Effects of common garden plants on tolerance, absorption and recovery abilities to NO2 stress

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202010051

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 127-134.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202010051

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of common garden plants on tolerance, absorption and recovery abilities to NO₂ stress

SHENG Qianqian¹(), DAI Anqi¹, ZHANG Huihui¹, XU Jingyuan¹, ZHU Zunling¹^,²^,^*()

1. College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing 210037, China
2. College of Art and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2020-10-30 Accepted:2021-06-23 Online:2022-03-30 Published:2022-04-08
Contact: ZHU Zunling E-mail:qqs@njfu.edu.cn;zhuzunling@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Garden plants, which can absorb and purify air pollutants, play an important role in the construction of urban ecological environments. Based on the practical application of urban road greening, we selected common garden plants in Jiangsu Province to study their tolerance, absorption, and recovery abilities under NO₂ stress. 【Method】We studied the tolerance, absorption, and recovery abilities of 38 garden plants to NO₂ stress using artificial fumigation in the laboratory and screened the plants with strong tolerance, absorption, and recovery abilities. 【Result】 Plants with strong NO₂ tolerance and strong absorption and recovering abilities included × Fatshedera lizei, Ilex crenata var. convexa, Litsea pungens, Hedera helix, Euonymus japonicus ‘Aurea-marginatus’, Buxus sinica var. parvifolia. Plants with strong NO₂ resistance and strong recovering abilities included Carpinus putoensis, × Fatshedera lizei, Pittosporum tobira, Ilex crenata var. convexa, Buxus sinica, Litsea pungens, Ginkgo biloba ‘Wannianjin’, Euonymus japonicus ‘Aurea-marginatus’, Ophiopogon japonicus ‘Nana’, Hosta ‘Green Gold’, and another 19 species. Plants with the strong absorptive capacities and recovery abilities are Camellia sasanqua, Euonymus japonicus ‘Aurea-marginatus’, Hedera helix, Vinca major ‘Variegata’, Buxus sinica var. parvifolia, Farfugium japonicum, and Iris tectorum. Plants with the strong NO₂ tolerance, strong absorption, and recovery abilities are Euonymus japonicus ‘Aurea-marginatus’, Hedera helix, Litsea pungens, × Fatshedera lizei, Ilex crenata var. convexa, Buxus sinica var. parvifolia, and Farfugium japonicum. 【Conclusion】Based on the analysis of NO₂ and other pollutants in urban roads in Nanjing over the last six years, it is considered that NO₂ is the main pollutant of urban road traffic. The selected plant species with strong tolerance, absorption capacities, and recovery capacities can supplement and improve the NO₂-resistant garden plant list in the traditional literature, providing a theoretical basis for the selection and allocation of road greening tree species in NO₂ polluted areas and potentially polluted areas.

Key words: garden plant, NO₂ tolerance, absorption ability, recovery ability, urban road greening

CLC Number:

S687.9

SHENG Qianqian, DAI Anqi, ZHANG Huihui, XU Jingyuan, ZHU Zunling. Effects of common garden plants on tolerance, absorption and recovery abilities to NO₂ stress[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 127-134.

Figures/Tables 6

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

The tolerance level of xylophyta and herbaceous plants to NO2"

木本植物 xylophyta	耐受性/ h resistance	耐受性等级 level	木本植物 xylophyta	耐受性/ h resistance	耐受性等级 level	草本植物 herbaceous	耐受性/ h resistance	耐受性等级 level
彩叶杞柳 Salix integra ‘Hakuro Nishiki’	4	弱	普陀鹅耳枥Carpinus putoensis	48	较强	花叶美人蕉Canna indica	4	弱
洒金桃叶珊瑚 Aucuba japonica var. variegata	4	弱	熊掌木 × Fatshedera lizei	48	较强	鸢尾Iris tectorum	10	较弱
红王子锦带 Weigela florida ‘Red Prince’	4	弱	海桐Pittosporum tobira	48	较强	金边麦冬 Liriope spicata var. variegata	36	中等
花叶蔓长春 Vinca major‘Variegata’	4	弱	龟甲冬青 Ilex crenata var. convexa	48	较强	大吴风草Farfugium japonicum	48	较强
云南黄素馨Jasminum mesnyi	5	弱	瓜子黄杨Buxus sinica	48	较强	万年青Rohdea japonica	48	较强
南天竹Nandina domestica	5	弱	红花檵木 Loropetalum chinense var. rubrum	48	较强	金边玉簪Hosta ‘Green Gold’	48	较强
铺地柏Juniperus procumbens	5	弱	木姜子Litsea pungens	72	强	金边菖蒲Acorus calamus	48	较强
金森女贞 Ligustrum japonicum var. howardii	5	弱	金叶银杏G. biloba‘Wannianjin’	72	强	矮麦冬Ophiopogon japonicus	72	强
珊瑚树Viburnum odoratissimum	8	较弱	金边黄杨 Euonymus japonicus‘Aurea-marginatus’	72	强
毛鹃Rhododendron× pulchrum	8	较弱	欧洲鹅耳枥Carpinus betulus	72	强
茶梅Camellia sasanqua	8	较弱	银杏Ginkgo biloba	72	强
六月雪Serissa japonica	9	较弱	波叶金桂 Osmanthus fragrans ‘Boye Jingui’	72	强
小叶栀子Gardenia jasminoides	24	中等	小叶黄杨Buxus sinica var. parvifolia	72	强
八仙花Hydrangea macrophylla	36	中等	常春藤 Hedera nepalensis var. sinensis	72	强
夏蜡梅Calycanthus chinensis	36	中等	狭叶十大功劳Mahonia fortunei	72	强

Table 2

Table 3

The absorption and recovery abilities of xylophyta and herbaceous plants under NO2 stress"

种类 type	种 spiece	N含量/(mg·m^-3)			吸收能力/倍 absorptive capacity	吸收能力等级 level of absorptive capacity	恢复能力/倍 recovery capacity	恢复能力等级 level of recovery capacity
种类 type	种 spiece	熏气零点 fumigation zero point	熏气72 h after fumigation 72 h	恢复后 after recovery	吸收能力/倍 absorptive capacity	吸收能力等级 level of absorptive capacity	恢复能力/倍 recovery capacity	恢复能力等级 level of recovery capacity
木本植物 xylophyta	铺地柏	1.12	0.00	0.28	-1.00	弱	0.12	较强
	南天竹	1.68	0.56	0.28	-0.67	弱	0.14	较强
	狭叶十大功劳	1.40	0.70	0.98	-0.50	较弱	-0.21	较强
	银杏	1.68	1.12	1.56	-0.33	较弱	0.29	较强
	六月雪	1.40	0.84	1.28	-0.40	较弱	-1.00	中等
	欧洲鹅耳枥	1.40	1.12	1.27	-0.20	中等	-0.14	较强
	小叶栀子	1.40	1.12	1.27	-0.20	中等	0.01	较强
	云南黄素馨	1.12	0.84	1.02	-0.25	中等	0.00	较强
	毛鹃	0.84	0.56	1.68	-0.33	中等	-0.34	较强
	普陀鹅耳枥	1.12	0.98	1.05	-0.13	中等	0.12	较强
	红王子锦带	1.40	1.26	1.34	-0.10	中等	1.00	强
	波叶金桂	0.42	0.42	1.68	0.00	中等	0.06	较强
	红花檵木	0.84	0.84	0.70	0.00	中等	-1.00	中等
	洒金桃叶珊瑚	0.84	0.84	0.28	0.00	中等	-3.00	较弱
	瓜子黄杨	1.12	1.12	0.98	0.00	中等	0.19	较强
	夏蜡梅	1.12	1.12	1.13	0.00	中等	-0.15	较强
	金叶银杏	0.56	0.56	0.56	0.00	中等	-0.20	较强
	金森女贞	1.12	1.23	1.02	0.10	中等	0.07	较强
	海桐	0.70	0.84	0.98	0.20	中等	0.14	较强
	八仙花	1.12	1.34	1.34	0.20	中等	-5.00	弱
	彩叶杞柳	0.56	0.84	0.73	0.50	中等	0.75	强
	茶梅	0.42	0.84	0.98	1.00	较强	0.32	较强
	金边黄杨	0.14	0.70	0.84	4.00	较强	0.34	较强
	常春藤	0.28	0.84	0.56	2.00	较强	0.00	较强
	花叶蔓长春	0.56	1.12	0.98	1.00	较强	0.33	较强
	木姜子	0.56	1.26	0.94	1.25	较强	-0.12	较强
	熊掌木	0.84	1.68	0.28	1.00	较强	0.07	较强
	龟甲冬青	1.40	2.24	1.76	0.60	较强	-0.33	较强
	小叶黄杨	0.28	1.40	0.70	4.00	强	0.18	较强
	珊瑚树	0.42	1.68	0.42	3.00	强	-0.14	较强
草本植物 herbage	金边麦冬	1.36	0.56	0.42	-0.59	较弱	-2.00	较弱
	金边菖蒲	1.40	0.84	1.24	-0.40	较弱	0.00	较强
	花叶美人蕉	1.68	1.40	1.50	-0.17	中等	-1.00	中等
	万年青	1.10	0.87	1.07	-0.21	中等	-0.27	较强
	金边玉簪	1.40	1.68	1.50	0.20	中等	0.28	较强
	矮麦冬	0.28	0.56	0.84	1.00	中等	0.67	强
	大吴风草	0.28	0.84	0.84	2.00	较强	0.17	较强
	鸢尾	0.28	1.12	0.56	3.00	较强	-0.50	较强

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

References 25

[1]	STATLER G D. Leaf wettability of wheat in relation to infection by Puccinia recondita f.sp. tritici[J]. Phytopathology, 1980, 70(7):641. DOI: 10.1094/phyto-70-641. doi: 10.1094/phyto-70-641
[2]	NULL. Air pollution and its effects on plants in China[J]. J Appl Ecol, 1989, 26(3):763-773. doi: 10.2307/2403688
[3]	缪宇明, 陈卓梅, 陈亚飞, 等. 浙江省38种园林绿化植物苗木对二氧化氮气体的抗性及吸收能力[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2008, 25(6):765-771.
	MIAO Y M, CHEN Z M, CHEN Y F, et al. Resistance to and absorbency of gaseous for 38 young landscaping plants in Zhejiang Province[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2008, 25(6):765-771. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2008.06.017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2008.06.017
[4]	NOUCHI I. Responses of whole plants to air pollutants[M]// Air pollution and plant biotechnology. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2002:3-39. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-68388-9_1. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-68388-9_1
[5]	陈卓梅. 二氧化氮胁迫下樟树的生理生化响应研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2009.
	CHEN Z M. Physiological and biochemical responses of Cinnamomum camphora to nitrogen dioxide induced stress[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2009.
[6]	滕士元, 陈卓梅, 杜国坚. 二氧化氮对樟树幼苗硝酸还原酶活力和氮元素积累的影响[J]. 浙江林业科技, 2010, 30(4):70-72.
	TENG S Y, CHEN Z M, DU G J. Effects of NO₂ on the activity of nitrate reductase and N accumulation of Cinnamomum camphora seedlings[J]. J Zhejiang For Sci Technol, 2010, 30(4):70-72. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2010.04.017. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3776.2010.04.017
[7]	MORIKAWA H, ERKIN O C. Basic processes in phytoremediation and some applications to air pollution control[J]. Chemosphere, 2003, 52(9):1553-1558. DOI: 10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00495-8. doi: 10.1016/s0045-6535(03)00495-8
[8]	SHENG Q Q, ZHANG Y L, ZHU Z L, et al. An experimental study to quantify road greenbelts and their association with PM_2.5 concentration along city main roads in Nanjing, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 667, 710-717. DOI: /10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.306. doi: /10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.306
[9]	SHENG Q Q, ZHU Z L. Effects of nitrogen dioxide on biochemical responses in 41 garden plants[J]. Plants, 2019, 8(2):45. DOI: 10.3390/plants8020045. doi: 10.3390/plants8020045
[10]	孙淑萍. 3种垂直绿化植物对污染物的富集及生理响应[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2011.
	SUN S P. Absorption and physiological response of three vertical greening plant species to pollutants[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2011.
[11]	黄芳, 王建明, 徐玉梅. 二氧化硫污染对几种作物的伤害研究[J]. 山西农业科学, 2007, 35(11):56-58.
	HUANG F, WANG J M, XU Y M. Reseach on effect of sulfur dioxide to some enzymes in different crops[J]. J Shanxi Agric Sci, 2007, 35(11):56-58.
[12]	潘文, 张卫强, 张方秋, 等. 红花荷等植物对SO₂和NO₂的抗性[J]. 生态环境学报, 2012, 21(11):1851-1858.
	PAN W, ZHANG W Q, ZHANG F Q, et al. Resistance of Rhodoleia championii and other plants to sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2012, 21(11):1851-1858. DOI: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2012.11.009. doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2012.11.009
[13]	LIU X, HOU F, LI G, et al. Effects of nitrogen dioxide and its acid mist on reactive oxygen species production and antioxidant enzyme activity in Arabidopsis plants[J]. J Environ Sci (China), 2015, 34:93-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.011. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2015.03.011
[14]	HU Y B, BELLALOUI N, TIGABU M, et al. Gaseous NO₂ effects on stomatal behavior,photosynthesis and respiration of hybrid poplar leaves[J]. Acta Physiol Plant, 2015, 37(2):1-8. DOI: 10.1007/s11738-014-1749-8. doi: 10.1007/s11738-014-1749-8
