黑龙江省红松人工林林分乔木层可加性碳储量模型

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007007

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 115-121.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007007

黑龙江省红松人工林林分乔木层可加性碳储量模型

辛士冬¹(), 姜立春¹^,^*(), 穆林²

1.东北林业大学林学院,森林生态系统可持续经营教育部重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨 150040
2.东丰县国有总场大兴林场,吉林辽源 136300

收稿日期:2020-07-03 接受日期:2020-10-10 出版日期:2022-01-30 发布日期:2022-02-09
通讯作者: 姜立春
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划(2017YFB0502700);黑龙江省应用技术研究与开发计划项目(GA19C006)

Predictive model of stand tree layer additive carbon storage of Korean pine plantation in Heilongjiang Province, China

XIN Shidong¹(), JIANG Lichun¹^,^*(), MU Lin²

1. Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management Ministry of Education, School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
2. Daxing Forest Farm, State Owned General Farm of Dongfeng County, Liaoyuan 136300,China

Received:2020-07-03 Accepted:2020-10-10 Online:2022-01-30 Published:2022-02-09
Contact: JIANG Lichun

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】大尺度森林碳储量的估算备受关注,而构建林分乔木层碳储量模型是一种评估森林碳储量快捷且准确的方式。【方法】以黑龙江省(东京城、林口、帽儿山、孟家岗)207块红松人工林样地数据为研究对象,选择聚合法、平差法、分解法作为构建林分碳储量模型的可加性方法,以加权回归来消除碳储量模型的异方差。采用留一交叉验证法(leave-one-out cross validation, LOOCV)对3种可加性方法的碳储量模型进行评价。【结果】基于3种可加性方法林分碳储量模型拟合结果之间存在略微的差异。聚合法的总体预测能力略优于平差法和分解法,具体预测精度排序为聚合法>平差法>分解法。当预测林分总碳储量时,3种可加性方法在不同林分断面积区间的预测能力表现并不一致。【结论】基于聚合法的林分碳储量模型更适合于黑龙江省红松人工林的碳储量预测,但当预测红松人工林的林分总碳储量时,应根据林分断面积区间选择合适的可加性方法。

关键词: 红松人工林, 可加性方法, 碳储量, 预测精度

Abstract:

【Objective】 The estimation of large-scale forest carbon storage has attracted much attention, and the establishment of forest tree layer carbon storage model is an effective method to evaluate forest carbon storage. 【Method】 A total of 207 plots in a Korean pine plantation in Heilongjiang Province (Dongjingcheng, Linkou, Maoershan, Mengjiagang) were studied for modeling stand carbon storage, and choose the aggregation method, adjustment method, disaggregation method as the additivity method of establishing the stand carbon storage model, the research used the weighted regression to eliminate the heteroscedasticity of the carbon storage model, and adopted the leave-one-out cross validation method to evaluate the carbon stock model based on three additivity methods. 【Result】 There were slight differences between the fitting results of the forest carbon storage model based on the three additivity methods. The overall prediction ability of the aggregation method was slightly better than the adjustment method and the disaggregation method, and the specific prediction precision was ranked as the aggregation method > adjustment method > disaggregation method. When predicting stand total carbon storage, the predictability of the three additivity methods in different stand basal area intervals was not consistent. 【Conclusion】 The stand carbon storage model based on aggregation method was more suitable for the prediction of carbon storage of Korean pine plantation in Heilongjiang Province. However, when predicting the total carbon storage of Korean pine plantations, the appropriate additive method should be selected according to the stand basal area interval.

Key words: Pinus koraiensis (Korean pine) plantation, additivity methods, carbon storage, prediction precision

中图分类号:

S758.5

辛士冬,姜立春,穆林. 黑龙江省红松人工林林分乔木层可加性碳储量模型[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(1): 115-121.

XIN Shidong, JIANG Lichun, MU Lin. Predictive model of stand tree layer additive carbon storage of Korean pine plantation in Heilongjiang Province, China[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 46(1): 115-121.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007007.

