
A study on the biocontrol of pine wilt disease by Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13
YIN Yannan, TAN Jiajin, LI Mengwei, XU Jialin, HAO Dejun
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 152-158.
A study on the biocontrol of pine wilt disease by Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13
【Objective】The pine wilt disease caused by parasitic Bursaphelenchus xylophilus occurs in susceptible tree species such as Pinus densiflora, P. massoniana and P. thunbergii. There is no optimal control treatment available owing to the fast onset and spread of the disease, high costs of physical and chemical control methods, and environmental pollution issues. To determine safe and effective biological control methods, this study explored the prevention and control of the disease by Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13 using potted P. massoniana seedlings in a greenhouse. 【Method】Different number of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus AMA3 (2 000, 4 000 and 6 000) were inoculated on two-year-old P. massoniana seedlings to determine the critical value of symptoms of the pine wilt disease. Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13 is a nematocidal endophyte that was isolated from P. elliottii in Nanjing. To understand the effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 on the pine wilt disease, the roots of two-year-old P. massoniana were inoculated with a 20 mL suspension of 4×10 8 cfu/mL of B. cereus NJSZ-13 as the treatment and with sterile water and an agar medium as the control. Twenty milliliters of bacterial powder suspension of 4×10 8,4×107 and 2×107 cfu/mL of B. cereus NJSZ-13 were applied by the root filling method. Two-year-old P. massoniana seedlings were treated under two conditions, namely root filling with powder suspension and application of bacterial powder. Bacillus cereus NJSZ-13 and B. xylophilus AMA3 were inoculated with the P. massoniana roots in different orders, namely together, before 7 d, and after 7 d, and the control group was set up. The bacterial concentration, inoculation method, and time were included in the evaluation of the biocontrol effect. 【Result】The critical point of B. xylophilus inoculation in P. massoniana was 4 000. The fermented culture and sterilized culture of B. cereus NJSZ-13 had no effect on the pine wilt disease development. The biocontrol effect of the B. cereus NJSZ-13 suspension on the pine wilt disease was 33%. At the same concentration, the preventive effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 did not differ between the powder and bacterial suspensions. The biocontrol effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 did not improve when the bacterial suspension concentration reached a certain level. The biocontrol effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 was significantly higher than that of the control. The control effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 powder application was the same as that of the root filling method. 【Conclusion】The critical point of B. xylophilus inoculation in two-year-old P. massoniana can effectively avoid the disadvantage of an excessive concentration of B. xylophilus inoculation, which can reduce the control effect. The B. cereus NJSZ-13 bacterial suspension and powder had control effects on the pine wilt disease. It is better to apply B. cereus NJSZ-13 when P. massoniana is still healthy and uninfected. The preventive effect of B. cereus NJSZ-13 can be achieved by smearing the bacteria on pine branches.
Bursaphelenchus xylophilus / Bacillus cereus / bacteria suspension / Pinus massoniana / pine wilt disease / spray drying / control effect
[1] |
方丽英. 松材线虫病[J]. 广西林业, 2002(1):38-38.
|
[2] |
孙永春. 南京中山陵发现松材线虫[J]. 江苏林业科技, 1982,9(4):47-27.
|
[3] |
理永霞, 张星耀. 松材线虫病致病机理研究进展[J]. 环境昆虫学报, 2018,40(2):231-241.
|
[4] |
胡龙娇, 吴小芹. 松树抗松材线虫病机制研究进展[J]. 生命科学, 2018,30(6):659-666.
|
[5] |
蒋敏, 黄斌, 余旭, 等. 松材线虫病的分布、危害及其防治对策[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2018,38(6):83-91.
|
[6] |
徐红梅, 赵青, 殷涛. 以松材线虫为靶标生物防治技术研究[J]. 湖北林业科技, 2018,47(1):51-55.
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
牛秋红, 董冰雪, 黄思良, 等. 松材线虫生防细菌的筛选、鉴定及其毒性因子的初步研究[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2010,30(8):76-81.
|
[9] |
余子全, 周燚, 孙明, 等. 苏云金芽孢杆菌防治植物寄生线虫的研究进展[J]. 植物保护学报, 2004,31(4):418-424.
|
[10] |
史应武, 娄恺, 李春. 植物内生菌在生物防治中的应用[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2009,29(6):61-64.
|
[11] |
李亮亮, 谈家金, 陈凤毛. 两株松材线虫拮抗细菌的筛选和鉴定[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(4):37-41.
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
丁晓磊. 基于高通量测序的松材线虫致病机理与毒力差异研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2016.
|
[14] |
毛小芳, 李辉信, 陈小云, 等. 土壤线虫三种分离方法效率比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004,23(3):149-151.
|
[15] |
陈凤毛, 史延梅, 王姝颖, 等. 不同株系拟松材线虫对黄山松和黑松苗木的致病性[J]. 林业科学, 2010,46(12):86-90.
|
[16] |
翁启勇, 陈庆河, 赵健, 等. 利福平标记菌株BS1在番茄、茄子根部及土壤中的定殖动态[J]. 福建农业学报, 2003,18(2):87-88.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
谈家金, 杨荣铮, 吴慧平. 不同地理种群的松材线虫对马尾松的致病力差异[J]. 植物检疫, 2000,14(6):324-325.
|
[19] |
周爱东, 徐小明, 王岚, 等. 松材线虫病发生34 a的综合防控——以江苏省镇江市为例[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2019,46(4):54-57.
|
[20] |
朱丽梅, 吴小芹, 徐旭凌. 松材线虫拮抗细菌的筛选和鉴定[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,32(3):91-94.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
罗兰, 谢丙炎, 杨宇红, 等. 具杀线虫活性的苏云金杆菌筛选研究[J]. 植物病理学报, 2007,37(3):314-316.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
王方, 王林松, 马怡, 等. 杀松材线虫细菌的分离、鉴定及其培养条件研究[J]. 微生物学杂志, 2019,39(3):22-28.
|
[25] |
曾腓力. 美国松材线虫携带细菌的生防潜能研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2010.
|
[26] |
曾腓力, 贲爱玲, 郑敬荣, 等. 美国松材线虫体表携带优势细菌的鉴定及致病性[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012,29(5):696-702.
|
[27] |
姚伍, 郑催云, 陈红梅, 等. 福建三明市应用Smal-007菌剂防治松材线虫病的效果[J]. 林业科学, 2018,54(1):168-173.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |