Comparative study on the effects of nutrient solution treatment in hydroponic cultivation of Carpinus betulus

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911011

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2): 17-24.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.201911011

Previous Articles Next Articles

Comparative study on the effects of nutrient solution treatment in hydroponic cultivation of Carpinus betulus

HUO Yan¹(), ZHANG Huihui¹, ZHU Zunling¹^,²^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2019-11-11 Accepted:2020-12-21 Online:2021-03-30 Published:2021-04-09
Contact: ZHU Zunling E-mail:yanhuo@njfu.edu.cn;zhuzunling@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To provide a theoretical basis for hydroponic breeding, production, and further physiological and biochemical studies of Carpinus betulus, the effects of type, concentration and pH of ordinary nutrient solution treatment and special nutrient solution for hydroponic seedling growth of C. betulus were examined, and the best nutrient solution for the growth of C. betulus seedlings was screened.【Method】We used C. betulus hydroponic seedlings as the test material. We analyzed the survival rate, number of leaves, average number of roots, average number of second roots and fresh root weight as morphological indexes; and soluble sugar content, starch content, soluble protein content, POD activity and root activity as physical indexes. Hydroponic seedling growth was examined by the type, concentration and pH value of nutrient solution treatment using three factors and three level orthogonal tests. To obtain the best ordinary nutrient solution, we tested hydroponic seedling growth treated with the best ordinary nutrient solutions and special nutrient solutions made by the authors using a single factor test.【Result】The orthogonal test of nutrient solution showed that the most suitable ordinary nutrient solution was the 1/4 Hewitt formula (A3B3). In this condition of pH 6.5, the survival rate was 85.71%, the number of leaves was 1.60, the average number of roots was 4.40, the average number of second roots was 25.90, and the fresh root weight was 0.40 g. The soluble sugar content, starch content, soluble proteins content, and the rooting activity were significantly higher than those in the other treatments, although the POD activity was significantly lower than that in the other treatment. The single factor test of the nutrient solutions showed that the most suitable nutrient solution for C. betulus growth was the special nutrient solution No. 1. Under this condition, the survival rate was 93.33%, the soluble sugar content was 0.13 mg/g, the starch content was 2.55 mg/g, the soluble proteins content was 33.33 mg/g, and the rooting activity was 49.75 μg/(g·h).【Conclusion】The most suitable nutrient solution for C. betulus was the special nutrient solution No.1 prepared by us.

Key words: Carpinus betulus, hydroponic culture, nutrient solution, roots growth, soluble sugav content

CLC Number:

S718
S687

HUO Yan, ZHANG Huihui, ZHU Zunling. Comparative study on the effects of nutrient solution treatment in hydroponic cultivation of Carpinus betulus[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(2): 17-24.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig.1

Fig.2

References 33

[1]	PAULA M. The woody plant manual[M]. Washington D C: USDA Forest Service, 2008: 328-332.
[2]	CIECKIEWICZ E, ANGENOT L, GRAS T, et al. Potential anticancer activity of young Carpinus betulus leaves[J]. Phytomedicine, 2012,19(3/4):278-283.DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.09.072.
[3]	CUINICA L G, ABREU I, ESTEVES DA SILVA J. Effect of air pollutant NO₂ on Betula pendula, Ostrya carpinifolia and Carpinus betulus pollen fertility and human allergenicity[J]. Environ Pollut, 2014,186:50-55.DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.12.001.
[4]	ZHOU Q, ZHU Z L, SHI M, et al. Growth and physicochemical changes of Carpinus betulus L.influenced by salinity treatments[J]. Forests, 2018,9(6):354.DOI: 10.3390/f9060354.
[5]	SHENG Q Q, ZHU Z L. Photosynthetic capacity,stomatal behavior and chloroplast ultrastructure in leaves of the endangered plant Carpinus putoensis W.C.Cheng during gaseous NO₂ exposure and after recovery[J]. Forests, 2018,9(9):561.DOI: 10.3390/f9090561.
[6]	METZGER F T. Carpinus caroliniana Walt[M]// BURNS R M, HONKALA B H. Silvics of North America (Volume 2): Hardwoods. Washington D.C: USDA Forest Service, 1990: 179-185.
[7]	MAYNARD B K, BASSUK N L. Effects of stock plant etiolation,shading,banding,and shoot development on histology and cutting propagation of Carpinus betulus L.‘Fastigiata’[J]. Jashs, 1996,121(5):853-860.DOI: 10.21273/jashs.121.5.853.
[8]	MAYNARD B K, BASSUK N L. Stock plant etiolation and stem banding effect on the auxin dose-response of rooting in stem cuttings of Carpinus betulus L.‘Fastigiata’[J]. Plant Growth Regul, 1991,10(4):305-311.DOI: 10.1007/BF00024590.
[9]	王华芳. 水培花卉[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002.
	WANG H F. Hydroponic culture of flowers [M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2002.
[10]	赵九洲, 陈洁敏, 陈松笔, 等. 无土基质与营养液EC值对切花菊生长发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 1999,26(5):327-330.
	ZHAO J Z, CHEN J M, CHEN S B, et al. Effects of growing medium and nutrient solution electrical conductivity (EC)on the growth and development of cut chrysanthemum[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 1999,26(5):327-330.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.1999.05.010.
[11]	别之龙, 徐加林, 杨小峰. 营养液浓度对水培生菜生长和硝酸盐积累的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005,21(S2):109-112.
	BIE Z L, XU J L, YANG X F. Effects of different nutrient solution concentrations on the growth and nitrate accumulation of hydroponic lettuce[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2005,21(S2):109-112.
[12]	祝遵崚, 火艳. 欧洲鹅耳枥水培专用营养液:中国, 201510102354.1[P]. 2017-11-14.
	ZHU Z L, HUO Y. Special nutrient solution for water culture of Carpinus: China, 201510102354.1[P]. 2017-11-14.
[13]	李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1999.
	LI H S. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and biochemical experiments [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1999.
[14]	张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学试验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003.
	ZHANG Z L, ZHAI W Q. Experimental guidance of plant physiology[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003.
[15]	郑炳松. 现代植物生理生化技术研究[M]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2006.
	ZHENG B S. Research on modern plant physiological and biochemical technology [M]. Beijing: China Meteorological Press, 2006.
[16]	张鸽香, 周丽琴. 水杨酸对水培风信子生长及开花的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(5):20-24.
	ZHANG G X, ZHOU L Q. Effects of SA on the growth and flowering of hydroponics Hyacinthus orientalis[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(5):20-24.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.05.004.
[17]	许业洲, 杜超群, 许秀环, 等. 湿地松针叶束水培无性系生长特性遗传分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(5):25-30.
	XU Y Z, DU C Q, XU X H, et al. Growth character heritability studies of water culture clones propagated from needle fascicles of Pinus elliottii[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(5):25-30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.05.005.
[18]	王瑞, 胡笑涛, 王文娥, 等. 张菠菜水培不同营养液浓度的产量、品质、元素利用效率主成分分析研究[J]. 华北农学报, 2016,31(S) : 206-212.
	WANG R, HU X T, WANG W E, et al. Different concentrations of nutrient solution based on principal component analysis comprehensive evaluation of hydroponic spinach[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2016,31(S) : 206-212.
[19]	丁文雅, 邬小撑, 刘敏娜, 等. 不同营养液配方对雾培生菜生物量和营养品质的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2012,38(2):175-184.
	DING W Y, WU X C, LIU M N, et al. Effects of different hydroponic nutrient solutions on biomass production and nutritional quality of aeroponically grown lettuce[J]. J Zhejiang Univ (Agric Life Sci), 2012,38(2):175-184.
[20]	马太和. 无土栽培[M]. 北京: 北京出版社, 1980.
	MA T H. Soilless culture [M]. Beijing: Beijing Press, 1980.
[21]	安娜, 须晖, 孙周平, 等. 雾培番茄不同营养液配方的生产效果比较[J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2006,37(3):495-497.
	AN N, XU H, SUN Z P, et al. Effects of different nutrient solutions on the tomato plant with areoponics culture[J]. J Shenyang Agric Univ, 2006,37(3):495-497.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-1700.2006.03.057.
[22]	石磊, 代红军. 不同浓度营养液处理对长寿花生长及形态指标的影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2013(22):67-70.
	SHI L, DAI H J. Effect of different nutritious solution on growth indicators and morphological index of Kalanchoe blossfeldiana[J]. North Hortic, 2013(22):67-70.
[23]	SEVIL KILINC S, ERTAN E, SEFEROGLU S. Effects of different nutrient solution formulations on morphological and biochemical characteristics of nursery fig trees grown in substrate culture[J]. Sci Hortic, 2007,113(1):20-27.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.01.032.
[24]	SAVVAS D, KARAGIANNI V, KOTSIRAS A, et al. Interactions between ammonium and pH of the nutrient solution supplied to Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii) grown in pumice[J]. Plant Soil, 2003,254(2):393-402.DOI: 10.1023/A:1025595201676.
[25]	卢文晋. 枸杞水培根原机诱导基理研究[D]. 西宁:青海大学, 2014.
	LU W J. Lycium chinense water bacon original machine induced research base[D]. Xining:Qinghai University, 2014.
[26]	罗盼, 周兰英, 高宏梅, 等. 不同营养液水培对蟹爪兰的生长影响[J]. 北方园艺, 2011(16):86-88.
	LUO P, ZHOU L Y, GAO H M, et al. Effects of different nutrient solution on the growth of Zygocactus truncatus with water culture[J]. North Hortic, 2011(16):86-88.
[27]	季延海, 武占会, 于平彬, 等. 不同营养液浓度对水培韭菜生长适应性的影响[J]. 中国蔬菜, 2017(11):53-56.
	JI Y H, WU Z H, YU P B, et al. Effect of nutrient solution with different concentration on growing adaptability of Chinese chive under water culture condition[J]. China Veg, 2017(11):53-56.
[28]	刘丹, 毕晓露, 郭腾, 等. 广东万年青在北方地区温室环境下水培营养液配方筛选[J]. 新疆农业科学, 2015,52(4):667-674.
	LIU D, BI X L, GUO T, et al. Screening of nutrient solution formula of Aglaonema modestum in the greenhouse environment in northeastern China[J]. Xinjiang Agric Sci, 2015,52(4):667-674.DOI: 10.6048/j.issn.1001-4330.2015.04.013.
[29]	张仲新, 方正, 李英丽. 不同营养液水培对含羞草生长发育的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2007,34(4):1037-1040.
	ZHANG Z X, FANG Z, LI Y L. Effects of different nutrient solutions on the growth and development of Mimosa pudica in hydroponics[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2007,34(4):1037-1040.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2007.04.042.
[30]	廖静. 三种观赏植物水培机制与技术研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2006.
	LIAO J. Study on hydroponics theory and technology of three ornamentals[D]. Yaan:Sichuan Agricultural University, 2006.
[31]	翁忙玲, 吴震, 李谦盛, 等. 营养液浓度及pH值对山葵生长及光合速率的影响[J]. 园艺学报, 2004,31(1):101-102.
	WENG M L, WU Z, LI Q S, et al. Effects of strength and pH of nutrient solution on the growth and net photosynthetic rate of wasabi(Wasabi japonica Matsum.)[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2004,31(1):101-102.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2004.01.027.
[32]	陈发棣, 房伟民, 余真霞, 等. 中国石竹无土栽培初步研究[J]. 上海农业学报, 1999,15(2):87-89.
	CHEN F D, FANG W M, YU Z X, et al. Preliminary study on soilless culture of Dianthus chinensis[J]. Acta Agricul Turae Shanghai, 1999,15(2):87-89.
[33]	宋立奕, 方升佐. 水培青檀幼苗对NaCl胁迫的生理响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,30(2):94-98.
	SONG L Y, FANG S Z. Physiological responses of Pteroceltis tatarinowii seedlings under hydroponic culture to NaCl stress[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2006,30(2):94-98.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.02.023.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

处理 treatment	存活率/% survival rate	叶片数 leaf number	平均根数 average root number	平均二级根数 average second root number	根鲜质量/g fresh root weight
A1B1C1	64.29±0.71 Ed	1.30±0.02 Cc	1.44±0.03 Ee	7.47±0.02 ff	0.37±0.02 ABabc
A1B2C2	64.20±0.55 Ed	1.32±0.02 Cc	2.00±0.05 Cc	6.09±0.04 Gg	0.43±0.04 Aab
A1B3C3	92.86±0.14 Aa	1.59±0.02 Aa	2.31±0.04 Bb	18.83±0.08 Cc	0.36±0.04 ABCbc
A2B1C2	42.86±2.86 Fc	0.80±0.10 Ef	1.33±0.05 Ef	1.99±0.11 Hh	0.25±0.05 Cd
A2B2C3	64.29±1.67 Ed	1.11±0.04 De	1.67±0.07 Dd	6.14±0.04 Gg	0.33±0.02 ABCcd
A2B3C1	78.57±2.57 CDc	1.63±0.02 Aa	2.27±0.06 Bb	14.60±0.04 Dd	0.27±0.07 BCd
A3B1C3	83.33±1.67 BCb	1.20±0.03 Dd	1.97±0.05 Cc	19.81±0.05 Bb	0.44±0.06 Aa
A3B2C1	78.57±3.50 Dc	1.45±0.04 Bb	2.33±0.05 Bb	13.16±0.04 Ee	0.40±0.09 Aabc
A3B3C2	85.71±2.29 Bb	1.60±0.03 Aa	4.40±0.05 Aa	25.90±0.03 Aa	0.40±0.03 Aabc

因子 factor	存活率/% survival rate	叶片数 leaf number	平均根数 average root number	平均二级根数 average second root number	根鲜质量/g fresh root weight
A1	74.20±14.01 Bb	1.40±0.14 Aa	1.92±0.38 Bb	10.80±6.05 Bb	0.39±0.04 Aa
A2	61.59±15.66 Cc	1.18±0.37 Bb	1.76±0.42 Bb	7.58±5.57 Cc	0.28±0.06 Bb
A3	81.85±4.71 Aa	1.42±0.18 Aa	2.90±1.14 Aa	19.62±5.52 Aa	0.41±0.06 Aa
B1	63.49±17.62 Cc	1.10±0.24 Cc	1.58±0.30 Cc	9.76±7.90 Bb	0.35±0.09 Aa
B2	68.43±6.43 Bb	1.30±0.15 Bb	2.00±0.29 Bb	8.46±3.52 Bb	0.39±0.06 Aa
B3	85.71±6.42 Aa	1.61±0.03 Aa	2.99±1.06 Aa	19.78±4.94 Aa	0.34±0.07 Aa
C1	63.49±7.04 Cc	1.46±0.15 Aa	2.02±0.43 Bb	11.74±3.27 Bb	0.35±0.08 Aa
C2	68.43±18.66 Bb	1.24±0.36 Bb	2.58±1.40 Aa	11.33±11.07 Bb	0.36±0.09 Aa
C3	85.71±13.11 Aa	1.30±0.22 Bb	1.98±0.28 Bb	14.93±6.60 Aa	0.38±0.06 Aa

指标 index	存活率 survival rate	叶片数 leaf number	平均根数 average root number	平均二级根数 average second root number
存活率
叶片数	0.836^**
平均根数	0.613^**	0.644^**
平均二级根数	0.892^**	0.705^**	0.811^**
根鲜质量	0.454^*	0.282	0.275	0.359

