JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 72-80.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009018
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Ying(), FENG Jian*(), YU Shihe, LU Aijun, WANG Qin, WANG Qianchun
Received:
2020-09-07
Accepted:
2020-12-01
Online:
2021-11-30
Published:
2021-12-02
Contact:
FENG Jian
E-mail:zhengying55555@126.com;lnlkyfj@163.com
CLC Number:
ZHENG Ying, FENG Jian, YU Shihe, LU Aijun, WANG Qin, WANG Qianchun. Effects of initial planting density on growth and stem form of four Larix clones[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 72-80.
Table 1
The growth situation of the 4 clones at different initial planting densities"
指标 index | 无性系 clone | 不同林龄无性系生长特征 growth situation of clones with different age | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 a | 7 a | 9 a | 11 a | 13 a | ||||||||||||
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | ||
胸径 DBH | 无性系1 | 2.88± 0.18 aB | 2.87± 0.8 aA | 3.23± 0.41aB | 6.89± 0.42 aB | 6.39± 1.20 aA | 6.76± 0.45 aB | 9.91± 0.53 aBC | 9.06± 0.98 aB | 8.99± 0.58 aB | 12.27± 0.84 aBC | 11.15± 1.09 aB | 10.96± 0.91 aAB | 14.2± 0.82 aBC | 12.42± 0.89 aBC | 12.09± 1.03 aA |
无性系2 | 2.83± 0.27 aB | 2.55± 0.94 aA | 3.31± 0.09 aB | 7.11± 0.38 aB | 6.38± 1.1 a7A | 6.97± 0.26 aB | 10.87± 0.75 aC | 9.47± 0.92 aB | 9.14± 0.29 aB | 13.57± 1.12 bC | 11.67± 0.73 aB | 11.21± 0.55 aB | 15.36± 1.13 bC | 13.17± 0.45 aC | 12.10± 0.73 aA | |
无性系3 | 2.44± 0.46 aAB | 2.05± 0.46 aA | 2.78± 0.20 aB | 6.00± 0.61 aAB | 5.30± 0.60 aA | 5.82± 0.21 aA | 8.94± 0.72 aAB | 7.95± 0.50 aAB | 7.80± 0.37 aA | 11.14± 0.85 aAB | 9.91± 0.56 aAB | 9.47± 0.75 aA | 12.51± 0.89 bAB | 11.54± 0.15 aB | 10.37± 0.86 aA | |
无性系4 | 1.84± 0.11 aA | 1.68± 0.32 aA | 2.04± 0.12 aA | 5.29± 0.41 aA | 4.55± 0.42 aA | 5.40± 0.21 aA | 7.73± 0.29 aA | 6.98± 0.41 aA | 7.42± 0.37 aA | 10.13± 0.49 bA | 8.91± 0.36 aA | 9.33± 0.49 aA | 11.60± 0.56 bA | 10.17± 0.24 aA | 10.37± 0.52 aA | |
树高 height | 无性系1 | 3.63± 0.12 aB | 3.60± 0.73 aA | 3.90± 0.32 aB | 6.49± 0.10 aB | 6.44± 0.87 aA | 6.87± 0.21 aC | 9.02± 0.22 aB | 8.90± 0.87 aA | 9.25± 0.11 aB | 11.21± 0.33 aBC | 10.87± 0.73 aA | 11.20± 0.33a B | 13.96± 0.44 aC | 13.41± 0.66 aB | 13.79± 0.51 aB |
无性系2 | 3.66± 0.13 aB | 3.45± 0.71 aB | 4.07± 0.17 aB | 6.44± 0.23 aB | 6.10± 0.83 aA | 6.76± 0.18 aBC | 9.12± 0.24 aB | 8.80± 0.78 aA | 9.29± 0.08 aB | 11.61± 0.22 aC | 11.14± 0.94 aA | 11.72± 0.19 aB | 14.01± 0.08 aC | 13.61± 0.60 aAB | 13.68± 0.41 aAB | |
无性系3 | 3.49± 0.34 aB | 3.32± 0.44 aA | 3.91± 0.13 aB | 6.09± 0.44 aAB | 5.97± 0.44 aA | 6.46± 0.09 aB | 8.36± 0.60 aAB | 8.21± 0.38 aA | 9.05± 0.23 aB | 10.64± 0.49 aAB | 10.43± 0.51 aA | 11.31± 0.13 aB | 13.10± 0.19 aB | 13.16± 0.63 aAB | 13.45± 0.58 aAB | |
无性系4 | 2.81± 0.11 aA | 2.74± 0.28 aA | 3.10± 0.06 aA | 5.61± 0.06 aA | 5.29± 0.37 aA | 5.93± 0.12 aA | 7.93± 0.08 aA | 7.75± 0.49 aA | 8.47± 0.12 aA | 10.19± 0.12 aA | 9.73± 0.52 aA | 10.52± 0.19 aA | 12.35± 0.30 aA | 11.98± 0.64 aA | 12.62± 0.26 aA | |
