Effects of simulated acid rain on growth and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Populus simonii ×P. nigra

ZHANG Meng, XU Gaoshan, TENG Zhiyuan, LIU Guanjun, ZHANG Xiuli

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 57-64.

PDF(2440 KB)
PDF(2440 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 57-64. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202003068

Effects of simulated acid rain on growth and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Populus simonii ×P. nigra

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 Populus simonii × P. nigra belongs to the genus Populus, family Salicaceae, and grows in northern China. This hybrid tree grows fast, reproduces easily, develops quickly, and has strong adaptability. It has been reported that P. simonii × P. nigra has biological characteristics that contribute to various types of resistance, such as to drought, barren conditions and alkali salt. This is an important fast-growing and high-yield timber species in China. Acid rain has negative impacts on the vegetation of ecological systems and is widespread in northern and southern China. However, relatively little information is known about the influence of acid rain on the growth and photosynthetic characteristics of P. simonii × P. nigra in China. To elucidate this issue, we studied the responses of P. simonii × P. nigra to simulated acid rain (SAR) at different pH values. The growth indices and leaf ultrastructure, antioxidant enzymes, and photosystem Ⅱ activities of P. simonii × P. nigra were studied in response to SAR stress. The results could provide necessary referenced data for planting P. simonii × P. nigra in northern China, where acid rain has increased. 【Method】 P. simonii × P. nigra stecklings were treated with SAR at three levels. The acid rain concentrate was diluted to simulate severe acid rain (pH 2.5) and moderate acid rain (pH 4.5), and diluted electrolyte liquor was used as a control (CK, pH 7.0). All treatment P. simonii × P. nigra stecklings were sprayed with SAR every day. To account for the stomatal distribution, leaves were sprayed with acid rain on both sides. Meanwhile,the pots were covered with a plastic hood to avoid the indirect effects of SAR from the soil. When apparent symptoms occurred in leaves, we detected and analyzed the effects of acid rain on the index of growth, leaf anatomic structure, physiological indices, OJIP curves, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters; chlorophyll a fluorescence technology is considered a probe to monitor the photosynthetic characteristics of plants, which is crucial for analyzing the extent of damage to the photosynthetic apparatus under various stress conditions. 【Result】 Compared to CK, the plant height, stem diameter, leaf number and leaf area increased significantly in the SAR treatment at pH 4.5. The chloroplast structure was complete, and the thylakoids were intact, but the leaf color became light green, there were no starch grains, and the number of osmiophilic droplets increased slightly. Moreover, the stem diameter and leaf area in SAR at pH 2.5 were significantly reduced. The leaves became yellow, prominent spots appeared on the blade tips and veins, and there were a small number of starch grains, but the number and volume of osmiophilic droplets increased significantly. The physiological index, the rate of O 2 · -production, and the content of H2O2 and CAT activities were higher than that of CK, and the greater the acidity, the more significant the increase. However, POD and SOD activities were increased in the pH 4.5, but decreased in the pH 2.5. There was no noticeable difference in the treatment of pH 4.5 and CK except for relative variable fluorescence of point L at 0.15 ms (VL), and relative variable fluorescence of point K at 0.3 ms (VK). Correspondingly, the parameters of VL and VK and relative variable fluorescence of point J at 2 ms (VJ), relative variable fluorescence of point I at 30 ms (VI), and the relative reduced rate of QA (MO) increased significantly at pH 2.5 treatment. However, the chlorophyll fluorescence curve area (Fix Area) and the size of the plastid quinone pool (Sm) in the pH 2.5 treatment were significantly lower than those in the CK. 【Conclusion】 The effect of simulated acid rain on the growth of P. simonii × P. nigra mainly depends on the pH value. When SAR at pH 2.5 inhibited the growth and leaf physiology of P. simonii × P. nigra and showed symptoms of necrotic spots, the chloroplast structure was abnormal, the thylakoid arrangement was irregular, and the electron transfer of photosystem Ⅱ was inhibited. However, pH 4.5 SAR treatment benefited P. simonii × P. nigra, and the ultrastructure of leaves was normal. This indicates that P. simonii × P. nigra stecklings had a high tolerance to acid rain at pH 4.5.

Key words

Populus simonii × P.nigra; / leaf phenotype / atmospheric nitrogen and sulfur deposition / ultramicroscopic structure / chlorophyll fluorescence a

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHANG Meng , XU Gaoshan , TENG Zhiyuan , et al . Effects of simulated acid rain on growth and photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Populus simonii ×P. nigra[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(6): 57-64 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202003068

References

[1]
陈文胜, 出佳范, 吕再辉, 等. 模拟酸雨处理后番茄叶片叶绿素含量及叶绿素荧光参数的动态变化[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2019, 28(3):108-116.
CHEN W S, CHU J F, LYU Z H, et al. Dynamic changes in chlorophyll content and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of leaf of Lycopersicon esculentum after simulated acid rain treatment[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2019, 28(3):108-116. DOI: 10.3969 /j.issn.1674-7895.2019.03.14.
[2]
周思婕, 王平, 张敏, 等. 大气酸沉降对马尾松幼苗根系生理特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(4):111-118.
ZHOU S J, WANG P, ZHANG M. et al. Effects of atmospheric acid deposition on root physiological characteristic of Pinus massoniana seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(4):111-118. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201907002.
[3]
吉仁慈, 朱义勇, 柴源, 等. 模拟SO2湿沉降对桑树叶片光合日变化和生长的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2016, 32(6):1396-1403.
JI R C, ZHU Y Y, CHAI Y, et al. Diurnal changes of leaf photosynjournal and growth of mulberry in response to simulated SO2 wet deposition[J]. Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 2016, 32(6):1396-1403.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2016.06.031.
[4]
KHOSHBAKHT D, ASGHARI M R, HAGHIGHI M. Effects of foliar applications of nitric oxide and spermidine on chlorophyll fluorescence,photosynjournal and antioxidant enzyme activities of Citrus seedlings under salinity stress[J]. Photosynthetica, 2018, 56(4):1313-1325.DOI: 10.1007/s11099-018-0839-z.
[5]
PARVEEN A, AKASH M S, REHMAN K, et al. Recent investigations for discovery of natural antioxidants: a comprehensive review[J]. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr, 2016, 26(2):143-160.DOI: 10.1615/critreveukaryotgeneexpr.2016015974.
[6]
TRIPATHY B C, OELMÜLLER R. Reactive oxygen species generation and signaling in plants[J]. Plant Signal Behav, 2012, 7(12):1621-1633.DOI: 10.4161/psb.22455.
[7]
AJIGBOYE O O, RAY R V, MURCHIE E H. Chlorophyll fluorescence on the fast timescale[J]. Methods Mol Biol, 2018, 1770:95-104.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7786-4_6.
[8]
ZHANG C, YI X, GAO X, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of tea seedlings (Camellia sinensis) to simulated acid rain conditions[J]. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf, 2020, 192:110315.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110315.
[9]
王月, 许博涛, 滕志远, 等. 模拟酸雨对桑树叶片生长及其光系统Ⅱ活性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(9):2220-2229.
WANG Y, XU B T, TENG Z Y, et al. Effect of simulated acid rain on the growth and photosystem Ⅱ in the leaves of mulberry seedlings[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2018, 35(9):2220-2229.DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2017-0429.
[10]
胡月, 张倩, 孙东彬, 等. 模拟酸雨对桑树叶片光合日变化的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2015, 32(11):1862-1870.
HU Y, ZHANG Q, SUN D B, et al. Effects of simulated acid rain on diurnal changes of mulberry (Morus alba) photosynjournal[J]. Pratacultural Sci, 2015, 32(11):1862-1870.DOI: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0160.
[11]
宋博, 李凤日, 董利虎, 等. 黑龙江西部地区人工小黑杨立木可加性生物量模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11):58-68.
SONG B, LI F R, DONG L H, et al. Additive system of biomass equations for planted Populus simonii × P. nigra in western Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(11):58-68.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180062.
[12]
刘文国, 张旭东, 黄玲玲, 等. 我国杨树生理生态研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2010, 23(1):50-55.
LIU W G, ZHANG X D, HUANG L L, et al. Research progress on physiologic and ecologic characteristics of popular[J]. World For Res, 2010, 23(1):50-55.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2010.01.002.
[13]
宋扬, 张潆心, 郭娜, 等. 低温胁迫后不同光强对小黑杨幼苗叶片叶绿素荧光和能量分配的影响[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(10):4421-4423.
SONG Y, ZHANG Y X, GUO N, et al. Effects of lights intensity on chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics and energy allocation pathways in leaves of Populus simonii × P. nigra seedlings after chilling stress[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2013, 41(10):4421-4423.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2013.10.151.
[14]
黄海娇, 胡雪婷, 李慧玉, 等. 盐胁迫下8个转基因小黑杨株系的抗逆性比较[J]. 森林工程, 2009, 25(4):14-18.
HUANG H J, HU X T, LI H Y, et al. Adverse resistance comparison of eight transgenic Populus simonii × P. nigra lines under NaCl stress[J]. For Eng, 2009, 25(4):14-18.DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2009.04.016.
[15]
张恒, 刘晓婷, 陈嵩, 等. 盐胁迫下三倍体小黑杨杂种无性系叶片蛋白质差异表达分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(2):59-66.
ZHANG H, LIU X T, CHEN S, et al. Analysis of differentially expressed proteins in leavess of triploid Populus simonii × P.nigra hybrid clones under salt stress[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(2):59-66.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904027.
[16]
王鸿伟, 宁晓光, 王恩海, 等. 抗干旱耐盐碱树种的选择[J]. 林业科技, 2006, 31(3):12-15.
WANG H W, NING X G, WANG E H, et al. Selection of tree species with drought-resistance and salt tolerance[J]. For Sci Technol, 2006, 31(3):12-15.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-9499.2006.03.005.
[17]
马连祥, 周定国, 徐魁梧. 酸雨对杨树生长和木材化学性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(6):95-99.
MA L X, ZHOU D G, XU K W. The effects of acid rain on Populus euramericana tree ring width and wood properties[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2000, 36(6):95-99.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.06.016.
[18]
MA Y Q, ZHAO K J, ZHANG Z L, et al. Influence of rain and sulphur dioxide on low level chemiluminescence from leaf of Populus tomentosa[J]. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol, 1992, 49(6):906-913.DOI: 10.1007/BF00203166.
[19]
蔡朋程. 浅析中国的酸雨分布现状及其成因[J]. 科技资讯, 2018, 16(15):127-128.
CAI P C. Analysis on distribution status and causes of acid rain in China[J]. Sci Technol Inf, 2018, 16(15):127-128.DOI: 10.16661/j.cnki.1672-3791.2018.15.127.
[20]
黄佳欢, 刘关君, 陈瑾元, 等. 小黑杨PnCCH10基因的克隆、功能初步鉴定及遗传转化[J]. 植物生理学报, 2019, 55(11):1625-1637.
HUANG J H, LIU G J, CHEN J Y, et al. Cloning,preliminary function identification and genetic transformation of PnCCH10 gene in Populus simonii × Populus nigra[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2019, 55(11):1625-1637.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2019.0123.
[21]
STRASSER B J. Donor side capacity of Photosystem Ⅱ probed by chlorophyll a fluorescence transients[J]. Photosynth Res, 1997, 52(2):147-155.DOI: 10.1023/A:1005896029778.
[22]
SUZUKI N, MILLER G, SALAZAR C, et al. Temporal-spatial interaction between reactive oxygen species and abscisic acid regulates rapid systemic acclimation in plants[J]. Plant Cell, 2013, 25(9):3553-3569.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.114595.
