引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202012

国家林草科技领军期刊
中国精品科技期刊
中国高校百佳科技期刊
江苏省新闻出版政府奖期刊奖
RCCSE林学权威期刊（A+）
CSCD核心期刊
Scopus数据库收录期刊
中文核心期刊
SCD核心期刊

作者加群：102861116

微信公众号：南京林业大学学报

高级检索

南京林业大学学报（自然科学版） ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (1): 97-105.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202012

引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较

魏静¹(), 谭星¹, 王昌盛¹, 闫瑞², 李林珂¹, 宁月¹, 刘芸¹^,^*()

1.西南大学资源环境学院,重庆 400715
2.重庆市荣昌区岚峰林场,重庆 402460

收稿日期:2022-02-16 修回日期:2022-05-25 出版日期:2024-01-30 发布日期:2024-01-24
基金资助:
重庆市科技兴林重大专项;重庆市林业局科技兴林项目(渝林科研2020-3)

Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils

WEI Jing¹(), TAN Xing¹, WANG Changsheng¹, YAN Rui², LI Linke¹, NING Yue¹, LIU Yun¹^,^*()

1. College of Resources and Environment, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China
2. Lanfeng Forest Farm of Rongchang District of Chongqing City, Chongqing 402460, China

Received:2022-02-16 Revised:2022-05-25 Online:2024-01-30 Published:2024-01-24

1. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较.zip(42466KB)

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】研究引种美国红枫(Acer rubrum)在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性,为美国红枫在重庆地区的发展和适地适品种提供参考。【方法】以生长在重庆地区中性紫色土区(NS1)和石灰性紫色土区(AS2)的引种美国红枫‘马莫’(A. rubrum × freemanii ‘Marmo’)和‘金叶美国槭’(文中为‘金叶槭’A. rubrum‘Aurea’)为研究对象,在生长旺盛的夏季,对美国红枫在两种紫色土区生长、叶色和光合特性进行测定。【结果】①‘马莫’的净株高、冠幅、叶面积与土壤碱解氮(AN)、速效钾(AK)和有机质(SOM)含量、碳氮比(C/N)呈极显著正相关(P<0.05),与土壤pH呈极显著负相关(P<0.05)。中性和石灰性紫色土区‘马莫’株高较引种初期分别增加3.44、1.18 m,地径分别增加5.14、2.22 cm,引种前后叶面积、比叶面积差异显著(P<0.05);‘金叶槭’净株高、净地径、比叶面积无显著性差异。②中性紫色土区‘马莫’叶绿素a(Chla)、叶绿素b(Chlb)、总叶绿素(ChlT)、类胡萝卜素(Car)含量及色彩亮度(L^*)、红绿色度(a^*)、黄蓝色度(b^*)、最大光化学效率(F_v/F_m)、电子传递效率(ETR)、实际光能捕获效率Y(Ⅱ)、光化学猝灭系数(q_P)、最大净光合速率(P_n,max)、光饱和点(LSP)、表观量子效率(AQY)、叶片羧化速率(α)和光呼吸速率(R_p)显著高于石灰性紫色土区(P<0.05);与石灰性紫色土区相比,中性紫色土区‘金叶槭’P_n,max和胞间CO₂浓度(CSP)显著增加、光补偿点(LCP)、CO₂补偿点(CCP)显著降低(P<0.05),而两种紫色土‘金叶槭’Chla、ChlT含量及Chl a/b、L^*、a^*、b^*、F_v/F_m、ETR、Y(Ⅱ)、q_PLSP、AQY、暗呼吸速率(R_d)、CCP和R_p差异均不显著(P>0.05)。【结论】‘马莫’在中性紫色土区通过增加光能捕获面积提高PSⅡ光合电子传递速率和光合速率,降低有机物质的消耗,从而增强光合能力,表现出较强的生长适应性,而在石灰性紫色土区的表现较差,说明该品种对碱性紫色土壤的适应性一般;两种紫色土区‘金叶槭’的光合特性和生长均表现出较强的适应性。

