JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 88-96.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006045
Previous Articles Next Articles
SHAN Kaili(), ZANG Hao, PAN Ping, NING Jinkui, OUYANG Xunzhi*()
Received:
2020-06-26
Accepted:
2020-09-24
Online:
2022-01-30
Published:
2022-02-09
Contact:
OUYANG Xunzhi
E-mail:1321566532@qq.com;oyxz@jxau.edu.cn
CLC Number:
SHAN Kaili, ZANG Hao, PAN Ping, NING Jinkui, OUYANG Xunzhi. Individual tree crown width prediction models for natural Phoebe bournei in central Jiangxi Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 88-96.
Table 1
Summary statistics of plots"
统计量 statistic quantity | 闽楠单木 Phoebe bournei individual | 林分 stand | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
胸径/cm DBH | 树高/m height | 冠幅/m crown width | 平均 胸径/cm average DBH | 平均 树高/m average height | 平均 冠幅/m average crown width | 密度/ (株·hm-2) density | |
平均值 mean | 10.10 | 8.20 | 2.60 | 11.80 | 9.20 | 3.30 | 1 657.70 |
标准差 SD | 8.84 | 3.92 | 1.93 | 3.85 | 1.92 | 1.22 | 733.12 |
最小值 min. | 2.00 | 1.90 | 0.50 | 6.60 | 6.20 | 1.70 | 50.00 |
最大值 max. | 69.60 | 32.00 | 22.50 | 24.10 | 15.00 | 7.50 | 2 800.00 |
Table 2
Alternative basic models"
模型 model | 模型表达式 model equation | 模型形式 model form | 模型 model | 模型表达式 model equation | 模型形式 model form |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
M1 | CW=a0+b0DBH | 线性 Linear | M7 | CW=exp(a0+b0DBH) | Growth |
M2 | CW=a0+b0DBH+c0 | 二次型 Quadratic | M8 | CW=a0[1-exp(-b0DBH) | Richards |
M3 | CW=a0 | 幂函数 Power | M9 | CW=a0/[1+b0exp(-c0DBH)] | Logistic |
M4 | CW=a0[1-exp(-b0DBH)] | Monomolecular | M10 | CW=a0/[1+exp[b0+β2ln(DBH+1)]] | Logistic |
M5 | CW=[DBH/(a0+b0DBH)]2 | Hossfeld 1 | M11 | CW=a0[1-exp(-b0 | Weibull |
M6 | CW=a0( | Compound |
Table 3
Evaluation index value of basic models"
模型 model | 建模数据 fitting data | 检验数据 validation data | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | σ(RMSE) | σ(RMA) | σ(MAE) | σ(RMSE) | σ(RMA) | σ(MAE) | ||||||||||||||
平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | |||||||
M1 | 0.718 5 | 0.011 9 | 1.167 4 | 0.020 6 | 0.281 1 | 0.003 5 | 0.833 6 | 0.016 7 | 1.258 7 | 0.499 4 | 0.279 7 | 0.093 9 | 0.950 6 | 0.359 2 | ||||||
M2 | 0.722 7 | 0.012 8 | 1.158 6 | 0.020 7 | 0.280 1 | 0.003 5 | 0.832 1 | 0.016 7 | 1.255 6 | 0.518 3 | 0.279 7 | 0.093 1 | 0.944 3 | 0.353 0 | ||||||
M3 | 0.692 7 | 0.010 9 | 1.220 1 | 0.025 2 | 0.303 4 | 0.004 9 | 0.855 3 | 0.019 0 | 1.338 3 | 0.582 9 | 0.301 7 | 0.127 9 | 1.006 9 | 0.421 0 | ||||||
M4 | 0.627 0 | 0.015 9 | 1.343 9 | 0.028 5 | 0.462 7 | 0.018 4 | 0.973 8 | 0.025 6 | 1.494 5 | 0.666 2 | 0.435 6 | 0.245 1 | 1.145 0 | 0.476 2 | ||||||
M5 | 0.562 9 | 0.010 8 | 1.455 6 | 0.040 1 | 0.460 3 | 0.026 0 | 1.001 0 | 0.030 4 | 1.547 2 | 0.815 8 | 0.442 4 | 0.269 9 | 1.181 9 | 0.546 7 | ||||||
M6 | 0.664 8 | 0.016 9 | 1.273 8 | 0.022 9 | 0.310 8 | 0.003 6 | 0.959 1 | 0.015 4 | 1.309 4 | 0.548 0 | 0.294 2 | 0.097 7 | 0.980 7 | 0.381 1 | ||||||
M7 | 0.664 8 | 0.016 9 | 1.273 8 | 0.022 9 | 0.310 8 | 0.003 6 | 0.959 1 | 0.015 4 | 1.309 4 | 0.548 0 | 0.294 2 | 0.097 7 | 0.980 7 | 0.381 1 | ||||||
M9 | 0.708 8 | 0.013 1 | 1.187 4 | 0.020 7 | 0.291 1 | 0.003 3 | 0.866 1 | 0.015 7 | 1.277 3 | 0.540 5 | 0.284 1 | 0.092 9 | 0.957 8 | 0.344 6 |
Table 4
Evaluation index values of four models with partial competition factors"
模型类型 model | 竞争指标 competitive index | σ(RMSE) | σ(RMA) | σ(MAE) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | 平均值 mean | 标准差 SD | ||
OLS模型 OLS model | 无 | 1.255 6 | 0.518 3 | 0.279 7 | 0.093 1 | 0.944 3 | 0.353 0 |
AB | 1.284 3 | 0.490 6 | 0.280 6 | 0.097 0 | 0.956 9 | 0.338 2 | |
ABL | 1.230 1 | 0.521 3 | 0.276 6 | 0.101 5 | 0.926 8 | 0.359 5 | |
ISD | 1.267 4 | 0.462 3 | 0.278 9 | 0.093 8 | 0.943 2 | 0.308 4 | |
Hegyi(N=1) | 1.259 0 | 0.524 8 | 0.280 6 | 0.095 0 | 0.946 3 | 0.356 7 | |
Hegyi(R=1) | 1.261 1 | 0.524 6 | 0.280 9 | 0.094 7 | 0.954 4 | 0.012 9 | |
混合效应模型 mixed effects model | 无 | 0.846 0 | 0.321 8 | 0.211 1 | 0.056 5 | 0.650 1 | 0.258 1 |
AB | 0.894 8 | 0.331 0 | 0.219 0 | 0.052 8 | 0.690 9 | 0.263 6 | |
ABL | 0.846 4 | 0.314 9 | 0.211 7 | 0.054 4 | 0.649 2 | 0.251 4 | |
ISD | 0.895 7 | 0.333 7 | 0.218 9 | 0.052 5 | 0.691 8 | 0.266 8 | |
Hegyi(N=1) | 0.848 6 | 0.322 2 | 0.211 4 | 0.055 5 | 0.652 1 | 0.255 6 | |
Hegyi(R=1) | 0.839 1 | 0.317 6 | 0.210 8 | 0.056 6 | 0.649 0 | 0.263 8 | |
增强回归树 BRT | 无 | 1.502 0 | 0.627 8 | 0.311 5 | 0.113 2 | 1.067 6 | 0.446 5 |
AB | 1.555 2 | 0.595 3 | 0.349 9 | 0.115 8 | 1.133 8 | 0.429 5 | |
ABL | 1.526 1 | 0.621 1 | 0.323 6 | 0.114 3 | 1.084 9 | 0.430 1 | |
ISD | 1.539 4 | 0.553 4 | 0.351 2 | 0.112 0 | 1.131 4 | 0.403 4 | |
Hegyi(N=4) | 1.476 3 | 0.574 6 | 0.306 6 | 0.112 0 | 1.057 4 | 0.420 1 | |
Hegyi(R=7) | 1.459 9 | 0.536 9 | 0.305 2 | 0.113 2 | 1.051 5 | 0.416 4 | |
随机森林 RF | 无 | 1.567 6 | 0.656 8 | 0.340 2 | 0.109 3 | 1.140 9 | 0.465 9 |
AB | 1.400 6 | 0.468 3 | 0.320 2 | 0.074 8 | 1.058 2 | 0.281 0 | |
ABL | 1.488 8 | 0.606 6 | 0.319 2 | 0.099 2 | 1.090 4 | 0.387 5 | |
ISD | 1.529 4 | 0.645 8 | 0.335 8 | 0.101 4 | 1.111 4 | 0.361 6 | |
Hegyi(N=8) | 1.455 1 | 0.650 2 | 0.330 4 | 0.109 5 | 1.094 4 | 0.518 3 | |
Hegyi(R=6) | 1.460 1 | 0.687 6 | 0.331 9 | 0.108 3 | 1.110 1 | 0.547 7 |
Table 5
Parameters estimates and evaluation indexes for models"
项目 item | 参数 parameter | OLS模型 OLS model | 混合效应模型 mixed effect model |
