Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities

WANG Zhen, GAO Yajun, YAN Fanfeng, WANG Xiaowei, LI Huaqing, JIANG Lei

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 187-196.

PDF(1466 KB)
PDF(1466 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (2) : 187-196. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】Comprehensive assessment of tree species can provide scientific references for road greening and gallery ecosystem construction in coastal cities with complex natural conditions.【Method】Lianyungang City was chosen as the case study. Fifty-five commonly seen tree species were scientifically monitored, surveyed and analyzed. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was adopted, and five Level-Ⅰ indexes were designed, including the ecological indexes, landscape indexes, adaptability indexes, economic indexes and negative consequences. On this basis, 30 Level-Ⅱ indexes were put forward and quantitatively marked. The weights and assignments of each assessment index were identified. Subsequently, a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities was developed. The assessment system is used to clarify the strengths and weaknesses of tree species in practical situations. The tree species were graded according to final scores.【Result】In terms of ecological indexes, the weight of overshadow and cooling performance was the highest (0.513 7). In terms of landscape indexes, the weight of leaf color, leaf amount and flower were the highest (0.181 8). In terms of adaptability indexes, the weight of resistance against wind, plant diseases, insect diseases, and salt and alkali were the highest (0.174 0). In terms of economic indexes, the weights of the seedling price and maintenance intensity at the index layer were both 0.4. In terms of negative consequences, the weight of fluffy catkin and pollen was the highest (0.6). At the criterion layer, the weight of ecological indexes, landscape indexes and adaptability was 0.3, accounting for 90% of the total; the weight of economic indexes and negative consequence was only 0.05. The assessment results suggest tree species are tall and large, with dense branches and leaves, and which are resistant to adverse conditions, scored higher.【Conclusion】Improving the ecological environment is the main greening goal of coastal cities. In choosing tree species, the authorities should increase the percentage of local tree species and promote them as backbone tree species for future road greening. At the same time, the economic performance of maintenance and management, and the negative consequences of fluffy catkin and pollen should be taken into consideration.

Key words

coastal city / road greening / Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP) / comprehensive assessment of trees

Cite this article

Download Citations
WANG Zhen , GAO Yajun , YAN Fanfeng , et al . Construction of a comprehensive assessment system for road greening tree species in coastal cities[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2021, 45(2): 187-196 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007030

References

[1]
徐彩瑶, 濮励杰, 朱明. 沿海滩涂围垦对生态环境的影响研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(3):1148-1162.
XU C Y, PU L J, ZHU M. Effect of reclamation activity on coastal ecological environment:progress and perspectives[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(3):1148-1162. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201611142316.
[2]
孟紫琪, 龙凌波, 佘倩楠, 等. 基于土地利用/覆盖变化的中国大陆沿海地区生态状况评价[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018,29(10):3337-3346.
MENG Z Q, LONG L B, SHE Q N, et al. Assessment of ecological conditions over China’s coastal areas based on land use/cover change[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018,29(10):3337-3346. DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201810.016.
[3]
许凤娇, 吕晓. 基于土地利用变化的江苏沿海地区生态风险格局[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(20):7312-7325.
XU F J, LYU X. Ecological risk pattern based on land use changes in Jiangsu coastal areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(20):7312-7325.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201709041596.
[4]
高宾, 李小玉, 李志刚, 等. 基于景观格局的锦州湾沿海经济开发区生态风险分析[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(12):3441-3450.
GAO B, LI X Y, LI Z G, et al. Assessment of ecological risk of coastal economic developing zone in Jinzhou Bay based on landscape pattern[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011,31(12):3441-3450.
[5]
HUBBARD R K, STRICKLAND T C, PHATAK S. Effects of cover crop systems on soil physical properties and carbon/nitrogen relationships in the coastal plain of southeastern USA[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2013,126:276-283. DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2012.07.009.
[6]
毛志刚, 谷孝鸿, 刘金娥, 等. 盐城海滨盐沼湿地及围垦农田的土壤质量演变[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010,21(8):1986-1992.
MAO Z G, GU X H, LIU J E, et al. Evolvement of soil quality in salt marshes and reclaimed farmlands in Yancheng coastal wetland[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2010,21(8):1986-1992.
[7]
张濛, 濮励杰, 王小涵, 等. 长期耕种对江苏沿海围垦区滨海盐土理化性质和小麦产量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2016,36(16):5088-5097.
ZHANG M, PU L J, WANG X H, et al. Effects of long-time cultivation on physicochemical properties of coastal saline soil and wheat production at reclamation areas of Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016,36(16):5088-5097. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201502060296.
[8]
牛东玲, 王启基. 盐碱地治理研究进展[J]. 土壤通报, 2002,33(6):449-455.
NIU D L, WANG Q J. Research progress on saline-alkali field control[J]. Chin J Soil Sci, 2002,33(6):449-455. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2002.06.014.
[9]
赖小红, 李名扬, 刘聪, 等. 植物物候对重庆主城区热岛效应的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2019,39(19):7025-7034.
LAI X H, LI M Y, LIU C, et al. The phenological responses of plants to the heat island effect in the main urban area of Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019,39(19):7025-7034. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201809252082.
[10]
武小钢, 蔺银鼎. 城市道路隔离带绿化模式对人行道空气质量的影响评价[J]. 环境科学学报, 2015,35(4):984-990.
WU X G, LIN Y D. Impact of plant configuration mode of greening segregating belt on air quality of adjacent sidewalk in urban street[J]. Acta Sci Circumstantiae, 2015,35(4):984-990. DOI: 10.13671/j.hjkxxb.2014.0863.
[11]
李萍, 王松, 王亚英, 等. 城市道路绿化带 “微峡谷效应” 及其对非机动车道污染物浓度的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011,31(10):2888-2896.
LI P, WANG S, WANG Y Y, et al. “Micro-canyon effect” of city road green belt and its effect on the pollutant concentration above roads for non-motorized vehicles[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2011,31(10):2888-2896.
[12]
蔡红艳, 杨小唤, 张树文. 植物物候对城市热岛响应的研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014,33(1):221-228.
CAI H Y, YANG X H, ZHANG S W. Research advances in plant phenological responses to urban heat island[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014,33(1):221-228.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.20131220.0003.
[13]
许格希, 裴顺祥, 郭泉水, 等. 城市热岛效应对气候变暖和植物物候的影响[J]. 世界林业研究, 2011,24(6):12-17.
XU G X, PEI S X, GUO Q S, et al. Influence of urban heat island effect on climate warming and plant phenology[J]. World For Res, 2011,24(6):12-17.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2011.06.003.
[14]
MORRIS C J G, SIMMONDS I. Associations between varying magnitudes of the urban heat island and the synoptic climatology in Melbourne,Australia[J]. Int J Climatol, 2000,20(15):1931-1954. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0088(200012)20:151931::AID-JOC578>3.0.CO;2-D.
[15]
马赫, 张天海, 罗宏森, 等. 沿海快速城市化地区能值生态足迹变化分析[J]. 生态学报, 2018,38(18):6465-6472.
MA H, ZHANG T H, LUO H S, et al. Analysis of emergy ecological footprint change of coastal rapid urbanization areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018,38(18):6465-6472. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201803010409.
[16]
马静娜. 防护林生态效益评价研究综述[J]. 防护林科技, 2012(1):79-82.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5215.2012.01.027.
[17]
李庆贱, 陈志强, 时瑞亭, 等. 白榆家系苗期耐盐碱研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2010,32(5):74-81.
LI Q J, CHEN Z Q, SHI R T, et al. Alkaline-salt tolerance indices of Ulmus pumila L.seedling and family evaluation on alkaline-salt tolerance[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2010,32(5):74-81.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2010.05.023.
[18]
张华新, 刘正祥, 刘秋芳. 盐胁迫下树种幼苗生长及其耐盐性[J]. 生态学报, 2009,29(5):2263-2271.
ZHANG H X, LIU Z X, LIU Q F. Seedling growth and salt tolerance of tree species under NaCl stress[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2009,29(5):2263-2271. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2009.05.010.
[19]
韩燕燕, 鲁艳, 吕光辉. 植物耐盐的生理机制及基因工程新进展[J]. 生物技术通报, 2007(4):10-14,18.
HAN Y Y, LU Y, LYU G H. Advances in research on the mechanism of plant salinity tolerance and recent experimentation with transgenic plants[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2007(4):10-14,18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5464.2007.04.003.
[20]
ZHU J K. Salt and drought stress signal transduction in plants[J]. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2002,53:247-273. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.091401.143329.
[21]
唐桂兰, 游良旺, 芦建国. 城市道路绿化对行车视线诱导的植物合理种植间距[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,41(5):180-184.
TANG G L, YOU L W, LU J G. The reasonable planting distance of urban road greening induced by driving sight line[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017,41(5):180-184. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201605002.
[22]
LI H E, LI B T. Relation between traffic environment and heavy metal, Lead and Cadium contents of roadside trees in urban[J]. Environmental Protection in Transportation, 2001,22(5):10-14.
[23]
CHRISTOFOROU C S, SALMON L G, HANNIGAN M P, et al. Trends in fine particle concentration and chemical composition in southern California[J]. J Air Waste Manag Assoc, 2000,50(1):43-53. DOI: 10.1080/10473289.2000.10463985.
[24]
FREER-SMITH P H, HOLLOWAY S, GOODMAN A. The uptake of particulates by an urban woodland:Site description and particulate composition[J]. Environ Pollut, 1997,95(1):27-35. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(96)00119-4.
[25]
ZHOU X H, BRANDLE J R, MIZE C W, et al. Three-dimensional aerodynamic structure of a tree shelterbelt:definition,characterization and working models[J]. Agroforest Syst, 2005,63(2):133-147. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-004-3147-5.
[26]
SHASHUA-BAR L, POTCHTER O, BITAN A, et al. Microclimate modelling of street tree species effects within the varied urban morphology in the Mediterranean City of Tel Aviv,Israel[J]. Int J Climatol, 2010,30(1):44-57. DOI: 10.1002/joc.1869.
[27]
于金涛, 肖文发, 王鹏程, 等. 防护林健康评价研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2013,26(1):31-36.
YU J T, XIAO W F, WANG P C, et al. Research advances of health assessment of shelterbelts[J]. World For Res, 2013,26(1):31-36.
[28]
杨琴军, 苏洪明, 夏欣, 等. 基于植物多样性的武汉市道路绿化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2007,31(4):98-102.
YANG Q J, SU H M, XIA X, et al. Researches of street greening based on plant diversity investigation in Wuhan[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2007,31(4):98-102. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2007.04.022.
[29]
赵瑾, 李文银, 魏国仁, 等. 宝鸡市5种乡土树种抗旱性综合评价和研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019,34(6):74-81.
ZHAO J, LI W Y, WEI G R, et al. Comprehensive study and evaluationon drought resistance of nativetress speciesin BaoJi[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2019,34(6):74-81. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.06.12.
[30]
闫晓云, 张秋良, 韩鹏, 等. 呼和浩特市绿化树种综合评价及树种选择[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2011,25(3):135-140.
YAN X Y, ZHANG Q L, HAN P, et al. Comprehensive assessment and selection for urban tree species in Hohhot[J]. J Arid Land Resour Environ, 2011,25(3):135-140.DOI: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2011.03.026.
[31]
丁纯璐, 马健霄, 朱宁. 基于层次分析法的城市绿道综合评价研究[J]. 森林工程, 2020,36(2):81-90.
DING C L, MA J X, ZHU N. Research on comprehensive evaluation of urban greenway based on AHP[J]. Forest Engineering, 2020,36(2):81-90.
[32]
林玮, 白青松, 陈雪梅, 等. 华南主要造林树种碳汇能力评价体系构建及优良碳汇树种筛选[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020,40(1):28-37.
LIN W, BAI Q S, CHEN X M, et al. Construction of the carbon sink capacity evaluation system of main afforestation tree species in south China and selection of the fine carbon sink species[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2020,40(1):28-37. DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812070.
[33]
张锁成, 谷建才, 王秀芳, 等. 基于AHP方法的高速公路中央分隔带绿化植物综合评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2012,27(4):100-102,107.
ZHANG S C, GU J C, WANG X F, et al. Evaluation of greening plants in expressway divider based on AHP method[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2012,27(4):100-102,107. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2012.04.18.
[34]
国家市场监督管理总局, 国家标准化管理委员会. 森林生态系统服务功能评估规范 GB/T 38582—2020[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2020.
[35]
王嘉楠, 赵德先, 刘慧, 等. 不同类型参与者对城市绿地树种的评价与选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2017,34(6):1120-1127.
WANG J N, ZHAO D X, LIU H, et al. Selection of tree species in an urban green space by local participants[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2017,34(6):1120-1127. DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2017.06.021.
[36]
黄少雄, 卢明明, 陈捷, 等. 层次分析法在粤北高速公路沿线绿化树种选择中的运用[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2016,45(2):177-182.
HUANG S X, LU M M, CHEN J, et al. The application of analytic hierarchy process on choice of greening tree species along expressway in north of Guangdong Province[J]. Subtrop Plant Sci, 2016,45(2):177-182.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7791.2016.02.017.
[37]
许秀玉, 肖莉, 王明怀, 等. 沿海抗台风树种评价体系构建与选择[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015,32(4):516-522.
XU X Y, XIAO L, WANG M H, et al. A comprehensive evaluation system for anti-typhoon performance of trees in coastal areas[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2015,32(4):516-522.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2015.04.004.
[38]
林玮, 白青松, 陈雪梅, 等. 华南主要造林树种碳汇能力评价体系构建及优良碳汇树种筛选[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2020,40(1):28-37.
LIN W, BAI Q S, CHEN X M, et al. Construction of the carbon sink capacity evaluation system of main afforestation tree species in south China and selection of the fine carbon sink species[J]. J Southwest For Univ, 2020,40(1):28-37.DOI: 10.11929/j.swfu.201812070.
[39]
谢春平, 方彦, 刘大伟, 等. 基于层次分析法的江苏宁镇山脉乡土树种评价[J]. 亚热带植物科学, 2019,48(2):161-168.
XIE C P, FANG Y, LIU D W, et al. Evaluation of native trees species in Ningzhen Mountains of Jiangsu Province by analytic hierarchy process[J]. Subtrop Plant Sci, 2019,48(2):161-168.DOI: 10.16590/j.cnki.1001-4705.2019.04.148.
[40]
杨静怡, 张政文, 吴峰. 贵阳市主要绿化树种功能评价[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2020,48(3):156-161. DOI: 10.15889/j.issn.1002-1302.2020.03.027.
[41]
张德顺, 刘鸣. 基于“植物功能性状-生态系统服务”评价框架的园林树种选择方法:以上海为例[J]. 中国园林, 2020,36(2):106-111.
ZHANG D S, LIU M. A “Plant Functional Traits-ecosystem Services” approach for the selection of landscape trees:a case study in Shanghai[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2020,36(2):106-111. DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2020.02.0106.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Copyright reserved © 2021
PDF(1466 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/