Assessing natural forest fragmentation process dynamics and its drivers in the Pacific northwest region, USA

LI Xin, WENG Weisong, LI Mingshi

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 174-182.

PDF(7330 KB)
PDF(7330 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3) : 174-182. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006001

Assessing natural forest fragmentation process dynamics and its drivers in the Pacific northwest region, USA

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 The accurate quantification of forest fragmentation severity and fragmentation processes plays an important role in understanding the dynamics of ecological service functions induced by habitat changes. This analysis quantified the spatial process of forest fragmentation in the Pacific northwest region, USA, and explored the socioeconomic driving forces contributing to the fragmentation process, thereby providing a reference for formulating a reasonable forest management plan in similar regions. It is of great significance to learn from the advanced philosophy of natural forest management as a reference with which to effectively improve the management of natural forests in northeastern China. 【Method】 Based on a triple-date national land cover database (NLCD), including NLCD2008, NLCD2013 and NLCD2016, with a spatial resolution of 30 m, forest landscape patterns were first analyzed using landscape indices, followed by a forest fragmentation process model to characterize four fragmentation processes of the deforested patches to reveal the dynamics of the natural forest fragmentation pattern. Next, the socioeconomic drivers responsible for the observed forest fragmentation dynamics and their management implications were examined. 【Result】 ① From 2008 to 2016, the overall natural forest area showed a slight increasing trend and the forest loss area continued to be lower than the forest recovery area. The mean patch area of forest gradually increased, whereas the number of patches gradually decreased, indicating that forests connectivity gradually improved. ② Forest fragmentation was widespread in the region and gradually decelerated over time; the subdivision and shrinkage components dominated the entire fragmentation processes, and an apparent successive sequence, subdivision-shrinkage-perforation-attrition, was clearly observed in the fragmentation process maps. ③ Forest fragmentation was primarily driven by local socioeconomic factors, particularly the dependency of population growth, residential construction, agricultural expansion and economic booms on forest resources. 【Conclusion】 In the past 10 years, the forest fragmentation level in the Pacific Northwest, which has been greatly affected by human disturbance, has been gradually reduced. Additionally, the forest landscape did not change substantially during the study period. Regional forests not only met the needs for timber industry development but also met the requirements of ecological conservation.

Key words

forest fragmentation / fragmentation processes model / driving force / management of natural forest

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Xin , WENG Weisong , LI Mingshi. Assessing natural forest fragmentation process dynamics and its drivers in the Pacific northwest region, USA[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(3): 174-182 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006001

