Genetic diversity and paternity analyses in a 1.5th generation seed orchard of Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir

CHEN Xingbin, XU Haining, XIAO Fuming, SUN Shiwu, LOU Yongfeng, ZOU Yuanxi, XU Xiaoqiang

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 87-92.

PDF(1871 KB)
PDF(1871 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 87-92. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202005006

Genetic diversity and paternity analyses in a 1.5th generation seed orchard of Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 Chinese fir [Cunninghamia lanceolata (Lamb.) Hook] is an important, fast-growing timber species that is widely distributed in southern China. The Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir is derived from C. lanceolata originating in Jiangxi Province, and its high proportion of shiny, chestnut-brown xylem surrounding the pith is an extremely valuable raw material for craft, architecture and interior decoration. This study aimed to provide a scientific basis for the management of red-heart Chinese fir seed orchards. 【Method】 We investigated the genetic diversity and analyzed the paternity of a 1.5th generation seed orchard of red-heart Chinese fir in the Baiyunshan Mountain Forest Farm (Qingyuan District, Jiangxi Province, China). The genetic diversity of 32 parent trees and 459 open-pollinated progenies from 14 clones in a 1.5th generation clonal seed orchard was analyzed using 12 polymorphic SSR loci. We then conducted a paternity test of the progeny. 【Result】 We detected 3-7 and 4-11 alleles (Na) at averages of 4.41 and 6.50 per SSR loci, respectively, in the parent and progeny populations. The average number of alleles in the progeny population was 2.09, which was higher than that in the parent population. The effective numbers of alleles (Ne) were 2.330 and 2.306 in the parent and progeny populations, respectively. The progeny population contained all alleles detected in the parent population. In addition, 25 alleles detected in the progeny population were undetectable in the parent population. The Shannon information index (I) was 1.004 and 0.992 in the parent and progeny populations, respectively, indicating slightly higher genetic diversity in the progeny than in the parent population. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) was smaller in the progeny, than in the parent population (0.525 vs. 0.571), indicating a slightly lower proportion of heterozygosity in the progeny than in the parents. The multilocus (tm) and single-locus (ts) outcrossing rates in the seed orchard were 1.012 and 0.991, respectively, and the inbreeding between parents was not significant (tm-ts = 0.021). The number of effective pollen donors (Nep) was 7.81. The multilocus [Rp(m)] and single locus [Rp(s)] paternal correlations of the seed orchard were 0.128 and -0.016, respectively. The difference [Rp(s)-Rp(m)] between them was -0.144 < 0, indicating the absence of close relationships among the parents. The multilocus outcrossing rate (tm) among families ranged from 0.938 to 1.200, and the multilocus outcrossing rate (tm) of 10 families was more than 0. The biparental inbreeding (tm-ts) among families ranged from -0.127 to 0.150, and the tm-ts of nine families was more than 0, indicating that these families were inbred. The male parents of 325 progeny were determined at an 80% confidence level, accounting for 70.8% of the total progeny analyzed. The male and female parents of all progeny were generated from different clones, indicating the absence of selfing in this seed orchard. The proportions of paternal identification among families differed. The proportion of paternal identification of family No. 41 was the highest (93.9%), whereas that of the other families ranged from 54.3% to 90.9%. Paternal parents of 30 offspring in family No. 8 were identified, the paternity of 16 offspring was the same clone, accounting for 53.3% of the total offspring of this family. Paternal parents of 26 offspring in family No. 12 were identified, the paternity of 12 offspring was the same clone, accounting for 46.2% of the total offspring of this family. These results indicated that pollination affinity differed among the clones. A non-random mating phenomenon was also identified in the seed orchard. Among 32 clones, 26 provided effective pollen. Clone numbers 22 and 29 provided pollen for 33 offspring with the highest male parent contribution rate of 10.2%, compared with the 0.3%-8.9% rate of other clones. Eleven clones with the highest paternal contribution produced 70.2% of the offspring. 【Conclusion】 The 1.5th generation clonal seed orchard of red-heart Chinese fir was found to have rich genetic diversity, which remained equally in the progeny and parent populations. The outcrossing rate of this seed orchard was high, and some families had a low level of inbreeding. Self-pollination was absent, pollination affinity differed among clones, and the paternal contribution of clones was not equal throughout this red-heart Chinese fir seed orchard.

Key words

Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir / seed orchard / SSR / genetic diversity / paternity analysis

Cite this article

Download Citations
CHEN Xingbin , XU Haining , XIAO Fuming , et al . Genetic diversity and paternity analyses in a 1.5th generation seed orchard of Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(3): 87-92 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202005006

References

[1]
GONZAGA J, MANOEL R, SOUSA A, et al. Pollen contamination and nonrandom mating in a Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh seedling seed orchard[J]. Silvae Genet, 2016,65:1-11. DOI: org/10.1515/sg-2016-0001.
[2]
HANSEN O K, KJAER E D. Paternity analysis with microsatellites in a Danish Abies nordmanniana clonal seed orchard reveals dysfunctions[J]. Can J For Res, 2006,36(4):1054-1058.DOI: 10.1139/x05-299.
[3]
FERNANDES L, ROCHETA M, CORDEIRO J, et al. Genetic variation,mating patterns and gene flow in a Pinus pinaster Aiton clonal seed orchard[J]. Ann For Sci, 2008,65(7):706.DOI: 10.1051/forest:2008049.
[4]
PLOMION C, LEPROVOST G, POT D, et al. Pollen contamination in a maritime pine polycross seed orchard and certification of improved seeds using chloroplast microsatellites[J]. Can J For Res, 2001,31(10):1816-1825.DOI: 10.1139/x01-115.
[5]
DUREL C E, BERTIN P, KREMER A. Relationship between inbreeding depression and inbreeding coefficient in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster)[J]. Theor Appl Genet, 1996,92(3):347-356.DOI: 10.1007/bf00223678.
[6]
DERING M, MISIORNY A, CHALUPKA W. Inter-year variation in selfing,background pollination,and paternal contribution in a Norway spruce clonal seed orchard[J]. Can J For Res, 2014,44(7):760-767.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0061.
[7]
曾志光, 杨先锋, 肖复明, 等. 陈山红心杉材性变异及其基因资源利用的研究[J]. 江西林业科技, 2001,29(3):1-6,39.
ZENG Z G, YANG X F, XIAO F M, et al. Study on variability of timber characters and gene resources utilization for Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir[J]. Jiangxi For Sci Technol, 2001,29(3):1-6,39.DOI: 10.16259/j.cnki.36-1342/s.2001.03.001.
[8]
葛艺早, 刘文飞, 吴建平, 等. 不同施肥处理对杉木种子园种子品质的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2016,36(4):442-448.
GE Y Z, LIU W F, WU J P, et al. Effects of different fertilization treatments on quality of the seeds in a third generation seed orchard of Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. J For Environ, 2016,36(4):442-448.DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2016.04.010.
[9]
郑仁华. 杉木种子园自由授粉子代遗传变异及优良遗传型选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,30(1):8-12.
ZHENG R H. Genetic variations of seed orchard open-pollinated progenies and selection of superior genotypes of Chinese fir[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2006,30(1):8-12.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2006.01.002.
[10]
陈兴彬, 何龙燕, 肖复明, 等. 基于转录组测序的陈山红心杉EST-SSR开发及应用[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020,40(8):120-127.
CHEN X B, HE L Y, XIAO F M, et al. Development and application of EST-SSR markers in Chenshan red-heart Chinese fir based on transcriptome sequencing[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2020,40(8):120-127.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.08.015.
[11]
RITLAND K. Extensions of models for the estimation of mating systems using n independent loci[J]. Heredity, 2002,88(4):221-228.DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6800029.
[12]
SUN M, RITLAND K. Mating system of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis),a successful colonizer in north America[J]. Heredity, 1998,80(2):225-232.DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00290.x.
[13]
KALINOWSKI S T, TAPER M L, MARSHALL T C. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment[J]. Mol Ecol, 2007,16(5):1099-1106.DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x.
[14]
乔东亚, 王鹏, 王淑安, 等. 基于SNP标记的紫薇遗传多样性分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020,44(4):21-28.
QIAO D Y, WANG P, WANG S A, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Lagerstroemia germplasm resources based on SNP markers[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020,44(4):21-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003075.
[15]
艾畅, 徐立安, 赖焕林, 等. 马尾松种子园的遗传多样性与父本分析[J]. 林业科学, 2006,42(11):146-150.
AI C, XU L A, LAI H L, et al. Genetic diversity and paternity analysis of a seed orchard in Pinus massoniana[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2006,42(11):146-150.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2006.11.026.
[16]
于大德, 袁定昌, 张登荣, 等. 华北落叶松种子园不同世代间遗传多样性变化[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2014,15(5):940-947.
YU D D, YUAN D C, ZHANG D R, et al. Genetic diversity of Larix principis-rupprechtii Mayr.seed orchard among generations[J]. J Plant Genet Resour, 2014,15(5):940-947.DOI: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2014.05.004.
[17]
赵奋成, 郭文冰, 林昌明, 等. 不同近交程度对湿地松结实与生长的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(1):9-17.
ZHAO F C, GUO W B, LIN C M, et al. Effects of different inbreeding levels on seed characteristics and growth of slash pine[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019,43(1):9-17.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712043.
[18]
谭小梅, 周志春, 金国庆, 等. 马尾松二代无性系种子园遗传多样性和交配系统分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012,48(2):69-74.
TAN X M, ZHOU Z C, JIN G Q, et al. Genetic diversity and mating system analysis of Pinus massoniana in a second-generation clonal seed orchard[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2012,48(2):69-74.
[19]
MORIGUCHI Y, YAMAZAKI Y, TAIRA H, et al. Mating patterns in an indoor miniature Cryptomeria japonica seed orchard as revealed by microsatellite markers[J]. New For, 2010,39(3):261-273.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-009-9169-0.
[20]
叶培忠, 陈岳武, 蒋恕, 等. 杉木种子生活力变异的研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1981,5(3):22-32.
YE P Z, CHEN Y W, JIANG S, et al. A preliminary study on the variation of seed vigor of Chinese fir[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1981,5(3):22-32.
[21]
GONZÁLEZ-MARTÍNEZ S C, GERBER S, CERVERA M T, et al. Selfing and sibship structure in a two-cohort stand of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) using nuclear SSR markers[J]. Ann For Sci, 2003,60(2):115-121.DOI: 10.1051/forest:2003003.
[22]
DE-LUCAS A I, ROBLEDO-ARNUNCIO J J, HIDALGO E, et al. Mating system and pollen gene flow in Mediterranean maritime pine[J]. Heredity (Edinb), 2008,100(4):390-399.DOI: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6801090.
[23]
GRATTAPAGLIA D, AMARAL DIENER P S, SANTOS G A. Performance of microsatellites for parentage assignment following mass controlled pollination in a clonal seed orchard of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.)[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2014,10(6):1631-1643.DOI: 10.1007/s11295-014-0784-3.
[24]
DERING M, MISIORNY A, CHALUPKA W. Inter-year variation in selfing,background pollination,and paternal contribution in a Norway spruce clonal seed orchard[J]. Can J For Res, 2014,44(7):760-767.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2014-0061.
[25]
CHEN X B, SUN X M, DONG L M, et al. Mating patterns and pollen dispersal in a Japanese larch (Larix kaempferi) clonal seed orchard:a case study[J]. Sci China Life Sci, 2018,61(9):1011-1023.DOI: 10.1007/s11427-018-9305-7.
[26]
SHIMONO A, WANG X R, TORIMARU T, et al. Spatial variation in local pollen flow and mating success in a Picea abies clone archive and their implications for a novel “breeding without breeding” strategy[J]. Tree Genet Genomes, 2011,7(3):499-509.DOI: 10.1007/s11295-010-0351-5.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021
PDF(1871 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/