处理 treatment	可溶性糖含量/ (mg·g^-1) soluble sugar content	淀粉含量/ (mg·g^-1) starch content	可溶性蛋白含量/ (mg·g^-1) soluble proteins content	POD活性/ (U·g^-1) POD activity	根系活力/ (μg·g^-1·h^-1) root activity
A1B1C1	0.12±0.00 Aa	2.30±0.22 BCbc	19.23±0.31 Df	86.66±11.55 Cc	19.23±3.00 Df
A1B2C2	0.11±0.01 ABab	2.03±0.07 BCc	49.00±0.43 Aa	183.33±15.28 b	49.00±3.00 Aa
A1B3C3	0.13±0.02A Bab	2.00±0.08 Cc	38.13±0.09 Bb	40.00±10.00 Cc	38.13±3.00 Bb
A2B1C2	0.08±0.01 Cc	2.51±0.07 Bb	10.55±0.12 Eg	270.00±79.37 Aa	10.55±2.00 Eg
A2B2C3	0.08±0.01 Cc	3.04±0.14 Aa	31.68±0.39 BCcd	220.00±20.00 ABab	31.68±4.04 BCcd
A2B3C1	0.12±0.02 Aa	2.23±0.06 BCbc	35.29±0.19 BCbc	233.33±23.09 ABab	35.29±3.00 BCbc
A3B1C3	0.10±0.02 ABCbc	2.22±0.11 BCbc	31.25±0.93 BCcd	93.33±11.55 Cc	31.25±3.51 BCcd
A3B2C1	0.12±0.01 ABab	2.21±0.08 BCbc	36.88±0.18 Bbc	60.00±20.00 Cc	36.88±3.00 Bbc
A3B3C2	0.08±0.02 BCc	2.34±0.56 BCbc	28.70±1.996 Cd	220.00±26.46 ABab	28.76±3.00 Cd

因子 factor	可溶性糖含量/ (mg·g^-1) soluble sugar content	淀粉含量/ (mg·g^-1) starch content	可溶性蛋白含量/ (mg·g^-1) soluble proteins content	POD活性/ (U·g^-1) POD activity	根系活力/ (μg·g^-1·h^-1) root activity
A1	0.11±0.01 Aa	2.11±0.19 Bb	36.39±0.32 Bb	103.33±64.23 Bb	35.45±13.30 Aa
A2	0.09±0.02 Bb	2.59±0.37 Aa	35.45±0.67 Bc	241.11±48.07 Aa	25.84±11.89 Bb
A3	0.10±0.02 Ab	2.25±0.29 Ab	37.92±1.30 Aa	124.44±75.18 Bb	32.30±4.53 Aa
B1	0.10±0.02 Aa	2.34±0.18 Aa	36.50±1.63 Aa	150.00±98.74 Aa	20.34±9.35 Bb
B2	0.10±0.02 Aa	2.43±0.48 Aa	37.00±1.17 Aa	154.44±74.35 Aa	39.19±8.23 Aa
B3	0.10±0.02 Aa	2.19±0.32 Aa	36.27±1.18 Ab	164.44±95.28 Aa	34.06±4.91 Aa
C1	0.12±0.01 Aa	2.25±0.13 Aa	36.89±1.30 Aa	126.67±82.46 Bb	30.47±8.85 Aa
C2	0.09±0.02 Bb	2.29±0.35 Aa	36.03±1.47 Ab	224.44±56.81 Aa	29.44±16.82 Aa
C3	0.09±0.02 Bb	2.42±0.48 Aa	36.84±1.17 Aa	117.78±81.05 Bb	33.69±4.53 Aa

Comparative study on the effects of nutrient solution treatment in hydroponic cultivation of Carpinus betulus

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 33

Related Articles 3

Recommended Articles 0

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

指标 index	可溶性糖含量 soluble sugar content	淀粉含量 starch content	可溶性蛋白含量 soluble proteins content	POD活性 POD activity
可溶性糖含量
淀粉含量	-0.544^**
可溶性蛋白含量	0.136	-0.011
POD活性	-0.407^*	0.465^*	-0.516^**
根系活力	0.282	-0.330	0.278	-0.250

[1]	SHENG Qianqian, DAI Anqi, SONG Min, TANG Rui, ZHU Zunling. Photosynthetic physiological characteristics of two kinds of hornbeam under NO₂ stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(2): 10-16.
[2]	ZHU Zunling, LIN Qingmei, XU Yuanyuan. Storage substance content and corresponding enzyme activity during the stratification of Carpinus betulus seeds [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(06): 157-160.
[3]	Wang Mingxiu, Huang Minren, Lu Shixing, Xu Xizeng, Xu Nong & Wu Rongling. A STUDY OF THE NEW CLONES OF THE AIGEIROS SECTION——Ⅲ. GENETIC VARIATION OF ROOTING CARACTERS [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1988, 12(01): 1-11.