Diagnostic study on mineral nutrition in leaves of Liangping pomelo during fruit expansion period

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902008

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2020, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 111-116.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201902008

Previous Articles Next Articles

Diagnostic study on mineral nutrition in leaves of Liangping pomelo during fruit expansion period

FENG Dalan(), WEI Liben, HUANG Xiaohui, WANG Yushu, ZHANG Hong^*()

Chongqing Academy of Forestry, Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory for Forest Ecological Protection and Restoration in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, Chongqing 400036, China

Received:2019-02-26 Revised:2019-08-19 Online:2020-03-30 Published:2020-04-01
Contact: ZHANG Hong E-mail:786182557@qq.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aimed to provide a reference for nutrient diagnosis and balanced fertilization of Liangping pomelo orchards.【Method】The nutritional status of pomelo leaves of 18 representative orchards in the Liangping pomelo core production area was studied using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS); the N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Zn, Fe, Cu, and Mn contents of pomelo leaves were determined during fruit expansion period, and the diagnosis standard of leaf nutrition was put forward.【Result】The average content of P, K, Mg, Cu in the leaves of high-yielding orchards was higher than that of low yield garden, and N, Ca, Zn, Fe, Mn were lower than that of low yield garden.According to the range of mineral nutrient content in leaves from high-yielding pomelo orchards, the appropriate values of mineral nutrient elements in Liangping pomelo leaves during fruit expansion period were as follows: N, (22.12 ± 2.53) g/kg; P, (0.77 ± 0.20) g/kg; K, (16.50 ± 4.67) g/kg; Ca, (29.13 ± 6.12) g/kg; Mg, (3.92 ± 0.89) g/kg; Zn, (18.45 ± 3.07) mg/kg; Fe, (128.26 ± 34.00) mg/kg; Cu, (20.66 ± 5.68) mg/kg; and Mn, (20.98 ± 9.70) mg/kg. The order of nutrient requirement was different in different orchards; high-yielding pomelo orchards were relatively deficient in K, Mg, Fe, Mn, and Cu, whereas low-yielding pomelo orchards were relatively deficient in K, Mg, Fe, and Mn. The imbalanced index of nutrition in low-yielding pomelo orchards was higher than that in high-yielding pomelo orchards, which indicated that the imbalance of nutrition proportion was more serious in low yield pomelo garden, which was one of the reasons for the low yield of pomelo tree in low yield garden.【Conclusion】K, Mg, and Fe deficiencies are common in Liangping pomelo orchards, especially in low-yielding pomelo orchards. The results suggest that pomelo orchards should be appropriately supplemented with K, Fe, and Mg trace element fertilizer to improve their production potential.

Key words: Liangping pomelo, mineral nutrition, nutrition diagnosis, diagnosis recommendation integrated system(DRIS)

CLC Number:

S666.9

FENG Dalan, WEI Liben, HUANG Xiaohui, WANG Yushu, ZHANG Hong. Diagnostic study on mineral nutrition in leaves of Liangping pomelo during fruit expansion period[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(2): 111-116.

Figures/Tables 3

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

DRIS indices and orders of nutrient requirement"

果园编号 orchard No.		诊断指数 DRIS indices									需肥顺序 order of nutrient requirement	平均营养不平衡指数 NIIa
果园编号 orchard No.		N	P	K	Ca	Mg	Zn	Fe	Cu	Mn	需肥顺序 order of nutrient requirement	平均营养不平衡指数 NIIa
高产园	1	24.51	-469.52	-254.70	559.45	-1 194.35	-437.82	-415.71	781.20	-288.46	Mg>P>Zn>Fe>Mn>K>N>Ca>Cu	491.75
	2	481.55	624.56	1 835.79	-495.18	-1 428.14	1 047.69	-137.02	-1 078.33	-850.92	Mg>Cu>Mn>Ca>Fe>N>P>Zn>K	886.58
	7	-240.17	406.49	-383.69	-202.38	191.29	-164.16	-317.45	-545.35	2 148.34	Cu>K>Fe>N>Ca>Zn>Mg>P>Mn	511.03
	8	-102.75	130.30	-109.27	-208.37	398.50	289.01	-329.78	327.23	279.64	Fe>Ca>K>N>P>Mn>Zn>Cu>Mg	241.65
	9	156.69	-94.31	1125.60	-1088.45	-5.51	-104.08	-1165.80	691.48	287.08	Fe>Ca>Zn>P>Mg>N>Mn>Cu>K	524.33
	10	-39.05	-205.76	49.33	583.23	49.43	138.29	-87.71	262.41	-905.28	Mn>P>Fe>N>K>Mg>Zn>Cu>Ca	257.83
	13	298.50	474.77	-1 968.31	456.56	185.32	-1 182.04	891.84	240.07	814.42	K>Zn>Mg>Cu>N>Ca>P>Mn>Fe	723.54
	14	-549.74	177.59	1 112.84	-558.82	281.33	-259.88	1 141.30	-945.48	-20.65	Cu>Ca>N>Zn>Mn>P>Mg>K>Fe	560.85
	15	332.62	422.66	-1 798.39	864.33	378.24	-464.02	911.66	366.53	709.08	K>Zn>N>Cu>Mg>P>Mn>Ca>Fe	694.17
低产园	3	993.34	800.26	-3 320.61	-212.73	-51.29	418.26	989.60	-425.46	213.82	K>Cu>Ca>Mg>Mn>Zn>P>Fe>N	825.04
	4	743.39	-452.26	1252.46	-1 440.07	-2 191.59	774.78	-998.63	1 252.90	-404.91	Mg>Ca>Fe>P>Mn>N>Zn>K>Cu	1 056.78
	5	640.09	743.09	1 471.24	-524.27	-1 719.70	665.60	-614.68	437.38	-1 132.61	Mg>Mn>Fe>Ca>Cu>N>Zn>P>K	883.19
	6	686.04	-528.52	938.32	-147.68	-1 452.93	859.41	-1 032.16	173.50	-514.02	Mg>Fe>P>Mn>Ca>Cu>N>Zn>K	703.62
	11	-3.78	-341.05	437.00	947.61	-635.77	803.52	633.88	-439.58	-744.49	Mn>Mg>Cu>P>N>K>Fe>Zn>Ca	554.07
	12	-275.72	9.33	110.08	210.70	207.08	161.75	-530.06	-228.98	699.95	Fe>N>Cu>P>K>Zn>Mg>Ca>Mn	270.40
	16	-305.92	636.16	-4 289.29	255.67	-523.60	5176.10	-9.11	-1390.44	1 962.39	K>Cu>Mg>N>Fe>Ca>P>Mn>Zn	1 616.52
	17	-961.86	1687.11	-3 576.36	728.92	356.76	1 439.40	-229.42	-532.40	5 830.08	K>N>Cu>Fe>Mg>Ca>Zn>P>Mn	1 704.70
	18	-923.24	2 533.27	-5 156.38	-571.53	-679.58	-72.76	-896.48	880.98	10 540.65	K>N>Fe>Mg>Ca>Zn>Cu>P>Mn	2 472.76