关键词: 引种, 美国红枫, 生长适应性, 光合特性, 叶绿素荧光参数, 叶色参数

Abstract:

【Objective】 The growth and photosynthetic characteristics responses of Acer rubrum following introduction to two kinds of purple soil were studied, to provide reference data for the development and use of a suitable variety of A. rubrum in the Chongqing area of China. 【Method】 A. rubrum ‘Marmo’ and ‘Aurea’ introduced into neutral purple soil (NS1) and callitic purple soil (AS2) were analyzed. Growth, leaf color, and photosynthetic characteristics of A. rubrum were compared in the two kinds of purple soil in summer, when their growth was vigorous. 【Result】 The net plant height, crown width, leaf area of ‘Marmo’ were positively correlated with alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen, available potassium, carbon/nitrogen ratio, and organic matter, and negatively correlated with soil pH. Compared with the initial introduction, the plant height of ‘Marmo’ in the neutral and calcareous zones increased by 3.44 m and 1.18 m, respectively, ground diameter increased by 5.14 cm and 2.22 cm, respectively, and the leaf area and specific leaf area were significantly different. However, there were no significant differences of ‘Aurea’ in net plant height, net ground diameter, or specific leaf area. The chlorophyll a (ChlT), chlorophyll b (Chlb), total chlorophyll (ChlT), carotenoid (Car), L^*, a^* and b^* values, maximum photochemical efficiency (F_v/F_m), electron transfer efficiency (ETR), light energy capture efficiency Y(Ⅱ), photochemical quenching coefficients (q_P), leaf maximum net photosynthetic rate, light saturation point (LSP), apparent quantum yield (AQY), leaf carboxylation rate, leaf carboxylation rate (α), and photorespiration rate (R_p) of ‘Marmo’ in neutral zone were significantly higher than that of in calcareous zone (P<0.05). Compared with purple soil alkaline zone, P_n,max and intercellular CO₂ concentration of (C_s) ‘Aurea, in the neutral zone were significantly increased, LCP, CO₂ compensation point (CCP) were significantly decreased (P<0.05). Chla, ChlT, Chl a/b, L^*, a^*, b^* F_v/F_m, ETR, Y(Ⅱ), q_P, LSP, AQY, CCP, R_d and R_p of ‘Aurea’ in the neutral zone were not significantly different from those in the calcareous zone (P>0.05). 【Conclusion】 Among the two types of purple soil, ‘Marmo’ increased the photosynthetic electron transfer rate and photosynthetic rate of photosystem Ⅱ and reduced the consumption of organic matter by increasing the light energy capture area. The photosynthetic capacity was enhanced and growth was strong in the neutral region, while the performance of ‘Marmo’ was poor in the calcareous zone, indicating that this variety is not suitable for alkaline purple soil. The photosynthetic characteristics and growth of ‘Aurea’ showed strong adaptability to the two types of purple soil.

Key words: introduction, Acer rubrum, growth adaptability, photosynthetic characteristics, chlorophyll fluorescence parameter, leaf color parameter

中图分类号:

魏静,谭星,王昌盛,等. 引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.

WEI Jing, TAN Xing, WANG Changsheng, YAN Rui, LI Linke, NING Yue, LIU Yun. Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils[J].Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Science Edition), 2024, 48(1): 97-105.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202202012.

图/表 5

表1

表2

图1

表3

两种紫色土上不同品种美国红枫叶片光相应参数"

品种 variety	试验区 test site	P_n,max/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	LSP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	LCP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	R_d/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	AQY	$R 12$
‘马莫’MM	NS1	17.95±1.20 a	1 482.46±48.31 a	27.48±0.83 a	1.96±0.09 a	0.07±0.00 a	0.999 4
	AS2	5.97±0.32 b	1 224.15±23.80 b	28.08±2.23 a	1.70±0.06 a	0.05±0.02 b	0.997 8
‘金叶槭’JYQ	NS1	13.40±0.77 a	1 409.64±44.87 a	35.89±1.46 b	2.24±0.06 a	0.07±0.00 a	0.998 6
	AS2	10.65±0.23 b	1 313.82±104.62 a	48.94±1.13 a	2.23±0.05 a	0.06±0.00 a	0.998 3
品种 variety	试验区 test site	α/ (mol·m^-2·s^-1)	A_n,max/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	CSP/ (μmol·mol^-1)	CCP/ (μmol·mol^-1)	R_p/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	$R 22$
‘马莫’MM	NS1	0.09±0.00 a	34.18±1.49 a	2 001.51±324.84 a	98.78±0.83 b	7.54±0.07 a	0.987 0
	AS2	0.04±0.00 b	19.45±0.55 b	1 793.11±163.56 a	122.69±2.06 a	4.26±0.26 b	0.986 5
‘金叶槭’JYQ	NS1	0.08±0.00 a	29.04±1.89 a	2 129.64±37.21 a	103.26±0.86 a	7.20±0.11 a	0.988 1
	AS2	0.07±0.01 a	29.23±1.08 a	1 945.93±49.80 b	108.56±7.46 a	6.16±0.40 a	0.986 1

表3

图2

参考文献 41

[1]	颜廷武. 不同种源美国红枫苗期光合特性研究[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2014(6): 24-26.
	YAN T W. Studies on seedling photosynthetic characteristics of Acer rubrum from different provenances[J]. Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2014(6): 24-26. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2014.06.006.
[2]	何素芬, 钟栎, 何剑平. 美国红枫引种繁育与规模化栽培技术初报[J]. 农业科技与信息, 2016, 13(22):111,113.
	HE S F, ZHONG L, HE J P. Preliminary report on introduction,breeding and large-scale cultivation techniques of American Red maple[J]. Inf Agric Sci Technol, 2016, 13(22):111,113. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6997.2016.22.080.
[3]	吴雅琼, 刘婧, 汪贵斌, 等. 美国红枫的组织培养与快繁技术[J]. 北方园艺, 2016(20): 97-102.
	WU Y Q, LIU J, WANG G B, et al. Tissue culture and rapid propagation of Acer rubrum[J]. North Hortic, 2016(20):97-102. DOI:10.11937/bfyy.201620025.
[4]	何素芬, 吴戎, 顾大勤. 美国红枫硬枝扦插育苗试验研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2014, 35(1): 61-62,88.
	HE S F, WU R, GU D Q. Experimental study on hardwood cuttings of Acer rubrum[J]. J Sichuan For Sci Technol, 2014, 35(1):61-62, 88. DOI:10.16779/j.cnki.1003-5508.2014.01.015.
[5]	WESTON D J, BAUERLE W L. Inhibition and acclimation of C3 photosynthesis to moderate heat:a perspective from thermally contrasting genotypes of Acer rubrum(Red maple)[J]. Tree Physiol, 2007, 27: 1083-1092. DOI:10.1093/treephys/27.8.1083.
[6]	李力. 北美红枫呈色生理机制及叶色调控[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016.
	LI L. Physiological mechanism and leaf color regulation of red maple in north America[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016.
[7]	BERG G, SMALLA K. Plant species and soil type cooperatively shape the structure and function of microbial communities in the rhizosphere[J]. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 2009, 68(1): 1-13. DOI:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00654.x.
[8]	熊淑萍, 张娟娟, 杨阳, 等. 不同冬小麦品种在3种质地土壤中氮代谢特征及利用效率分析[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(7): 601-610.
	XIONG S P, ZHANG J J, YANG Y, et al. Research on nitrogen metabolism characteristics and use efficiency in different winter wheat cultivars grown on three soil textures[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(7): 601-610. DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00062.
[9]	WANG G M, STRIBLEY D P, TINKER P B, et al. Effects of pH on arbuscular mycorrhiza, I: field observations on the long-term liming experiments at Rothamsted and Woburn[J]. New Phytol, 1993, 124(3): 465-472. DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03837.x.
[10]	丁武泉, 包兵, 李航, 等. 三峡库区消落区紫色土对重金属的吸附特征[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2007, 23(1):40-42,62.
	DING W Q, BAO B, LI H, et al. Heavy metal adsorption characteristics of purple soil in water-level-fluctuating zone of Three-Gorge Seservoir region[J]. J Ecol Rural Environ, 2007, 23(1):40-42, 62. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4831.2007.01.009.
[11]	袁贵琼, 刘芸, 邬静淳, 等. 模拟三峡库区消落带水淹对3类土壤中桑树和水桦生长的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 46(6): 65-74.
	YUAN G Q, LIU Y, WU J C, et al. Response of growth of mulberry and birch under three soil types to simulated flooding in the Three Gorges Reservoir region[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 46(6): 65-74. DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2018.06.009.
[12]	黄小辉, 刘芸, 李佳杏, 等. 模拟三峡库区消落带土壤干旱对桑树生理特性的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(9): 127-132.
	HUANG X H, LIU Y, LI J X, et al. Simulation the effect of soil drought on mulberry physiological characteristics in the Three Gorges Reservoir area[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci), 2013, 35(9): 127-132. DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2013.09.024.
[13]	王峰, 陈玉真, 尤志明, 等. 不同类型茶园土壤团聚体组成特征及稳定性研究[J]. 茶叶科学, 2014, 34(2): 129-136.
	WANG F, CHEN Y Z, YOU Z M, et al. Study on the composition characteristics and stability of soil aggregates in different types of tea garden[J]. J Tea Sci, 2014, 34(2): 129-136. DOI:10.13305/j.cnki.jts.2014.02.004.
[14]	张淑勇, 周泽福, 夏江宝, 等. 不同土壤水分条件下小叶扶芳藤叶片光合作用对光的响应[J]. 西北植物学报, 2007, 27(12): 2514-2521.
	ZHANG S Y, ZHOU Z F, XIA J B, et al. The responses of Euonymus fortunei var. radicans sieb leaf photosynthesis to light in different soil moisture[J]. Journal of Northwest Plants, 2007, 27(12): 2514-2521. DOI:1000-4025( 2007)12-2514-2521.
[15]	夏贵菊, 何彤慧, 赵永全, 等. 不同土壤类型对芦苇生长及光合特征的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(6): 1252-1258.
	XIA G J, HE T H, ZHAO Y Q, et al. Influence of different soil types on reed growth and photosynthesis characteristics[J]. Journal of Northwest Plants, 2014, 34(6): 1252-1258. DOI:10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.06.1252.
[16]	闫小莉, 王德炉. 不同类型土壤栽培对苦丁茶树叶片生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(19): 7208-7217.
	YAN X L, WANG D L. Effects of different soil types on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Ligustrum robustum[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(19): 7208-7217. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201806111303.
[17]	杨剑虹, 王成林, 代亨林. 土壤农化分析与环境监测[M]. 北京: 中国大地出版社, 2008.
	YANG J H, WANG C L, DAI H L. Soil agrochemical analysis and environmental monitoring[M]. Beijing: China Land Press, 2008.
[18]	苍晶, 赵会杰. 植物生理学实验教程[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013: 57-59.
	CANG J, ZHAO H J. Experimental course of plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013:57-59.
[19]	TAN X, WU J J, LIU Y, et al. Estimation of leaf color variances of Cotinus coggygria based on geographic and environmental variables[J]. J For Res, 2021, 32(2): 609-622. DOI:10.1007/s11676-020-01118-6.
[20]	YE Z P, YU Q. Comparison of new and several classical models of photosynthesis in response to irradiance[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2008, 32(6): 1356-1361. DOI:10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.016.
[21]	陈芳清, 郭成圆, 王传华, 等. 水淹对秋华柳幼苗生理生态特征的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2008, 19(6): 1229-1233.
	CHEN F Q, GUO C Y, WANG C H, et al. Effects of water logging on eco-physiological characteristics of Salix variegate seedlings[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2008, 19(6): 1229-1233. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.2008.0228.
[22]	谢春, 周长芳, 龙水云, 等. 挺水植物与浮叶植物光合荧光特性的差异[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(7): 2493-2502.
	XIE C, ZHOU C F, LONG S Y, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics differ between emergent and floating-leaved macrophytes[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(7): 2493-2502. DOI:10.5846/stxb201704120652.
[23]	白宇清, 谢利娟, 王定跃. 不同遮荫、土壤排水处理对毛棉杜鹃幼苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(2): 44-53.
	BAI Y Q, XIE L J, WANG D Y. Influences of different shading and soil water drainage on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Rhododendron moulmainense[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2017, 53(2): 44-53. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20170206.
[24]	BOARDMAN N K. Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1977, 28: 355-377. DOI:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035.
[25]	JOUBERT C, YOUNG P R, EYÉGHÉ-BICKONG H A, et al. Field-grown grapevine berries use carotenoids and the associated xanthophyll cycles to acclimate to UV exposure differentially in high and low light (shade) conditions[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2016, 7:786. DOI:10.3389/fpls.2016.00786.
[26]	陆燕元, 马焕成, 李昊民, 等. 土壤干旱对转基因甘薯光合曲线的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(7): 2155-2160.
	LU Y Y, MA H C, LI H M, et al. Light response characteristics of photosynthetic of transgenic sweet potato under drought stress[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(7): 2155-2160. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201306041308.
[27]	叶子飘, 赵则海. 遮光对三叶鬼针草光合作用和叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2009, 28(1): 19-22.
	YE Z P, ZHAO Z H. Effects of shading on the photosynthesis and chlorophyll content of Bidens pilosa[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2009, 28(1): 19-22. DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2009.0052.
[28]	王荣荣, 夏江宝, 杨吉华, 等. 贝壳砂生境干旱胁迫下杠柳叶片光合光响应模型比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2013, 37(2): 111-121.
	WANG R R, XIA J B, YANG J H, et al. Comparison of light response models of photosynthesis in leaves of Periploca sepium under drought stress in sand habitat formed from seashells[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2013, 37(2): 111-121. DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2013.00012.
[29]	RICHARDSON A D, BERLYN G P. Spectral reflectance and photosynthetic properties of Betula papyrifera (Betulaceae) leaves along an elevational gradient on Mt. Mansfield, Vermont,USA[J]. Am J Bot, 2002, 89(1): 88-94. DOI:10.3732/ajb.89.1.88.
[30]	李威, 杨德光, 牟尧, 等. 去遮荫后东北红豆杉幼苗和幼树光合特性对比[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(2): 179-185.
	LI W, YANG D G, MU Y, et al. Photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of seedlings and saplings of Taxus cuspidata after removing shade[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2018, 54(2): 179-185. DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20180221.
[31]	BUSCH F A. Photorespiration in the context of Rubisco biochemistry, CO₂ diffusion and metabolism[J]. Plant J, 2020, 101(4): 919-939. DOI:10.1111/tpj.14674.
[32]	王振夏, 魏虹, 吕茜, 等. 枫杨幼苗对土壤水分“湿-干”交替变化光合及叶绿素荧光的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(3): 888-897.
	WANG Z X, WEI H, LYU Q, et al. Response of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of Pterocarya stenoptera seedlings to submergence and drought alternation[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2013, 33(3): 888-897. DOI:10.5846/stxb201204240589.
[33]	DEMMIG B, BJÖRKMAN O. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence(77K) and photon yield of O₂ evolution in leaves of higher plants[J]. Planta, 1987, 171(2): 171-184. DOI: 10.1007/BF00391092.
[34]	SHARP R E, MATTHEWS M A, BOYER J S. Kok effect and the Quantum yield of photosynthesis: light partially inhibits dark respiration[J]. Plant Physiol, 1984, 75(1): 95-101. DOI:10.1104/pp.75.1.95.
[35]	BRESTIC M, ZIVCAK M, KUNDERLIKOVA K, et al. High temperature specifically affects the photoprotective responses of chlorophyll b-deficient wheat mutant lines[J]. Photosynth Res, 2016, 130(1/3): 251-266. DOI:10.1007/s11120-016-0249-7.
[36]	LI X X, ZENG R S, LIAO H. Improving crop nutrient efficiency through root architecture modifications[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2016, 58(3): 193-202. DOI:10.1111/jipb.12434.
[37]	饶立华, 蒋德安, 薛建明, 等. 钾营养对水稻光合器功能的效应与谷粒产量的影响[J]. 植物生理学报, 1989, 15(2): 191-197.
	RAO L H, JIANG D A, XUE J M, et al. Effect of potassium on the function of photosynthetic apparatus and grain yield of rice[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 1989, 15(2): 191-197.
[38]	韩辉, 宫伟. 不同土壤酸碱度对紫花槭秋季叶色变化的影响[J]. 吉林农业, 2010(6): 76-80.
	HAN H, GONG W. Effects of soil pH on leaf color of Acer truncatum in autumn[J]. Jilin Nongye, 2010(6): 76-80.
[39]	苏娓娓. 不同K⁺和pH水平对红叶石楠叶色和生理的影响[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2011.
	SU W W. The influence of different K⁺ and pH treatments to the leaf colour and physiology property of Photinia×fraseri ‘Red Robin’[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2011.
[40]	邓雪花, 喻阳华, 熊康宁, 等. 不同林龄花椒光合特性及对土壤养分的响应[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2022, 42(2): 149-157.
	DENG X H, YU Y H, XIONG K N, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics and responses to soil nutrients of differently aged Zanthoxylum planispinum stands[J]. J For Environ, 2022, 42(2): 149-157. DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2022.02.005.
[41]	张黛静, 陈倩青, 宗洁静, 等. 增施有机肥对冬小麦同化物积累与分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(6): 1869-1876.
	ZHANG D J, CHEN Q Q, ZONG, J J, et al. Effects of increasing organic fertilizer application on assimilates accumulation and distribution in winter wheat[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(6): 1869-1876. DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201906.014.

指标 index	试验区test site
指标 index	NS1	AS2
海拔/m altitude	371	375
土壤类型soil type pH	中性紫色土 7.4	石灰性紫色土 8.7
土壤容重/(g·cm^-3)soil bulk density	1.85±0.04 a	1.84±0.03 a
土壤含水率/% soil moisture	0.26±0.01 a	0.12±0.01 b
有机质含量/(g·kg^-1) SOM content	17.40±0.50 a	7.02±0.38 b
碱解氮含量/(mg·kg^-1) AN content	80.73±3.29 a	44.22±2.20 b
有效磷含量/(mg·kg^-1) AP content	4.87±0.23 a	3.67±0.30 b
速效钾含量/(mg·kg^-1) AK content	107.41±3.08 a	60.18±0.67 b
碳氮比C/N	10.31±0.61 a	6.68±0.12 b
全磷含量/(g·kg^-1) TP content	0.42±0.03 b	0.51±0.02 a
全钾含量/ (g·kg^-1) TK content	14.30±0.19 b	15.59±0.40 a

品种 variety	试验区 test site	净株高/m net plant height	净地径/cm net ground diameter	冠幅/m grown width	叶面积/cm² LA	比叶面积/ (cm²·g^-1) SLA
‘马莫’(MM)	NS1	3.44±0.18 a	5.14±0.34 a	2.44±0.17 a	62.35±2.01 a	26.46±2.47 a
	AS2	1.18±0.11 b	2.22±0.14 b	1.04±0.06 b	41.54±0.38 b	17.74±1.34 b
‘金叶槭’(JYQ)	NS1	3.69±0.21 a	6.04±0.38 a	2.12±0.14 a	35.92±3.93 a	30.94±4.05 a
	AS2	3.06±0.12 b	6.01±0.27 a	1.86±0.07 a	34.41±3.44 a	29.14±3.76 a
品种 variety	试验区 test site	叶干质量/g leaf mass	L^*	a^*	b^*	C^*
‘马莫’(MM)	NS1	2.36±0.16 a	21.54±0.85 b	-12.91±0.22 b	19.06±0.24 b	23.02±0.22 b
	AS2	2.35±0.18 a	40.64±0.71 a	-3.31±0.24 a	44.11±0.64 a	44.25±0.62 a
‘金叶槭’(JYQ)	NS1	1.16±0.08 a	42.34±4.03 a	-5.32±0.84 a	45.74±3.62 a	46.06±1.99 a
	AS2	1.18±0.03 a	40.59±2.12 a	-4.03±0.13 a	44.79±1.64 a	44.98±1.63 a

