Dynamic analyses of forest ecological functions based on fixed plot data of continuous forest resources inventories from 1979 to 2012 in Guangzhou

QIAN Chunhua, ZHAO Yichen, LI Mingyang, LI Tao

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 205-212.

PDF(3462 KB)
PDF(3462 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2) : 205-212. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009063

Dynamic analyses of forest ecological functions based on fixed plot data of continuous forest resources inventories from 1979 to 2012 in Guangzhou

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 The scientific forest management should be established based on the ecological rationality. A comprehensive evaluation of forest ecological functions and an analysis of driving factors at the regional scale can provide scientific references for the formulation of forest management plans. 【Method】 Guangzhou City in the Pearl River Delta was selected as the case study area, and 148 fixed plot data of continuous forest resource inventories from 1979 to 2012 in eight periods were collected as the main information source. The spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of forest ecological functions were analyzed based on the construction of the ecological function index. 【Result】 (1) From 1979 to 2012, the number of plots with improved forest ecological functions in the study area was greater than the number of plots with the decreased. The proportion of middle and high grade plots showed a steady increasing trend, whereas the proportion of low grade plots showed a stepwise downward trend. (2) From 1979 to 2012, the spatial aggregation of forest ecological functions in the study area showed a complex change process that first increased, then declined sharply, and then slowly increased. The geographical distribution centers of the high-value points of ecological functions gradually shifted from south to north and west to east. (3) The geographically weighted regression (GWR) analysis showed that the first four main driving factors affecting the spatial difference in forest ecological functions in the study area were ranked as follows: altitude>vegetation fractional coverage>slope> per capita gross domestic product (GDP). 【Conclusion】 The occupation and degradation of forest land caused by urbanization, industrialization and the impact of changes in forestry policies and regulations on forest farmers’ enthusiasm for the forest management are the main driving factors causing changes in regional forest ecological functions. Strengthening the forest management and enhancing forestland protection are the only viable approaches to improving regional forest ecology.

Key words

forest ecological function / fixed plot data of continuous forest resources inventory / driving factor / Guangzhou

Cite this article

Download Citations
QIAN Chunhua , ZHAO Yichen , LI Mingyang , et al. Dynamic analyses of forest ecological functions based on fixed plot data of continuous forest resources inventories from 1979 to 2012 in Guangzhou[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(2): 205-212 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009063

