Response of physiological indexes of three Olea europaea cultivars to PEG stress

DU Jincheng, LI Xinxin, WANG Zeliang, LIU Si, ZHONG Yi, WANG Lihua

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2) : 137-143.

PDF(5216 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(5216 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2) : 137-143. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208063

Response of physiological indexes of three Olea europaea cultivars to PEG stress

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 The physiological and biochemical response characteristics of leaves under continuous drought stress in three main cultivars of Olea europaea (‘Arbeqina’‘Koroneiki’ and ‘Arbosana’) in the Sichuan Province were compared to provide a basis for the cultivation and introduction of excellent varieties of olive according to local conditions. 【Method】 Taking ‘Arbeqina’‘Koroneiki'and ‘Arbosana’ as the research objects, polyethylene glycol 6000 (PEG-6000) solutions with mass ratio of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 30% were used to simulate continuous drought stress for 35 days. The corresponding physiological indicators of the leaves were analyzed, measured, and evaluated.【Result】 Over time with the deepening of osmotic stress, the functional traits of leaves among the three oleifera cultivars displayed certain interspecific differences. At the same time, the peroxidase (POD) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities in the leaves of the three cultivars of olive oil displayed an increasing trend. Compared with the cultivars, over time with the deepening of osmotic stress, the chlorophyll content of ‘Koroneiki’ decreased slightly, the proline content increased significantly, and the POD and SOD activities in leaves increased significantly. 【Conclusion】 The leaf function traits of the three olive varieties under different levels of continuous drought stress varied greatly, displaying different adaptive characteristics. Among the three varieties, the leaf function traits followed the order of ‘Koroneiki’>‘Arbosana’>‘Arbeqina’. Among the tested olive varieties, ‘Koroneiki’ had a strong osmotic adjustment ability and antioxidant capacity, and a strong adaptability to drought stress, being superior to ‘Arbosana’ and ‘Arbeqina’.

Key words

Olea europaea / drought stress / PEG stress / physiological properties of leaves / Sichuan Province

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
DU Jincheng , LI Xinxin , WANG Zeliang , et al . Response of physiological indexes of three Olea europaea cultivars to PEG stress[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(2): 137-143 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208063

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
[1]
陈剑英. 高产优质木本油料树种:油橄榄[J]. 云南林业, 2006, 27(3):30.
CHEN J Y. Olive,a woody oil tree with high yield and high quality[J]. Yunnan For, 2006, 27(3):30.
Cited in this article [1]
[2]
李聚桢. 我国油橄榄产业发展的探讨[J]. 粮油食品科技, 2012, 20(2):23-26.
LI J Z. Discussion on the development of olive industry in China[J]. Sci Technol Cereals Oils Foods, 2012, 20(2):23-26.DOI: 10.16210/j.cnki.1007-7561.2012.02.002.
Cited in this article [1]
[3]
姜成英, 赵梦炯, 吴文俊, 等. 油橄榄叶片营养诊断样品适宜采集期研究[J]. 甘肃林业科技, 2017, 42(3):10-15.
JIANG C Y, ZHAO M J, WU W J, et al. Appropriate sampling periods for leaf nutrient diagnosis in Olea europaea[J]. J Gansu For Sci Technol, 2017, 42(3):10-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-0960.2017.03.002.
Cited in this article [1]
[4]
GUINDA Á, CASTELLANO J M, SANTOS-LOZANO J M, et al. Determination of major bioactive compounds from olive leaf[J]. LWT Food Sci Technol, 2015, 64(1):431-438.DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2015.05.001.
Cited in this article [1]
[5]
兰艳, 徐应杰, 谭枫, 等. 干旱胁迫下油橄榄品种光合特性研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2016, 36(11):2247-2255.
LAN Y, XU Y J, TAN F, et al. Photosynthetic characters of different introduced olive varieties under drought stress[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2016, 36(11):2247-2255.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2016.11.2247.
Cited in this article [3]
[6]
王怡. 水分胁迫对3个油橄榄品种光合及生理特性的影响[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2012.
WANG Y. Study on effccts of water stress on photosynthesis and physiologieal charaeteristics of three olive varieties[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2012.
Cited in this article [3]
[7]
刘晓英, 罗远培. 干旱胁迫对作物生长后效影响的研究现状[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2002, 20(4):6-10.
LIU X Y, LUO Y P. Present situation of study on after-effect of water stress on crop growth[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2002, 20(4):6-10.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7601.2002.04.002.
Cited in this article [1]
[8]
刘兴芬, 朱建明. 不同水分胁迫对油橄榄生长指标的影响[J]. 中国林副特产, 2010(3):8-11.
LIU X F, ZHU J M. The influence of different water stress on the growth index of Olea europaea[J]. For Prod Speciality China, 2010(3):8-11.DOI: 10.13268/j.cnki.fbsic.2010.03.006.
Cited in this article [1]
[9]
徐应杰. 凉山引进油橄榄品种幼苗抗旱性比较[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2015.
XU Y J. Comparison of drought resistance on introduced olive cultivars seedlings in Liangshan[D]. Ya'an: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2015.
Cited in this article [1]
[10]
李予霞, 崔百明, 董新平, 等. PEG处理下葡萄试管苗脯氨酸及内源ABA含量变化的研究[J]. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 22(1):43-45.
LI Y X, CUI B M, DONG X P, et al. A study on proline and ABA content changs under water stress induced by PEG[J]. J Shihezi Univ (Nat Sci), 2004, 22(1):43-45.DOI: 10.13880/j.cnki.65-1174/n.2004.01.011.
Cited in this article [1]
[11]
万里强, 石永红, 李向林, 等. PEG胁迫下3个多年生黑麦草品种抗性生理研究[J]. 草地学报, 2009, 17(4):440-444.
WAN L Q, SHI Y H, LI X L, et al. Physiological resistance of three Lolium perenne L.varieties under PEG stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2009, 17(4):440-444.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2009.04.006.
Cited in this article [2]
[12]
王玉刚, 阿不来提, 齐曼. 两狗牙根品种对干旱胁迫反应的差异[J]. 草业学报, 2006, 15(4):58-64.
WANG Y G, ABULAITI, QI M. Differing response to drought stress of two Cynodon dactylon varieties[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2006, 15(4):58-64.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2006.04.009.
Cited in this article [1]
[13]
HUANG J, WU P T, ZHAO X N. Effects of rainfall intensity,underlying surface and slope gradient on soil infiltration under simulated rainfall experiments[J]. CATENA, 2013, 104:93-102.DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.10.013.
Cited in this article [1]
[14]
赵曼利. 不同品种油橄榄对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗旱性综合评价[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2016.
ZHAO M L. The physiological response to drought stress of different varieties of Olea europaea L.and drought resistance comprehensive evaluation[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2016.
Cited in this article [1]
[15]
赵阳, 赵曼利, 焦润安, 等. 陇南油橄榄主栽品种对干旱胁迫的生理响应及抗性综合评价[J]. 热带作物学报, 2017, 38(9):1620-1627.
ZHAO Y, ZHAO M L, JIAO R A, et al. The physiological response and comprehensive evaluation of drought hardiness under drought stress of Longnan olive main varieties[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2017, 38(9):1620-1627.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2017.09.007.
Cited in this article [2]
[16]
李庆华. 油橄榄品种豆果在云南丽江栽培技术[J]. 中国南方果树, 2015, 44(6):131-133.
LI Q H. Cultivation techniques of olive variety Douguo in Lijiang,Yunnan Province[J]. South China Fruits, 2015, 44(6):131-133.DOI: 10.13938/j.issn.1007-1431.20150321.
Cited in this article [1]
[17]
李勇杰, 宁德鲁, 张艳丽, 等. 油橄榄品种‘柯基’的引种选育[J]. 中国果树, 2018(4):83-84.
LI Y J, NING D L, ZHANG Y L, et al. Introduction breeding of an olive cultivar ‘Koroneiki’[J]. China Fruits, 2018(4):83-84.
Cited in this article [1]
[18]
杜晋城, 李德荣, 黄飞逸, 等. 油橄榄新品种‘澳利欧2号’[J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(S2):2863-2864.
DU J C, LI D R, HUANG F Y, et al. A new olive cultivar ‘Olio 2’[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2018, 45(S2):2863-2864.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0119.
Cited in this article [1]
[19]
李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2002.
LI H S. Modern plant physiology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2002.
Cited in this article [1]
[20]
王占军, 蒋齐, 刘华, 等. 基于干旱胁迫的沙地柠条生理生态响应[J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(23):161-165.
WANG Z J, JIANG Q, LIU H, et al. Rresponse of eco-physiology of Caragana korshinskii Kom to water stress in desert land[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2009, 25(23):161-165.
Cited in this article [1]
[21]
潘昕, 邱权, 李吉跃, 等. 干旱胁迫对两种速生树种叶绿素含量的影响[J]. 桉树科技, 2013, 30(3):17-22.
PAN X, QIU Q, LI J Y, et al. Effects of drought stress on chlorophyll content of two fast-growing tree species[J]. Eucalypt Sci Technol, 2013, 30(3):17-22.DOI: 10.13987/j.cnki.askj.2013.03.005.
Cited in this article [1]
[22]
BEN A C, BEN R B, SENSOY S, et al. Changes in gas exchange,proline accumulation and antioxidative enzyme activities in three olive cultivars under contrasting water availability regimes[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2009, 67(2):345-352.DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.07.006.
Cited in this article [1]
[23]
李自龙, 徐雪风, 焦健, 等. 不同品种油橄榄离体叶片对渗透胁迫的生理响应及其抗旱机制[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(9):1808-1814.
LI Z L, XU X F, JIAO J, et al. Physiological responses and mechanism of drought resistance in leaves of different olive varieties under osmotic stress[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2014, 34(9):1808-1814.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-4025.2014.09.1808.
Cited in this article [2]
[24]
ROUSSOS P A, DENAXA N K, DAMVAKARIS T, et al. Effect of alleviating products with different mode of action on physiology and yield of olive under drought[J]. Sci Hortic, 2010, 125(4):700-711.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.003.
Cited in this article [1]
[25]
李勇杰, 张艳丽, 宁德鲁, 等. 不同种源油橄榄品种抗旱性研究[J]. 广东农业科学, 2013, 40(22):67-69.
LI Y J, ZHANG Y L, NING D L, et al. Evaluation of drought resistance of olive varieties from different provenance[J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2013, 40(22):67-69.DOI: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2013.22.036.
Cited in this article [1]
[26]
郑爱泉, 侯煜, 赵钢平, 等. 水分胁迫对作物生长及生理代谢的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学, 2008, 54(2):120-122.
ZHENG A Q, HOU Y, ZHAO G P, et al. Effects of water stress on crop growth and physiological metabolism[J]. Shaanxi J Agric Sci, 2008, 54(2):120-122.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2008.02.045.
Cited in this article [1]
[27]
郭春芳, 孙云. 干旱胁迫下植物的渗透调节及脯氨酸代谢研究进展[J]. 福建教育学院学报, 2015, 16(1):114-118,128.
GUO C F, SUN Y. Progress in the study of plants’ osmotic adjustment and proline metabolism under drought stress[J]. J Fujian Inst Educ, 2015, 16(1):114-118,128.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9884.2015.01.032.
Cited in this article [1]
[28]
焦蓉, 刘好宝, 刘贯山, 等. 论脯氨酸累积与植物抗渗透胁迫[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(7):216-221.
JIAO R, LIU H B, LIU G S, et al. Discussion of accumulation of proline and its relationship with osmotic stress tolerance of plants[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(7):216-221.
Cited in this article [1]
[29]
王海珍, 徐雅丽, 张翠丽, 等. 干旱胁迫对胡杨和灰胡杨幼苗渗透调节物质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2015, 29(12):125-130.
WANG H Z, XU Y L, ZHANG C L, et al. Effects of drought stress on osmotic adjustment substances and antioxidant enzymes activity of Populus euphratica and Populus pruinosa seedlings[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2015, 29(12):125-130.DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2015.412.
Cited in this article [1]
[30]
时连辉, 牟志美, 姚健. 不同桑树品种在土壤水分胁迫下膜伤害和保护酶活性变化[J]. 蚕业科学, 2005, 31(1):13-17.
SHI L H, MU Z M, YAO J. Cell membrance damage and change of protective enzymes’ activity in different mulberry varieties under soil water stress[J]. Acta Sericologica Sin, 2005, 31(1):13-17.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.0257-4799.2005.01.004.
Cited in this article [1]
[31]
王俊刚, 陈国仓, 张承烈. 水分胁迫对2种生态型芦苇(Phragmites communis)的可溶性蛋白含量、SOD、POD、CAT活性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22(3):561-565.
WANG J G, CHEN G C, ZHANG C L. The effects of water stress on soluble protein content,the activity of SOD,POD and CAT of two ecotypes of reeds (Phragmites communis)[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2002, 22(3):561-565.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-4025.2002.03.016.
Cited in this article [1]
[32]
杜晋城, 李欣欣, 叶敏, 等. 不同土壤含水量对油橄榄幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2021, 39(4):18-24.
DU J C, LI X X, YE M, et al. Effects of different soil water content on physiological characteristics of young olive trees[J]. Non Wood For Res, 2021, 39(4):18-24.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2021.04.003.
Cited in this article [1]
PDF(5216 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