
Seasonal variation characteristics of soil quality in Zijin Mountain under the disturbance of trample
LIU Qianqian, PENG Xiaonan, LIU Xin, WANG Shutian, DAI Kanglong, XU Haibin, DONG Li’na, ZHANG Jinchi
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 185-193.
Seasonal variation characteristics of soil quality in Zijin Mountain under the disturbance of trample
【Objective】 This research aims to explore the characteristics of soil quality change in Zijin Mountain National Urban Forest Park under trampling disturbance and study the influence of seasonal changes on soil quality under the same trampling disturbance conditions. 【Method】This study took Nanjing Zijin Mountain National Urban Forest Park as the research object. Eight tourist roads with a width of 3 m were randomly selected; a 7 m × 1 m soil collection sample strip was set vertically on each tourist trail, and soil was collected from each strip. Three 1 m × 1 m soil sampling points were set up on the transect. The first, second and third sampling points were respectively 1 m, 3 m and 7 m away from the center of the road as the active area, buffer zone and background area, respectively. The soil was collected over four seasons to determine the seasonal changes in soil physical and chemical properties and soil enzymes under different trampling disturbance intensities on the tourist roads. A factor analysis method was used to calculate the variance contribution rates of the principal components, and the coefficients of each index in the linear combination of the principal components were weighted and averaged to determine the weight and law of soil quality changes. 【Result】 In the background area, buffer zone and active area, the bulk density was higher in spring and autumn and lower in summer and winter. The maximum moisture content and porosity of the soil in summer and winter were higher than those in spring and autumn. The pH were higher in summer and winter, and lower in spring and autumn. The organic matter content in spring was significantly lower than that in summer, autumn and winter, and the content of available phosphorus was the highest in summer and lowest in spring. Soil enzyme activity in summer was higher than that in spring, autumn and winter. In the background area, the soil quality in spring was lower than that in summer, autumn and winter. Under different degrees of trampling disturbance, the soil quality in summer and winter was higher than that in spring and autumn. With increasing intensity of trampling disturbance, soil bulk density and pH showed an upward trend in the four seasons. However, maximum moisture content, capillary porosity, biochemical indicators and enzyme activity all showed a downward trend in the four seasons. Structural equilibrium equation model (SEM) analysis showed that soil physical and chemical characteristics and soil enzyme activity were significantly correlated with soil quality. 【Conclusion】 The study showed that soil total nitrogen content, available phosphorus content, maximum moisture content, and enzyme activity are more weighted; that is, they make a greater contribution to changes in soil quality under different seasons and intensities of trampling and can be used as the soil comprehensive quality evaluation index of Zijin Mountain National Urban Forest Park. Seasonal changes have significant effects on soil physical and chemical properties and soil enzymes with the same intensity of trampling disturbance.
physical and chemical properties of soil / enzyme activity / trampling / seasonal changes / Zijin Mountain National Urban Forest Park
[1] |
赵敏. 旅游活动对黄山土壤和植被的影响[J]. 山东农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 46(1):78-81.
|
[2] |
谭小爱, 王平, 邹亚萍, 等. 旅游活动对香格里拉景区土壤重金属污染的影响[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 121-127.
|
[3] |
王文娟, 李景文, 王中斌, 等. 胡杨根际土壤真菌群落代谢特征及其土壤影响因子研究[J]. 西北植物学报, 2017, 37(7):1429-1437.
|
[4] |
陶宝先, 张金池, 俞元春, 等. 苏南丘陵地区森林土壤酶活性季节变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2010, 19(10):2349-2354.
|
[5] |
杨宁, 杨满元, 雷玉兰, 等. 紫色土丘陵坡地土壤微生物群落的季节变化[J]. 生态环境学报, 2015, 24(1):34-40.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
谭周进, 肖启明, 杨海君, 等. 旅游对张家界国家森林公园土壤酶及微生物作用强度的影响[J]. 自然资源学报, 2006, 21(1):133-138.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
段青倩, 樊文华, 吴艳军, 等. 旅游踩踏对五台山东台山地草甸土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2015, 35(4):97-100.
|
[11] |
郭亚芬, 王朋薇. 旅游活动对红花尔基国家森林公园土壤肥力及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2009, 40(3):529-532.
|
[12] |
柴锦隆, 徐长林, 张德罡, 等. 模拟践踏和降水对高寒草甸土壤养分和酶活性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(1):333-344.
|
[13] |
杨倩, 刘目兴, 王苗苗, 等. 武汉市典型绿地植被类型对表层土壤入渗和持水性能的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2019, 28(6):1324-1333.
|
[14] |
巩劼, 陆林, 晋秀龙, 等. 黄山风景区旅游干扰对植物群落及其土壤性质的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(5):2239-2251.
|
[15] |
李灵, 梁彦兰, 江慧华, 等. 旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤重金属污染和土壤性质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(19):171-174,181.
|
[16] |
石强, 雷相东, 谢红政. 旅游干扰对张家界国家森林公园土壤的影响研究[J]. 四川林业科技, 2002, 23(3): 28-33.
|
[17] |
孔祥丽, 李丽娜, 龚国勇, 等. 旅游干扰对明月山国家森林公园土壤的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2008, 29(3):350-353.
|
[18] |
何贵永, 孙浩智, 史小明, 等. 青藏高原高寒湿地不同季节土壤理化性质对放牧模式的响应[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(4):12-20.
|
[19] |
高雪峰, 韩国栋, 张功, 等. 荒漠草原不同放牧强度下土壤酶活性及养分含量的动态研究[J]. 草业科学, 2007, 24(2):10-13.
|
[20] |
曲学斌, 胡继超, 朱红霞, 等. 紫金山南坡土壤养分分布状况分析[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2009, 15(20):39-40,57.
|
[21] |
王舒甜, 张金池, 郑丹扬, 等. 钟山风景区土壤环境对人为踩踏扰动的响应[J]. 林业科学, 2017, 53(8):9-16.
|
[22] |
曹丽娟. 旅游干扰对河南云台山风景区土壤质量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015(4): 73-77.
|
[23] |
鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
|
[24] |
关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1986.
|
[25] |
刘世平, 陈后庆, 聂新涛, 等. 稻麦两熟制不同耕作方式与秸秆还田土壤肥力的综合评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(5):51-56.
|
[26] |
吴玉红, 田霄鸿, 南雄雄, 等. 基于因子和聚类分析的保护性耕作土壤质量评价研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2):223-228.
|
[27] |
孙飞达, 朱灿, 李飞, 等. 旅游干扰对高寒草地植物多样性和土壤生化特性的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(11):2541-2549.
|
[28] |
石亚芳, 赵允格, 李晨辉, 等. 踩踏干扰对生物结皮土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(10):3227-3234.
|
[29] |
李灵, 张玉, 江慧华, 等. 旅游干扰对武夷山风景区土壤质量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2009, 16(6):56-62.
|
[30] |
朱芳, 白卓灵, 陈耿, 等. 旅游活动对武当山风景区生态环境的影响[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(3):89-95.
|
[31] |
刘小兰. 旅游干扰对九寨沟冷杉林下枯落物及其土壤水文功能的影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(2):229-234.
|
[32] |
曾丹娟, 徐广平, 黄玉清, 等. 北部湾经济区枯落物及其林下土壤持水能力研究[J]. 水土保持研究, 2015, 22(4):210-213,220.
|
[33] |
陈广磊, 田昆, 王行, 等. 高原湿地纳帕海土壤持水力对不同放牧的响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2016, 30(4):123-129,141.
|
[34] |
陆林, 巩劼, 晋秀龙. 旅游干扰对黄山风景区土壤的影响[J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(2):209-223.
|
[35] |
马剑, 刘贤德, 何晓玲, 等. 旅游干扰对祁连山风景区土壤性质的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(5):924-930.
|
[36] |
邓如军, 张天汉, 石多仁, 等. 旅游干扰对额济纳旗胡杨林区土壤环境的影响[J]. 林业调查规划, 2018, 43(6):87-93.
|
[37] |
王立龙, 陆林. 旅游干扰对太平湖国家湿地公园土壤酶活性及大型土壤动物分布的影响[J]. 湿地科学, 2013, 11(2):212-218.
|
[38] |
杨万勤, 王开运. 森林土壤酶的研究进展[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(2):152-159.
|
[39] |
朱家琪, 满秀玲, 张頔, 等. 大兴安岭北部针叶林土壤团聚体酶活性研究[J]. 森林工程, 2020, 36(4):1-11.
|
[40] |
文都日乐, 张静妮, 李刚, 等. 放牧干扰对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2010, 18(4):517-522.
|
[41] |
曹淑宝, 刘全伟, 王立群, 等. 短期放牧对草甸草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 微生物学通报, 2012, 39(6):741-748.
|
[42] |
倪珊珊, 彭琳, 高越. 旅游干扰对峨眉山风景区土壤及植被的影响[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016, 37(3):93-96.
|
[43] |
孟庆华, 李根英. 山东主要土类有机质及其与供磷特性的关系[J]. 土壤通报, 2007, 38(1):25-28.
|
[44] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |