Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars)

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911045

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 107-115.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911045

Previous Articles Next Articles

Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars)

FENG Yuanyuan(), LI Qingying^*(), HUANG Junhua, HU Shaoqing^*()

School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci & Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China

Received:2019-11-22 Accepted:2020-03-05 Online:2021-01-30 Published:2021-02-01
Contact: LI Qingying,HU Shaoqing E-mail:15067148109@163.com;dongzeli06@163.com;13600512490@163.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Numerical classification was carried out by observing the leaf and branch characteristics of Osmanthus fragrans cultivars. The results will provide a reference for their breeding and classification. 【Methods】 The morphological characteristics of 25 O. fragrans cultivars were observed in spring. Thirty-five leaf and branch characteristics were used for R-type clusters and a principal component analysis (PCA). After removing characteristics with a high correlation and low cumulative contribution, 35 characteristics were selected to conduct the classification of color-leafed O. fragrans colour cultivars with the Q-type cluster analysis. 【Results】 The R-type clusters showed that several variables (whether the leaf surface was wrinkled or not, whether the lateral veins were uplifted or not, petiole color, whether the new branches were dichromatic or not, the convex-concave degrees of the transverse section and the main vein of the leaves, and whether there were spotted blades on the mature leaves or not), were all significantly correlated with the color and color type at each stage of the leaves. All the other factors were relatively independent. The PCA showed that 11 principal components were extracted, their cumulative contribution was 87.618%. The cumulative contribution of the top nine principal components was 81.157%, mainly reflecting leaf colour representation in all stages, leaf size, serrated leaf margin, and leaf shape. The results of the Q-type cluster showed that the 25 O. fragrans cultivars were divided into the following: two categories based on the color of mature leaves; three categories based on average leaf width; and 10 categories according to the leaf width, the young leaf color type, leaf cross section, leaf shape, and leaf texture. 【Conclusion】 In general, the color of mature leaves, the cross section of the blade and the leaf width may be the most important criteria and the basis for the classification of color-leafed O. fragrans cultivars. However, this needs to be explored and verified.

Key words: color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans, cultivar, numerical classification, clustering analysis, principal component analysis

CLC Number:

S685.13
S718

FENG Yuanyuan, LI Qingying, HUANG Junhua, HU Shaoqing. Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars)[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(1): 107-115.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Characters and codes of color-leafed O. fragrans cultivars"

编号 No.	性状(代号) character(code)	性状类型 character type	详细编码情况(赋值) detailed coding (assignment)
1	叶长leaf length(LL)	多态	<6.5 cm(0);6.5~8.5 cm(1); 8.5~10.5 cm(2);>10.5 cm(3)
2	叶宽leaf width(LW)	多态	<2 cm(0);2~3 cm(1); 3~4 cm(2);>4 cm(3)
3	叶形指数leaf shape index(LSI)	数量
4	叶柄长petiole length(PL)	数量
5	侧脉对数lateral veins logarithmic(LVL)	多态	6~8对(0); 8~10对(1); >10对(2)
6	新枝颜色new branch color(NBC)	多态	黄色(1);黄褐色(2);红色(3);紫红色(4);紫色(5);黄色或黄绿色(6);黄绿色或黄褐色(7);黄绿色或红色(8);黄绿色或紫色(9)
7	幼叶颜色 young leaf color(YLC)	多态	黄色(1);黄褐色(2); 红色(3);紫红色(4);紫色(5); 黄色或黄褐色(6);黄色或红色(7);黄色或紫色(8);紫色+黄绿(9);黄+黄绿色或黄色(10):紫色+黄绿或紫色(11);紫色+黄绿色或黄色(12);紫色+黄绿色或黄色+黄绿色(13)
8	幼叶色彩类型color type of young leaves(CTOYL)	多态	单色纯色(0);双色纯色(1); 斑色(2);纯色+斑色(3);两种斑色(4)
9	展叶时间leaf expansion time(LET)	多态	2月中(0);2月末(1);3月初(2);3月中(3);3月末(4); 3月末(5)
10	叶色leaf color(LC)	多态	黄绿(1);黄色(2); 黄褐色(3); 红色(4); 紫色(5); 棕色(6);黄色或黄绿色(7); 紫色+黄绿色(8);紫色+黄绿色或黄色(9);紫色+黄绿色或黄色+黄绿色(10)
11	叶柄颜色petiole color(PC)	多态	黄绿(1);黄色(2);红色(3);紫色(4);棕色(5); 黄色或黄绿色(6);红色或黄绿色(7); 紫色或黄绿色(8)
12	叶色类型color type of young leaves(CTOYL)	多态	单色纯色(0);双色纯色(1); 斑色(2);纯色+斑色(3);两种斑色(4)
13	叶形leaf shape(LS)	多态	披针形(1); 椭圆状披针形(2);长椭圆形(3);倒卵状椭圆形(4);卵状椭圆形(5);椭圆形(6);卵形(7);卵圆形(8);不规则形(9)
14	叶片横切面cross section of blade(CSOB)	多态	一字形(0);U形(1);V形(2)
15	叶缘皱曲leaf margin curved wrinkle(LMCW)	多态	平直(1);向上(2);向下反曲(3);波状起伏(4)
16	锯齿部位sawtooth position(SP)	多态	全缘(0);上1/3或上1/2具齿(1);全锯齿(2)
17	锯齿深浅sawtooth depth(SD)	多态	全缘(0);有锯齿(1);深锯齿(2)
18	叶尖形状leaf opex shape (LOS)	多态	突尖(1);尖(2);渐尖(3);长渐尖(4);尾尖(5)
19	叶基形状leaf base shape(LBS)	多态	狭楔形(1);楔形(2);宽楔形(3); 圆形(4); 平截(5)
20	主脉凹凸度main pulse concavity(MPC)	多态	小(0);中等(1);大(2)
21	成熟叶叶色mature leaf color(MLC)	多态	绿色(1);墨绿色(2);斑色叶(3)
22	幼叶叶柄颜色与成型叶是否不同whether the petiole color of young leaves is consistent with that of formed leaves(PCOYL)	二态	是(1);无(0)
23	新枝是否双色whether the new branches were dichromatic or not(NBWDO)	二态	是(1);否(0)
24	叶片光泽度blade gloss(BG)	二态	油亮(1);不油亮(0)
25	叶片厚度blade thickness(BT)	二态	厚(1);薄(0)
26	叶片硬度blade hardness(BH)	二态	硬(1);软(0)
27	主脉颜色main vein color(MVC)	二态	紫红(1);黄绿(0)
28	侧脉颜色lateral veins color(LVC)	二态	紫红(1);黄绿(0)
29	侧脉是否隆起whether the lateral veins were uplifted or not(TLVWUO)	二态	是(1);否(0)
30	叶面是否皱缩whether the leaf surface was wrinkled or not(LSWWO)	二态	是(1);否(0)
31	叶尖是否反曲whether the opex of the leaf is inverted or not(OOTLI)	二态	是(1);否(0)
32	叶尖是否歪斜whether the opex of the leaf is askew or not(OOTLIA)	二态	是(1);否(0)
33	网脉是否明显whether the reticular vein is obvious or not(RVIOO)	二态	是(1);否(0)
34	叶型leaf type(LT)	二态	两型叶(1);一型叶(0)
35	成熟叶有无花斑whether the spotted blades is on the mature leaves or not(SBIO)	二态	有(1);无(0)

Table 2

Fig.2

Table 3

Latent root contributor ratios and accumulative contributor ratios of the principal component of 35 characters"

性状(代号) character (code)	主成分 principal component
性状(代号) character (code)	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11
叶长(LL)	-0.316	-0.446	0.132	-0.030	-0.063	0.377	0.090	0.289	0.381	-0.080	-0.025
叶宽(LW)	0.261	-0.697	0.465	-0.035	-0.194	0.192	0.125	0.027	0.291	-0.046	0.133
叶形指数(LSI)	-0.300	0.357	-0.454	0.050	0.132	0.182	-0.350	0.451	0.090	0.272	0.016
叶柄长(PL)	-0.114	-0.167	-0.038	-0.430	0.187	-0.421	-0.508	0.249	0.084	0.219	0.209
侧脉对数(LVL)	-0.288	0.606	-0.132	0.175	-0.414	-0.116	-0.047	0.019	0.403	-0.132	-0.047
新枝颜色(NBC)	0.017	0.263	0.699	-0.121	-0.221	-0.066	0.325	-0.128	-0.122	0.294	-0.064
幼叶颜色(YLC)	0.865	0.168	0.249	0.059	0.177	0.149	-0.039	0.125	0.053	-0.122	0.154
幼叶色彩类型(CTOYL)	0.875	0.260	0.116	0.044	0.194	0.080	-0.123	0.087	-0.033	-0.138	0.092
展叶时间(LET)	0.388	0.040	0.205	0.278	0.142	-0.274	-0.289	-0.146	0.458	-0.129	-0.255
叶色(LC)	0.838	-0.013	0.086	0.240	0.121	0.051	0.123	0.150	0.185	-0.175	0.205
叶柄颜色(PC)	0.928	0.197	0.038	0.133	0.118	0.036	-0.013	0.047	0.041	-0.143	0.010
叶色类型(CTOYL)	0.241	0.653	0.382	-0.213	-0.231	-0.017	0.149	0.167	-0.035	0.334	-0.001
叶形(LS)	0.475	-0.313	0.294	-0.130	-0.288	0.164	0.092	-0.133	-0.116	0.044	-0.319
叶片横切面(CSOB)	-0.465	0.457	0.453	0.334	0.311	0.068	0.107	0.111	0.120	0.044	0.115
叶缘皱曲(LMCW)	-0.401	0.317	0.543	-0.122	0.182	0.133	-0.020	-0.122	-0.084	-0.248	0.267
锯齿部位(SP)	-0.025	-0.511	0.226	0.589	0.278	0.069	-0.240	0.132	-0.062	0.270	-0.072
锯齿深浅(SD)	0.053	-0.733	0.267	-0.074	0.118	0.326	-0.020	0.162	-0.058	0.202	0.025
叶尖形状(LOS)	-0.310	0.106	0.325	0.264	0.471	-0.396	0.037	-0.149	0.323	0.155	-0.177
叶基形状(LBS)	-0.433	-0.068	0.088	-0.337	-0.099	0.284	0.034	-0.077	0.471	0.048	0.418
主脉凹凸度(MPC)	-0.613	0.485	0.444	0.292	0.175	0.040	0.069	0.009	-0.013	-0.054	0.021
成熟叶叶色(MLC)	0.885	0.034	-0.211	0.121	0.144	0.084	-0.113	0.033	-0.044	0.081	0.138
幼叶叶柄与成型叶颜色是否不同(PCOYL)	-0.028	-0.533	-0.086	-0.084	0.126	0.508	-0.079	-0.227	0.274	0.133	-0.335
新枝是否双色(NBWDO)	0.512	0.502	0.291	-0.295	-0.148	0.242	-0.013	0.099	0.031	0.423	-0.004
叶片光泽度(BG)	0.051	-0.007	-0.066	0.346	0.452	0.146	0.298	-0.480	-0.223	0.234	0.032
叶片厚度(BT)	0.258	-0.059	-0.295	0.129	-0.505	-0.432	0.509	0.106	0.172	0.011	-0.096
叶片硬度(BH)	0.067	-0.348	0.224	0.609	-0.125	-0.432	0.162	0.192	0.123	0.260	0.115
主脉颜色(MVC)	0.023	-0.335	0.592	-0.107	0.129	-0.218	-0.015	0.282	-0.201	-0.451	-0.152
侧脉颜色(LVC)	0.031	-0.537	0.191	-0.096	-0.135	-0.343	0.063	0.549	-0.205	0.088	0.066
侧脉是否隆起(LVWUO)	-0.236	0.063	0.046	0.663	-0.517	0.298	-0.278	0.064	-0.154	-0.043	0.057
叶面是否皱缩(LSWWO)	-0.236	0.063	0.046	0.663	-0.517	0.298	-0.278	0.064	-0.154	-0.043	0.057
叶尖是否反曲(OOTLI)	-0.305	0.258	-0.294	0.094	0.409	0.152	0.288	0.543	0.079	-0.009	-0.287
叶尖是否歪斜(OOTLIA)	-0.183	0.127	-0.247	0.056	0.205	0.342	0.702	0.380	-0.080	-0.115	0.018
网脉是否明显(RVIOO)	0.092	-0.436	-0.388	0.253	0.054	-0.163	0.417	-0.253	0.077	0.089	0.373
叶型(LT)	0.786	0.285	0.053	-0.034	-0.186	0.140	0.116	0.041	0.213	0.045	-0.139
成熟叶有无花斑(SBIO)	0.899	0.116	-0.238	0.179	0.150	0.015	-0.109	0.040	-0.048	0.069	0.035
特征根characteristic root	7.700	4.743	3.266	2.828	2.424	2.162	2.062	1.817	1.410	1.224	1.037
贡献率/% contribution rate	22.000	13.527	9.333	8.080	6.927	6.178	5.891	5.192	4.029	3.497	2.963
累积贡献率/% cumulative contribution	22.000	35.527	44.859	52.939	69.867	66.045	71.936	77.128	81.157	84.655	87.618

Table 3

Fig.3

References 23

[1]	向民, 段一凡, 向其柏. 木犀属品种国际登录中心年报(1) 彩叶桂品种群的建立[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014,38(1):2, 187.
	XIANG M, DUAN Y F, XIANG Q B. Establishment of a new group:Osmanthus fragrans colour group[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014,38(1):2, 187.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2014.01.034.
[2]	冯园园, 李清莹, 胡绍庆. 彩叶桂品种资源与研究现状[J]. 浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,36(6):793-798.
	FENG Y Y, LI Q Y, HU S Q. Resources and research status of Osmanthus fragrans colour group cultivars[J]. J Zhejiang Sci-Tech Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019,36(6):793-798.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-3851(n).2019.06.013.
[3]	刘毅, 唐德瑞, 何佳林, 等. 陕西银杏主要栽培品种的数量分类研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2006,21(6):100-104.
	LIU Y, TANG D R, HE J L, et al. Studies on numeric taxonomy of main cultivars of Ginkgo biloba in Shaanxi Province[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2006,21(6):100-104.
[4]	杨如兴, 孔祥瑞, 张磊, 等. 茶树品种(品系)芽叶色泽表型遗传数量分类研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2016,24(4):444-451.
	YANG R X, KONG X R, ZHANG L, et al. Numerical taxonomy of leaf color phenotypes for tea(Camellia sinensis)[J]. J Trop Subtrop Bot, 2016,24(4):444-451.DOI: 10.11926/j.issn.1005-3395.2016.04.012.
[5]	郭林林, 宗成堃, 刘甜, 等. 丹参种质资源的数量分类研究[J]. 山东农业科学, 2014,46(5):55-59,2.
	GUO L L, ZONG C K, LIU T, et al. Numerical taxonomy study of Salvia miltiorrhiza germplasm resources[J]. Shandong Agric Sci, 2014,46(5):55-59,2. DOI: 10.14083/j.issn.1001-4942.2014.05.022.
[6]	王玉蛟, 高岚, 杨勇, 等. 基于花色表型的芍药品种数量分类研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018,40(7):96-103.
	WANG Y J, GAO L, YANG Y, et al. Numerical classification of peony cultivars based on flower color phenotype[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018,40(7):96-103. DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20170391.
[7]	赵喜萍, 李林, 魏朔南. 陕西漆树品种数量分类学研究[J]. 中国生漆, 2007,26(1):8-10.
	ZHAO X P, LI L, WEI S N. Study on quantiative taxonomy of cultivars in Toxicodendron vernicifluum in Shaanxi[J]. J Chin Lacq, 2007,26(1):8-10. DOI: 10.19334/j.cnki.issn.1000-7067.2007.01.003.
[8]	赵小兰, 陈振锋. 武汉地区桂花品种的数量分类研究[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版), 1998,16(6):3-5.
	ZHAO X L, CHEN Z F. Studies on the numerical taxonomy of Osmanthus fragrans Lour. cultivars in Wuhan[J]. J Hubei Univ Nat (Nat Sci Ed), 1998,16(6):3-5.
[9]	曾明颖. 四川省桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 南方农业, 2009,3(2):68-70.
	ZENG M Y. Numerical classification of the sweet Osmanthus cultivars in Sichuan Province[J]. South China Agric, 2009,3(2):68-70.DOI: 10.19415/j.cnki.1673-890x.2009.02.024.
[10]	段一凡, 王贤荣, 梁丽丽, 等. 湖北咸宁桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(自然科学版), 2010,28(3):289-293,301.
	DUAN Y F, WANG X R, LIANG L L, et al. A numerical classification of the sweet Osmanthus cultivars in Xianning of Hubei Province[J]. J Hubei Univ Natl (Nat Sci Ed), 2010,28(3):289-293,301.
[11]	刘龙昌, 向其柏. 桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2004,24(3):233-236.
	LIU L C, XIANG Q B. Study on numerical taxonomy of sweet Osmanthus cultivars[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 2004,24(3):233-236.DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2004.03.010 .
[12]	唐东芹. 桂花品种数量分类研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1998,22(1):3-5.
	TANG D Q. A study on numerical classification of the cultivars of sweet Osmanthus (Osmanthus fragrans (Thunb.) Lour.)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1998,22(1):3-5. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.1998.01.002.
[13]	臧德奎, 向其柏, 季春峰. 柊树品种分类研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004,28(S1):58-64.
	ZANG D K, XIANG Q B, JI C F. A study on the cultivars of false holly (Osmanthus heterophyllus)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2004,28(S1):58-64.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2004.z1.009.
[14]	臧德奎. 桂花品种分类研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2004.
	ZANG D K. Studies on the cultivar classification of sweet Osmanthus[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2004.
[15]	季春峰. 木犀属(Osmanthus)的系统分类学研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2004.
	JI C F. Systematic taxonomy of the genus Osmanthus (Oleaceae)[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2004.
[16]	路飞. 桂花新品种DUS测试指南的研制[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2009.
	LU F. Study on the design of DUS testing guideline for new varieties of Osmanthus fragrans[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2009.
[17]	李新蕊. 主成分分析、因子分析、聚类分析的比较与应用[J]. 山东教育学院学报, 2007,22(6):23-26.
	LI X R. Compare and application of principal component analysis,factor analysis and clustering analysis[J]. J Shandong Educ Inst, 2007,22(6):23-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2816.2007.06.006.
[18]	MCCABE G P, SNEATH P H A, SOKAL R R. Book reviews: numerical taxonomy, the principles and practice of numerical classification[J]. J American Statistical Association, 1974,70(352):962. DOI: 10.1126/science.183.4126.739.
[19]	郑玉红, 贾春, 顾永华, 等. 君子兰及其研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2012(19):189-195.
	ZHENG Y H, JIA C, GU Y H, et al. Research and development on Clivia miniata (Lindl.) regel[J]. North Hortic, 2012(19):189-195.
[20]	赵冰, 司国臣, 顾欣, 等. 秦岭秀雅杜鹃7个野生群体形态性状的变异分析[J]. 植物研究, 2012,32(5):561-566.
	ZHAO B, SI G C, GU X, et al. Population variation analysis of seven Rhododendron concinnum wild populations in Qinling Mountains[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2012,32(5):561-566.
[21]	鲁涤非, 王其超. 桂花品种分类标准的探讨[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1986,5(2):179-181.
	LU D F, WANG Q C. An investigation on the classification of Osmanthus fragrans Lour. cultivars[J]. J Huazhong Agric, 1986,5(2):179-181.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.1986.02.013.
[22]	刘玉莲. 南京地区桂花栽培品种调查研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1985,9(1):30-37.
	LIU Y L. Preliminary study of sweet Osmanthus in Nanjing area[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1985,9(1):30-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.jssn.1000-2006.1985.01.004.
[23]	胡绍庆, 张后勇, 吴光洪, 等. 桂花品种分类系统研究[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2005,31(4):95-98.
	HU S Q, ZHANG H Y, WU G H, et al. Studies on resource and taxon of Osmanthus fagrans cultivars[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2005,31(4):95-98.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-9209.2005.04.015.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

编号 No.	品种名 cultivars name	原产地 origin	编号 No.	品种名 cultivars name	原产地 origin
1	‘罗彩1号’(‘Luocai 1’)	广西桂林	14	‘闽彩12’(‘Mincai 12’)	福建漳州
2	‘罗彩2号’(‘Luocai 2’)	广西桂林	15	‘闽彩13’(‘Mincai 13’)	福建漳州
3	‘罗彩16号’(‘Luocai 16’)	广西桂林	16	‘闽台桂魁’(‘Mintai Guikui’)	福建漳州
4	‘罗彩17号’(‘Luocai 17’)	广西桂林	17	‘永福幻彩’(‘Yongfu Huancai’)	福建漳州
5	‘罗彩18号’(‘Luocai 18’)	广西桂林	18	‘闽彩25’ (‘Mincai 25’)	福建漳州
6	‘罗彩19号’(‘Luocai 19’)	广西桂林	19	‘永福绚彩’(‘Yongfu Xuancai’)	福建漳州
7	‘永福金彩’(‘Yongfu Jincai’)	福建漳州	20	‘闽彩28’ (‘Mincai 28’)	福建漳州
8	‘永福紫绚’(‘Yongfu Zixuan’)	福建漳州	21	‘云田彩桂’(‘Yuntain Caigui’)	湖南株洲
9	‘朝阳金钻’(‘Chaoyang Jinzuan’)	福建漳州	22	‘银碧双辉’(‘Yinbi Shuanghui’)	湖南株洲
10	‘闽农桂冠’(‘Minnong Guiguan’)	福建漳州	23	‘彩虹’(‘Caihong’)	湖南株洲
11	‘永福粉彩’(‘Yongfu Fencai’)	福建漳州	24	‘虔南桂妃’(‘Qiannan Guifei’)	重庆垫江
12	‘永福彩霞’(‘Yongfu Caixia’)	福建漳州	25	‘金玉桂花’(‘Jinyu Guihua’)	浙江杭州
13	‘闽彩10’(‘Mincai 10’)	福建漳州

Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars)

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 23

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	CHENG Caiyun, XUE Jianhui, MA Jie. Assessment of different Karst plantation types on soil quality based on a minimum data set [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 134-142.
[2]	LI Yang, ZHANG Yunqi, WEN Yue, ZHANG Suilin, CHEN Yonghao, QI Jianxun, ZHANG Junpei, HOU Zhixia. Correlation analysis and model construction of nut phenotype and kernel quality of early-fruiting walnuts (Juglans regia) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(1): 119-127.
[3]	MU Yunjie, GAO Demin, LONG Tengteng, GUO Zaijun, NIU Haifeng. Analysis of the physicochemical properties and flammability of the plant leaves of typical plants in Chongli District of Zhangjiakou City, Hebei Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 239-244.
[4]	WANG Yihan, LIU Jiaojiao, JIN Peiquan, LI Shuqing, WEI Jianfen, GUO Peng, SHANG Fude. Construction of molecular ID for Osmanthus fragrans cultivars based on phenotypic traits and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 12-24.
[5]	BIAN Lili, LIANG Dahong, FAN Meiling, WU Hongyu, ZHOU Binao, YAO Wenjing, WANG Fusheng, DING Yulong, LIN Shuyan. Analysis and comprehensive evaluation of nutrient components in bamboo shoots of different clones of Chimonobambusa utilis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 159-167.
[6]	ZHANG Zanpei, GU Yueying, SHANG Xulan, WANG Ji, FANG Shengzuo. An evaluation on the cold tolerance of twenty-three Cyclocarya paliurus families under natural low temperatures [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 85-92.
[7]	ZHAO Jinman, HAN Xinyue, CHENG Ruiming, ZHANG Zhidong. Health assessment of Larix gmelinii var. principis-rupprechtii and Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica plantations in Saihanba Nature Reserve [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 199-206.
[8]	GONG Rui, XIA Xi, ZHANG Chunying. Alkali stress tolerance analysis of four Rhododendron cultivars [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 113-120.
[9]	ZHU Yanyan, JIA Ruirui, FU Yu, CHANG Lin, YUE Yuanzheng, YANG Xiulian, WANG Lianggui. Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 155-165.
[10]	ZHAO Zhiqiang, XU Xiaolong, YUAN Qing, WU Yan. Landscape pattern evolution and driving factors of Songhua River wetland in Harbin [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 219-226.
[11]	WANG Zhenmeng, DU Zhenyu, WANG Xia, WANG Hongyong, GAO Jia, MA Bingyao. Quercus rubra ‘Chuanqi’ and Q. palustris ‘Hongyundangtou’: two new cultivars of Quercus [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 281-283.
[12]	ZHOU Qun. Breeding of a new cultivar of Bougainvillea ‘Zhongmin 2’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 268-270.
[13]	YANG Suzhi, DUAN Lei, ZHANG Li, FENG Zhaohui, LU Xin, HAN Lihua, BAI Yuru, WU Zhiyan. New Xanthoceras sorbifolium cultivars ‘Mengguan No.1’ and ‘Mengguan No.2’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 262-264.
[14]	CHENG Wenqiang, XU Yang, WU Kaiyun, ZHAO Xianmin, GONG Bangchu. Comparison of three comprehensive evaluation methods to evaluate the quality of persimmon fruit [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 61-72.
[15]	ZHANG Jinguang, SONG Anqi, XIA Tianyu, ZHAO Bing. Evaluating the urban park green space exposure from the perspective of the community life circle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 191-198.