---|---|---|---|
固定参数 fixed parameter | a0 | 1.431 366 | 1.222 190 |
b0 | 0.134 100 | 0.222 282 | |
b1 | 0.022 591 | — | |
c0 | 0.001 121 | -0.002 181 | |
方差组成 composition of variance | | — | 0.192 855 |
| — | 0.011 628 | |
| — | 0.000 010 | |
| — | -0.027 466 | |
| — | 0.000 925 | |
| — | -0.000 313 | |
评价指标 evaluation indexes | R2 | 0.727 9 | 0.851 0 |
σ(RMSE) | 1.149 1 | 0.850 3 | |
σ(RMA) | 0.281 3 | 0.217 5 | |
σ(MAE) | 0.829 9 | 0.614 5 |
[1] |
SHARMA R P, VACEK Z, VACEK S. Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2016, 366:208-220.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.040.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.040 |
[2] |
MONSERUD R A, STERBA H. A basal area increment model for individual trees growing in even-and uneven-aged forest stands in Austria[J]. For Ecol Manag, 1996, 80(1/2/3):57-80.DOI: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03638-5.
doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(95)03638-5 |
[3] |
TAHVANAINEN T, FORSS E. Individual tree models for the crown biomass distribution of Scots pine,Norway spruce and birch in Finland[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2008, 255(3/4):455-467.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.035.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.035 |
[4] |
MONSERUD R A, STERBA H. Modeling individual tree mortality for Austrian forest species[J]. For Ecol Manag, 1999, 113(2/3):109-123.DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00419-8.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00419-8 |
[5] |
HAO X, YUJUN S, XINJIE W, et al. Linear mixed-effects models to describe individual tree crown width for China-fir in Fujian Province,southeast China[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(4):e0122257.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122257.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122257 |
[6] | 符亚健, 吕飞舟, 朱光玉, 等. 华北落叶松天然次生林单木冠幅模型构建[J]. 林业资源管理, 2016(5):65-70. |
FU Y J, LÜ F Z, ZHU G Y, et al. Construction of crown width model for single tree of natural Larix principis-rupprechtii forest[J]. For Resour Manag, 2016(5):65-70.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.05.012.
doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2016.05.012 |
|
[7] | 刘月, 王君, 杨雨春, 等. 不同林分密度胡桃楸胸径、树高、材积与冠幅关系[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3):28-35. |
LIU Y, WANG J, YANG Y C, et al. Relationship between crown width and DBH, tree height or volume of Juglans mandshurica in stands of different density[J]. Forest Engineering, 2021, 37(3):28-35.DOI: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2021.03.004.
doi: 10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2021.03.004 |
|
[8] |
THORPE H C, ASTRUP R, TROWBRIDGE A, et al. Competition and tree crowns: a neighborhood analysis of three boreal tree species[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259(8):1586-1596.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.035.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.035 |
[9] | 雷相东, 张则路, 陈晓光. 长白落叶松等几个树种冠幅预测模型的研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2006, 28(6):75-79. |
LEI X D, ZHANG Z L, CHEN X G. Crown-width prediction models for several tree species including Larix olgensis in northeastern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2006, 28(6):75-79.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.06.013.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1522.2006.06.013 |
|
[10] | 贺梦莹, 董利虎, 李凤日. 长白落叶松-水曲柳混交林冠幅预测模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2020, 42(7):23-32. |
HE M Y, DONG L H, LI F R. Crown width prediction models for Larix olgensis and Fraxinus mandshurica mixed plantations[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2020, 42(7):23-32.DOI: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190250.
doi: 10.12171/j.1000-1522.20190250 |
|
[11] | 覃阳平, 张怀清, 陈永富, 等. 基于简单竞争指数的杉木人工林树冠形状模拟[J]. 林业科学研究, 2014, 27(3):363-366. |
QIN Y P, ZHANG H Q, CHEN Y F, et al. Canopy shape simulation of Chinese fir plantation based on simple competition index[J]. For Res, 2014, 27(3):363-366.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2014.03.011.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2014.03.011 |
|
[12] | 符利勇, 孙华. 基于混合效应模型的杉木单木冠幅预测模型[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(8):65-74. |
FU L Y, SUN H. Individual crown diameter prediction for Cunninghamia lanceolata forests based on mixed effects models[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2013, 49(8):65-74.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130810.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20130810 |
|
[13] | 张鹏, 王新杰, 高志雄, 等. 将乐地区马尾松最优冠幅模型研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2015, 30(4):94-98. |
ZHANG P, WANG X J, GAO Z X, et al. Optimal crown diameter models for Pinus massoniana in Jiangle,Fujian Province[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2015, 30(4):94-98.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.04.16.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2015.04.16 |
|
[14] |
RAPTIS D, KAZANA V, KAZAKLIS A, et al. A crown width-diameter model for natural even-aged black pine forest management[J]. Forests, 2018, 9(10):610.DOI: 10.3390/f9100610.
doi: 10.3390/f9100610 |
[15] | 韩艳刚, 雷泽勇, 赵国军, 等. 樟子松人工固沙林冠幅:胸径模型[J]. 干旱区研究, 2018, 35(5):1129-1137. |
HAN Y G, LEI Z Y, ZHAO G J, et al. Canopy-DBH models for sand-fixing plantation of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2018, 35(5):1129-1137.DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.05.16.
doi: 10.13866/j.azr.2018.05.16 |
|
[16] |
XIANG W, HASSEGAWA M, FRANCESCHINI T, et al. Characterizing wood density-climate relationships along the stem in black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) B.S.P.) using a combination of boosted regression trees and mixed-effects models[J]. Forestry (Lond), 2019, 92(3):357-374.DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpz006.
doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpz006 |
[17] | 徐奇刚, 雷相东, 国红, 等. 基于多层感知机的长白落叶松人工林林分生物量模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):97-107. |
XU Q G, LEI X D, GUO H, et al. Stand biomass model of Larix olgensis plantations based on multi-layer perceptron networks[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(5):97-107.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190035.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190035 |
|
[18] | 沈剑波, 王应宽, 雷相东, 等. 基于BP神经网络的广东省针阔混交异龄林立地质量评价[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):38-47. |
SHEN J B, WANG Y K, LEI X D, et al. Site quality evaluation of uneven-aged mixed coniferous and broadleaved stands in Guangdong Province of southern China based on BP neural network[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(5):38-47.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190028.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190028 |
|
[19] | 曹梦, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 基于哑变量的闽楠天然次生林单木胸径和树高生长模型研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(5):88-96. |
CAO M, PAN P, OUYANG X Z, et al. Growth model of DBH and tree height for individual tree of natural secondary Phoebe bournei forest based on dummy variable[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2019, 41(5):88-96.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190026.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20190026 |
|
[20] | 曹梦, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 天然次生林中闽楠生物量分配特征及相容性模型[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019, 36(4):764-773. |
CAO M, PAN P, OUYANG X Z, et al. Biomass allocation characteristics and a compatible model for Phoebe bournei in a natural secondary forest[J]. J Zhejiang A & F Univ, 2019, 36(4):764-773.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.017.
doi: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2019.04.017 |
|
[21] | 褚欣, 潘萍, 李琦, 等. 闽楠天然次生林直径分布模拟研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(2):273-280. |
CHU X, PAN P, LI Q, et al. A study on diameter distribution simulation of natural secondary Phoebe bournei forest[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2019, 41(2):273-280.DOI: 10.13836/j.jjau.2019033.
doi: 10.13836/j.jjau.2019033 |
|
[22] | 欧建德. 林下闽楠更新层生境质量评价模型的建立与应用[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2015, 35(2):73-78. |
OU J D. Establishment and application of habitat quality evaluation model for understory Phoebe bournei regeneration layer[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2015, 35(2):73-78.DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.02.012.
doi: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2015.02.012 |
|
[23] |
FU L Y, SUN H, SHARMA R P, et al. Nonlinear mixed-effects crown width models for individual trees of Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) in south-central China[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 302:210-220.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.036.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.03.036 |
[24] |
SÁNCHEZ-GONZÁLEZ M, CAÑELLAS I, MONTERO G. Generalized height-diameter and crown diameter prediction models for cork oak forests in Spain[J]. Invest Agrar:Sist Recur For, 2007, 16(1):76.DOI: 10.5424/srf/2007161-00999.
doi: 10.5424/srf/2007161-00999 |
[25] |
SÖNMEZ T. Diameter at breast height-crown diameter prediction models for Picea orientalis[J]. Afr J Agric Res, 2009, 4(3):215-219.DOI: 10.1021/jf803390m.
doi: 10.1021/jf803390m |
[26] | 欧强新, 李海奎, 雷相东, 等. 基于清查数据的福建省马尾松生物量转换和扩展因子估算差异解析:3种集成学习决策树模型的比较[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(6):2007-2016. |
OU Q X, LI H K, LEI X D, et al. Difference analysis in estimating biomass conversion and expansion factors of masson pine in Fujian Province,China based on national forest inventory data:a comparison of three decision tree models of ensemble learning[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29(6):2007-2016.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.019.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201806.019 |
|
[27] | KUHN M, JOHNSON K. Applied predictive modeling[M]. Beijing: China Machine Press, 2016. |
[28] | 汤孟平, 陈永刚, 施拥军, 等. 基于Voronoi图的群落优势树种种内种间竞争[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(11):4707-4716. |
TANG M P, CHEN Y G, SHI Y J, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition analysis of community dominant plant populations based on Voronoi diagram[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2007, 27(11):4707-4716.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.11.039.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2007.11.039 |
|
[29] | 华伟平, 丘甜, 江希钿, 等. 黄山松单木竞争分析及模型建立[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2017, 37(2):201-206. |
HUA W P, QIU T, JIANG X D, et al. Study on individual tree competition analysis and development model of the Pinus taiwanensis[J]. J For Environ, 2017, 37(2):201-206.DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2017.02.012.
doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2017.02.012 |
|
[30] | 曾思齐, 龙时胜, 肖化顺, 等. 南方地区青冈栎次生林种内与种间竞争研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(10):1-5. |
ZENG S Q, LONG S S, XIAO H S, et al. Intraspecific and interspecific competition of Cyclobalanopsis glauca secondary forests in south China[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2016, 36(10):1-5.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.10.001.
doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2016.10.001 |
|
[31] | 宋博, 李凤日, 董利虎, 等. 黑龙江西部地区人工小黑杨立木可加性生物量模型[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2018, 40(11):58-68. |
SONG B, LI F R, DONG L H, et al. Additive system of biomass equations for planted Populus simonii × P.nigra in western Heilongjiang Province of northeastern China[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2018, 40(11):58-68.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180062.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.20180062 |
|
[32] | 刘平, 王玉涛, 马履一. 低山侧柏人工林单木冠幅预测模型及精度评价[J]. 林业资源管理, 2014(2):52-57,104. |
LIU P, WANG Y T, MA L Y. Individual crown width prediction models and accuracy appraisal for Platycladus orientalis plantation in low mountainous area[J]. For Resour Manag, 2014(2):52-57,104.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.02.011.
doi: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2014.02.011 |
|
[33] |
KUEHNE C, WEISKITTEL A R, WASKIEWICZ J. Comparing performance of contrasting distance-independent and distance-dependent competition metrics in predicting individual tree diameter increment and survival within structurally-heterogeneous,mixed-species forests of Northeastern United States[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2019, 433:205-216.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.002.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.11.002 |
[34] | 李婉婷, 姜立春, 万道印. 基于混合效应的兴安落叶松树高与胸径关系模拟[J]. 植物研究, 2014, 34(3):343-348. |
LI W T, JIANG L C, WAN D Y. Simulation of height-diameter relationships for Larix gmelinii based on mixed effects[J]. Bull Bot Res, 2014, 34(3):343-348.DOI: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.03.010.
doi: 10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2014.03.010 |
|
[35] | 吕乐, 董利虎, 李凤日. 黑龙江省东部地区天然椴树单木冠幅预测模型[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(7):37-42. |
LÜ L, DONG L H, LI F R. Individual tree crown width prediction models for natural Tilia tuan in eastern Heilongjiang Province[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(7):37-42.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.07.007.
doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.07.007 |
|
[36] | 田德超, 李凤日, 董利虎. 依据分位数回归建立的长白落叶松潜在最大冠幅预测模型[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2019, 47(8):41-46. |
TIAN D C, LI F R, DONG L H. Potential maximum crown width prediction model of Larix olgensis by quantile regression[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2019, 47(8):41-46.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.08.008.
doi: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2019.08.008 |
|
[37] | 符亚健. 华北落叶松天然林单木冠幅模型研究[D]. 长沙:中南林业科技大学, 2017. |
FU Y J. Developing individual tree crown width models for Larix principis-rupprechtii[D]. Changsha:Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017.DOI: 10.7666/d.Y3269461.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y3269461 |
|
[38] | DELGADO M F, CERNADAS E, BARRO S, et al. Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?[J]. J Mach Learn Res, 2014, 15(1):3133-3181. |
[39] | 李永亮, 张怀清, 杨廷栋, 等. 基于自适应神经模糊系统的杉木冠幅估算方法[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(11):45-51. |
LI Y L, ZHANG H Q, YANG T D, et al. A method of estimating Chinese fir crown width based on adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2019, 55(11):45-51.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191106.
doi: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20191106 |
[1] | GAI Junpeng, CHEN Dongsheng, JIA Weiwei, WANG Zheng. Developing height growth model of Larix kaempferi based on genetic and climate effects [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 51-60. |
[2] | FENG Yining, LI Yingang, QI Ming, ZHOU Pengyan, ZHOU Qi, DONG Le, XU Li’an. Genetic diversity analyses of Phoebe bournei representative populations in Fujian Province based on SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 102-108. |
[3] | ZHANG Lan,ZHANG Yi,DUAN Ruyan,WEI Xiaoli,XU Xiaoqin. Genetic variation among origin locations of Phoebe bournei(Hemsl.) Yang and a preliminary selection based on seedling growth and root traits [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 33-40. |
[4] | XU Hao, SUN Yujun, WANG Xinjie, GAO Zhixiong, DONG Yunfei. Analysis of the branch size for Chinese fir plantation using the linear mixed effects model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(02): 97-103. |
[5] | WANG Dongguang,YIN Guangtian,YANG Jinchang,LI Rongsheng,ZOU Wentao,JIA Ruifeng. Effects of phosphorus fertilization on growth and foliar nutrient(N,P,K) of Phoebe bournei seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(03): 40-44. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||