparent quantum efficiency (A_QY) and dark respiration rate (R_d) of ‘Western’ and ‘Forket’ were better than those of others, which meant that they were more adaptable to weak light. The PSⅡ maximum photochemical quantum yield (F_v/F_m) and potential photochemical activity (F_v/F₀) of ‘Western’ were the highest, followed by those of ‘Forket’. The F_v/F_mand F_v/F₀of ‘Moore’ were significantly lower than those of the other varieties. The correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the fluorescence parameters and characteristic parameters of the light response curve. The F_v/F_m and F_v/F₀ were positively correlated with P_n,max, which reflected the photosynthetic efficiency of the varieties.

Conclusion

The photosynthetic characteristics of six different varieties of C. illinoinensis were quite different. According to the results of this study, the photosynthetic characteristics of ‘Western’ were recognized as the best of all with the characteristics of ‘Forket’ being slightly inferior to those of ‘Western’. The characteristics of the other four varieties were average compared to those of ‘Western’ and ‘Forket’. It was clear that ‘Western’ and ‘Forket’ have a wide range of light adaptations and high photosynthetic efficiency and thus have a great potential for popularization and utilization.

Key words: Carya illinoinensis, diurnal variations of photosynthesis, light response curves, chlorophyll fluorescence

中图分类号:

S718

汤文华,窦全琴,潘平平,等. 不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(3): 81-88.

TANG Wenhua, DOU Quanqin, PAN Pingping, JI Yanhong, XIE Yinfeng. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafted plants of different Carya illinoinensis varieties[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(3): 81-88.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903004.

图/表 8

图1

图2

图3

表1

图4

表2

表3

表4

参考文献 25

1	袁紫倩.薄壳山核桃‘马汉’品种营养元素周年动态变化规律研究[D].杭州：浙江农林大学，2014.
	YUAN Z Q.Study on the dynamic changes of pecan ‘Mahan’ nutrients[D].Hangzhou：Zhejiang A&F University，2014.
2	朱海军.薄壳山核桃容器苗培育关键技术研究[D].南京：南京林业大学，2016.
	ZHU H J.Study on the key technique of Caryaillinoensis containerized seedling[D].Nanjing：Nanjing Forestry University，2016.
3	罗会婷，许梦阳，贾晓东，等.薄壳山核桃种仁中酚类成分含量和抗氧化能力差异分析及优株筛选[J].植物资源与环境学报，2018,27（4）：63-71.
	LUO H T,XV M Y, JIA X D. Analyses on phenolics content and difference in antioxidant ability of kernel of Carya illinoinensis and superior individuals screening[J].Journal of Plant Resources and Environment,2018,27（3）：49-55.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2018.04.07.
4	张日清，李江，吕芳德，等.我国引种美国山核桃历程及资源现状研究[J].经济林研究，2003，21(4)：107-109.
	ZHANG R Q，LI J，YU F D，et al.Historical survey of the introduced pecan tree in China：distribution and resource estimate[J].Economic Forest Researches，2003，21(4)：107-109.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.200304036.
5	彭方仁，李永荣，郝明灼，等.我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J].林业科技开发，2012，26(4)：1-4.
	PENG F R，LI Y R，HAO M Z，et al.Production status and industrialization development strategy of Carya illinoensis in China[J].China Forestry Science and Technology，2012，26(4)：1-4. DOI:10.3969/j.issn1000-8101.201204001.
6	郑小琴，陈文静，曹凡，等.配方施肥对薄壳山核桃苗期养分含量及光合作用的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2019，43(5)：169-174.
	ZHENG X Q，CHEN W J，CAO F，et al.Effects of the proportional fertilization on the nutrient content and photosynthesis of young grafted pecan seedlings[J].J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed)，2019，43(5)：169-174.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811045.
7	韩杰，张明，林苏宝，等.不同修剪措施对薄壳山核桃幼树光合特性的影响[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2017，41(6)：13-18.
	HAN J，ZHANG M，LIN S B，et al.Effects of different pruning measures on the photosynthetic characteristics of pecan seedlings[J].J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed)，2017，41(6)：13-18.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201703024.
8	何海洋，彭方仁，张瑞，等.不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2015，39(4)：19-25.
	HE H Y，PENG F R，ZHANG R，et al.Photosynthetic characteristics of grafting plants of different pecan varieties[J].J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed)，2015，39(4)：19-25. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201504004.
9	凌骅，黄坚钦，温国胜，等.5种美国山核桃苗叶片光合生理特性比较[J].林业科学，2014，50(8)：174-178.
	LING H，HUANG J Q，WEN G S，et al.Comparison of leaf photosynthetic physiological characteristics in viveCaryaillinoensis varieties[J].Scientia Silvae Sinicae，2014，50(8)：174-178.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20140825.
10	李健，凌骅，杨先裕，等.美国引进的6个薄壳山核桃品种光合生理特性比较[J].安徽农业大学学报，2018，45(2)：258-262.
	LI J，LIN H，YANG X Y，et al.Comparison of the photosynthetic physiological characteristics of six pecan cultivars introduced from the United States[J].J Anhui Agri Univ，2018，45(2)：258-262.DOI:10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.2018042 7.005.
11	叶子飘，于强.一个光合作用光响应新模型与传统模型的比较[J].沈阳农业大学学报，2007，38(6)：771-775.
	YE Z P，YU Q.Comparison of a new model of light response of photosynthesis with traditional models[J].J Shenyang Agri Univ，2007，38(6)：771-775. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.007 06001.
12	马宗琪，崔静，王秀，等.树木叶片叶绿素含量三种测定方法的比较[J].林业科技，2016，41(5)：42-45.
	MA Z Q，CUI J，WANG X，et al.Comparative study on three methods of chlorophyll content determination of tree leaves[J].Forestry Science & Technology，2016，41(5)：42-45. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.201605013.
13	韩志国.20种湿地植物的叶绿素荧光特性[D].广州：暨南大学，2006. HAN Z G.Chlorophyll fluorescence of 20 species of wetland plants[D].Guangzhou：Ji’nan University，2006.
14	丁俊祥，邹杰，唐立松，等.克里雅河流域荒漠-绿洲交错带3种不同生活型植物的光合特性[J].生态学报，2015，35(3)：733-741.
	DING J X，ZOU J，TANG L S，et al.Photosynthetic characteristics of three different life⁃form plants in the desert⁃oasis ecotone of Keriya River Basin[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica，2015，35(3)：733-741.DOI:10.5846/stxb201310302623.
15	潘俊倩，谷小红，郭宝林.2种淫羊藿的光合日变化比较[J].农学学报，2017，7(4)：51-57.
	PAN J Q，GU X H，GUO B L.Two Epimedium species：diurnal variation of photosynthesis[J].Journal of Agriculture，2017，7(4)：51-57.
16	杨雨华，宗建伟，杨风岭.不同生长势马尾松光合日变化研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报，2014，34(8)：25-29.
	YANG Y H，ZONG J W，YANG F L.Investigations on diurnal photosynthesis variation of Pinusmassoniana Lamb.with different growth vigor[J].Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology，2014，34(8)：25-29.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.201408023.
17	谭晓红，彭祚登，贾忠奎，等.不同刺槐品种光合光响应曲线的温度效应研究[J].北京林业大学学报，2010，32(2)：64-68.
	TAN X H，PENG Z D，JIA Z K，et al.Influence of air temperatures on photosynthetic light⁃response curves of Robiniapseudoacacia L[J].J Beijing For Univ，2010，32(2)：64-68. DOI:10.13332/j.1000-1522.201002015.
18	全先奎，王传宽.兴安落叶松对环境变化的物候驯化和光合能力适应[J].生态学报，2015，35(13)：4538-4546.
	QUAN X K，WANG C K.Acclimation of leaf phenology and adaptation of photosynthetic capacity of Larixgmelinii to environmental changes[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica，2015，35(13)：4538-4546. DOI:10.5846/stxb201404070661.
19	KAUTSKY H，HIRSCH A.Neue versuche zur kohlensaure assimilation[J].Natur wissenschaften，1931，19(48)：964.DOI:10.1007/bf01516164.
20	FARQUHAR G D，CAEMMERER S，BERRY J A.Models of photosynthesis[J].Plant Physiology，2001，125(1)：42-45.DOI:10.1104/pp.125.1.42.
21	李六林，杨佩芳，田彩芳，等.树莓光合特性的研究[J].园艺学报，2003，30(3)：314-316.
	LI L L，YANG P F，TIAN C F，et al.Studies on photosynthetic characteristics of Rubusstrigosus mick[J].Acta Horticulturae Sinica，2003，30(3)：314-316.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.200303015.
22	高云，傅松玲.两个美国山核桃品种的光合生理特性比较[J].南京林业大学学报(自然科学版)，2011，35(4)：34-38.
	GAO Y，FU S L.Research on the photosynthetic characteristics of the two varieties of pecan[J].J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed)，2011，35(4)：34-38.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006. 201104007.
23	FARQUHAR G D，SHARKEY T D.Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J].Annu Rev Plant Physiol，1982，33(1)：317-345.DOI:10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533.
24	PEGORARO E，REY A，BOBICH E G，et al.Effect of elevated CO₂ concentration and vapour pressure deficit on isoprene emission from leaves of Populusdeltoides during drought[J].Functional Plant Biology，2004，31(12)：1137.DOI:10.1071/fp04142.
25	杜晓华，齐阳阳，李建飞，等.低温胁迫对大花三色堇和角堇光合作用与叶绿素荧光的影响[J].西北农业学报，2017，26(10)：1499-1506.
	DU X H，QI Y Y，LI J F，et al.Effect of low temperature stress on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of Viola × wittrockiana and Violacornuta[J].Acta Agriculturae Boreali⁃occidentalis Sinica，2017，26(10)：1499-1506.DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.201710012.

