Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia indica based on fluorescent SSR markers

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203038

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 61-69.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203038

Previous Articles Next Articles

Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia indica based on fluorescent SSR markers

WANG Zhiyi¹^,²(), LI Zhenfang², PENG Chan², CHEN Ying¹^,^*(), ZHANG Xinye²^,^*()

1. College of Forestry, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Huibei Academy of Forestry, Wuhan 430075, China

Received:2022-03-20 Revised:2022-05-06 Online:2023-03-30 Published:2023-03-28

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 In this study, 239 germplasms of Lagerstroemia and one germplasm of Heimia were used to analyze the interspecific characteristics and genetic diversity of germplasm resources within L. indica, providing a scientific basis for collection, conservation and rational utilization of germplasm resources.【Method】 Genotypes of samples were identified based on 16 pairs of fluorescent primers; genotypes were read by the GeneMarker software. The characteristic loci of 239 germplasms of L. indica and one germplasm of H. myrtifolia were analyzed. The POPGENE, Cervus, NTSYS and GenAlEx software were used to estimate genetic diversity parameters, the cluster analysis and principal corrdinate analysis of 227 L. indica germplasms. 【Result】 Characteristic loci information of L. indica was the most abundant. Among the characteristic loci information reflected by 15 primers, L. indica all had unique loci that were different from the other six species, and some specific characteristic loci were not found in L. limii, L. excelsa and L. caudata. A total of 143 alleles were detected by 16 pairs of SSR(simple sequence repeat) fluorescent primers; there was an average of 8.938 alleles per locus and the average number of alleles per locus (N_e) was 3.600; Shannon’s Information Index (I) was 1.459, the average observed heterozygosity (H_o) was 0.577, the average expected heterozygosity (H_e) was 0.687, the average value of Nei’s genetic diversity index (H) was 0.685, and the average polymorphism information (PIC) in primers was 0.648. From the genetic diversity of 227 L. indica. based on the genetic distance between samples, a genetic cluster map was drawn and the samples were divided into 10 groups. The L. indica germplasm introduced from United States and wild L. indica germplasm from Hubei were relatively independent and clustered into different groups. The cluster analysis showed that L. indica germplasms were divided into 10 groups, among which the imported L. indica germplasm from the United States and the wild L. indica germplasm from Hubei were clustered into different groups. The principal corrdinate analysis showed that the 10 groups could be roughly divided into three regions, among which the wild L. indica germplasm from Hubei Province and the germplasm introduced from the United States were relatively clustered together.【Conclusion】 SSR markers can effectively reflect genetic diversity among L. indica germplasm resources, and can further optimize the collection and preservation of L. indica germplasm resources, build the core germplasm, create new varieties and provide a scientific basis for the rational development and utilization.

Key words: Lagerstroemia indica, genetic diversity, simple sequence repeat (SSR), clustering analysis

CLC Number:

S722

WANG Zhiyi, LI Zhenfang, PENG Chan, CHEN Ying, ZHANG Xinye. Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia indica based on fluorescent SSR markers[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 61-69.

Figures/Tables 9

Table 1

Fig.1

Table 2

Information of different characteristic bands at 16 loci"