图/表 7

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

图1

参考文献 31

[1]	YEN T M, HUANG K L, LI L E, et al. Assessing carbon sequestration in plantation forests of important conifers based on the system of permanent sample plots across Taiwan[J]. J Sustain For, 2020, 39(4):392-406. DOI: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1673181. doi: 10.1080/10549811.2019.1673181
[2]	PAN Y D, BIRDSEY R A, FANG J Y, et al. A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6045):988-993. DOI: 10.1126/science.1201609. doi: 10.1126/science.1201609
[3]	ZHANG Y D, GU F X, LIU S R, et al. Variations of carbon stock with forest types in subalpine region of southwestern China[J]. For Ecol and Manag, 2013, 300:88-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.010. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.06.010
[4]	李海奎, 雷渊才, 曾伟生. 基于森林清查资料的中国森林植被碳储量[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(7):7-12.
	LI H K, LEI Y C, ZENG W S. Forest carbon storage in China estimated using forestry inventory data[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(7):7-12.
[5]	GÓMEZ-GARCíA E. Estimating the changes in tree carbon stocks in Galician forests (NW Spain) between 1972 and 2009[J]. For Ecol and Manag, 2020, 467:118157. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118157. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118157
[6]	DIXON R K, SOLOMON A M, BROWN S, et al. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems[J]. Science, 1994, 263(5144):185-190. DOI: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185. doi: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185
[7]	方精云, 郭兆迪, 朴世龙, 等. 1981—2000年中国陆地植被碳汇的估算[J]. 中国科学:D辑, 2007, 37(6):804-812.
	FANG J Y, GUO Z D, PIAO S L, et al. Estimation of carbon sequestration of terrestrial plant in China during 1981-2000[J]. Sci China: Ser D, 2007, 37(6):804-812. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7240.2007.06.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7240.2007.06.012
[8]	CASTEDO-DORADO F, GÓMEZ-GARCÍA E, DIÉGUEZ-ARANDA U, et al. Aboveground stand-level biomass estimation: a comparison of two methods for major forest species in northwest Spain[J]. Ann For Sci, 2012, 69(6):735-746. DOI: 10.1007/s13595-012-0191-6. doi: 10.1007/s13595-012-0191-6
[9]	DONG L H, ZHANG L J, LI F R. Evaluation of stand biomass estimation methods for major forest types in the eastern Daxing’an Mountains, northeast China[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(9):715. DOI: 10.3390/f10090715. doi: 10.3390/f10090715
[10]	PARÉ D, BERNIER P, LAFLEUR B, et al. Estimating stand-scale biomass, nutrient contents, and associated uncertainties for tree species of Canadian forests[J]. Can J For Res, 2013, 43(7):599-608. DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2012-0454. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2012-0454
[11]	徐凯健, 曾宏达, 朱小波, 等. 基于五种大气校正的多时相森林碳储量遥感反演研究[J]. 光谱学与光谱分析, 2017, 37(11):3493-3498.
	XU K J, ZENG H D, ZHU X B, et al. Evaluation of five commonly used atmospheric correction algorithms for multi-temporal aboveground forest carbon storage estimation[J]. Spectrosc Spectr Anal, 2017, 37(11):3493-3498. DOI: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)11-3493-06. doi: 10.3964/j.issn.1000-0593(2017)11-3493-06
[12]	陈幸良, 巨茜, 林昆仑. 中国人工林发展现状、问题与对策[J]. 世界林业研究, 2014, 27(6):54-59.
	CHEN X L, JU Q, LIN K L. Development status, issues and countermeasures of China’s plantation[J]. World For Res, 2014, 27(6):54-59. DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.06.008. doi: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2014.06.008
[13]	YIN Y, MA D, WU S. Climate change risk to forests in China associated with warming[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):493. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-18798-6. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-18798-6
[14]	HU H F, WANG G G. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in the south Carolina Piedmont between 1936 and 2005[J]. For Ecol and Manag, 2008, 255(5/6):1400-1408. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.064. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.10.064
[15]	DONG L H, ZHANG L J, LI F R. Developing additive systems of biomass equations for nine hardwood species in northeast China[J]. Trees, 2015, 29(4):1149-1163. DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1196-1. doi: 10.1007/s00468-015-1196-1