冠幅 crown width | 无性系1 | 2.36± 0.05 aC | 2.18± 0.31 aAB | 2.39± 0.06 aAB | 2.63± 0.20 aB | 2.45± 0.28 aB | 2.43± 0.10 aB | 2.96± 0.09 bB | 2.58± 0.09 abB | 2.21± 0.25 aA | 3.46± 0.25 bAB | 3.03± 0.16 abAB | 2.67± 0.34 aA | |||
无性系2 | 2.55± 0.07 aD | 2.39± 0.16 aB | 2.44± 0.13 aB | 2.69± 0.19 aB | 2.47± 0.22 aB | 2.42± 0.20 aB | 2.93± 0.14 bB | 2.60± 0.05 bB | 2.06± 0.20 aA | 3.54± 0.44 bB | 3.12± 0.09 abB | 2.63± 0.32 aA | ||||
无性系3 | 2.20± 0.02 aB | 2.11± 0.07 aAB | 2.23± 0.12 aAB | 2.23± 0.13 aA | 2.13± 0.07 aAB | 2.16± 0.10 aAB | 2.52± 0.19 bA | 2.32± 0.06 aA | 1.93± 0.24 aA | 2.93± 0.19 aAB | 2.73± 0.18 aAB | 2.35± 0.30 aA | ||||
无性系4 | 1.92± 0.03 aA | 1.88± 0.13 aA | 2.16± 0.11 bA | 2.09± 0.10 aA | 1.97± 0.11 aA | 2.06± 0.13 aA | 2.49± 0.16 aA | 2.28± 0.17 aA | 2.14± 0.07 aA | 2.79± 0.15 aA | 2.57± 0.29 aA | 2.63± 0.13 aA | ||||
单株 材积 individual volume | 无性系1 | 0.001 5± 0.000 2 aB | 0.001 7± 0.000 9 aA | 0.002 2± 0.000 4 aC | 0.013 6± 0.001 8 aB | 0.012 6± 0.005 1 aA | 0.014 0± 0.002 1 aB | 0.037 1± 0.004 6 aC | 0.031 7± 0.008 5 aAB | 0.031 8± 0.004 2 aB | 0.068 7± 0.011 0 aBC | 0.056 3± 0.010 0 aB | 0.056 6± 0.000 0 aBC | 0.111 5± 0.015 0 aBC | 0.084 0± 0.020 0 aBC | 0.082 2± 0.020 0 aA |
无性系2 | 0.001 5± 0.000 3 aB | 0.001 4± 0.000 9 aA | 0.002 1± 0.000 1 aBC | 0.014 4± 0.001 8 aB | 0.011 8± 0.004 8 aA | 0.014 5± 0.001 3 aB | 0.044 6± 0.005 8 aBC | 0.033 9± 0.008 3 aB | 0.032 7± 0.001 9 aB | 0.085 7± 0.014 aC | 0.062 3± 0.010 0 aB | 0.060 4± 0.010 0 aC | 0.129 6± 0.019 0 aC | 0.094 5± 0.010 0 aC | 0.081 2± 0.010 0 aA | |
无性系3 | 0.001 1± 0.000 4 aAB | 0.000 8± 0.000 4 aA | 0.001 5± 0.000 2 aB | 0.010 1± 0.002 4 aAB | 0.007 9± 0.002 2 aA | 0.009 9± 0.000 6 aA | 0.028 6± 0.005 5 aAB | 0.022 5± 0.003 6 aAB | 0.023 7± 0.001 5 aA | 0.054 4± 0.008 0 aAB | 0.042 9± 0.010 0 aAB | 0.042 7± 0.010 0 aAB | 0.082 7± 0.011 0 aAB | 0.071 3± 0.010 0 aAB | 0.060 3± 0.010 0 aA | |
无性系4 | 0.000 5± 0.000 1 aA | 0.000 4± 0.000 2 aA | 0.000 7± 0.000 1 aA | 0.007 2± 0.001 1 aA | 0.005 2± 0.001 3 aA | 0.007 9± 0.000 5 bA | 0.020 5± 0.001 4 aA | 0.016 7± 0.002 5 aA | 0.020 3± 0.001 7 aA | 0.043 5± 0.004 0 bA | 0.032 7± 0.003 6 aA | 0.038 5± 0.003 1 abA | 0.067 6± 0.006 0 bA | 0.051 4± 0.004 4 aA | 0.056± 0.004 8 bA | |
蓄积量 stand volume | 无性系1 | 1.650± 0.11 aB | 1.95± 1.13 aA | 6.28± 1.18 bC | 14.72± 0.24 aBC | 14.79± 6.15 aAB | 37.46± 5.26 bB | 39.71± 0.98 aB | 38.32± 9.60 aAB | 79.81± 8.17 bB | 71.41± 1.22 aB | 64.52± 7.62 aA | 136.88± 18.80 bA | 112.68± 2.42 aC | 99.60± 6.53 bA | 178.75± 20.20 bA |
无性系2 | 1.82± 0.24 aB | 2.08± 1.42 aA | 6.94± 0.08 bC | 18.37± 1.41 aC | 19.77± 9.22 aB | 47.27± 3.91 bC | 56.59± 2.32 aC | 59.05± 18.40 aB | 98.45± 0.22 bC | 104.11± 2.37 aC | 108.78± 26.1 aB | 183.13± 16.90 bB | 157.16± 0.71 aD | 166.15± 28.9 aB | 237.94± 26.2 bB | |