[23]
MILLER G, SCHLAUCH K, TAM R, et al. The plant NADPH oxidase RBOHD mediates rapid systemic signaling in response to diverse stimuli[J]. Sci Signal, 2009, 2(84):ra45.DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.2000448.
[24]
LIU E N, LIU C P. Effects of simulated acid rain on the antioxidative system in Cinnamomum philippinense seedlings[J]. Water Air Soil Pollut, 2011, 215(1/2/3/4):127-135.DOI: 10.1007/s11270-010-0464-3.
[25]
DEBNATH B, IRSHAD M, MITRA S, et al. Acid rain deposition modulates photosynjournal,enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activities in tomato[J]. Int J Environ Res, 2018, 12(2):203-214.DOI: 10.1007/s41742-018-0084-0.
[26]
何亚飞, 张珊珊, 孙鑫, 等. 高频度模拟酸雨胁迫条件下菲白竹的光合响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(4):49-55.
HE Y F, ZHANG S S, SUN X, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics of Pleioblastus fortunei to high frequent simulated acid rain[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 40(4):49-55.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.04.008.
[27]
LI C, ZHENG Y, ZHOU J, et al. Changes of leaf antioxidant system,photosynjournal and ultrastructure in tea plant under the stress of fluorine[J]. Biol Plant, 2011, 55(3):563-566.DOI: 10.1007/s10535-011-0126-3.
[28]
许大全, 沈允钢. 光合产物水平与光合机构运转关系的探讨[J]. 植物生理学报, 1982, 8(2):173-186.
XU D Q, SHEN Y G. Exploring the relationship between the photosynthate level and the operation of photosynthetic apparatus[J]. Acta phytophysiologia Sinica, 1982, 8(2):173-186.
[29]
MEZZETTI A, LEIBL W. Time-resolved infrared spectroscopy in the study of photosynthetic systems[J]. Photosynth Res, 2017, 131(2):121-144.DOI: 10.1007/s11120-016-0305-3.
[30]
王雯, 李曼, 王丽红, 等. 酸雨对全生育时期水稻叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2014, 23(1):80-85.
WANG W, LI M, WANG L H, et al. Effects of acid rain on the chlorophyll fluorescence reaction in rice at the whole growth stages[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2014, 23(1):80-85.DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2014.01.011.
[31]
MURCHIE E H, LAWSON T. Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications[J]. J Exp Bot, 2013, 64(13):3983-3998.DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ert208.
[32]
NISHIYAMA Y, ALLAKHVERDIEV S I, MURATA N. A new paradigm for the action of reactive oxygen species in the photoinhibition of photosystem Ⅱ[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2006, 1757(7):742-749.DOI: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2006.05.013.
[33]
冯建灿, 胡秀丽, 毛训甲. 叶绿素荧光动力学在研究植物逆境生理中的应用[J]. 经济林研究, 2002, 20(4):14-18,30.
FENG J C, HU X L, MAO X J. Application of chlorophyll fluorescence dynamics to plant physiology in adverse circumstance[J]. Econ For Res, 2002, 20(4):14-18,30.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2002.04.004.
[34]
易晓芹, 田双红, 贺群, 等. 模拟酸雨胁迫对茶树幼苗生长和光合生理的影响[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学, 2019, 38(7):3188-3193.
YI X Q, TIAN S H, HE Q, et al. Effects of simulated acid rain stress on the growth and photosynthetic physiology of tea seedlings[J]. Genom Appl Biol, 2019, 38(7):3188-3193.DOI: 10.13417/j.gab.038.003188.
[35]
金清, 江洪, 余树全, 等. 酸雨胁迫对亚热带典型树种幼苗生长与光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(6):3322-3327.
JIN Q, JIANG H, YU S Q, et al. Research on the growth and photosynjournal of typical seedlings in subtropical regions under acid rain stress[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009, 29(6):3322-3327.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.06.065.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021.
PDF(2440 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/