References

[1]
World Meteorological Organization. An IPCC Special Report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5 ℃ above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty[R]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC, 2018.
[2]
LE Q C, MORIARTY R, ANDREW R M, et al. Global carbon budget 2015[J]. Earth System Science Data, 2015,7(2):349-396. DOI: 10.5194/essd-7-349-2015.
[3]
KONDO M, SAITOH T, SATO H, et al. Comprehensive synjournal of spatial variability in carbon flux across monsoon Asian forests[J]. Agric For Meteorol, 2017,232:623-634. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.10.020.
[4]
朱若柠, 沈文娟, 张亚丽, 等. 基于时间序列MODIS-VCF数据的云南省森林覆盖变化及破碎化分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019,43(2):184-190.
ZHU R N, SHEN W J, ZHANG Y L, et al. Assessing changes in forest coverage and forest fragmentation patterns in Yunnan Province from time series MODIS-VCF products(2000-2016)[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019,43(2):184-190.
[5]
李明诗, 明莉, 樊鸣鸣, 等. 美国西部国有森林破碎化模式及其管理含义[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2012,40(3):103-107.
LI M S, MING L, FAN M M, et al. Spatio-temporal patterns and managerial implications of forest fragmentation derived from three national parks in the western United States[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2012,40(3):103-107. DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2012.03.028.
[6]
李丹, 陈宏伟, 李根前, 等. 我国天然林与人工林的比较研究[J]. 林业调查规划, 2011,36(6):59-63.
LI D, CHEN H W, LI G Q, et al. Comparative analysis of artificial forest and natural forest in China[J]. For Invent Plan, 2011,36(6):59-63.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3168.2011.06.016.
[7]
HERMOSILLA T, WULDER M A, WHITE J C, et al. Impact of time on interpretations of forest fragmentation:three-decades of fragmentation dynamics over Canada[J]. Remote Sens Environ, 2019,222:65-77.DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.12.027.
[8]
WEN D Z. Land mosaics:the ecology of landscapes and regions[J]. J Environ Qual, 1997,26(3):918.DOI: 10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030047x.. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1997.00472425002600030047x.
[9]
邬建国. 景观生态学——格局过程尺度与等级[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
WU J G. Landscape ecology:scale and hierarchy of pattern processes[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[10]
REN X Y, LU Y Y, WU Y W, et al. Differences in fragmentation processes between western natural forests and southeastern forest plantations in the United States: a case study comparing the states Washington and Mississippi State[J]. J Environ Manag, 2017,188:268-277. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.068.
[11]
RITTERS K H, COULSTON J W, WICKHAM J D . Fragmentation of forest communities in the eastern United States[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2012,263:85-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.09.022.
[12]
HARGREAVES A L. Lasting signature of forest fragmentation.[J]. Science, 2019,366(6470):1196-1197. DOI: 10.1126/science.aba1103.
[13]
DIDHAM R K, KAPOS V, EWERS R M. Rethinking the conceptual foundations of habitat fragmentation research[J]. Oikos, 2012,121(2):161-170. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.20273.x.
[14]
FAHRIG L. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2003,34(1):487-515. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419.
[15]
FAHRIG L. Ecological responses to habitat fragmentation per Se[J]. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2017,48(1):1-23. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110316-022612.
[16]
TAUBERT F, FISCHER R, GROENEVELD J, et al. Global patterns of tropical forest fragmentation[J]. Nature, 2018,554(7693):519-522. DOI: 10.1038/nature25508.
[17]
BRINCK K, FISCHER R, GROENEVELD J, et al. High resolution analysis of tropical forest fragmentation and its impact on the global carbon cycle[J]. Nat Commun, 2017,8(1):14855. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms14855.
[18]
BUTLER B J, SWENSON J J, ALIG R J. Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2004,189(1/2/3):363-373. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2003.09.013.
[19]
李明诗, 刘图强, 潘洁. 森林破碎化的社会经济驱动力分析:以美国阿拉巴马州为例[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010,38(6):57-59.
LI M S, LIU T Q, PAN J. Assessment of socio-economic drivers contributing to forest fragmentation: a case study from Alabama,USA[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010,38(6):57-59.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2010.06.033.
[20]
任芯雨, 吕莹莹, 李明诗. 基于景观镶嵌度指数的森林破碎化模式动态:以美国俄勒冈州为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014,25(8):2317-2326.
REN X Y, LYU Y Y, LI M S. Assessing dynamic patterns of forest fragmentation based on a landscape mosaic indicator: a case study of Oregon State, USA[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2014,25(8):2317-2326. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140530.004.
[21]
RIITTERS I K, COULSTON J W, WICKHAM J D, et al. Localizing national fragmentation statistics with forest type maps[J]. J For, 2003,101(4):18-22. DOI: 10.1505/IFOR.5.2.176.17415.
[22]
RIITTERS K H, WICKHAM J D, O’NEILL R V, et al. Fragmentation of continental United States forests[J]. Ecosystems, 2002,5(8):0815-0822. DOI: 10.1007/s10021-002-0209-2.
[23]
ANDRONACHE I, MARIN M, FISCHER R, et al. Dynamics of forest fragmentation and connectivity using particle and fractal analysis[J]. Sci Rep, 2019,9(1):1-9. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-48277-z.
[24]
沈文娟, 徐婷, 李明诗. 中国三大林区森林破碎化及干扰模式变动分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,37(4):75-79.
SHEN W J, XU T, LI M S. Spatio-temporal changes in forest fragmentation, disturbance patterns over the three giant forested regions of China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013,37(4):75-79. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.04.014.
[25]
李瑶, 肖向明, 李香萍, 等. 中国森林破碎化多尺度评价[J]. 生物多样性, 2017,25(4):372-381.
Abstract
基于2010年50 m空间分辨率森林分布图, 我们利用森林破碎化模型制作了中国森林6个不同破碎化类型 (内部森林、孔洞森林、边缘森林、斑块森林、过渡森林和未确定森林)的空间分布图。然后结合2010年中国行政区划图, 对比分析了不同尺度行政区域的森林破碎化情况。结果表明: 在国家尺度上, 斑块森林的比例最大(49.05%), 内部森林的比例最小(3.40%); 在区域尺度上, 东北地区森林破碎化程度最低, 西南地区森林破碎化程度次之, 华北平原、华中地区、山东半岛、黄淮海平原的森林破碎化程度最高; 在省级尺度上, 上海市森林破碎化程度最高, 天津市次之, 云南省及黑龙江省森林破碎化程度较低; 在县级尺度上, 陕西省所属的县森林破碎化程度最低。由此可知, 总体上我国森林破碎化情况较为严重, 但不同森林破碎化类型的空间分布存在较大差异。本研究可为各级林业部门管理森林资源以及优化林业生产和森林空间格局中提供数据支持, 提高森林的生态系统服务功能和生物多样性保护功能。
LI Y, XIAO X M, LI X P, et al. Multi-scale assessments of forest fragmentation in China[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2017,25(4):372-381.DOI: 10.17520/biods.2016257.
[26]
MEIGS G W, DUNN C J, PARKS S A, et al. Influence of topography and fuels on fire refugia probability under varying fire weather conditions in forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Can J For Res, 2020,50(7):636-647.DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2019-0406.
[27]
Pacific Northwest Forest Inventory and Analysis Database (PNW-FIADB). Resource monitoring and assessment programR]. Portland: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 2016.
[28]
LI S J, YANG B. Introducing a new method for assessing spatially explicit processes of landscape fragmentation[J]. Ecol Indic, 2015,56:116-124. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.031.
[29]
YANG L M, JIN S M, DANIELSON P, et al. A new generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: requirements, research priorities, design, and implementation strategies[J]. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2018,146:108-123. DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.006.
[30]
JIN S M, HOMER C, YANG L M, et al. Overall methodology design for the United States National Land Cover Database 2016 products[J]. Remote Sens, 2019,11(24):2971-3003. DOI: 10.3390/rs11242971.
[31]
TEPLEY A J, SWANSON F J, SPIES T A. Fire-mediated pathways of stand development in Douglas-fir/western hemlock forests of the Pacific Northwest, USA[J]. Ecology, 2013,94(8):1729-1743. DOI: 10.1890/12-1506.1.
[32]
Oregon Goveronment. Oregon Department of Forestry Forest Resources Planning Program: Harvest reports. [R/OL]. Oregon: Oregon Goveronment, 2017.
[33]
Oregon Forest Resources Institute. Oregon’s Forest Protection Laws: an illustrated manual-revised[R]. rd Ed. Oregon: Oregon Government, 2018.
[34]
United State Department of Agriculture. National report on sustainable forests-2010 [R/OL]. Washington: United State Department of Agriculture, 2010. https://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/national-report
[35]
谭文雄, 刘碧云, 陈富强. 美国林业可持续发展研究借鉴的文献综述[J]. 世界林业研究, 2008,21(S1) : 16-20.
TAN W X, LIU B U, CHEN F Q, et al. Summary of studies for sustainable development of American forestry[J]. World For research, 2008,21(S1):16-20
[36]
孙飞, 陈敏学, 毛丽君, 等. 中国大陆省级尺度森林破碎化特征评价[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,39(1):43-51.
SUN F, CHEN M X, MAO L J, et al. Assessment of provincial-scale forest fragmentation in Chinese mainland[J]. J Northwest A F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2011,39(1):43-51.DOI: 10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2011.01.025.
[37]
Pacific Northwest Research Station General Technical Report (PNW-GTR-976). Washington’s forest resources, 2007-2016: 10-year forest inventory and analysis report[R]. Portland: USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 2019.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021
PDF(7330 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/