Table 3

References 20

[1]	周心智, 文家富, 张云贵, 等. 重庆市梁平区梁平柚产业发展成效[J]. 南方农业, 2017,11(31):10-12.
	ZHOU X Z, WEN J F, ZHANG Y G, et al. Development effect of Liangping pomelo industry in Liangping District of Chongqing[J]. South China Agric, 2017,11(31):10-12.DOI: 10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2017.31.003.
[2]	BAILEY J, CUSHNAHAN A, BEATTIE J A M. The diagnosis and recommendation integrated system (DRIS) for diagnosing the nutrient status of grassland swards: II. model calibration and validation[J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 197(1):137-147. DOI: 10.1023/A:1004288505814. doi: 10.1023/A:1004288505814
[3]	FILHVM ALVES M F D A. DRIS:concepts and applications on nutritional diagnosis in fruit crops[J]. Sci Agric (Piracicaba,Braz), 2004, 61(5):550-560.DOI: 10.1590/s0103-90162004000500015.
[4]	耿增超, 张立新, 赵二龙, 等. 陕西红富士苹果矿质营养DRIS标准研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2003,23(8):1422-1428.
	GENG Z C, ZHANG L X, ZHAO E L, et al. Study on the diagnosis with DRIS norm of mineral elements in Fuji apple in Shaanxi Province[J]. Acta Bot Boreali-Occidentalia Sin, 2003,23(8):1422-1428.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2003.08.022.
[5]	杨宇, 邓正春, 彭永胜, 等. 柑橘叶片营养诊断施肥技术研究[J]. 湖南农业科学, 2013(15):183-184.
	YANG Y, DENG Z C, PENG Y S, et al. Study on fertilization techniques for nutrition diagnosis of citrus leaves[J]. Hunan Agric Sci, 2013(15):183-184.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-060X.2013.15.065.
[6]	柴仲平, 王雪梅, 陈波浪, 等. 库尔勒香梨叶片营养诊断研究[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(2):177-185.
	CHAI Z P, WANG X M, CHEN B L, et al. Study on leaf nutrition diagnosis of Korla fragrant pear[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2014,32(2):177-185.
[7]	李志国, 曾华, 张过师, 等. 红阳猕猴桃叶片营养DRIS诊断[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014,53(18):4344-4348.
	LI Z G, ZENG H, ZHANG G S, et al. DRIS diagnosis of leaf nutrient of Actinidia chinesis ‘Hongyang’ [J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2014,53(18):4344-4348.DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2014.18.095.
[8]	姜继元, 李铭, 郭绍杰, 等. 焉耆垦区克瑞森葡萄叶片营养DRIS标准研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2013,27(12):142-146.
	JIANG J Y, LI M, GUO S J, et al. Leaf nutrient diagnostic standard of Crimson seedless grape with DRIS in Yanqi Reclamation Region[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2013,27(12):142-146.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-7578.2013.12.024.
[9]	郭素娟, 李广会, 熊欢, 等. “燕山早丰”板栗叶片 DRIS 营养诊断研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(3):709-717.
	GUO S J, LI G H, XIONG H, et al. Foliar nutrition diagnosis of Castanea mollissima by using diagnosis and recommendation integrated system [J]. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci, 2014,20(3):709-717.DOI: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0324.
[10]	梁智, 邹耀湘. 新疆南部石榴矿质营养DRIS诊断初步研究[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2010(1):41-44,74.
	LIANG Z, ZOU Y X. Preliminary study on DRIS for pomegranate foliar diagnosis of mineral nutrition in southern area of Xinjiang[J]. Soil Fertil Sci China, 2010(1):41-44,74.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-6257.2010.01.009.
[11]	彭志平, 潘汝忠. 紫花芒果N P K CaMg叶片诊断的DRIS标准初步研究[J]. 热带亚热带土壤科学, 1998(1):36-40.
	PENG Z P, PAN R Z. Preliminary study on DRIS norms for mango foliar diagnosis of N,P,K,Ca and Mg[J]. Tropical and Subtropical Soil Science, 1998(1):36-40.
[12]	郑永强, 王娅, 杨琼, 等. 重庆三峡库区鲍威尔脐橙花期叶片矿质营养诊断[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(12):2378-2390.
	ZHENG Y Q, WANG Y, YANG Q, et al. Leaf nutritional diagnosis of Powell navel orange at flowering stage in Chongqing Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Sci Agric Sin, 2018,51(12):2378-2390.DOI: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2018.12.014.
[13]	刘红霞, 张会民, 郭大勇, 等. 豫西地区红富士苹果叶片营养诊断[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009,15(2):457-462.
	LIU H X, ZHANG H M, GUO D Y, et al. Foliar nutrition diagnosis of red Fuji apple in western Henan Province[J]. Plant Nutr Fertil Sci, 2009,15(2):457-462.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2009.02.031
[14]	MCCRAY J M, JI S, POWELL G, et al. Sugarcane response to DRIS-based fertilizer supplements in Florida[J]. J Agron Crop Sci, 2010, 196(1):66-75.DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00395.x. doi: 10.1111/jac.2009.196.issue-1
[15]	黄丽萍, 张倩茹, 尹蓉, 等. 矿质营养元素与果树生长发育的关系[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017,56(4):601-602,607.
	HUANG L P, ZHANG Q R, YIN R, et al. Progressing on the relation between mineral nutrients and fruit tree growth and development[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2017,56(4):601-602,607.DOI: 10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2017.04.001.
[16]	李美桂, 谢文龙, 谢钟琛, 等. 早熟砂梨矿质营养适宜值研究[J]. 果树学报, 2008,25(4):473-477.
	LI M G, XIE W L, XIE Z C, et al. Study on the optimum parameters of mineral nutrition in orchard for early season pear cultivars[J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008,25(4):473-477. DOI: 10.13925/J.CNKI.GSXB.2008.04.029.
[17]	叶静, 潘存德, 王世伟, 等. 新疆乌什县新温185号核桃树体营养盈亏分析[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2014,51(4):614-619.
	YE J, PAN C D, WANG S W, et al. Analysis of nutrition elements of abundance and loss situation of Juglans regia Xinwen 185 in Wushi County,Xinjiang [J]. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2014,51(4):614-619.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2014.04.004.
[18]	孙骞, 杨军, 张绍阳, 等. 钾营养与果树光合生理及果实品质关系研究进展[J]. 广东农业科学, 2006,33(12):126-129.
	SUN Q, YANG J, ZHANG S Y, et al. Research progress on relationship between potassium nutrition and photosynjournal physiology & fruit quality of fruit trees[J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2006,33(12):126-129.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2006.12.046.
[19]	王红霞, 张志华, 玄立春. 果树光合作用研究进展[J]. 河北农业大学学报, 2003,26(z1):49-52.
	WANG H X, ZHANG Z H, XUAN L C. Advances in research of photosynjournal in fruit trees[J]. J Agric Univ Hebei, 2003,26(z1):49-52.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1573.2003.z1.015.
[20]	安华明, 樊卫国. 果树铁营养研究进展[J]. 西南农业学报, 2001,14(3):83-89.
	AN H M, FAN W G. A review on research advances in iron nutrition of fruit trees[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2001,14(3):83-89.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2001.03.020.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

果园类型 orchard type	果园编号 orchard No.	大量元素含量/(g·kg^-1) macro elements contents					微量元素含量/(mg·kg^-1) trace elements contents
果园类型 orchard type	果园编号 orchard No.	N	P	K	Ca	Mg	Zn	Fe	Cu	Mn
高产园 high yield orchard	1	20.87	0.82	21.52	21.66	2.24	21.86	105.74	10.76	11.80
	2	20.05	1.17	15.14	37.49	2.70	15.64	106.84	25.79	16.05
	7	26.00	0.87	10.22	33.98	4.18	13.24	167.33	21.66	25.93
	8	19.19	0.67	14.79	31.65	3.86	18.03	100.70	22.08	10.43
	9	25.66	0.46	10.02	35.38	4.18	16.12	154.71	23.82	22.70
	10	22.49	0.79	22.33	21.59	4.53	18.95	87.82	26.42	19.22
	13	23.48	0.75	16.34	30.41	4.29	20.75	132.69	16.01	43.30
	14	21.93	0.60	16.32	27.51	5.01	22.62	112.13	25.34	20.03
	15	19.40	0.80	21.86	22.54	4.26	18.83	186.42	14.05	19.36
	平均值mean	22.12	0.77	16.50	29.13	3.92	18.45	128.26	20.66	20.98
	标准差SD	2.53	0.20	4.67	6.12	0.89	3.07	34.00	5.68	9.70
	变异系数 CV	0.11	0.25	0.28	0.21	0.23	0.17	0.27	0.27	0.46
低产园 low yield orchard	3	24.56	0.95	23.99	26.54	2.59	23.32	105.75	23.19	11.79
	4	24.38	1.00	23.13	21.94	2.43	23.94	100.73	29.33	15.50
	5	23.10	0.80	19.49	27.70	2.44	22.60	84.11	18.79	13.54
	6	20.73	0.60	9.66	35.92	3.50	57.49	152.63	14.11	40.85
	11	28.39	1.09	8.23	26.59	3.67	18.15	167.85	14.47	19.99
	12	20.66	0.70	17.41	32.18	4.37	21.58	105.07	18.74	25.20
	16	20.92	0.45	10.31	40.86	4.24	34.15	151.89	18.22	78.11
	17	22.10	0.53	17.94	38.09	2.98	25.82	148.12	16.91	13.89
	18	21.16	0.48	8.61	34.00	2.83	23.68	147.95	27.01	11.70
	平均值mean	22.89	0.73	15.42	31.54	3.23	27.86	129.34	20.09	25.62
	标准差SD	2.56	0.24	6.30	6.24	0.75	11.92	30.09	5.33	21.77
	变异系数 CV	0.11	0.32	0.41	0.20	0.23	0.43	0.23	0.27	0.85

表示形式 expression form	高产园high yield orchard			低产园low yield orchard				方差比 V_H/V_L
表示形式 expression form	平均值 mean	V_H	变异系数CV	平均值 mean	V_L	变异系数CV		方差比 V_H/V_L
K/N	0.767	0.067	0.338	0.675	0.067	0.384		0.998^*
Ca/N	1.324	0.082	0.216	1.410	0.149	0.274		0.547^*
Mg/N	0.178	0.002	0.225	0.144	0.002	0.290		0.921^*
P/Fe	6.428	6.045	0.382	6.139	8.009	0.461		0.755^*
表示形式 expression form	高产园high yield orchard			低产园low yield orchard				方差比 V_H/V_L
表示形式 expression form	平均值 mean	V_H	变异系数CV	平均值 mean	V_L		变异系数CV	方差比 V_H/V_L
P/Mn	43.382	435.420	0.481	38.759	757.900		0.710	0.575^*
K/P	22.123	37.474	0.277	21.802	53.680		0.336	0.698^*
Mg/P	5.526	4.861	0.399	4.966	5.240		0.461	0.928^*
Ca/K	2.003	0.933	0.482	2.479	1.541		0.501	0.605^*
Mg/K	0.260	0.011	0.403	0.256	0.018		0.529	0.597^*
Zn/Fe	0.154	0.003	0.327	0.220	0.006		0.344	0.448^*
Zn/Mn	1.038	0.232	0.464	1.207	0.400		0.524	0.581^*
Zn/Cu	0.999	0.226	0.475	1.532	1.017		0.658	0.222^*
Fe/Mn	6.823	5.170	0.333	5.761	10.422		0.560	0.496^*
Fe/Cu	6.895	10.479	0.470	7.008	8.742		0.422	1.199^*
100N/Fe	1.811	16.354	0.223	1.867	26.965		0.278	0.606^*
1 000N/Mn	1.200	157.960	0.331	1.128	482.370		0.616	0.327^*
10^-2P/Ca	2.751	0.007	0.304	2.539	0.016		0.506	0.425^*
100K/Zn	8.905	376.72	0.218	6.273	980.450		0.499	0.384^*
100K/Fe	1.398	37.349	0.437	1.348	63.516		0.591	0.588^*
100K/Mn	9.449	2 467.500	0.526	8.669	5083.610		0.822	0.485^*
1 000Ca/Mn	1.604	502.490	0.442	1.417	653.610		0.571	0.769^*
100Mg/Cu	1.996	33.193	0.289	1.749	47.129		0.393	0.704^*
10^-5Zn/Ca	67.321	0.005	0.335	88.331	0.009		0.341	0.561^*
10^-3Zn/Mg	5.023	0.004	0.382	8.829	0.011		0.379	0.327^*
10^-5Cu/Ca	72.089	0.005	0.311	67.695	0.009		0.438	0.571^*
10^-4Cu/K	13.948	0.004	0.454	14.822	0.005		0.473	0.816^*

Diagnostic study on mineral nutrition in leaves of Liangping pomelo during fruit expansion period

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 3

References 20

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	PAN Pingping, DOU Quanqin, TANG Wenhua, XIE Yinfeng. Effects of slow release fertilizer dosage on growth and nutrient contents of Carya illinoensis container seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(5): 163-168.
[2]	Ji Kongshu Zou Yongmei Chen Tianhua Huang Jianlin Wang Zhangrong (College of Forestry Resources and Environment Nanjing Forestry University Nanjing 210037)Wang Qiming. A STUDY ON THE GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION OF THE MINERAL NUTRIENT IN MASSON PINE(PINUS MASSONIANA LAMB. ) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1996, 20(01): 22-25.
[3]	Lin Fang Luo Ruying Jiang Jianping(Nanjing Forestry University). SOIL NUTRITIVE CONDITIONS AND TREE GROWTH OF CHINESE FIR [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1991, 15(02): 41-46.