[16]	WANG C K. Biomass allometric equations for 10 co-occurring tree species in Chinese temperate forests[J]. For Ecol and Manag, 2006, 222(1/2/3):9-16. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.074. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.074
[17]	贾炜玮. 东北林区各林分类型森林生物量和碳储量[M]. 哈尔滨: 黑龙江科学技术出版社, 2014.
	JIA W W. Forest biomass and carbon storage of various forest types in northeast China forest area[M]. Harbin: Heilongjiang Science and Technology Press, 2014.
[18]	贾炜玮, 孙赫明, 李凤日. 包含哑变量的黑龙江省落叶松人工林碳储量预测模型系统[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(3):814-822.
	JIA W W, SUN H M, LI F R. Prediction model system with dummy variables for carbon storage of larch plantation in Heilongjiang Province, China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(3):814-822. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.013. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201903.013
[19]	贾炜玮, 林键. 黑龙江省主要林分类型林分碳储量预估模型[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2017, 45(8):30-38.
	JIA W W, LIN J. Carbon stock predicting models of main forest types in Heilongjiang Province[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2017, 45(8):30-38. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.08.007. doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2017.08.007
[20]	BI H Q, LONG Y S, TURNER J, et al. Additive prediction of aboveground biomass for Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations[J]. For Ecol and Manag, 2010, 259(12):2301-2314. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.003. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.03.003
[21]	GONZÁLEZ-GARCÍA M, HEVIA A, MAJADA J, et al. Above-ground biomass estimation at tree and stand level for short rotation plantations of Eucalyptus nitens (Deane & Maiden) Maiden in northwest Spain[J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 2013, 54:147-157. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.019. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.03.019
[22]	袁位高, 江波, 葛永金, 等. 浙江省重点公益林生物量模型研究[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2009, 29(2):1-5.
	YUAN W G, JIANG B, GE Y J, et al. Study on biomass model of key ecological forest in Zhejiang Province[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2009, 29(2):1-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2009.02.001. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2009.02.001
[23]	PARRESOL B R. Additivity of nonlinear biomass equations[J]. Can J For Res, 2001, 31(5):865-878. DOI: 10.1139/x00-202. doi: 10.1139/x00-202
[24]	唐守正, 张会儒, 胥辉. 相容性生物量模型的建立及其估计方法的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(S1):19-27.
	TANG S Z, ZHANG H R, XU H. Study on establish and estimate method of compatible biomass model[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2000, 36(S1):19-27.
[25]	唐守正, 朗奎建, 李海奎. 统计和生物数学模型计算:ForStat教程[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2008.
	TANG S Z, LANG K J, LI H K. Statistics and computation of biomathematical models:ForStat tutorial [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2008.
[26]	曾伟生, 唐守正. 非线性模型对数回归的偏差校正及与加权回归的对比分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(2):137-143.
	ZENG W S, TANG S Z. Bias correction in logarithmic regression and comparison with weighted regression for non-linear models[J]. For Res, 2011, 24(2):137-143. DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2011.02.011. doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2011.02.011
[27]	DONG L H, LIU Y S, ZHANG L J, et al. Variation in carbon concentration and allometric equations for estimating tree carbon contents of 10 broadleaf species in natural forests in northeast China[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(10):928. DOI: 10.3390/f10100928. doi: 10.3390/f10100928
[28]	ZHAO D H, KANE M, MARKEWITZ D, et al. Additive tree biomass equations for midrotation loblolly pine plantations[J]. For Sci, 2015, 61(4):613-623. DOI: 10.5849/forsci.14-193. doi: 10.5849/forsci.14-193
[29]	GONZALEZ-BENECKE C, ZHAO D H, SAMUELSON L, et al. Local and general above-ground biomass functions for Pinus palustris trees[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(6):310. DOI: 10.3390/f9060310. doi: 10.3390/f9060310
[30]	TIMILSINA N, STAUDHAMMER C L. Individual tree-based diameter growth model of slash pine in Florida using nonlinear mixed modeling[J]. For Sci, 2013, 59(1):27-37. DOI: 10.5849/forsci.10-028. doi: 10.5849/forsci.10-028
[31]	TEMESGEN H, MONLEON V J, HANN D W. Analysis and comparison of nonlinear tree height prediction strategies for Douglas-fir forests[J]. Can J For Res, 2008, 38(3):553-565. DOI: 10.1139/x07-104. doi: 10.1139/x07-104