References

[1]
KINDLER E. A comparison of the concepts:ecosystem services and forest functions to improve interdisciplinary exchange[J]. For Policy Econ, 2016, 67:52-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.03.011.
[2]
刘世荣, 代力民, 温远光, 等. 面向生态系统服务的森林生态系统经营:现状、挑战与展望[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(1):1-9.
LIU S R, DAI L M, WEN Y G, et al. A review on forest ecosystem management towards ecosystem services:status,challenges,and future perspectives[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(1):1-9.
[3]
LOOMES R, O’NEILL K. Nature’s services:societal dependence on natural ecosystems[J]. Pac Conserv Biol, 1997, 6(3):274. DOI: 10.1071/pc000274.
[4]
蒋延玲, 周广胜. 中国主要森林生态系统公益的评估[J]. 植物生态学报, 1999, 23(5):426-432.
Abstract
为生态系统管理提供科学的量化指标,以我国森林为研究对象,根据全国第3次森林资源清查资料(1984~1988)及Costanza等(1997)的森林生态系统公益资料计算了我国38种主要森林类型生态系统公益的总价值约为117.401亿美元,其中以森林营养循环的贡献最大(约占40%),而原材料(包括木材、燃料、饲料)的贡献仅占15%,反映出森林生态系统公益的显著性。 研究发现,各森林类型的生态系统公益(Va)与其总生产力(Tp)具有良好的相关关系:Ln(Va)=108.21(Tp)0.93,R2=0.844。这对于简化生态系统公益的评估具有重要意义。本研究为合理保护和可持续利用森林资源提供了科学的量化依据。
JIANG Y L, ZHOU G S. Estimation of ecosystem services of major forest in China[J]. Acta Phytoecol Sin, 1999, 23(5):426-432.
[5]
鲍文, 包维楷, 何丙辉, 等. 森林生态系统对降水的分配与拦截效应[J]. 山地学报, 2004, 22(4):483-491.
BAO W, BAO W K, HE B H, et al. Interception effects of forest ecosystems to precipitation:a review[J]. J Mt Sci, 2004, 22(4):483-491. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2786.2004.04.017.
[6]
刘煊章, 田大伦, 周志华. 杉木林生态系统净化水质功能的研究[J]. 林业科学, 1995(3):193-199.
LIU X Z, TIAN D L, ZHOU Z H. Studies on the function for purifying water of Chinese fir plantation ecosystem[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 1995(3):193-199.
[7]
杨吉华, 柳凯生, 宫锐, 等. 山丘地区森林保持水土效益的研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 1993, 7(3):47-52,66.
YANG J H, LIU K S, GONG R, et al. Study on the benefits of forest on water and soil conservation in mountainous areas[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 1993, 7(3):47-52,66. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.1993.03.008.
[8]
欧阳志云, 王效科, 苗鸿. 中国陆地生态系统服务功能及其生态经济价值的初步研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(5):607-613.
OUYANG Z Y, WANG X K, MIAO H. A primary study on Chinese terrestrial ecosystem services and their ecological-economic values[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 1999, 19(5):607-613.
[9]
国家林业局调查规划设计院. 国家森林资源连续清查技术规定[S]. 北京: 国家林业局调查规划设计院, 2014.
[10]
王柏昌, 张伟东, 杨智萍. 森林生态指数在森林资源规划设计调查中的应用[J]. 华东森林经理, 2007, 21(1):52-53,56.
WANG B C, ZHANG W D, YANG Z P. Application of forest ecological indexes in forest resource planning,designing and surveyin[J]. East China For Manag, 2007, 21(1):52-53,56. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-7743.2007.01.016.
[11]
桂子凡. 广州市森林健康风险研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2013.
GUI Z F. The research of forest health risk in Guangzhou[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2013.
[12]
肖兴威. 中国森林生物量与生产力的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2005.
XIAO X W. Study on forest biomass and productivity in China[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2005.
[13]
李苗苗. 植被覆盖度的遥感估算方法研究[D]. 北京: 中国科学院遥感应用研究所, 2003.
LI M M. The method of vegetation fraction estimation by remote sensing[D]. Beijing: Institute of Remote Sensing Applications, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2003.
[14]
李萍, 魏朝富, 邱道持. 基于熵权法赋权的区域耕地整理潜力评价[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007, 23(6):536-541.
LI P, WEI C F, QIU D C. Potentiality evaluation of regional cultivated land consolidation and rehabilitation based on entropy weight method:a case study of Chongqing municipality[J]. Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2007, 23(6):536-541. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2007.06.116.
[15]
穆少杰, 李建龙, 陈奕兆, 等. 2001-2010年内蒙古植被覆盖度时空变化特征[J]. 地理学报, 2012, 67(9):1255-1268.
MU S J, LI J L, CHEN Y Z, et al. Spatial differences of variations of vegetation coverage in Inner Mongolia during 2001-2010[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2012, 67(9):1255-1268.
[16]
BESAG J, NEWELL J. The detection of clusters in rare diseases[J]. J Royal Stat Soc:Ser A (Stat Soc), 1991, 154(1):143-155. DOI: 10.2307/2982708.
[17]
FOTHERINGHAM A S, BRUNSDON C, CHARLTON M E. Quantitative geography: perspectives on spatial data analysis[M]. London: SAGE Publications, 2000.
[18]
戴前石, 胡觉, 李建军. 基于连清数据的湖南森林碳密度估计及变化特征分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(4):129-135.
DAI Q S, HU J, LI J J. Estimation and analysis of variation characteristic of forest carbon density in Hunan Province using continuous forest inventory data[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(4):129-135.
PDF(3462 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/