品种varieties	P_n关联度relatimal degree
品种varieties	G_s	C_i	T_r	T_a	P_AR	H_R	C_a
‘Forket’	0.804	0.597	0.774	0.732	0.721	0.643	0.688
‘Western’	0.848	0.580	0.910	0.720	0.691	0.651	0.689
‘Cape Fear’	0.925	0.577	0.885	0.773	0.580	0.637	0.698
‘Moore’	0.908	0.774	0.940	0.891	0.764	0.820	0.839
‘Sioux’	0.856	0.679	0.672	0.816	0.540	0.729	0.769
‘Apache’	0.859	0.708	0.724	0.786	0.512	0.758	0.774

品种varieties	A_QY/(mol·mol^-1)	R_d/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	P_n,max/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	L_sp/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	L_cp/(μmol·m^-2·s^-1)
‘Forket’	0.044±0.002 a	0.853±0.100 c	15.436±0.990 a	1 235.770±37.602 b	31.831±4.280 d
‘Western’	0.043±0.003 a	1.086±0.240 c	16.538±1.260 a	1 477.450±56.323 a	38.400±1.829 c
‘Cape Fear’	0.032±0.002 b	1.039±0.062 c	14.385±1.288 ab	1 263.941±49.069 b	46.422±2.764 b
‘Moore’	0.026±0.006 c	2.167±0.577 a	12.813±0.590 b	1 045.340±25.230 d	56.920±7.441 a
‘Sioux’	0.029±0.001b c	1.971±0.042 a	12.584±1.231 b	1 182.190±41.667 c	53.651±2.918 a
‘Apache’	0.038±0.002 ab	1.655±0.033 b	13.531±0.988 ab	996.821±33.720 d	45.851±3.183 b