样本 sample	特征谱带/bp characteristic band
样本 sample	P10	P11	P13	P19	P1	P27	P32	P39	P3	P42	P43	P45	P49	P50	P51	P6
黄薇 Heimia myrtifolia			169			114、136、 139		344	125、140				168	212		159、181
大花紫薇 L. speciosa	168、179		165、173	249	205、219	120、142	278、287	344、349	125	308、314	281	196	148、166、 168	212	262	187
屋久岛紫薇 L. fauriei	154、168、	326	169、177	263	219、226	114、139	278	344、349	140、172	314	281、297	194、196	166、168	212	250、264	153、159
福建紫薇 L. limii	166、176^**		173	239^**	211、213	111、120	287	348^**	127、159	290	295	181^**	184、188	220	248	153
川黔紫薇 L. excelsa	158、168		169、177	233^**	201^**	136	281	328^**	133、140	290、296	295	194、198	176、178	210、212		155、157^**
尾叶紫薇 L. caudata	158、162、 164、168、 170、172^**	300^**、312	165、169、 177	229^、 230^、 237^**	203^、 206^、 217^、 218^、 223^**、 226	108^、 114、117^、 130^**	269^**、 275、278、 284	333^、 335、336、 337^、 340^、 345^	115、119^、 121^、 123^、 129^、 131^**、 140、147、 153	292、302、 308	295、297、 299	194、196、 198	174、178、 180^**	212	250、251、 253、259^**	149^、 155、 157^、 161^**
紫薇 L. indica	154、158、 160^、162、 164、166、 168、170、 177^、179	304^、312、 314^、316^、 322^、326、 328^*	161^、165、 169、 173、 177、 185^	243^、245^、246^、248^、249、254^、256^、257^、261^、263、265^、271^、273^*	202^、205、207^、211、 213、 215^*、 219、 226	111、 114、 120、 123^、 133^、 136、 139、 142、 149^、 158^	275、 278、 281、 284、 287	322^、330^、331^、332^、335、 336、339^、344、346^、349、350^、352^	115、125、 127、133、 137^、140、142^、145^、147、 153、157^、159、161^、167^、172、174^*	290、294^、296、 302、304^、308、310^、314、317^、394^*	281、 283^、 295、 297、 299、 303、 304^	184^*、194、196、 198	140^、 148、 166、 168、 170^、 174、 176、 178、 182^*、 184、 188	208^、210、 212、214^、220、 232^*	248^、250、 251、 253、256^、262、263^、264、265^、266^*	151、153、 155、159、 175^、181、 185^、187

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.2

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.3

References 29

[1]	陈俊愉. 《中国花卉品种分类学》序言[J]. 中国园林, 1998, 14(5):21-22.
	CHEN J Y. Preface to taxonomy of Chinese flower varieties[J]. J Chin Landsc Archit, 1998, 14(5):21-22.
[2]	乔东亚, 王鹏, 王淑安, 等. 基于SNP标记的紫薇遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):21-28.
	QIAO D Y, WANG P, WANG S A, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia germplasm resources based on SNP markers[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(4):21-28.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003075.
[3]	方文培, 张泽荣. 中国植物志[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1983.
	FANG W P, ZHANG Z R. Flora reipublicae popularis sinicae[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1983.
[4]	王金凤, 柳新红, 陈卓梅. 紫薇属植物育种研究进展[J]. 园艺学报, 2013, 40(9):1795-1804.
	WANG J F, LIU X H, CHEN Z M. Research progress in breeding of Lagerstroemia plant[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2013, 40(9):1795-1804.DOI:10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2013.09.016.
[5]	罗雪梦, 王晓明, 曾慧杰, 等. 紫叶紫薇花芽分化及雌雄配子体发育的形态学研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(2):129-138.
	LUO X M, WANG X M, ZENG H J, et al. Morphological study on floral bud differentiation and the development of female and male gametophytes in purple-leaf Lagerstroemia indica[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2022, 42(2):129-138.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2022.02.014.
[6]	陈燕, 李玉娟, 王莹, 等. 紫薇属植物研究进展[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2021, 49(4):7-9.
	CHEN Y, LI Y J, WANG Y, et al. Research progress of Lagerstroemia plants[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2021, 49(4):7-9.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2021.04.003.
[7]	梁燕, 韩传明, 孙超, 等. 基于AFLP标记的薄壳山核桃种质资源遗传多样性分析[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2022, 49(1):1-7.
	LIANG Y, HAN C M, SUN C, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of pecan germplasm resources based on AFLP markers[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci & Technol, 2022, 49(1):1-7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2022.01.001.
[8]	袁金玲, 马婧瑕, 钟远标, 等. 基于SSR标记的丛生竹杂种鉴定、遗传分析和指纹图谱构建[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):10-18.
	YUAN J L, MA J X, ZHONG Y B, et al. SSR-based hybrid identification,genetic analyses and fingerprint development of hybridization progenies from sympodial bamboo (Bambusoideae,Poaceae)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):10-18.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202012046.
[9]	杨卓, 杨晓杰, 付学鹏. 扎龙湿地10个不同居群芦苇的ITS序列分析[J]. 种子, 2021, 40(11):122-125.
	YANG Z, YANG X J, FU X P. ITS sequence analysis of 10 different populations of Phragmites australis in Zhalong wetland[J]. Seed, 2021, 40(11):122-125.DOI:10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2021.11.122.
[10]	DUARTE A B, GOMES W S, NIETSCHE S, et al. Genetic diversity between and within full sib families of Jatropha using ISSR markers[J]. Ind Crops Prod, 2018, 124:899-905.DOI:10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.08.066.
[11]	臧明月, 李璇, 方炎明. 基于SSR标记的白栎天然居群遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(1):63-69.
	ZANG M Y, LI X, FANG Y M. Genetic diversity analysis among natural populations of Quercus fabri based on SSR markers[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(1):63-69.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202004049.
[12]	王亮, 韦继光, 葛春峰, 等. 基于SSR标记分析蓝莓品种‘蓝美1号’自由授粉子代遗传多样性及群体遗传结构[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2022, 31(3):35-43.
	WANG L, WEI J G, GE C F, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity and population genetic structure of open-pollinated progenies of Vaccinium corymbosum ‘Lanmei 1’ based on SSR marker[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2022, 31(3):35-43.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2022.03.05.
[13]	王玲玲, 陈东亮, 黄丛林, 等. SSR分子标记技术在植物研究中的应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(36):123-126,130.
	WANG L L, CHEN D L, HUANG C L, et al. Application of SSR molecular marker technique in plant research[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2017, 45(36):123-126,130.DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2017.36.039.
[14]	WANG L H, ZHANG Y X, ZHU X D, et al. Development of an SSR-based genetic map in sesame and identification of quantitative trait loci associated with charcoal rot resistance[J]. Sci Rep, 2017, 7:8349.DOI:10.1038/s41598-017-08858-2.
[15]	CHIOU C Y, SHIH H C, TSAI C C, et al. The genetic relationships of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana Lam.) cultivars using SSR markers[J]. Heliyon, 2020, 6(10):e05078.DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05078.
[16]	罗芊芊, 赵明水, 肖德卿, 等. 基于SSR标记羊角槭子一代和子二代的遗传多样性分析[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2022, 31(5):66-73.
	LUO Q Q, ZHAO M S, XIAO D Q, et al. Analysis on genetic diversity of first filial generation and second filial generation of Acer yangjuechi based on SSR markers[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2022, 31(5):66-73.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2022.05.08.
[17]	石纹豪, 黄振霖, 杨水英, 等. 重庆马铃薯致病疫霉(Phytophthora infestans)的SSR基因型分析[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(12):36-41.
	SHI W H, HUANG Z L, YANG S Y, et al. SSR genotypic analysis of Phytophthora infestans on potato plants in Chongqing[J]. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2014, 36(12):36-41.DOI:10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2014.12.007.
[18]	POOLER M R. Molecular genetic diversity among 12 clones of Lagerstroemia fauriei revealed by AFLP and RAPD markers[J]. HortScience, 2003, 38(2):256-259.DOI:10.21273/hortsci.38.2.256.
[19]	RINEHART T A, POUNDERS C T. Estimating diversity among lagerstroemia species and hybrids using SSR markers[J]. Acta Hortic, 2010(885):285-290.DOI:10.17660/actahortic.2010.885.39.
[20]	WANG X W, WADL P A, POUNDERS C, et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity and pedigree within crapemyrtle cultivars using simple sequence repeat markers[J]. J Amer Soc Hort Sci, 2011, 136(2):116-128.DOI:10.21273/jashs.136.2.116.
[21]	CAI M, PAN H T, WANG X F, et al. Development of novel microsatellites in Lagerstroemia indica and DNA fingerprinting in Chinese Lagerstroemia cultivars[J]. Sci Hortic, 2011, 131:88-94.DOI:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.09.031.
[22]	HE D, LIU Y, CAI M, et al. Genetic diversity of Lagerstroemia (Lythraceae) species assessed by simple sequence repeat markers[J]. Genet Mol Res, 2012, 11(3):3522-3533.DOI:10.4238/2012.September.26.9.
[23]	彭婵, 李振芳, 马林江, 等. 紫薇属种间杂种SSR分子鉴定与遗传分析[J]. 北方园艺, 2020(13):83-90.
	PENG C, LI Z F, MA L J, et al. Identification and genetic analysis in Lagerstroemia interspecific hybrids using SSR markers[J]. North Hortic, 2020(13):83-90.DOI:10.11937/bfyy.20193171.
[24]	张海燕, 樊军锋, 郑涛. 18份杨树资源的遗传多样性分析[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 48(12):47-54,63.
	ZHANG H Y, FAN J F, ZHENG T. Genetic diversity analysis of 18 poplar resources[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 48(12):47-54,63.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2020.12.006.
[25]	苏晓娜, 王惠梅, 黄雪雯, 等. 利用SSR标记分析东北野生菰遗传多样性和遗传结构[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(3):579-589.
	SU X N, WANG H M, HUANG X W, et al. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of Zizania latifolia Griseb(Turcz) from northeast China based on SSR analysis[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(3):579-589.DOI:10.13836/j.jjau.2018075.
[26]	李博, 潘文婷, 李康琴, 等. 三种常用亲本分析软件效率的比较:以鹅掌楸属树种控制授粉子代亲本分析为例[J]. 分子植物育种, 2013, 11(2):241-248.
	LI B, PAN W T, LI K Q, et al. A comparison among three softwares of parentage analysis (CERVUS,COLONY and PAPA):a case study on parentage analysis of control pollination progenies in Liriodendron[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2013, 11(2):241-248.DOI:10.3969/mpb.011.000241.
[27]	李欣. 居群遗传分析软件:GENALEX 6简介[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2008, 27(4):59-62.
	LI X. Introduction to a population genetic software: GENALEX 6[J]. Chin Wild Plant Resour, 2008, 27(4):59-62.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2008.04.017.
[28]	赵盼, 栗丹阳, 马锦林, 等. 油料树种千年桐的SSR标记开发、遗传多样性与群体结构分析[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(11):50-61.
	ZHAO P, LI D Y, MA J L, et al. SSR marker development,genetic diversity and population structure analysis in oil tree species Vernicia montana[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2021, 43(11):50-61.DOI:10.12171/j.1000-1522.20210054.
[29]	乔中全, 王晓明, 李永欣, 等. 38个紫薇品种亲缘关系的ISSR分析[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(4):565-571.
	QIAO Z Q, WANG X M, LI Y X, et al. Phylogenetic relationships among 38 cultivars of Lagerstroemia indica based on ISSR molecular markers[J]. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2019, 31(4):565-571.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2019.04.08.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

引物名称 primer	上游引物序列 forward primer	下游引物序列 reverse primer	产物大小/bp length	重复基元 repeat motif	退火温度/℃ annealing temperature
P1	AGAGAAAGAGAGGAGCGGGAGT	ACCTTCTTCCCCAATTCAATCC	213	(GT)6GC(GT)6	55.0
P3	GGTGGAGATGCTAACAAGCAAG	GGATTTTTGCTGTAGGGTGATT	161	(TG)16	55.0
P6	ACATGGCTCCCATCACACAG	CAGGGGATTCTTGTTTTGCTTT	160	(AC)6	55.0
P10	ACGGTAGATAAGGTGAGC	GGTTTCGTATCGTCGTAG	166	(CT)9T(CTGT)GT(CTGT)4	52.0
P11	TACTGGGTATCCGTTTCT	ACAGGTGCATTTACTTCC	317	(CT)6CC(CT)12	50.0
P13	GGGAATTTGGGATATGGA	TAAAGAAACGACCGAGCC	179	(AAAG)5	52.0
P19	TAGTCCATTCATGTCAAG	GGATTCACCAAACTACTT	246	(AG)14	52.0
P27	GTCTCACTCTCTCAACTCAAGGGC	TGAGAAAGAATTTTTCCTGAACCG	137	(TCT)6	55.0
P32	CCCAAGTTCAACAAATCTCC	ATCGTTTCCTGGCGTCT	279	(GAA)6GAG(GAA)3	56.0
P39	GATGGGTTTGGCTCTGC	GTCCTCCTCACTTGTTTCC	348	(AG)17	54.0
P42	GGACTGTGAAGGGCTGTG	ACGGAAGTAGGGACCAAA	297	(GGA)5	53.5
P43	AAGTCAAGTAGTTAGCAAGT	AACATAAACAGCCAGAGT	282	(TC)6	46.2
P45	CTTCGGTTCTTTCTTAGTG	GTGATTTGCTTGCCTTGA	200	(AG)6	48.5
P49	ATGCCCGACTTCCACCAA	CAACGGATGTCCTTCACC	169	(CT)7	50.8
P50	AAGGAGTTGGTGAGGGAA	AGAAGGAAGCAAGGCAGA	208	(TC)9	50.1
P51	CGGGACTCGCTCAGAGGACA	CTTCGCCGCTGCGTTTCA	248	(TCT)5	57.3