无性系3 | 1.28± 0.54 aAB | 0.61± 0.08 aA | 4.46± 0.55 bB | 12.03± 3.22 aAB | 8.14± 2.01 aAB | 28.54± 0.13 bA | 34.22± 7.45 aAB | 26.71± 8.42 aA | 67.32± 1.15 bA | 63.18± 9.21 aAB | 52.98± 19.00 aA | 112.27± 5.26 bA | 93.82± 8.20 aB | 86.86± 28.90 aA | 146.63± 8.83 bA | |
无性系4 | 0.65± 0.02 bA | 0.37± 0.04 aA | 1.94± 0.16 cA | 9.71± 0.80 bA | 5.28± 0.03 aA | 24.49± 1.69 cA | 25.91± 0.20 bA | 18.22± 0.02 aA | 60.29± 3.93 cA | 53.64± 2.28 aA | 37.05± 0.35 bA | 113.92± 6.11 cA | 78. 9± 4.33 aA | 58.02± 1.34 bA | 165.59± 10.70 cA |
Table 2
The stem form characteristics of four clones at different initial planting densities"
无性系 clone | 高径比height-diameter ratio | 树干圆满度stem fullness | 树干通直度stem straightness | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | B | C | A | B | C | A | B | C | |
无性系1 clone 1 | 0.99± 0.041 aAB | 1.08± 0.033 aAB | 1.15± 0.054 bA | 1.01± 0.012 aA | 1.00± 0.003 aA | 1.00± 0.006 aA | 2.99± 0.014 aC | 3.00± 0.000 aA | 2.95± 0.045 aA |
无性系2 clone 2 | 0.91± 0.060 aA | 1.03± 0.016 bA | 1.13± 0.034 cA | 1.00± 0.011 aA | 1.00± 0.010 aA | 0.99± 0.008 aA | 2.81± 0.028 aB | 2.66± 0.274 aA | 2.57± 0.292 aA |
无性系3 clone 3 | 1.05± 0.073 aAB | 1.14± 0.043 aB | 1.3± 0.050 bB | 1.02± 0.017 aA | 1.01± 0.012 aA | 1.00± 0.001 aA | 2.84± 0.046 aB | 2.81± 0.041 aA | 2.59± 0.111 aA |
无性系4 clone 4 | 1.07± 0.059 aB | 1.18± 0.053 aB | 1.22± 0.071 aAB | 1.00± 0.002 aA | 1.00± 0.010 aA | 1.00± 0.005 aA | 2.69± 0.062 aA | 2.77± 0.078 aA | 2.78± 0.078 aA |
Table 3
The variation coefficients of growth and shapes of different clones under different initial planting densities"
无性系 clone | 密度 density | 树高 height | 胸径 DBH | 单株材积 individual volume | 树干通直度 stem straightness | 树干圆满度 stem fullness | 高径比 height- diameter ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
无性系1 clone 1 | A | 7.0 | 17.3 | 34.2 | 3.7 | 2.7 | 15.0 |
B | 8.6 | 18.5 | 36.8 | 8.4 | 2.7 | 15.1 | |
C | 7.2 | 19.2 | 38.5 | 8.5 | 2.2 | 15.6 | |
无性系2 clone 2 | A | 5.0 | 13.4 | 27.8 | 15.1 | 3.2 | 10.9 |
B | 7.5 | 16.3 | 34.0 | 22.2 | 3.3 | 13.0 | |
C | 6.1 | 16.9 | 35.4 | 20.9 | 2.9 | 13.0 | |
无性系3 clone 3 | A | 7.7 | 13.9 | 26.8 | 14.6 | 3.2 | 13.4 |
B | 8.7 | 15.6 | 34.6 | 15.3 | 2.9 | 16.3 | |
C | 6.3 | 17.6 | 33.7 | 19.1 | 2.6 | 11.6 | |
无性系4 clone 4 | A | 7.6 | 14.5 | 28.8 | 22.4 | 2.8 | 13.9 |
B | 8.7 | 17.9 | 36.0 | 20 | 2.7 | 16.2 | |
C | 6.2 | 18.1 | 35.7 | 17.4 | 2.3 | 16.2 |
[1] |
MCKEAND S, MULLIN T, BYRAM T, et al. Deployment of genetically improved loblolly and slash pines in the south[J]. J For, 2003, 101(3):32-37.DOI: 10.1093/jof/101.3.32.
doi: 10.1093/jof/101.3.32 |
[2] |
STAPE J L, BINKLEY D, RYAN M G, et al. The Brazil Eucalyptus potential productivity project: influence of water,nutrients and stand uniformity on wood production[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2010, 259(9):1684-1694.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.012.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.01.012 |