品种varieties	叶绿素含量/(mg·g^-1) chlorophyll content			叶绿素a/b比值Chl a/b	F_o	F_m	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o
品种varieties	Chla	Chlb	Ch1	叶绿素a/b比值Chl a/b	F_o	F_m	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o
‘Forket’	2.388±0.224 ab	0.835±0.088 ab	3.223±0.311 ab	2.858±0.058 bc	502±44.748 ab	2620±264.809 a	0.806±0.030 a	4.272±0.870 a
‘Western’	2.776±0.112 a	0.955±0.050 a	3.731±0.162 a	2.906±0.040 b	490±13.571 ab	2652±292.859 a	0.813±0.021 a	4.411±0.559 a
‘Cape Fear’	2.257±0.061 b	0.726±0.038 b	2.983±0.097 b	3.111±0.093 a	529±22.666 a	2674±277.274 a	0.801±0.016 a	4.048±0.400 ab
‘Moore’	2.404±0.231 ab	0.860±0.100 ab	3.264±0.330 ab	2.797±0.076 bc	516±27.779 ab	2119±341.109 b	0.749±0.024 b	3.142±0.868 b
‘Sioux’	2.545±0.243 ab	0.939±0.110 a	3.484±0.353 ab	2.709±0.057 c	464±32.468 b	2097±119.894 b	0.778±0.016 ab	3.532±0.333 ab
‘Apache’	2.001±0.137 b	0.714±0.040 b	2.715±0.175 b	2.803±0.069 bc	506±33.538 ab	2022±179.074 b	0.789±0.056 ab	3.152±0.407 b

参数parameters	F_v/F_m	F_v/F_o	A_QY	R_d	P_n,max	L_sp	L_cp
F_v/F_m	1
F_v/F_o	0.840^*	1
A_QY	0.841^*	0.671	1
R_d	-0.915^*	-0.882^*	-0.788	1
P_n,max	0.843^*	0.884^*	0.853^*	-0.862^*	1
L_sp	0.718	0.914^*	0.504	-0.663	0.813^*	1
L_cp	-0.858^*	-0.735	-0.969^**	0.883^*	-0.845^*	-0.495	1

[1]	田梦阳, 朱树林, 窦全琴, 季艳红. 薄壳山核桃-茶间作对‘安吉白茶’速生期光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.
[2]	魏静, 谭星, 王昌盛, 闫瑞, 李林珂, 宁月, 刘芸. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[3]	贾瑞瑞, 祝艳艳, 杨秀莲, 付钰, 岳远征, 王良桂. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[4]	孙晓伟, 王兴昌, 孙慧珍, 全先奎, 杨青杰. 雌雄异株树种山杨、水曲柳和东北红豆杉光合特性对比[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 129-135.
[5]	贾展慧, 贾晓东, 许梦洋, 莫正海, 翟敏, 宣继萍, 张计育, 王刚, 王涛, 郭忠仁. 薄壳山核桃原花青素合成关键酶基因的克隆与表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 49-57.
[6]	田梦阳, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰, 汤文华, 季艳红. 4个薄壳山核桃品种的光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 67-74.
[7]	黄小辉, 吴焦焦, 王玉书, 冯大兰, 孙向阳. 不同供氮水平的核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(2): 119-126.
[8]	季艳红, 潘平平, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 不同泥炭替代基质对薄壳山核桃幼苗生长及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 145-155.
[9]	季艳红, 汤文华, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰. 施肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(6): 47-56.
[10]	袁婷婷, 路远峰, 谢寅峰, 马迎莉, 吴桐, 倪震. 硼钼铜微肥配施对太子参光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(4): 130-136.
[11]	圣倩倩, 戴安琪, 宋敏, 唐睿, 祝遵凌. NO₂胁迫下两种鹅耳枥的光合生理特性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 10-16.
[12]	仲磊, 张焕朝, 范俊俊, 张丹丹, 江皓, 张往祥. 夏季淹水胁迫对北美枫香苗木叶色及光合荧光特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(2): 69-76.
[13]	蒋瑶, 魏海林, 高昌虎, 王大故, 冯楠可, 李睿, 刘榕榕, 吕芳德. 湖南低山丘陵区薄壳山核桃的开花物候期观测及品种配置[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 53-62.
[14]	许中秋, 隋德宗, 谢寅峰, 王俊毅. 两个乌桕新品种苗木光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 93-100.
[15]	周晓峰, 莫正海, 尚杨娟, 骆敏, 苏文川, 谭鹏鹏, 韩明慧, 邓秋菊, 田朝霞, 彭方仁. 薄壳山核桃CiDGAT1基因的克隆及表达模式分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(4): 55-62.

不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究

Photosynthetic characteristics of grafted plants of different Carya illinoinensis varieties

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 25

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