位点 locus	N_a	N_e	I	H_o	H_e	H	多态信息指数PIC
P10	10	4.698	1.760	0.753	0.789	0.787	0.758
P11	7	3.387	1.371	0.375	0.706	0.705	0.656
P13	6	3.241	1.357	0.634	0.693	0.692	0.643
P19	13	4.449	1.746	0.630	0.777	0.775	0.744
P1	8	4.002	1.536	0.643	0.752	0.750	0.709
P27	10	4.002	1.641	0.674	0.752	0.750	0.719
P32	5	1.578	0.724	0.374	0.367	0.366	0.339
P39	12	4.629	1.744	0.727	0.786	0.784	0.753
P3	16	3.719	1.884	0.789	0.733	0.731	0.715
P42	10	4.978	1.760	0.687	0.801	0.799	0.772
P43	7	2.361	1.121	0.520	0.578	0.576	0.537
P45	4	2.470	1.002	0.326	0.596	0.595	0.524
P49	11	2.041	1.155	0.327	0.511	0.510	0.481
P50	6	2.817	1.214	0.496	0.647	0.645	0.586
P51	10	2.933	1.376	0.537	0.661	0.659	0.621
P6	8	6.297	1.959	0.744	0.843	0.841	0.823
均值 mean	8.938	3.600	1.459	0.577	0.687	0.685	0.648

来源 source	自由度 df	平方和 SS	均方 MS	估计方差 estimated variance	总变异百分比/% percentage of total variation
组群间 between groups	9	468.986	52.110	1.237	21
个体间 between individuals	217	976.219	4.499	0.000	0
个体内 within the individual	227	1 047.500	4.615	4.615	79
总体 total	453	2 492.705		5.851	100

组群 group	A	B	C	D	E	F	G	H	I	J
A	—	0.706	0.802	0.619	0.779	0.509	0.611	0.599	0.753	0.300
B	0.348	—	0.497	0.472	0.491	0.383	0.325	0.393	0.640	0.261
C	0.221	0.699	—	0.722	0.794	0.633	0.685	0.713	0.623	0.402
D	0.480	0.752	0.326	—	0.668	0.451	0.459	0.456	0.457	0.488
E	0.249	0.712	0.231	0.403	—	0.460	0.510	0.653	0.577	0.346
F	0.675	0.961	0.457	0.795	0.776	—	0.453	0.406	0.476	0.338
G	0.493	1.124	0.378	0.778	0.673	0.793	—	0.435	0.484	0.385
H	0.512	0.935	0.338	0.785	0.426	0.901	0.833	—	0.457	0.281
I	0.284	0.447	0.474	0.783	0.550	0.743	0.726	0.782	—	0.294
J	1.205	1.343	0.911	0.717	1.062	1.085	0.954	1.270	1.223	—

Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia indica based on fluorescent SSR markers

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 29

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

组群 group	种质数量 germplasm quantity	全同胞种质 (美国) full sib germplasm (USA)	半同胞种质 (美国) half sib germplasm (USA)	品种 (美国) variety (USA)	野生紫薇 (中国湖北) wild crape myrtle (Hubei, China)	杂交种质 (中国国内) hybrid germplasm (China)	品种 (中国国内) variety (China)
A	90	17	38	16	4	2	13
B	38	1	28	7	1	1
C	38		1	3	32		2
D	32				32
E	7				1		6
F	2				2
G	5		1		2		2
H	2				1		1
I	10	1		4		3	2
J	3				3