[15]	圣倩倩, 徐晶圆, 宋敏, 等. NO₂胁迫下38种园林植物的形态伤害指数分析[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2020, 40(12):151-158.
	SHENG Q Q, XU J Y, SONG M, et al. Analysis of morphological injury index of 38 species of garden plants under NO₂ stress[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2020, 40(12):151-158. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.12.018. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2020.12.018
[16]	陶双成, 高硕晗, 熊新竹, 等. 北京典型跑步区域空气污染特征及跑步者呼吸暴露[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(8):3580-3590.
	TAO S C, GAO S H, XIONG X Z, et al. Air pollution characteristics and jogger inhalation exposure in typical running area of Beijing[J]. Environ Sci, 2018, 39(8):3580-3590. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201711178. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201711178
[17]	符传博, 陈有龙, 丹利, 等. 近10年海南岛大气NO₂的时空变化及污染物来源解析[J]. 环境科学, 2015, 36(1):18-24.
	FU C B, CHEN Y L, DAN L, et al. Temporal and spatial characteristics of atmospheric NO₂ over Hainan Island and the pollutant sources in recent 10 years[J]. Environ Sci, 2015, 36(1):18-24. DOI: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.01.003. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.2015.01.003
[18]	杨俊梅, 李培仁, 李义宇, 等. 南京北郊O₃、NO₂和SO₂变化特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(3):66-70.
	YANG J M, LI P R, LI Y Y, et al. Characteristics of SO₂,NO₂ and O₃ in the northern suburb of Nanjing[J]. J Meteorol Environ, 2014, 30(3):66-70. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2014.03.010. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2014.03.010
[19]	张莉, 王尚军, 王勇. 城市道路绿化对大气污染物的过滤作用[J]. 北方环境, 2013, 25(3):47-48.
	ZHANG L, WANG S J, WANG Y. Discussion on monitoring effect of road greening in city[J]. North Environ, 2013, 25(3):47-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0370.2013.03.016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-0370.2013.03.016
[20]	TAKAHASHI M, NAKAGAWA M, SAKAMOTO A, et al. Atmospheric nitrogen dioxide gas is a plant vitalization signal to increase plant size and the contents of cell constituents[J]. New Phytol, 2005, 168(1):149-154. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01493.x. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01493.x.
[21]	YONEYAMA T, KIM H Y, MORIKAWA H, et al. Metabolism and detoxification of nitrogen dioxide and ammonia in plants[M]// Air pollution and plant biotechnology. Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2002:221-234. DOI: 10.1007/978-4-431-68388-9_11. doi: 10.1007/978-4-431-68388-9_11
[22]	圣倩倩, 祝遵凌. 南京市7种适生彩叶植物抗NO₂能力及生态功能研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(8):81-88.
	SHENG Q Q, ZHU Z L. The NO₂ resistance study and garden application of seven colored plants in Nanjing[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2018, 38(8):81-88. DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.08.013. doi: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2018.08.013
[23]	陈伟光, 黄芳芳, 温小莹, 等. 大气SO₂和NO₂污染及植物的抗性和净化能力研究进展[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2017, 33(4):123-129.
	CHEN W G, HUANG F F, WEN X Y, et al. Research progress on the atmospheric SO₂ and NO₂ pollution and the plant resistance and purification capacity[J]. Guangdong For Sci Technol, 2017, 33(4):123-129. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2017.04.024. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2017.04.024
[24]	李博. 6种花灌木对汽车尾气胁迫的生理反应及抗性研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2012.
	LI B. The physiological response and tolerance of six species of flowering shrubs on stress of automobile exhaust[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2012.
[25]	刘凯伦, 郭晨, 谢志强, 等. 杜鹃等5种灌木对PM_2.5的净化作用初探[J]. 湖南林业科技, 2017, 44(1):62-65.
	LIU K L, GUO C, XIE Z Q, et al. Purification of PM_2.5 by five shrubs[J]. Hunan For Sci Technol, 2017, 44(1):62-65. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2017.01.012. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-5710.2017.01.012

