侧柏古树扦插试验及插穗营养物质变化

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903057

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 63-71.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903057

侧柏古树扦插试验及插穗营养物质变化

魏黔春¹^,²(), 江泽平²^,³, 刘建锋¹^,², 史胜青¹^,², 赵秀莲¹^,², 常二梅¹^,²^,^*()

1.中国林业科学研究院林业研究所,北京 100091
2.国家林业局林木培育重点实验室,北京 100091
3.中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京 100091

收稿日期:2019-03-21 修回日期:2019-09-03 出版日期:2020-02-08 发布日期:2020-02-02
通讯作者: 常二梅
作者简介:魏黔春( 675801545@qq.com)。
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费专项资金项目(CAFYBB2017ZA007);国家自然科学基金项目(31870664)

Effects of several factors on rooting of cutting propagation of ancient Platycladus orientalias and the changes of nutritive material

WEI Qianchun¹^,²(), JIANG Zeping²^,³, LIU Jianfeng¹^,², SHI Shengqing¹^,², ZHAO Xiulian¹^,², CHANG Ermei¹^,²^,^*()

1. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China
2. State Forestry Administration Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation,Beijing 100091, China
3. Research Institute of Forest Ecology, Environment and Protection, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091,China

Received:2019-03-21 Revised:2019-09-03 Online:2020-02-08 Published:2020-02-02
Contact: CHANG Ermei

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】 提高侧柏古树的嫩枝扦插生根率,建立侧柏古树扦插繁殖技术体系。【方法】 采用3种植物生长调节剂[ABT1,NAA和IBA+NAA(等质量比)]的3组质量浓度(200~600,1 000~3 000和4 000~10 000 mg/L)处理采自5、100、300、700 a侧柏的插穗,对插穗生根进程、生根性状(生根率、生根数量、最长根长)、生根进程中营养物质(可溶性淀粉、可溶性糖)含量进行动态测定。【结果】 通过观察发现:0~35 d为愈伤组织形成期;35~65 d为不定根形成期;65~95 d为不定根伸长期。50 a侧柏以南面上部的插穗生根效果较好,生根率为40.8%。100 a侧柏6月扦插的生根率为20.1%。5 a用质量浓度600 mg/L的ABT1处理4 h时的生根效果最好,而100、300、700 a侧柏插穗用中浓度的IBA+NAA (1:1)处理时扦插生根率较高。进一步筛选发现质量浓度为1 000 mg/L的IBA+NAA (等质量比)处理1 min的插穗生根效果最好。全部年龄段侧柏插穗在愈伤组织形成期,可溶性糖、淀粉含量都上升,而5 a侧柏插穗上升的幅度最大。【结论】 选择侧柏古树幼嫩枝条夏季扦插有利于促进插穗不定根的形成。

关键词: 侧柏, 古树, 扦插时间, 枝条部位, 生长调节剂处理, 营养物质

Abstract:

【Objective】 Improve the rooting rate and establish the wig cutting propagation of ancient Platycladus orientalis. 【Method】 In this study, a total of 3 treatment groups using three different concentrations (200-600 mg/L, 1 000-3 000 mg/L and 4 000-10 000 mg/L) of ABT1, NAA or IBA+NAA (mass ratio 1:1) were used to treat 5-, 100-, 300-, 700-year-oldPlatycladus orientalis cuttings. The rooting process, rooting (rooting rate, rooting number, the longest root length) and the dynamic changes in nutrient content (soluble sugar, soluble starch) were observed during the rooting process of Platycladus orientalis cuttings. 【Result】 The observations revealed that 0-35 days was the formation stage, the 35-65 days was adventitious roots formation stage, and 65-95 days was adventitious roots elongation stage. The southern upper cuttings from the 50-year-old P. orientalis exhibited the best rooting percentage of 40.8%. The rooting rate of the 100-year-old P. orientalis was the highest in June with 20.1%. Low concentration growth regulator treatment of ABT1 (600 mg/L) for 4 h was beneficial to root formation of cuttings from 5-year-old P. orientalis, and a mixture solution of medium concentration IBA+NAA(moss ratio 1:1) treatment is good for rooting of cuttings from 100-, 300- and 700-year-old P. orientalis. Further studies revealed that the optimal mixture solution of IBA+NAA (moss ratio 1:1) of 1 000 mg/L for 1 min could improve the rooting rate of cuttings from the ancient P. orientalis. For all age groups, the content of soluble sugar and starch increased during callus formation stage; the 5-year-old P. orientalis showed the maximum increase. 【Conclusion】 Nutrient content of the branches are relatively higher in summer, which is beneficial for increasing the rooting rate of P. orientalis cuttings.

Key words: Platycladus orientalias, ancient trees, cutting time, cutting position, growth regulator treatment, nutritive material

中图分类号:

S792

魏黔春,江泽平,刘建锋,等. 侧柏古树扦插试验及插穗营养物质变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2020, 44(1): 63-71.

WEI Qianchun, JIANG Zeping, LIU Jianfeng, SHI Shengqing, ZHAO Xiulian, CHANG Ermei. Effects of several factors on rooting of cutting propagation of ancient Platycladus orientalias and the changes of nutritive material[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2020, 44(1): 63-71.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903057.

图/表 12

表1

图1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

表7

表8

表9

图2

图3

参考文献 30

[1]	常二梅, 史胜青, 刘建锋, 等. 古侧柏针叶活性氧产生及其清除机制[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2011, 39(11):8-11.
	CHANG E M, SHI S Q, LIU J F, et al. ROS production and its elimination in old Platycladus orientalis’s leaves [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2011, 39(11):8-11. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.11.028. doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2011.11.028
[2]	常二梅, 史胜青, 刘建锋, 等. 古侧柏种子活力与树龄的关系研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(1):166-172.
	CHANG E M, SHI S Q, LIU J F, et al. Relationship between vigour of seeds and age of oldPlatycladus orientalis [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(1):166-172. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4025.2012.01.027. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4025.2012.01.027
[3]	CHANG E, ZHANG J, DENG N, et al. Transcriptome differences between 20-and 3000-year-old Platycladus orientalis reveals ROS involved in senescence regulation[J]. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 2017, 29:68-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.06.008. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbt.2017.06.008
[4]	OSTERC G, STEFANCIC M, STAMPAR F. Juvenile stockplant material enhances root development through higher endogenous auxin level[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2009, 31(5):899-903. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-009-0303-6. doi: 10.1007/s11738-009-0303-6
[5]	HUSEN A. Changes of soluble sugars and enzymatic activities during adventitious rooting in cuttings of Grewia optive as affected by age of donor plants and auxin treatments[J]. American Journal of Plant Physiology, 2012, 7(1):1-16. DOI: 10.3923/ajpp.2012.1.16. doi: 10.3923/ajpp.2012.1.16
[6]	姜凤琴, 康晓珊, 尹林克, 等. 株龄和插穗直径对甘蒙柽柳插穗成活率的影响[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2012, 21(4):111-113.
	JIANG F Q, KANG X S, YIN L K, et al. Effects of tree age and cutting diameter on survival rate of Tamarix austromongolica cuttings [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2012, 21(4):111-113.
[7]	王永格, 常卫民, 丛日晨. 不同树龄银杏嫩枝扦插繁殖试验研究[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2012, 32(12):8642-8644.
	WANG Y G, CHANG W M, CONG R C. Experimental study on softwood cutting propagation of Ginkgo biloba at sifferent ages [J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2012, 32(12):8642-8644. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2012.32.033. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2012.32.033
[8]	王振华, 程广有. 东北红豆杉古树复壮技术探讨[J]. 林业实用技术, 2012(12):26-27.
	WANG Z H, CHENG G Y. Discussion on the rejuvenation technology of Taxus cuspidata old trees in northeast China [J]. Practical Forestry Technology, 2012(12):26-27.
[9]	王晓娅, 邓志力. 采穗母树年龄与枝条类型对青海云杉嫩枝扦插生根的影响[J]. 山东林业科技, 2013, 43(6):25-26.
	WANG X Y, DENG Z L. Effects of age and branch type of heading mother tree on rooting of young branch cutting ofPicea crassifolia var. Qinghai [J]. Journal of Shandong Forestry Science and Technology, 2013, 43(6):25-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2013.06.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2013.06.008
[10]	詹亚光, 杨传平, 金贞福, 等. 白桦插穗生根的内源激素和营养物质[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2001, 29(4):1-4.
	ZHAN Y G, YANG C P, JIN Z F, et al. Endogenous hormones and nutritive material in softwood cuttings ofBetula platyphylla during rooting [J]. Journal of Mortheast Forestry University, 2001, 29(4):1-4. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2001.04.001. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2001.04.001
[11]	刘立成, 余刚, 张莹, 等. 扦插时间对蝟实插穗生根率和相关指标的影响及生根效应综合评价[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2016, 25(2):48-54.
	LIU L C, YU G, ZHANG Y, et al. Effect of cutting time on rooting rate and related indexes of cuttings of Kolkwitzia amabilis and comprehensive evaluation on rooting effect [J]. Journal of Plant Resources and Environment, 2016, 25(2):48-54. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.02.06. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2016.02.06
[12]	施浩威, 尤润, 马一丹, 等. 激素、扦插季节和木质化对红翅槭插条生根的影响[J]. 南昌工程学院学报, 2018, 37(4):27-30.
	SHI H W, YOU R, MA Y D, et al. Effect of hormone, season and lignification on adventitious rooting of cuttings in Acer fabri [J]. Journal of Nanchang Institute of Technology. 2018, 37(4):27-30. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4869.2018.04.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4869.2018.04.006
[13]	秦爱丽, 简尊吉, 马凡强, 等. 母树年龄、生长调节剂、容器与基质对崖柏嫩枝扦插的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(7):40-50.
	QIN A L, JIAN Z J, MA F Q, et al. Effects of the mother tree age, growth regulator, containers and substrates on softwood cutting propagation of Thuja sutchuenensis [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae. 2018, 54(7):40-50. DOI: CNKI:SUN:LYKE.0.2018-07-005. doi: CNKI:SUN:LYKE.0.2018-07-005
[14]	王东光. 闽楠嫩枝扦插繁殖技术及生根机理研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院, 2013.
	WANG D G. Soft cutting propagation techniques and rooting mechanism of Phoebe bournei (Hemsl.) Yang [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy forestry, 2013.
[15]	高林琴. 云杉扦插试验研究报告[J]. 林业科技, 2007(3):18-19.
	GAO L Q. Report on cutting test of spruce[J]. Forestry Science & Technology, 2007(3):18-19. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4707.2007.03.009. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-4707.2007.03.009
[16]	田雪邻, 史彦江, 宋锋惠, 等. 不同处理对平欧杂种榛黄化萌条扦插生根的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2018, 33(1):126-132.
	TIAN X L, SHI Y J, SONG F H, et al. Effects of different treatments on etiolated hard cutting propagation of Corylus heterophylla × Corylus avellana [J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2018, 33(1):126-132. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.01.20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2018.01.20
[17]	许晓岗, 丁芳芳, 李苏蓉, 等. 生长调节剂对垂珠花硬枝扦插生根及其氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2014, 49(1):89-98.
	XU X G, DING F F, LI S R, et al. Effects of growth regulators on hardwood cutting and oxidase activity of Styrax dasyanthus [J]. Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2014, 49(1):89-98. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2014.01.017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2014.01.017
[18]	魏黔春. 侧柏古树扦插繁殖技术与生根机理研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2015.
	WEI Q C. Cutting propagation technique and rooting mechanism of old Platycladus orientalis [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy Forestry, 2015.
[19]	HUSEN A. Stock-plant etiolation causes drifts in total soluble sugars and anthraquinones, and promotes adventitious root formation in teak (Tectona grandis L. f.) coppice shoots[J]. Plant Growth Regulation, 2008, 54(1):13-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10725-007-9222-y. doi: 10.1007/s10725-007-9222-y
[20]	陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学试验指导[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2006.
[21]	PALANISAMY K, SUBRAMANIAN K. Vegetative propagation of mature teak trees (Tectona grandis L.)[J]. Silvae Genetica, 2001, 50(5/6):188-191.
[22]	骆畅, 刘济明, 黄小龙, 等. 不同基质、生长调节剂及部位对米槁扦插生根的影响[J]. 四川大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 55(4):843-847.
	LUO C, LIU J M, HUANG X L, et al. Effects of different substrates,growth regulators and parts of cuttings on cutting propagation of Cinnamomum migao [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 55(4):843-847. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2018.04.030. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0490-6756.2018.04.030
[23]	王军辉, 张建国, 张守攻, 等. 青海云杉硬枝扦插的激素、年龄和位置效应研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版, 2006, 34(7):65-71.
	WANG J H, ZHANG J G, ZHANG S G, et al. Research of hormone,age and position effect of hardwood cutting in Picea crassifolia Kom [J]. Journal of Northwest Sci-Tech University of Agriculture and Forestry (Natural Science Edition), 2006, 34(7):65-71. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.07.015. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2006.07.015
[24]	严兴余. 塔柏扦插育苗技术初探[J]. 农业科技与信息(现代园林), 2009(6):51-52.
	YAN X Y. Primary study on cutting propagation of pyramidalis[J]. Modern Landscape Architecture, 2009(6):51-52.
[25]	傅瑞树, 孙晓冬, 黄琦, 等. 南方红豆杉扦插繁殖技术研究Ⅱ.穗条对扦插生根率的影响[J]. 武夷科学, 2005, 21(1):32-35.
	FU R S, SUN X D, HUANG Q, et al. Studies on cutting propagation of Taxus chinensis var.maire Ⅱ. effects of stock on the rooting rate of the cutting [J]. Wuyi Science Journal, 2005, 21(1):32-35. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4276.2005.01.008. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4276.2005.01.008
[26]	程广有. 紫杉插穗中生根抑制物的鉴定[J]. 北华大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 1(2):163-166.
	CHENG G Y. Determination of rooting-inhibitor in cutting of Taxus cuspidata [J]. Journal of Beihua University (Natural Science), 2000, 1(2):163-166.
[27]	韩路弯, 华建峰, 刘江, 等. 不同基质和扦插时间对‘中山杉118’插条生根的影响[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2015, 44(2):150-153.
	HAN L W, HUA J F, LIU J, et al. Effects of different cutting medium and cutting time on rooting of cutting of Taxodium hybrid ‘Zhongshanshan 118’ [J]. Subtropical Plant Science, 2015, 44(2):150-153. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2015.02.013. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2015.02.013
[28]	王建华, 孙晓梅, 王笑山, 等. 母株年龄、激素种类及其浓度对日本落叶松扦插生根的影响[J]. 林业科学研究, 2006, 19(1):102-108.
	WANG J H, SUN X M, WANG X S, et al. Effects of age, type of auxin and treatment concentration on rooting ability of Larix leptolepis [J]. Forest Research, 2006, 19(1):102-108. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.01.020. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2006.01.020
[29]	ZHANG J, SHI Y, ZHANG X, et al. Melatonin suppression of heat-induced leaf senescence involves changes in abscisic acid and cytokinin biosynjournal and signaling pathways in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.)[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 138:36-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.012. doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.02.012
[30]	韩伟, 王鹏, 冯忠良, 等. 扦插生根过程中贴梗海棠插穗生理生化指标的变化[J]. 山东农业科学, 2009, 43(3):28-30.
	HAN W, WANG P, FENG Z L, et al. Physiological and biocheminal changes of Chaenomeles specios cutting in rooting process [J]. Shandong Agriculture sciences, 2009, 43(3):28-30. DOI: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2009.03.033. doi: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2009.03.033

类别 type	处理/ (mg·L^-1) treatment concentration	浓度编号 No.	生长调节剂 growth regulator	调节剂编号 No.	处理时间 treatment time	时间编号 No.
低浓度 low soncen- tration	200	B₁	ABT1	A₁	1 h	C₁
	400	B₂	NAA	A₂	2 h	C₂
	600	B₃	IBA+ NAA (1∶1)	A₃	4 h	C₃
中浓度 middle soncen- tration	1 000	D₁	ABT1	A₁	30 s	E₁
	2 000	D₂	NAA	A₂	1 min	E₂
	3 000	D₃	IBA+ NAA (1∶1)	A₃	3 min	E₃
高浓度 high soncen- tration	4 000	F₁	ABT1	A₁	5 s	G₁
	8 000	F₂	NAA	A₂	30 s	G₂
	10 000	F₃	IBA+ NAA (1∶1)	A₃	60 s	G₃

扦插月份 cutting month	处理 treatments	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/ 条 rooting number	最长根长/cm the longest root length
4	IBA+ NAA (质量比1∶1) 1 000 mg/L 1 min	14.7 b	3.5 bc	10.3 b
6		20.1 a	7.2 a	15.8 a
7		15.0 b	5.2 ab	7.0 c
8		8.7 c	2.5 c	1.8 d
9		5.1 c	1.2 c	1.5 d

采条部位 position	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	最长根长/m the longest root length
东上up of east	36.9 b	11.0 b	14.0 b
东下below of east	19.0 d	8.0 cd	13.3 bc
南上up of south	40.8 a	12.3 a	15.8 a
南下below of south	18.1 e	7.4 d	12.0 cde
西上up of west	24.6 c	8.9 c	12.4 bcd
西下below of west	16.1 e	6.7 d	12.9 bc
北上up of north	7.7 f	3.4 e	10.4 e
北下below of north	20.1 d	8.0 dc	10.9 de

处理 treatment	5 a		100 a		300 a		700 a
处理 treatment	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number
A₁B₁C₂	73.9 b	20.2 c	19.0 a	5.0 b	16.1 b	2.2 c	0.0 d	0.0 e
A₁B₂C₃	38.4 f	12.7 e	0.0 c	0.00 f	5.5 e	0.8 d	3.9 c	0.7 d
A₁B₃C₁	90.2 a	23.2 b	0.0 c	0.0 f	20.1 a	2.8 b	7.7 bc	1.0 cd
A₂B₁C₁	66.5 c	17.3 d	13.2 b	3.3 bc	0.0 f	0.0 e	0.0 d	0.0 e
A₂B₂C₂	32.8 g	11.8 e	0.0 c	0.0 f	9.3 d	0.7 d	20.1 a	2.3 b
A₂B₃C₃	28.4 g	9.5 f	0.0 c	0.0 f	0.0 f	0.0 e	0.0 d	0.0 e
A₃B₁C₃	46.9 e	10.8 f	0.0 c	0.0 f	22.2 a	4.1 a	23.1 a	3.3 a
A₃B₂C₁	89.1 e	27.6 a	14.5 b	2.7 c	14.8 bc	2.2 c	16.1 b	1.7 c
A₃B₃C₂	67.8 c	15.2 d	14.8 b	4.3 b	0.0 e	0.0 e	0.0 d	0.0 e
CK	56.5 d	16.6 d	18.5 a	7.0 a	11.0 a	4.2 a	3.9 c	3.2 a

处理 treatment	5 a		100 a		300 a		700 a
处理 treatment	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number
A₁D₁E₂	69.9 a	21.18 b	20.1 bc	5.83 b	17.2 bc	3.33 d	25.9 a	6.83 a
A₂D₁E₃	54.8 b	20.06 b	22.5 bc	5.67 b	18.5 bc	5.17 bc	14.8 b	2.00 cd
A₃D₁E₁	71.9 a	24.30 a	17.7 cd	5.50 b	29.3 a	7.17 a	18.5 c	3.83 b
A₁D₂E₁	26.5 e	16.22 bc	20.1 bc	7.17 ab	16.5 c	3.00 d	12.2 d	2.00cd
A₂D₂E₂	45.4 c	13.56 d	19.0 cd	5.17 b	0.0 d	0.00 e	0.0 e	0.00 e
A₃D₂E₃	47.7 c	11.77 de	26.5 a	8.83 a	20.1 b	3.83 cd	13.2 d	2.33 cd
A₁D₃E₃	48.5 c	15.94 bc	7.7 d	3.00 c	16.1 c	4.50 c	16.1 bc	2.50 c
A₂D₃E₁	20.1 f	9.36 e	21.4 bc	7.33 ab	17.7 bc	4.50 c	17.7 bc	3.17 b
A₃D₃E₂	34.4 d	17.24 bc	25.4 a	7.17 ab	19.5 b	6.00 b	20.1 b	2.67 c

侧柏古树扦插试验及插穗营养物质变化

Effects of several factors on rooting of cutting propagation of ancient Platycladus orientalias and the changes of nutritive material

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 12

参考文献 30

相关文章 13

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

处理因素 treatment factors	生根率/% rooting rate		生根数/条 rooting number		最长根长/m the longest root length
处理因素 treatment factors	F	P	F	P	F	P
枝条部位cutting position	5.894	0.002^**	3.272	0.023^*	0.677	0.690
扦插时间cutting time	17.383	0.000^***	9.407	0.002^**	42.055	0.000^***
树龄tree age	38.686	0.000^***	46.164	0.000^***
生长调节剂处理growth regulator treatment	5.906	0.038^*	4.436	0.066	-	-

因素 factors	水平 levels	生根率/% rooting rate	生根数/条 rooting number
树龄/a tree age	5	51.4 a	13.85 a
	100	14.4 b	4.20 b
	300	13.5 b	2.65 b
	700	9.9 b	1.77 b
生长调节剂处理 growth regulator treatment	ABT1	18.2 ab	4.51 ab
	NAA	16.0 b	3.00 b
	NAA+IAA	21.7 a	5.20 a

[1]	宫楠, 祖鑫, 解志军, 朱长红, 李淑娴. 紫荆种子吸胀和层积过程中不同相态水分变化的核磁共振检测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(6): 42-50.
[2]	王碧霞, 杜小奇, 邓燕, 蔡晓梅, 苏光灿. 凉山油橄榄主栽品种叶中营养物质和酚类含量的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(4): 169-176.
[3]	邹雨婷, 朱铭玮, 李永荣, 翟金庭, 李淑娴. ‘凤丹’种子发育及其营养物质含量和相关酶活性的动态变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(5): 62-70.
[4]	张丹丹,范俊俊,赵明明,蔡喜彦,张往祥. 外施植物生长调节剂对细柄阿丁枫扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 42(01): 41-47.
[5]	费菲，肖文娅，刁娇娇，管云云，关庆伟. 林窗尺度对侧柏人工林植物多样性的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 41(05): 72-78.
[6]	吴雅琼,汪贵斌,曹福亮,祖元刚. 基质、插穗及促根剂对喜树扦插生根的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2016, 40(03): 1-8.
[7]	李瑞霞,凌宁,郝俊鹏,闵建刚,陈信力,关庆伟. 林龄对侧柏人工林碳储量以及细根形态和生物量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2013, 37(02): 21-27.
[8]	杨秀莲，王良桂. 桂花种子对赤霉素处理的生理生化响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2012, 36(01): 63-67.
[9]	尤海梅,藤原一绘. 徐州低山丘陵区侧柏人工林群落的复杂性[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2011, 35(06): 34-38.
[10]	温小荣1,周春国1,徐海兵2,刘曙雯2,万志洲2. 中山陵园古树名木地理信息系统的研建[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2006, 30(05): 139-142.
[11]	戴雨生;梁加逊;王行政;马阅;林其瑞. 不同地理种源侧柏对侧柏绿胶杯菌抗性的测定试验[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1998, 22(01): 53-56.
[12]	张金池,胡海波,朱克成,李兰,彭桂兰,徐亮. 苏南丘陵区不同土地利用状况的蓄水保土功能研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1995, 19(03): 6-10.
[13]	戴雨生;王学道;林其瑞. 侧柏叶枯病病原菌研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 1992, 16(01): 59-65.