[1]	ZHANG Jinguang, SONG Anqi, XIA Tianyu, ZHAO Bing. Evaluating the urban park green space exposure from the perspective of the community life circle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 191-198.
[2]	WANG Huanli, YAN Lingjun, HUANG Xi, WANG Zhongwei, TANG Shijie. Genetic diversity and genetic structure of Tilia miqueliana population [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(1): 145-153.
[3]	FENG Yining, LI Yingang, QI Ming, ZHOU Pengyan, ZHOU Qi, DONG Le, XU Li’an. Genetic diversity analyses of Phoebe bournei representative populations in Fujian Province based on SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 102-108.
[4]	LYU Feng, XIE Xiaoman, HAN Biao, LU Yizeng, WANG Lei, DONG Xin, WANG Yan, LU Lu, LIU Li, ZONG Shaoning, LI Wenqing. Genetic diversity analyses of Quercus acutissima based on SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 109-116.
[5]	GE Dapeng, REN Yuan, ZHAO Jun, WANG Yuting, LIU Xueqing, YUAN Zhaohe. Genetic diversity among wild populations of pomegranate in Tibet by SSR analyses [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 127-133.
[6]	HE Xudong, ZHENG Jiwei, JIAO Zhongyi, DOU Quanqin, HUANG Libin. Genetic diversity and structure analyses of Quercus shumardii populations based on SLAF-seq technology [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 81-87.
[7]	YUAN Jinling, MA Jingxia, ZHONG Yuanbiao, YUE Jinjun. SSR-based hybrid identification, genetic analyses and fingerprint development of hybridization progenies from sympodial bamboo (Bambusoideae, Poaceae) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 10-18.
[8]	GAO Jingbin, XU Liuyi, YE Jianren. Growth and genetic diversity analysis of clones screened by phenotypical resistant to pine wilt disease in Pinus massoniana [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 109-118.
[9]	CHEN Xingbin, XU Haining, XIAO Fuming, SUN Shiwu, LOU Yongfeng, ZOU Yuanxi, XU Xiaoqiang. Genetic diversity and paternity analyses in a 1.5th generation seed orchard of Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 87-92.
[10]	FENG Yuanyuan, LI Qingying, HUANG Junhua, HU Shaoqing. Numerical classification of 25 color-leafed Osmanthus fragrans clones (cultivars) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(1): 107-115.
[11]	CHEN Yuhua, YAO Dan, WU Hainan, TAO Shengtong, WU Jiyan, YANG Wenguo, TONG Chunfa. Analyses of dynamic growth traits of the stecklings from the F₁hybrid progeny of Populus deltoides × P. simonii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(1): 45-52.
[12]	ZANG Mingyue, LI Xuan, FANG Yanming. Genetic diversity analysis among natural populations of Quercus fabri based on SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(1): 63-69.
[13]	WANG Yingying, MA Yuying, ZHANG Yong, HUANG Zheng. Biodiversity and the risk of infectious diseases [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(6): 9-11.
[14]	QIAO Dongya, WANG Peng, WANG Shu’an, LI Linfang, GAO Lulu, YANG Rutong, WANG Qing, LI Ya. Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia germplasm resourcesbased on SNP markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 18-25.
[15]	SUN Yanxiao, WANG Xianrong, SUN Lei, JIA Ming. Genetic diversity analysis and fingerprint construction of fig(Ficus carica Linn.)cultivars by SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(06): 197-202.

组群 group	种质数量 germplasm quantity	全同胞种质 (美国) full sib germplasm (USA)	半同胞种质 (美国) half sib germplasm (USA)	品种 (美国) variety (USA)	野生紫薇 (中国湖北) wild crape myrtle (Hubei, China)	杂交种质 (中国国内) hybrid germplasm (China)	品种 (中国国内) variety (China)
A	90	17	38	16	4	2	13
B	38	1	28	7	1	1
C	38		1	3	32		2
D	32				32
E	7				1		6
F	2				2
G	5		1		2		2
H	2				1		1
I	10	1		4		3	2
J	3				3

组群 group	种质数量 germplasm quantity	全同胞种质 (美国) full sib germplasm (USA)	半同胞种质 (美国) half sib germplasm (USA)	品种 (美国) variety (USA)	野生紫薇 (中国湖北) wild crape myrtle (Hubei, China)	杂交种质 (中国国内) hybrid germplasm (China)	品种 (中国国内) variety (China)
A	90	17	38	16	4	2	13
B	38	1	28	7	1	1
C	38		1	3	32		2
D	32				32
E	7				1		6
F	2				2
G	5		1		2		2
H	2				1		1
I	10	1		4		3	2
J	3				3