统计量 statistic	海拔/ m altitude	坡度/ (°) slope	林分平均直径/cm quadratic mean diameter	平均树高/m mean tree height	林分密度/ (株·hm^-2) stand density	林分断面积/ (m²·hm^-2) stand basal area
最小值 min.	195	5	4.6	3.8	300.0	1.3
最大值 max.	673	25	30.9	17.5	2 900.0	69.1
平均值 mean	363	8	15.4	10.3	1 365.4	24.5
标准差 SD	117	5	4.6	2.5	478.1	11.6

统计量 statistic	碳储量 carbon storage
统计量 statistic	总计 total	树根 root	树干 stem	树枝 branch	树叶 leaf
最小值 min.	1.93	0.30	0.98	0.40	0.25
最大值 max.	137.48	26.48	73.71	29.56	7.73
平均值 mean	46.56	8.69	25.84	9.45	2.58
标准差 SD	24.26	4.77	13.01	5.34	1.29

方法 method	分量 component	α_i		β_i		γ_i
方法 method	分量 component	估计值 estimate	标准误 SE	估计值 estimate	标准误 SE	估计值 estimate	标准误 SE
聚合法 aggregation	总量 total	—	—	—	—	—	—
	树根 root	0.138 6	0.005 5	1.050 2	0.010 4	0.323 5	0.022 8
	树干 stem	0.728 4	0.027 1	0.995 8	0.007 1	0.161 4	0.018 8
	树枝 branch	0.121 4	0.007 1	1.043 9	0.011 6	0.421 2	0.027 1
	树叶 leaf	0.080 9	0.007 4	1.077 8	0.016 6	-0.001 3	0.043 8
平差法 adjustment	总量 total	0.990 3	0.061 3	1.013 3	0.016 4	0.253 0	0.033 5
	树根 root	0.143 0	0.010 5	1.049 2	0.021 4	0.310 5	0.043 4
	树干 stem	0.817 2	0.064 7	1.011 4	0.019 9	0.091 3	0.042 3
	树枝 branch	0.115 7	0.009 9	1.030 9	0.018 4	0.458 2	0.039 4
	树叶 leaf	0.071 0	0.007 4	1.074 5	0.019 5	0.056 1	0.050 1

项目item	α_t	β_t	γ_t	m₁	k₁	f₁	m₂	k₂	f₂	m₃	k₃	f₃
估计值 estimate	1.147 4	1.036 4	0.160 7	7.391 6	-0.042 7	-0.352 5	0.632 8	0.022 9	-0.385 1	1.290 8	0.007 2	-0.149 6
标准误 SE	0.061 0	0.011 4	0.030 0	0.582 6	0.017 0	0.039 5	0.047 7	0.014 1	0.036 8	0.074 8	0.014 2	0.028 1

方法 method	分量 component	R²	均方根误差/ (t·hm^-2) RMSE	权函数 weight functions
聚合法 aggregation	总量 total	0.973 8	3.923 7	G^{2.352 5}H^{-2.582 9}
	树根 root	0.971 4	0.806 5	G^{1.599 2}
	树干 stem	0.963 0	2.502 7	G^{-0.062 1}
	树枝 branch	0.969 3	0.936 3	G^{-1.103 0}H^{-2.036 2}
	树叶 leaf	0.931 9	0.335 9	G^{-1.112 2}
平差法 adjustment	总量 total	0.973 8	3.930 2	G^{2.311 6}H^{-2.309 7}
	树根 root	0.971 4	0.806 1	G^{1.599 9}
	树干 stem	0.963 2	2.493 5	G^{0.248 8}
	树枝 branch	0.969 3	0.937 0	G^{-1.225 1}H^{-2.309 7}
	树叶 leaf	0.931 1	0.338 0	G^{-1.083 1}
分解法 disaggregation	总量 total	0.973 7	3.934 6	G^{2.329 6}H^{-2.334 2}
	树根 root	0.970 9	0.812 8	G^{1.717 7}
	树干 stem	0.963 4	2.489 8	G^{-0.062 3}
	树枝 branch	0.969 2	0.937 5	G^{-0.522 3}
	树叶 leaf	0.931 6	0.336 7	G^{-1.109 5}

黑龙江省红松人工林林分乔木层可加性碳储量模型

Predictive model of stand tree layer additive carbon storage of Korean pine plantation in Heilongjiang Province, China

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 7

参考文献 31

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

方法 method	分量 component	平均误差绝对值 MAE	相对误差绝对值 MPE	平均相对误差/% MRE
聚合法 aggregation	总量 total	2.420 2	5.197 5	-1.375 5
	树根 root	0.535 9	6.166 7	-1.663 1
	树干 stem	1.687 9	6.532 1	-2.766 6
	树枝 branch	0.666 3	7.054 7	-0.975 7
	树叶 leaf	0.264 4	10.215 8	1.847 6
平差法 adjustment	总量 total	2.437 5	5.234 8	-1.011 3
	树根 root	0.538 2	6.192 7	-1.173 7
	树干 stem	1.673 7	6.477 0	-2.595 4
	树枝 branch	0.672 9	7.124 3	-0.348 6
	树叶 leaf	0.267 7	10.342 0	2.924 8
分解法 disaggregation	总量 total	2.464 4	5.292 5	-1.579 9
	树根 root	0.542 5	6.243 1	-1.677 8
	树干 stem	1.697 5	6.569 1	-3.403 5
	树枝 branch	0.679 0	7.189 1	-0.366 2
	树叶 leaf	0.266 1	10.278 6	2.374 4

[1]	杨宇萍, 胡文敏, 贾冠宇, 李果, 李毅. 基于InVEST与ANN-CA模型的环洞庭湖区土地利用碳储量情景模拟[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 175-184.
[2]	沈浩, 姜姜, 周晨, 潘庆全. 江西石城不同起源阔叶林碳储量驱动因子分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(4): 185-190.
[3]	张育诚, 韩念龙, 胡珂, 于淼, 黎兴强. 海南岛中部山区土地利用变化对碳储量时空分异的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 115-122.
[4]	宋磊, 金星姬, PUKKALA Timo, 李凤日. 长白落叶松人工林多目标经营模式研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 150-158.
[5]	杨永超, 段文标, 陈立新, 曲美学, 王亚飞, 王美娟, 石金永, 潘磊. 模拟氮磷沉降和凋落物处理对两种林型红松林土壤有机碳组分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 57-66.
[6]	王大卫, 沈文星. 中国主要树种人工乔木林碳储量测算及固碳潜力分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 11-19.
[7]	雷海清, 孙高球, 郑得利. 温州市森林生态系统碳储量研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 20-26.
[8]	肖君. 福建省天然乔木林碳储量动态变化及增汇策略[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(5): 27-32.
[9]	王有良, 林开敏, 宋重升, 崔朝伟, 彭丽鸿, 郑宏, 郑鸣鸣, 任正标, 邱明镜. 间伐对杉木人工林生态系统碳储量的短期影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(3): 65-73.
[10]	辛士冬, 何培, 姜立春. 不同矫正位置对落叶松分位数削度方程预测精度的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2021, 45(1): 182-188.
[11]	吴国训,唐学君,阮宏华,罗细芳. 基于森林资源清查的江西省森林碳储量及固碳潜力研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2019, 62(01): 105-110.
[12]	范立红,朱建华,李奇,冯源,肖文发. 三峡库区土地利用/覆被变化对碳储量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2018, 61(04): 53-60.
[13]	孟雪,刘雪惠,高媛赟,刘俊,温小荣,林国忠,徐达. 基于区域转换因子的不同立地质量阔叶林碳储量估测[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2017, 60(06): 87-92.
[14]	莫祝平,童德文,袁胜,韦立权,张小全. 广西珠江流域治理再造林项目碳汇监测研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2015, 58(03): 156-160.
[15]	方岳,刘华,白志强,臧润国,张帆,叶高,韩燕梁. 新疆喀纳斯保护区森林碳储量及碳密度研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2014, 57(06): 17-22.