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

叶片伤害情况 leaf damage rate	耐持续熏气时间/h resistance to continuous fumigation time	耐受性等级 tolerance level
无可见伤害或伤害极轻微tolerance grade no observable injury or minor injury grade	72	强
伤害叶数damage leaf number <25%,伤害面积damage area <20%	48	较强
伤害叶数damage leaf number <50%,伤害面积damage area <50%	24~36	中等
伤害叶数damage leaf number <75%,伤害面积damage area <70%	8~10	较弱
叶普遍受伤害,大块黄褐斑,甚至叶片脱落common leaf damage, large melasma, even leaf loss	4~5	弱

指标 index	变异来源 source of variation	平方和 SS	自由度 df	均方 MS	F	P
吸收能力 absorption capacity	处理间	145.912 3	37	3.943 6	144.500 0	0.000 1
	处理内	2.074 1	76	0.027 3
	总变异	147.986 4	113
恢复能力 recovery capacity	处理间	105.637 4	37	2.855 1	651.899 0	0.000 1
	处理内	0.332 9	76	0.004 4
	总变异	105.970 3	113

指标 index	NO₂耐受性 tolerance to NO₂	吸收性 absorption capacity	恢复能力 recovery capacity
NO₂耐受性tolerance to NO₂	1	0.16	0.38^*
吸收能力absorption capacity	0.16	1	0.08
恢复能力recovery capacity	0.38^*	0.08	1

Effects of common garden plants on tolerance, absorption and recovery abilities to NO₂ stress

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 25

Related Articles 1

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer