Effect of fungus-residue and other matrix formulations on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of shelled walnut seedlings

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007003

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (1): 145-155.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007003

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effect of fungus-residue and other matrix formulations on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of shelled walnut seedlings

JI Yanhong¹(), PAN Pingping¹, DOU Quanqin²^,^*(), XIE Yinfeng¹^,^*()

1. Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Jiangsu Aacademy of Forestry, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2020-07-02 Accepted:2020-07-31 Online:2022-01-30 Published:2022-02-09
Contact: DOU Quanqin,XIE Yinfeng E-mail:1678716640@qq.com;douqq2008@163.com;xxyy@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aims to investigate the effect of substrate formula like bacterial residue on seedling growth and fluorescence characteristics of Carya illinoinensis seedings and select a low-cost substrate formula suitable for seedling growth.【Method】 One-year-old container seedlings of Carya illinoinensis ‘Shaoxing’ progeny were used as material. The garden soil, peat, vinegar bad volume ratios were respectively set to 4:3:3 (A1), 4:2:4 (A2), 4:1:5 (A3) and garden soil, peat, mushroom residue volume ratios were respectively set to 4:3:3 (B1), 4:2:4 (B2), 4:1:5 (B3) formula, garden soil was the control (CK), seven treatments were used. The seedling height, ground diameter and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of these treatments were determined to analyze the effects of different matrix formula on the growth and fluorescence properties of C. illinoinensis container seedling.【Result】 The seedling growth indexes of the different treatments significantly differed. Unlike garden soil, adding mushroom residue and vinegar bad could decrease the bulk density, increase the ventilation of the matrix porosity and organic matter and so on. Adding mushroom residue substrate was conducive to the growth of C. illinoinensis seedlings. Besides, The order of treatments from small to large according to seedling height was CK < A3 < A1 < A2 < B1 < B3 < B2; the order according to ground diameter was CK < A1 < A2 < A3 < B1 < B2 < B3. The addition of B2 and B3 bacterial residues into the substrate was the most suitable for the growth of seedlings. Seedling height and ground diameter of seedings that treated by B3 garden soil, peat, mushroom residue volume 4:1:5 matrix were significantly higher than that of control, increased by 65% and 73% respectively. Also, In terms of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, the F_v/F_m ratio of B substrate treatment was higher than that of A substrate treatment in June and July, and there was no significant difference between A substrate and B substrate treatment in August and September. The F_v/F₀ of seedlings treated with B substrate was higher than that of seedlings treated with A substrate in June to August, and the F_v/F₀ of seedlings treated with A substrate was higher than that of seedlings treated with B substrate in September. The F_v '/F_m' index of all seedlings treated with B substrate was higher than that of seedlings treated with A substrate except in July. Φ_PSⅡ of seedling treated with substrate B in June to July was higher than that of treated substrate. The photochemical quenching (q_P) of seedling treated with the substrate B in June to July was higher than that treated with the substrate. Non-photocheroical quenching (NPQ) A of seedlings treated with A substrate were consistently higher than those treated with B substrate from June to September. During June to September, the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of B3 treated seeding were significantly higher than control. According to the correlation analysis, the seedling height, and the maximum water holding capacity and organic matter content were significantly positively correlated.There was a significant positive correlation between ground diameter and maximum water holding capacity.There is a high correlation between available phosphorus and available potassium, which was related to the pH value in the formula matrix. The suitable pH value was conducived to the conversion of phosphate and exchangeable potassium ions. When the pH value was between 6.0 and 6.5, the availability of phosphorus and potassium in the matrix was the highest. Seedling height, ground diameter and F₀, F_m, F_v'/ F_m, Φ_PSⅡ and q_P was significantly positively related, seedling height and NPQ was significantly negative correlation, and ground diameter were very significant negative correlation with NPQ.【Conclusion】 In order to reduce the amount of peat, the mixture matrix of garden soil, peat and bacterial residue with a volume ratio of 4:1:5 was suitable for improving the growth and the light energy utilization efficiency of C.inillinoinensis seeding, moreover, its cost of seedling cultivation decrease, which was conducive to production and application.

Key words: Carya illinoinensis, container, seedling matrix, growth, chlorophyll fluorescence

CLC Number:

S718

JI Yanhong, PAN Pingping, DOU Quanqin, XIE Yinfeng. Effect of fungus-residue and other matrix formulations on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of shelled walnut seedlings[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 145-155.

Figures/Tables 14

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.1

Table 4

Fig.2

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Table 9

Table 10

Table 11

Table 12

Correlation analysis between growth index and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters"

变量 variable	苗高 seedling height	地径 ground diameter	F_v/F_m	F_v/F₀	F_v'/F_m'	$Φ PS Ⅱ$	qP	NPQ
苗高 seedling height	1.00
地径 ground diameter	0.96^**	1.00
F_v/F_m	0.26	0.26	1.00
F_v/F₀	0.32	0.23	0.44	1.00
F_v'/F_m'	0.80^*	0.77^*	0.12	0.44	1.00
$Φ PS Ⅱ$	0.76^*	0.75^*	0.00	0.01	0.86^*	1.00
qP	0.75^*	0.80^*	0.09	0.27	0.94^**	0.96^**	1.00
NPQ	-0.86^*	-0.88^**	-0.33	-0.41	-0.95^**	-0.88^**	-0.95^**	1.00

Table 12

References 37

[1]	张日清, 李江, 吕芳德, 等. 我国引种美国山核桃历程及资源现状研究[J]. 经济林研究, 2003, 21(4):107-109.
	ZHANG R Q, LI J, LÜ F D, et al. Historical survey of the introduced pecan tree in China:distribution and resource estimate[J]. Econ For Res, 2003, 21(4):107-109.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2003.04.036. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8981.2003.04.036
[2]	董润泉. 引种美国山核桃大有发展前景[A]. 云南省科学技术协会、中共楚雄州委、楚雄州人民政府:云南省机械工程学会, 2018: 4.
	DONG R Q. The introduction of Carya illinoinensis has great prospects[A]. Yunnan Association for Science and Technology、Party Committee of Chuxiong Prefecture、Chuxiong People’s Government: Yunnan Institute of Mechanical Engineering, 2018: 4.
[3]	朱海军. 薄壳山核桃容器苗培育关键技术研究[D]. 南京:南京林业大学, 2016.
	ZHU H J. Study on the key technique of Carya illinoensis containerized seedling[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Forestry University, 2016.
[4]	唐文莉. 美国山核桃引种品种苗期特性及生理生态特性研究[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学, 2005.
	TANG W L. Research of seedling characters and eco-physiological indicators of introduced pecan varieties[D]. Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University, 2005.
[5]	张日清, 吕芳德, 陈建华. 我国引种美国山核桃的问题与发展建议[J]. 落叶果树, 2001, 33(4):30. DOI: 10.13855/j.cnki.lygs.2001.04.024. doi: 10.13855/j.cnki.lygs.2001.04.024
[6]	蔡开朗, 刘子嘉, 陈运雷, 等. 降香黄檀容器育苗技术研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(16):5082-5083,5087.
	CAI K L, LIU Z J, CHEN Y L, et al. Study on the container seedlings of Dalbergia odorifera[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2014, 42(16):5082-5083,5087.DOI: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2014.16.098. doi: 10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2014.16.098
[7]	WOOD B W. Pecan production in North America[J]. Southwestern Entomologist, 2003(51):1-19.
[8]	CHEN L, YANG X, RAZA W, et al. Solid-state fermentation of agro-industrial wastes to produce bioorganic fertilizer for the biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of cucumber in continuously cropped soil[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2011, 102(4):3900-3910.DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.126. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.11.126
[9]	MEDINA E, PAREDES C, PÉREZ-MURCIA M D, et al. Spent mushroom substrates as component of growing media for germination and growth of horticultural plants[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2009, 100(18):4227-4232.DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.055. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.055
[10]	OSTOS J C, LÓPEZ-GARRIDO R, MURILLO J M, et al. Substitution of peat for municipal solid waste-and sewage sludge-based composts in nursery growing media:effects on growth and nutrition of the native shrub Pistacia lentiscus L[J]. Bioresour Technol, 2008, 99(6):1793-1800.DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.033. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.033
[11]	黄斌龙, 阮少宁, 马志慧, 等. 不同轻型基质对卷荚相思容器苗生长的影响[J]. 森林与环境学报, 2015, 35(2):153-158.
	HUANG B L, RUAN S N, MA Z H, et al. The effects of different light mediums on the growth of container seedlings of Acacia cincinnata[J]. J For Environ, 2015, 35(2):153-158.DOI: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2015.02.010. doi: 10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2015.02.010
[12]	李明伟, 叶维雁, 刘鹏, 等. 不同基质对葡萄柚嫁接苗生长的影响[J]. 经济林研究, 2014, 32(3):139-143.
	LI M W, YE W Y, LIU P, et al. Effects of different substrates on grafting seedling growth of grapefruit[J]. Nonwood For Res, 2014, 32(3):139-143.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2014.03.062. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1003-8981.2014.03.062
[13]	黄军华. 不同基质对金森女贞容器苗生长的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012, 27(4):149-152.
	HUANG J H. Effects of different media on the growth of container seedlings of Ligustrum japonicum ‘Howardii’[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2012, 27(4):149-152.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.04.28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.04.28
[14]	林霞, 郑坚, 刘洪见, 等. 不同基质对无柄小叶榕容器苗生长和叶片生理特性的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(8):62-70.
	LIN X, ZHENG J, LIU H J, et al. Effects of different media on growth and leaf physiological characteristics of Ficus concinna var. subsessilis container seedlings[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2010, 46(8):62-70.
[15]	OLIET J A, PUÉRTOLAS J, PLANELLES R, et al. Nutrient loading of forest tree seedlings to promote stress resistance and field performance:a Mediterranean perspective[J]. New For, 2013, 44(5):649-669.DOI: 10.1007/s11056-013-9382-8. doi: 10.1007/s11056-013-9382-8
[16]	张海军. 不同基质配比对薄壳山核桃扦插苗生长的影响[D]. 杭州:浙江农林大学, 2015.
	ZHANG H J. Effects of different matrix formula on pecan cutting growth[D]. Hangzhou:Zhejiang A & F University, 2015.
[17]	曲绍轩, 杨华平, 李辉平, 等. 适宜于金针菇菌渣周年化栽培草菇的品种和基质配方筛选[J]. 湖北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 38(2):121-125.
	QU S X, YANG H P, LI H P, et al. Selection of varieties and formulations on Volvariella volvacea cultivated using Flammulina velutipes[J]. J Hubei Minzu Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 38(2):121-125.DOI: 10.13501/j.cnki.42-1908/n.2020.06.001. doi: 10.13501/j.cnki.42-1908/n.2020.06.001
[18]	王晓娅, 邓志力, 董静. 油松轻型基质无纺布容器育苗技术试验[J]. 山东林业科技, 2019, 49(4):51-53.
[19]	柴文臣. 工厂化育苗基质配比及生长调节剂对番茄苗期生长的影响[D]. 太谷:山西农业大学, 2017.
	CHAI W C. Effects of industrial-breeding substrate proportioning and plant growth ragulator on growth of tomato seedlings[D]. Taigu:Shanxi Agricultural University, 2017.
[20]	滕飞, 刘勇, 胡嘉伟, 等. 蘑菇渣堆肥对油松移植容器苗生长和养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):184-190.
	TENG F, LIU Y, HU J W, et al. Effects of different mushroom slag compost on growth and nutrient accumulation of Pinus tabulaeformis containerized transplantings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 40(5):184-190.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.029. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.029
[21]	贺殊敏, 周佩华, 辛贵民, 等. 基于木耳菌渣番茄育苗基质筛选研究[J]. 延边大学农学学报, 2020, 42(2):43-50.
	HE S M, ZHOU P H, XIN G M, et al. Study on the selection of tomato seedling medium based on fungus residue[J]. Agric Sci J Yanbian Univ, 2020, 42(2):43-50.DOI: 10.13478/j.cnki.jasyu.2020.02.007. doi: 10.13478/j.cnki.jasyu.2020.02.007
[22]	胡小京, 曾燕颖, 敖飞雄, 等. 不同栽培基质对两种石斛生长及生理的影响[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 44(11):29-35.
	HU X J, ZENG Y Y, AO F X, et al. Effects of different substrates on growth and physiology of two species of Dendrobium[J]. J Southwest China Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 44(11):29-35.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2019.11.005. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2019.11.005
[23]	常君, 王开良, 姚小华, 等. 不同基质、不同容器对薄壳山核桃苗木根系生长影响的研究[J]. 西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 37(8):86-91.
	CHANG J, WANG K L, YAO X H, et al. Research on growth of pecan seedlings and roots affected by different substrate and container[J]. J Southwest China Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2012, 37(8):86-91.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2012.08.008. doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xsxb.2012.08.008
[24]	中国科学院南京土壤研究所. 土壤理化分析[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1978.
[25]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[26]	刁清清, 毛碧增. 蘑菇渣处理现状及在农业生产上的应用[J]. 浙江农业科学, 2012, 53(12):1710-1712.
[27]	郭世荣. 固体栽培基质研究、开发现状及发展趋势[J]. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(S2):1-4.
	GUO S R. Research progress,current exploitations and developing trends of solid cultivation medium[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2005, 21(S2):1-4.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.z2.001. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6819.2005.z2.001
[28]	李谦盛. 芦苇末基质的应用基础研究及园艺基质质量标准的探讨[D]. 南京:南京农业大学, 2003.
	LI Q S. The study on application basics of reed residue substrate and discussion on the quality standard of horticultural substrate[D]. Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003.
[29]	刘帅成, 何洪城, 曾琴. 国内外育苗基质研究进展[J]. 北方园艺, 2014(15):205-208.
	LIU S C, HE H C, ZENG Q. Research progress of breeding substrate at home and abroad[J]. North Hortic, 2014(15):205-208.
[30]	朱海军, 生静雅, 刘广勤, 等. 控释肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗营养生长的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(1):37-41.
	ZHU H J, SHENG Y L, LIU G Q, et al. Effects of controlled release fertilizer on vegetative growth of container seedlings of carya muscovata[J]. J Central South Univ For & Technol, 2015, 35(1):37-41. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.01.008 doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.01.008
[31]	BUSTAMANTE M A, PAREDES C, MORAL R, et al. Composts from distillery wastes as peat substitutes for transplant production[J]. Resour Conserv Recycl, 2008, 52(5):792-799.DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.005. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.11.005
[32]	TRILLAS M I, CASANOVA E, COTXARRERA L, et al. Composts from agricultural waste and the Trichoderma asperellum strain T-34 suppress Rhizoctonia solani in cucumber seedlings[J]. Biol Control, 2006, 39(1):32-38.DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.05.007. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.05.007
[33]	潘平平, 窦全琴, 汤文华, 等. 缓释肥用量对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分含量的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5):163-168.
	PAN P P, DOU Q Q, TANG W H, et al. Effects of slow release fertilizer dosage on growth and nutrient contents of Carya illinoensis container seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(5):163-168.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811040. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811040
[34]	季艳红, 汤文华, 窦全琴, 等. 施肥对薄壳山核桃容器苗生长及养分积累的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(6):47-56.
	JI Y H, TANG W H, DOU Q Q, et al. Effects of fertifizer application on seedling growth and nutrient accumulation in Carya illinoinensis container seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(6):47-56. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009051. doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009051
[35]	刘建锋, 杨文娟, 江泽平, 等. 遮荫对濒危植物崖柏光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20):5999-6004.
	LIU J F, YANG W J, JIANG Z P, et al. Effects of shading on photosynthetic characteristics and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of the endangered plant Thuja sutchuenensis[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011, 31(20):5999-6004.
[36]	徐伟洲, 徐炳成, 段东平, 等. 不同水肥条件下白羊草光合生理生态特征研究Ⅲ.叶绿素荧光参数[J]. 草地学报, 2011, 19(1):31-37.
	XU W Z, XU B C, DUAN D P, et al. Study on the photosynthetic characteristics of Bothriochloa ischaemum under different water and nutrient conditions Ⅲ.Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters[J]. Acta Agrectir Sin, 2011, 19(1):31-37.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.006. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.01.006
[37]	赵丽英, 邓西平, 山仑. 渗透胁迫对小麦幼苗叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2005, 16(7):1261-1264.
	ZHAO L Y, DENG X P, SHAN L. Effects of osmotic stress on chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of wheat seedling[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2005, 16(7):1261-1264.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

基质种类 matrix type	pH	质量分数/% mass fraction
基质种类 matrix type	pH	有机质 organic matter	全氮 total nitrogen	全磷 total phosphorus	全钾 total potassium
园土 garden soil	6.81	4.69	0.18	0.02	0.01
泥炭 peat	4.60	33.30	0.44	0.21	0.05
菌渣 fungi residues	5.90	23.22	2.44	1.40	2.11
醋糟 vinegar residue	6.27	7.54	2.34	0.21	0.59

处理 treatment	基质含水率/% matrix water content	基质容重/ (g·cm^-3) matrix density	最大持水率/% maximum water holding capacity	最小持水率/% minimum field capacity	基质通气孔隙度/% matrix ventilation porosity
A1	61.26±3.00 aB	0.65±0.090 aAB	98.13±6.00 bCD	59.86±13.00 bB	23.02±12.00 bB
A2	50.86±3 00 bCD	0.64±0.060 aAB	110.66±18.00 abBC	67.49±6.00 abB	27.32±6.00 abAB
A3	51.45±9.00 bBCD	0.60±0.120 aB	124.44±22.00 aB	71.60±13.00 aAB	33.13±11.00 aA
B1	77.92±4.00 aA	0.75±0.030 aAB	84.37±12.00 cDE	59.36±8.00 bB	22.73±7.00 bB
B2	48.55±9.00 cDE	0.73±0.100 aAB	128.93±3.00 bB	68.47±5.00 bB	32.84±7.00 aA
B3	59.12±5.00 bBC	0.69±0.008 aAB	176.79±5.00 aA	83.35±4.00 aA	35.65±4.00 aA
CK	40.52±2.00 E	0.81±0.037 A	69.74±3.00 E	42.40±1.00 C	13.43±2.00 C

处理 treatment	有机质质量分数/% organic matter content	pH	全氮质量分数/% total nitrogen content	速效钾含量/ (mg·kg^-1) soil potassium	有效磷含量/ (mg·kg^-1) available phosphorus
A1	8.09±0.500 aAB	6.63±0.009 aABC	0.28±0.003 aB	215.67±2.00 aA	58.19±0.20 bC
A2	7.82±0.400 aB	6.53±0.005 abBCD	0.26±0.003 bC	184.33±3.00 bC	67.18±3.00 bB
A3	6.24±0.200 bC	6.45±0.009 bCD	0.22±0.001 cD	154.67±1.00 cE	69.38±3.00 bB
B1	8.69±0.500 aAB	6.71±0.090 aAB	0.26±0.005 cC	201.67±3.00 aB	58.74±0.40 bC
B2	9.34±0.050 aA	6.65±0.020 aABC	0.30±0.003 aA	170.67±2.00 bD	85.82±2.00 aA
B3	6.49±0.100 bC	6.35±0.004 bD	0.28±0.005 aB	166.00±2.00 bD	86.48±0.70 aA
CK	4.69±0.400 D	6.81±0.020 A	0.18±0.005 E	143.30±2.00 F	43.94±0.50 D

处理 treatment	苗高/cm height of seedling	地径/mm ground diameter
A1	27.60±0.33 b	6.04±0.08 d
A2	28.10±1.20 bc	6.24±0.14 d
A3	26.50±0.88 bc	6.53±0.25 d
B1	28.70±0.88 bc	7.53±0.13 c
B2	34.50±2.19 a	8.02±0.39 b
B3	32.90±1.86 a	8.60±0.42 a
CK	19.90±0.58 c	4.97±0.10 e

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	0.780±0.010 bD	0.770±0.009 bD	0.810±0.007 aAB	0.800±0.006 aB
A2	0.797±0.002 aC	0.780±0.002 aCD	0.810±0.006 aAB	0.800±0.004 aB
A3	0.795±0.009 aC	0.790±0.003 aBC	0.821±0.009 aA	0.801±0.004 aB
B1	0.805±0.006 bBC	0.790±0.006 bBC	0.813±0.008 aAB	0.790±0.009 bB
B2	0.811±0.007 bAB	0.793±0.005 bB	0.810±0.005 aAB	0.799±0.006 bB
B3	0.820±0.003 aA	0.810±0.009 aA	0.817±0.009 aAB	0.814±0.007 aA
CK	0.778±0.005 D	0.773±0.006 D	0.803±0.006 B	0.796±0.008 B

Effect of fungus-residue and other matrix formulations on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of shelled walnut seedlings

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 14

References 37

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	3.83±0.15 aC	3.68±0.12 bBC	4.21±0.09 bD	4.67±0.16 aA
A2	4.02±0.04 aBC	3.96±0.14 aA	4.45±0.08 aC	3.57±0.14 cD
A3	3.91±0.18 aC	3.50±0.18 bC	4.47±0.04 aC	4.24±0.16 bB
B1	4.24±0.10 aAB	3.83±0.11 aAB	4.67±0.19 bB	3.49±0.12 cDE
B2	4.37±0.10 aA	4.01±0.16 aA	4.86±0.11 aA	3.95±0.13 bC
B3	4.28±0.11 aA	3.87±0.15 aAB	4.34±0.13 cCD	4.22±0.08 aB
CK	3.45±0.10 D	3.22±0.09 D	3.95±0.11 E	3.36±0.04 E

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	0.552±0.010 aB	0.487±0.013 bB	0.581±0.00 5bC	0.561±0.008 aB
A2	0.536±0.005 aBC	0.500±0.010 bB	0.576±0.014 bC	0.574±0.011 aAB
A3	0.537±0.006 aBC	0.522±0.010 aA	0.609±0.006 aAB	0.566±0.015 aAB
B1	0.523±0.014 bC	0.496±0.010 aB	0.592±0.011 bBC	0.569±0.007 aAB
B2	0.607±0.013 aA	0.497±0.006 aB	0.601±0.007 bB	0.571±0.012 aAB
B3	0.603±0.013 aA	0.495±0.006 aB	0.622±0.014 aA	0.581±0.012 aA
CK	0.445±0.009 D	0.424±0.005 C	0.519±0.011 D	0.511±0.002 C

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	0.345±0.012 bB	0.368±0.011 bC	0.374±0.011 bC	0.364±0.009 bB
A2	0.373±0.010 aA	0.388±0.008 aB	0.392±0.008 aB	0.388±0.015 aA
A3	0.362±0.004 aA	0.399±0.003 aB	0.405±0.010 aB	0.384±0.009 aA
B1	0.369±0.011 aA	0.391±0.005 bB	0.401±0.008 bB	0.393±0.012 aA
B2	0.376±0.011 aA	0.394±0.012 bB	0.405±0.010 bB	0.381±0.006 bA
B3	0.367±0.006 aA	0.419±0.008 aA	0.423±0.007 aA	0.364±0.004 cB
CK	0.333±0.013 B	0.356±0.011 C	0.368±0.009 C	0.346±0.010 C

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	0.714±0.013 bD	0.757±0.010 cD	0.649±0.005 cE	0.626±0.008 cC
A2	0.726±0.015 bCD	0.789±0.007 bC	0.707±0.010 bB	0.671±0.009 aA
A3	0.748±0.009 aAB	0.826±0.007 aB	0.739±0.009 aA	0.655±0.011 bAB
B1	0.736±0.005 bBC	0.787±0.010 cC	0.669±0.013 bDE	0.642±0.011 bBC
B2	0.755±0.013 abAB	0.833±0.010 bB	0.691±0.012 aBC	0.659±0.004 aAB
B3	0.762±0.010 aA	0.867±0.010 aA	0.684±0.009 abCD	0.651±0.012 abB
CK	0.651±0.009 E	0.683±0.010 E	0.661±0.012 E	0.602±0.014 D

处理 treatment	6月 June	7月 July	8月 August	9月 September
A1	2.740±0.059 aB	2.413±0.063 aB	2.241±0.076 aB	2.321±0.072 aB
A2	2.566±0.078 bCD	2.323±0.072 aBCD	2.121±0.057 bC	2.203±0.075 bC
A3	2.472±0.019 cDE	2.208±0.075 bD	2.015±0.077 cCD	2.15±0.062 bCD
B1	2.624±0.038 aC	2.368±0.059 aBC	2.084±0.049 aC	2.123±0.033 aCDE
B2	2.453±0.054 bEF	2.281±0.044 aCD	1.915±0.069 bD	2.053±0.050 aE
B3	2.361±0.021 cF	1.889±0.073 bE	1.738±0.059 cE	2.119±0.076 aDE
CK	3.210±0.076 A	2.971±0.078 A	2.353±0.052 A	2.555±0.067 A

指标 index	苗高 seedling height	地径 ground diameter	土壤含水率 soil moisture constant	最大持水率 greatest capacity	通气孔隙度 aeration porosity	有机质含量 organic matter content	速效钾含量 soil potassium content	有效磷含量 available phosphorus content
苗高seedling height	1.00
地径ground diameter	0.96^**	1.00
土壤含水率soil moisture constant	0.34	0.39	1.00
最大持水率greatest capacity	0.76^*	0.77^*	0.00	1.00
通气孔隙度aeration porosity	0.47	0.59	0.76^*	0.47	1.00
有机质含量organic matter content	0.77^*	0.54	0.51	0.08	0.33	1.00
速效钾含量soil potassium content	0.50	0.39	-0.15	0.39	0.30	0.50	1.00
有效磷含量 available phosphorus content	0.26	0.05	-0.59	0.25	-0.27	0.30	0.77^*	1.00

[1]	YANG Hao, LIU Chao, ZHUANG Jiayao, ZHANG Shutong, ZHANG Wentao, MAO Guohao. Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[2]	WANG Gaiping, ZHANG Lei, CAO Fuliang, DING Yanpeng, ZHAO Qun, ZHAO Huiqin, WANG Zheng. Effect of red and blue light quality on growth physiological and flavonoid content of Ginkgo biloba seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[3]	HAN Xinyu, GAO Lushuang, QIN Li, PANG Rongrong, LIU Mingqian, ZHU Yihong, TIAN Yiyu, ZHANG Jin. Effect of stand density on radial growth-climate relationship of Larix gmelinii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 182-190.
[4]	YIN Zengfang, OU Xiang, CHEN Yao, YANG Aixiang, SUN Liyong. Research progress and prospects of biological basis in Magnolia biondii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 256-262.
[5]	TIAN Mengyang, ZHU Shulin, DOU Quanqin, JI Yanhong. The effects of intercropping of Carya illinoinensis and Camellia sinensis ‘Anjibaicha’ on photosynthetic characteristics of C. sinensis tree during rapid growth period [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.
[6]	WEI Xuying, ZHANG Yao, MA Meixia, JIANG Xueru, CHEN Huiting, WU Jing, YANG Yu, CAI Junhuo. Changes of non-structured carbohydrate and starch metabolizing enzyme in bulbs of Lycoris radiata within the annual growth cycle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 106-114.
[7]	ZHANG Xiwen, CHEN Xu, WU Jun, SUN Guofei, WU Liguo, ZHAO Changhai, DAI Weizhao, LIU Guifeng. Growth adaptability analysis of new varieties of color-leafed birch at a young age [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 124-130.
[8]	LUO Yiyi, LI Lingchao, CHENG Baodong. The impact of economic growth on forest fragmentation: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 227-236.
[9]	WEI Jing, TAN Xing, WANG Changsheng, YAN Rui, LI Linke, NING Yue, LIU Yun. Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[10]	OU Yang, OUYANG Fangqun, SUN Meng, WANG Chao, WANG Junhui, AN Sanping, WANG Lifang, XU Na, WANG Meng. Young growth rhythm, annual and density interaction effects and selection strategies of Picea abies clones [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 95-104.
[11]	LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, HU Jialing, ZHANG Wangxiang. Effects of fertilization on the leaf growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[12]	LI Jianxin, XU Sen, YANG Liting, CHEN Shuanglin, GUO Ziwu. Interannual effects of growth, module biomass accumulation and allocation of Polygonatum cyrtonema under Phyllostachys edulis forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 121-128.
[13]	WEI Yajuan, GUO Jing, DANG Xiaohong, Xie Yunhu, WANG Ji, LI Xiaole, WU Huimin. Morphological characteristics and influencing mechanisms of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas at different sandy land types in desert oasis ecotone of Jilantai [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 172-180.
[14]	JIA Ruirui, ZHU Yanyan, YANG Xiulian, FU Yu, YUE Yuanzheng, WANG Lianggui. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[15]	GAI Junpeng, CHEN Dongsheng, JIA Weiwei, WANG Zheng. Developing height growth model of Larix kaempferi based on genetic and climate effects [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 51-60.