[3] | 沈国舫. 森林培育学[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2001. |
SHEN G F. Forest silviculture[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2001. | |
[4] | WANG L, LONG H L, GUO H Y, et al. A study of the distribution and accumulation of major nutrient elements in different densities of Eucalyptus grandis full-text in English[J]. Agric Sci Technol, 2017, 18(6):1062-1066. |
[5] |
RAZAFINDRABE B H, HE B, INOUE S, et al. The role of forest stand density in controlling soil erosion: implications to sediment-related disasters in Japan[J]. Environ Monit Assess, 2010, 160(1/2/3/4):337-354.DOI: 10.1007/s10661-008-0699-2.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-008-0699-2 |
[6] |
EGBÄCK S, LIZINIEWICZ M, HÖGBERG K A, et al. Influence of progeny and initial stand density on growth and quality traits of 21 year old half-sib Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.)[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2012, 286:1-7.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.003.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.09.003 |
[7] |
CARDOSO D J, LACERDA A E B, ROSOT M A D, et al. Influence of spacing regimes on the development of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) in southern Brazil[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2013, 310:761-769.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.021.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.021 |
[8] |
DEBELL D S, CLENDENEN G W, HARRINGTON C A, et al. Tree growth and stand development in short-rotation Populus plantings:7-year results for two clones at three spacings[J]. Biomass Bioenergy, 1996, 11(4):253-269.DOI: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00020-7.
doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00020-7 |
[9] | 谌红辉, 丁贵杰, 温恒辉, 等. 造林密度对马尾松林分生长与效益的影响研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2011, 24(4):470-475. |
CHEN H H, DING G J, WEN H H, et al. Effects of planting density on growth and economic benefit of masson pine plantation[J]. For Res, 2011, 24(4):470-475.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2011.04.023.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2011.04.023 |
|
[10] | 李光友, 徐建民, 陆钊华, 等. 尾叶桉纸浆林造林密度控制技术的研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(2):175-181. |
LI G Y, XU J M, LU Z H, et al. A study on density control of silviculturing Eucalyptus urophylla pulp timbers[J]. For Res, 2002, 15(2):175-181.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2002.02.009.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2002.02.009 |
|
[11] | 王利宝, 张志毅, 康向阳, 等. 造林密度对白杨杂种无性系初期生长性状的影响[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2012, 34(5):25-30. |
WANG L B, ZHANG Z Y, KANG X Y, et al. Effects of planting density on the early growth traits of white poplar hybrid clones[J]. J Beijing For Univ, 2012, 34(5):25-30.DOI: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2012.05.017.
doi: 10.13332/j.1000-1522.2012.05.017 |
|
[12] |
WAGHORN M J, MASON E G, WATT M S. Influence of initial stand density and genotype on longitudinal variation in modulus of elasticity for 17-year-old Pinus radiata[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 252(1/2/3):67-72.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.019.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.019 |
[13] |
WAGHORN M J, WATT M S, MASON E G. Influence of tree morphology,genetics,and initial stand density on outerwood modulus of elasticity of 17-year-old Pinus radiata[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 244(1/2/3):86-92.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.057.(1-3):86-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.057.(1-3):86-92 |
[14] |
张全锋, 支恩波, 顾新庆, 等. 造林密度对杨树生长的影响[J]. 河北林业科技, 2010(5):1-3,7. DOI: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2010.05.030.
doi: 10.16449/j.cnki.issn1002-3356.2010.05.030 |
[15] |
DREW T J, FLEWELLING J W. Stand density management:an alternative approach and its application to Douglas-fir plantations[J]. For Sci, 1979, 25(3):518-532.DOI: 10.1093/forestscience/25.3.518.
doi: 10.1093/forestscience/25.3.518 |
[16] | 刘青华, 周志春, 张开明, 等. 造林密度对不同马尾松种源生长和木材基本密度的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2010, 46(9):58-64. |
LIU Q H, ZHOU Z C, ZHANG K M, et al. Initial stand density and provenance effects on the growth and wood basic density of masson pine[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2010, 46(9):58-64. | |
[17] | 祁万宜, 孙晓梅, 张守攻, 等. 北亚热带高山区日本落叶松纸浆用材林初植密度的研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2007, 26(4):552-556. |
QI W Y, SUN X M, ZHANG S G, et al. Initial density of Larix kaempferi pulpwood plantation for northern sub-tropical alpine area[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ, 2007, 26(4):552-556.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2007.04.028.
doi: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2007.04.028 |
|
[18] | 李荣丽. 造林密度对亚美马褂木无性系生长及材性效应的研究[D]. 南宁:广西大学, 2015. |
LI R L. Study on afforestation density effeacts on growth and wood quality of Liriodendron sinoamericanum clonal plantation[D]. Nanning:Guangxi University, 2015. | |
[19] |
HEIN S, WEISKITTEL A R, KOHNLE U. Effect of wide spacing on tree growth,branch and sapwood properties of young Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] in south-western Germany[J]. Eur J For Res, 2008, 127(6):481-493.DOI: 10.1007/s10342-008-0231-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10342-008-0231-9 |
[20] |
BENOMAR L, DESROCHERS A, LAROCQUE G R. The effects of spacing on growth,morphology and biomass production and allocation in two hybrid poplar clones growing in the boreal region of Canada[J]. Trees, 2012, 26(3):939-949.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-011-0671-6.
doi: 10.1007/s00468-011-0671-6 |
[21] | 王利宝. 白杨优良无性系与栽培密度互作效应研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2013. |
WANG L B. Study on white Poplar superior clones × planting density interactions[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2013. | |
[22] | ZHANG Z H, ZHANG Z Y, LIN S Z, et al. Effects of planting density on growth of new clones in Populus tomentosa[J]. For Stud China, 2003(2):23-29. |
[23] |
ROTH B E, JOKELA E J, MARTIN T A, et al. Genotype × environment interactions in selected loblolly and slash pine plantations in the southeastern United States[J]. For Ecol Manag, 2007, 238(1/2/3):175-188.DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.010.
doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.10.010 |
[24] | 郭鑫. 经营措施对秦岭华北落叶松人工林的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019. |
GUO X. Impact of management measure on Larix principis-rupprechti plantation in Qinling Mountains[D]. Yangling:Northwest A & F University, 2019. | |
[25] | 葛兆轩, 苑美艳, 单博文, 等. 塞罕坝华北落叶松人工林不同经营模式效果评价[J]. 林业科学研究, 2020, 33(5):38-47. |
GE Z X, YUAN M Y, SHAN B W, et al. Evaluation of management modes on Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations in Saihanba of Hebei Province,China[J]. For Res, 2020, 33(5):38-47.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.05.005.
doi: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2020.05.005 |
|
[26] |
陈东升, 李凤日, 孙晓梅, 等. 落叶松人工林大中径材优化经营模式[J]. 林业实用技术, 2014(9):27-30. DOI: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2014.09.007.
doi: 10.13456/j.cnki.lykt.2014.09.007 |
[27] | 董健, 赵文华, 黄国学, 等. 日本落叶松纸浆林造林密度试验[J]. 辽宁林业科技, 2001(5):1-4. |
DONG J, ZHAO W H, HUANG G X, et al. Experiments on different densities of Larix kaempferi pulp plantation[J]. J Liaoning For Sci Technol, 2001(5):1-4.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2001.05.001.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1714.2001.05.001 |
|
[28] | 栾启福, 姜景民, 张建忠, 等. 火炬松×加勒比松F1代生长、树干通直度和基本密度遗传和配合力分析[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(3):178-183. |
LUAN Q F, JIANG J M, ZHANG J Z, et al. Estimation of heritability and combining ability for growth,stem-straightness and wood density of the Fl generation of Pinus taeda × P. caribaea[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(3):178-183. | |
[29] | 王生华. 闽楠人工林生长与干形形质分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2012, 39(1):58-62. |
WANG S H. Analysis on growth and stem-form quality of Phoebe bournei plantation[J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2012, 39(1):58-62.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2012.01.14.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-7351.2012.01.14 |
|
[30] | 孙楠, 于秀兰, 张怡春, 等. 造林密度对杂种落叶松生长影响的初步分析[J]. 吉林林业科技, 2009, 38(2):1-4,10. |
SUN N, YU X L, ZHANG Y C, et al. Effect of planting density on growth of hybrid larch (Larix olgansis × Larix leptolepis)[J]. Jilin For Sci Technol, 2009, 38(2):1-4,10.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7129.2009.02.001.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7129.2009.02.001 |
|
[31] | 梁文俊, 丁国栋, 韦立伟, 等. 落叶松人工林密度对林木生长的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2010, 30(4):78-80,86. |
LIANG W J, DING G D, WEI L W, et al. Influences of density of Larix principis on tree growth[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2010, 30(4):78-80,86.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2010.04.042.
doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2010.04.042 |
|
[32] | 唐庆兰, 陈健波, 项东云, 等. 尾巨桉不同造林密度林分生长特性研究[J]. 广西林业科学, 2009, 38(3):141-145. |
TANG Q L, CHEN J B, XIANG D Y, et al. Growth characteristics of Eucalyptus urophylla × E. grandis stands with different planting spacing[J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2009, 38(3):141-145.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2009.03.004.1-145.
doi: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2009.03.004.1-145 |
|
[33] | 陈少雄, 李志辉, 李天会, 等. 不同初植密度的桉树人工林经济效益分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2008, 21(1):1-6. |
CHEN S X, LI Z H, LI T H, et al. Economic analysis of eucalypt plantation with different initial spacing[J]. For Res, 2008, 21(1):1-6.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.01.001.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2008.01.001 |
|
[34] | 李昌荣, 项东云, 周国福, 等. 栽培密度与施肥对尾巨桉中大径材生长的影响[J]. 广西林业科学, 2007, 36(1):31-35. |
LI C R, XIANG D Y, ZHOU G F, et al. Effects of different spacing and fertilization on growth of E.urophylla × E. grandis mid-large timber plantation[J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2007, 36(1):31-35.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2007.01.008.
doi: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2007.01.008 |
|
[35] | 谌红辉, 丁贵杰. 马尾松造林密度效应研究[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(1):92-98. |
CHEN H H, DING G J. Study on planting density effects for masson pine plantation[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2004, 40(1):92-98.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2004.01.015.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2004.01.015 |
|
[36] | 熊光康, 厉月桥, 熊有强, 等. 低密度造林对杉木生长、形质和材种结构的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(3):165-173. |
XIONG G K, LI Y Q, XIONG Y Q, et al. Effects of low stand density afforestation on the growth,stem-form and timber assortment structure of Cunninghamia lanceolata plantations[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(3):165-173. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007021.
doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202007021 |
|
[37] | 黄旺志, 赵剑平, 王昌薇, 等. 不同造林密度对杉木生长的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 1997(4):80-86. |
HUANG W Z, ZHAO J P, WANG C W, et al. Effects of various planting density on the growth of Chinese fir[J]. Acta Agric Univ Henanensis, 1997(4):80-86. | |
[38] |
翟秀春, 王春. 落叶松人工林首次间伐期的确定[J]. 科技创新导报, 2009, 6(1):115. DOI: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098x.2009.01.081.
doi: 10.16660/j.cnki.1674-098x.2009.01.081 |
[39] | 姚国明, 光增云, 田金萍, 等. 河南日本落叶松人工林抚育间伐开始期的确定[J]. 河南林业科技, 2000, 20(3):6-7. |
YAO G M, GUANG Z Y, TIAN J P, et al. Determining the beginning time of tending and intermediate cutting in Larix raempferi[J]. J Henan For Sci Technol, 2000, 20(3):6-7. | |
[40] | 唐伟东. 落叶松人工林抚育间伐技术的研究[J]. 林业勘查设计, 2016(2):61-63. |
TANG W D. Study on the intermediate cutting technology of larch plantation[J]. For Investig Des, 2016(2):61-63.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2016.02.028.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4505.2016.02.028 |
[1] | YANG Hao, LIU Chao, ZHUANG Jiayao, ZHANG Shutong, ZHANG Wentao, MAO Guohao. Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 81-89. |
[2] | WANG Gaiping, ZHANG Lei, CAO Fuliang, DING Yanpeng, ZHAO Qun, ZHAO Huiqin, WANG Zheng. Effect of red and blue light quality on growth physiological and flavonoid content of Ginkgo biloba seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 105-112. |
[3] | HAN Xinyu, GAO Lushuang, QIN Li, PANG Rongrong, LIU Mingqian, ZHU Yihong, TIAN Yiyu, ZHANG Jin. Effect of stand density on radial growth-climate relationship of Larix gmelinii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 182-190. |
[4] | YIN Zengfang, OU Xiang, CHEN Yao, YANG Aixiang, SUN Liyong. Research progress and prospects of biological basis in Magnolia biondii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 256-262. |
[5] | WEI Xuying, ZHANG Yao, MA Meixia, JIANG Xueru, CHEN Huiting, WU Jing, YANG Yu, CAI Junhuo. Changes of non-structured carbohydrate and starch metabolizing enzyme in bulbs of Lycoris radiata within the annual growth cycle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 106-114. |
[6] | ZHANG Xiwen, CHEN Xu, WU Jun, SUN Guofei, WU Liguo, ZHAO Changhai, DAI Weizhao, LIU Guifeng. Growth adaptability analysis of new varieties of color-leafed birch at a young age [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 124-130. |
[7] | LUO Yiyi, LI Lingchao, CHENG Baodong. The impact of economic growth on forest fragmentation: a case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 227-236. |
[8] | WEI Jing, TAN Xing, WANG Changsheng, YAN Rui, LI Linke, NING Yue, LIU Yun. Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 97-105. |
[9] | GAO Xieyu, DONG Lihu, HAO Yuanshuo. Effects of thinning on Larix olgensis plantation stem form based on TLS [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 85-94. |
[10] | OU Yang, OUYANG Fangqun, SUN Meng, WANG Chao, WANG Junhui, AN Sanping, WANG Lifang, XU Na, WANG Meng. Young growth rhythm, annual and density interaction effects and selection strategies of Picea abies clones [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 95-104. |
[11] | LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, HU Jialing, ZHANG Wangxiang. Effects of fertilization on the leaf growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 114-120. |
[12] | LI Jianxin, XU Sen, YANG Liting, CHEN Shuanglin, GUO Ziwu. Interannual effects of growth, module biomass accumulation and allocation of Polygonatum cyrtonema under Phyllostachys edulis forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 121-128. |
[13] | WEI Yajuan, GUO Jing, DANG Xiaohong, Xie Yunhu, WANG Ji, LI Xiaole, WU Huimin. Morphological characteristics and influencing mechanisms of Nitraria tangutorum nebkhas at different sandy land types in desert oasis ecotone of Jilantai [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 172-180. |
[14] | JIA Ruirui, ZHU Yanyan, YANG Xiulian, FU Yu, YUE Yuanzheng, WANG Lianggui. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 97-106. |
[15] | GAI Junpeng, CHEN Dongsheng, JIA Weiwei, WANG Zheng. Developing height growth model of Larix kaempferi based on genetic and climate effects [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 51-60. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||