引种美国红枫在两种紫色土区的生长和光合特性比较

Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils

RichHTML

PDF

详细数据

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 5

参考文献 41

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

作者

读者

审稿

[1]	胡衍平, 刘卫东, 张珉, 陈明皋, 程勇, 魏志恒, 庞文胜, 吴际友. 山乌桕家系叶片叶色参数和色素含量及其解剖结构研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(2): 123-133.
[2]	徐薪璐, 孔淑鑫, 吕卓, 江帅君, 赵婉琪, 林树燕. 靓竹叶色表型叶片形态、结构与光合特性相关性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2025, 49(1): 145-154.
[3]	李喜梅, 赵君静, 回祎, 黄鑫, 高春雨, 牛雅璇, 廖晓宇, 于晨一. 郑州市4种园林树木光合特性及其影响因素研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 105-112.
[4]	李潘亭, 杜满义, 王玥, 裴顺祥, 辛学兵. 元宝枫幼苗生长及光合特性对水肥耦合的响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(5): 113-122.
[5]	伍长风, 国靖, 汪贵斌. 雌雄银杏对温度变化的形态和生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 150-158.
[6]	马冲, 陆晖, 李运毛, 曹兵, 朱金忠, 亢彦东. 模拟大气CO₂浓度升高与氮添加对宁夏枸杞生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(4): 209-218.
[7]	杨皓, 刘超, 庄家尧, 张树同, 张文韬, 毛国豪. 不同载体菌肥对紫穗槐生长和光合特性及土壤养分的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[8]	王改萍, 章雷, 曹福亮, 丁延朋, 赵群, 赵慧琴, 王峥. 红蓝光质对银杏苗木生长生理特性及黄酮积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[9]	赵晓龙, 沈家怡, 刘涛, 吴家胜, 胡渊渊. 当年和越年生香榧叶片的光合效率及抗氧化特性的季节性变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(2): 45-50.
[10]	张曦文, 陈旭, 吴军, 孙国飞, 吴力国, 赵长海, 代伟昭, 刘桂丰. 彩叶桦新品种幼龄期生长适应性早期分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2024, 48(1): 124-130.
[11]	梁文超, 步行, 罗思谦, 谢寅峰, 胡加玲, 张往祥. 施肥对增温促花后‘长寿冠’海棠叶片生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[12]	贾瑞瑞, 祝艳艳, 杨秀莲, 付钰, 岳远征, 王良桂. 不同砧木对楸树嫁接苗生长及光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[13]	张银凤, 蔡洪月, 彭金根, 刘学军, 谢利娟, 张华, 王艳梅. 深圳城市公园不同栽植环境对毛棉杜鹃生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(2): 197-204.
[14]	孔鑫, 王爱英, 郝广友, 宁秋蕊, 王淼, 殷笑寒, 周永姣. 水曲柳幼苗水力结构和光合生理对光强梯度变化的耦合响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2023, 47(1): 83-91.
[15]	李振双, 王倩, 朱媛, 杨富成, 梁俊峰, 陆俊锟. 外源信号物质对檀香幼苗生长和光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.