Abstract
A comprehensive evaluation index system of the riparian buffer strips was constructed by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) based on the result of field survey on riparian, according to the characteristics of riparian zone in northern China. This index system offered 16 indicators according to the river health, bank stability, edaphic condition and vegetation status. The ecological riparian zone system states could be divided into four grades: perfect, good, normal and worse. The index system was used to evaluate the riparian buffer both firstlevel tributaries of Chishiqiao and Zihong rivers of the Qin river, and the result showed that Chishiqiao river was in “good” condition while Zihong river was in “normal” condition.
Cite this article
Download Citations
WANG Jinxiu，QI Shi，ZHANG Yaoqi，WANG Hui，LI Linying，WANG Di，YU Xiaoyan，LIU Jin.
Comprehensive evaluation of riparian buffer strips on the upper reaches of the Qin river, Shanxi province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2012, 36(01): 152-155 https://doi.org/10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.2012.01.032
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.title}}
{{custom_sec.content}}
References
[1]张建春.河岸带功能及其管理[J].水土保持学报，2001，15(6)：143-146.
[2]李云平.国外4种河溪健康评价方法述评[J].山西林业科技，2009，38(2)：27-30.
[3]夏继红，严忠民，蒋传丰.河岸带生态系统综合评价指标体系研究[J].水科学进展，2005，16(3)：345-348.
[4]高甲荣，王芳，朱继鹏，等.河溪生态系统自然性评价指标体系[J].中国水土保持科学，2006，4(5)：66-70.
[5]王国玉，李湛东.河岸带自然度综合评价指标体系的构建[J].山东林业科技，2008(6)：12-16.
[6]诸葛亦斯，刘德富，黄钰铃.生态河流缓冲带构建技术初探[J].水资源与水工程学报，2006，17(2)：63-67.
[7]Saaty T L. The U.S.OPEC energy conflict the payoff matrix by the Analytic Hierarchy Process[J]. International Journal of Game Theory, 1979,8(4):225-234.
[8]娄会品，高甲荣，陈子珊.北京郊区河岸带自然性评价指标体系[J].水土保持通报，2010（1）：161-165.
PDF(1307965 KB)
