Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6): 217-224.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202011003

Previous Articles Next Articles

Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei

WU Wenqing¹^,²(), XU Kefu²^,^*()

1. Wuxi Vocational Institute of Arts & Technology, Wuxi 214206,China;
2. College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230031,China

Received:2020-11-02 Accepted:2021-04-19 Online:2021-11-30 Published:2021-12-02
Contact: XU Kefu E-mail:1016403387@qq.com;xkf69@163.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 Based on the relationship between various types of open spaces and recreation behaviors, we propose landscape improvement and planning suggestions for urban park open spaces. 【Method】 In this study, we used the open space of the ring park in the old town of Hefei as the research object and analytical methods including the system for observing play and recreation in communities(SOPARC), big data analytics, kernel density estimation(KDE) and the principal component analysis, to determine the relationship between the urban park open spaces and recreation behaviors from a combined qualitative and quantitative perspective.【Result】 ① The demand for recreation behaviors in urban park open spaces is mainly from nearby residents, children and the elderly. ② The relationship between the different types of open spaces and recreation behaviors is quite different: the number and richness of recreation activities are the highest in green spaces, and the frequency of recreation behaviors is high, but the types are less in pavement and square spaces, the frequency and richness of recreation behavior in the waterfront space are low. ③ Space openness, space greenness, pavement degree, space accessibility and space hydrophilicity are the main factors influencing the space quality. ④ In most spaces, the density of ornamental recreation activities per 100 square meters is less than 3.0 instances, mainly concentrated in the waterfront space. The average density of amusement activities per 100 square meters is the highest, with up to 10.34 instances. The density of leisure activities is low, and the fluctuation trend is gentle. The density of sports recreation behavior fluctuates significantly.【Conclusion】 The types and characteristics of recreation behaviors in open spaces of urban parks vary considerably, and the degree of preference of various recreational behaviors to the space quality is different.

Key words: city park, open space, recreation behaviors, kernel density estimation (KDE), system for observing play and recreation in community (SOPARC), Hefei City

CLC Number:

X24
S718.6

WU Wenqing, XU Kefu. Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 217-224.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 2

Table 3

Fig.3

Fig.4

References 20

[1]	张旭. 基于环境—行为层面的成都浣花溪公园空间组织研究[D]. 雅安:四川农业大学, 2011.
	ZHANG X. The spatial organization study that based on the level environment-behavior research of Chengdu Huanhuaxi Park[D]. Ya’an:Sichuan Agricultural University, 2011.
[2]	斯蒂芬·史密斯. 游憩地理学理论与方法[M]. 吴必虎, 等, 译. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 1992:56-62.
	SMITH S. Theory and method of recreation geography[M]. WU B H, et al, Translate. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1992:56-62.
[3]	张帆. 日常生活视野下的旧城开放空间重构研究[M]. 南京: 东南大学出版社, 2016:4-8.
	ZHANG F. Reconstruction of open space in old city from the perspective of daily life[M]. Nanjing: Southeast University Press, 2016:4-8.
[4]	张婷, 叶莉. 城市居民家庭结构与游憩需求意向关系研究:以长沙市居民为例[J]. 开发研究, 2010(4):34-38.
	ZHANG T, YE L. Study on the relationship between family structure and recreation demand intention of urban residents: take Changsha residents as an example[J]. Research on Development, 2020(4):34-38.DOI: 10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2010.04.035. doi: 10.13483/j.cnki.kfyj.2010.04.035
[5]	AKPINAR A. Factors influencing the use of urban greenways:a case study of Aydin,Turkey[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2016, 16:123-131.DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.004
[6]	徐红蕾, 许凡. 交互性设计理念下城市运动空间研究[J]. 艺术科技, 2019, 32(5):82-83.
	XU H L, XU F. Research on urban movement space under the concept of interactive design[J]. Art Sci Technol, 2019, 32(5):82-83.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019.05.045. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9436.2019.05.045
[7]	赵弼皇, 李艳. 基于环境行为学的城市口袋公园空间行为调研与分析——以巢湖市伴园为例[J]. 现代园艺, 2019, 42(23):16-18.
	ZHAO B H, LI Y. Research and analysis on spatial behavior of urban pocket park based on environmental behavior: take Chaohu Companion Garden as an example[J]. Modern Horticulture, 2019, 42(23):16-18. DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2019.23.006. doi: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2019.23.006
[8]	WU K C, SONG L Y. A case for inclusive design:analyzing the needs of those who frequent Taiwan’s urban parks[J]. Appl Ergon, 2017, 58:254-264.DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.06.015
[9]	KIENAST F, DEGENHARDT B, WEILENMANN B, et al. GIS-assisted mapping of landscape suitability for nearby recreation[J]. Lands Urban Plan, 2012, 105(4):385-399.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.015
[10]	LEE B D. Motives, behaviors and attachments: a comparative study between older travelers younger travelers in a national scenic area[D]. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University, 2005: 137.
[11]	靳敏. 华清池景区游憩行为空间特征调查与评价[D]. 西安:西安建筑科技大学, 2013.
	JIN M. Studies on tourists behavioral characteristics with temporal and spatial distribution of Huaqing Pool Paradise[D]. Xi’an:Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 2013.
[12]	任斌斌, 李延明, 卜燕华, 等. 北京冬季开放性公园使用者游憩行为研究[J]. 中国园林, 2012, 28(4):58-61.
	REN B B, LI Y M, BU Y H, et al. Research on users recreation action in open park of Beijing in winter[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2012, 28(4):58-61.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2012.04.016. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2012.04.016
[13]	周乐乐. 基于游憩行为需求的城市滨海开放空间优化策略研究 :以青岛西部老城区海滨为例[D]. 青岛:青岛理工大学, 2018.
	ZHOU L L. Study on optimization strategy of urban coastal open space based on recreation behavior demand:taking the seaside in the old city of western Qingdao as an example[D]. Qingdao:Qingdao Tehcnology University, 2018.
[14]	赵颖. 以游憩需求为导向的北京市城市公园环功能提升与规划优化研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2019.
	ZHAO Y. Study on improvement of urban park circle function and planning optimization based on recreation demand in Beijing[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2019.
[15]	杨戈. 基于聚类分析的湖泊型公园滨水空间与游憩行为的关联性研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2018.
	YANG G. Relevance research on waterfront space and recreation behavior of the lake type park based on cluster analysis[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2018.
[16]	曾忠平, 王雅丽, 彭浩轩. 基于SOPARC和KDE的游客游憩行为研究:以武汉东湖绿道为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(12):58-62.
	ZENG Z P, WANG Y L, PENG H X. Research on tourist recreation behavior based on SOPARC and KDE: taking Wuhan East Lake greenway as an example[J]. Chin Lands Archi, 2019, 35(12):58-62.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0058. doi: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0058
[17]	李骏豪. 基于行为心理感知的合肥市环城公园POE评价研究[D]. 合肥:合肥工业大学, 2019.
	LI J H. Research on post occupancy evaluation of ring park based on behavioral and psychological perception in Heifei[D]. Hefei:Hefei University of Technology, 2019.
[18]	赵晓龙, 徐靖然, 刘笑冰, 等. 基于无人机(UAV)观测的寒地城市公园冬季体力活动及空间分布研究:以哈尔滨四个公园为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(12):40-45.
	ZHAO X L, XU J R, LIU X B, et al. Observations of winter physical activities in urban parks using UAVs:a case study of four city parks in Harbin[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(12):40-45.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0040. doi: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.12.0040
[19]	郭灿灿. 社区公园体力活动特征及其与环境特征关联性研究[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2020.
	GUO C C. Study on the characteristics of physical activity in community parks and its correlation with environmental characteristics[D]. Beijing:Beijing Forestry University, 2020.
[20]	王增. 园艺疗法在公园植物景观设计中的应用——以国家南方药用植物博览园中的五感花园设计为例[J]. 现代园艺2020, 43(12):103-104.
	WANG Z. Application of horticultural therapy in plant landscape design of park:taking the design of Wugan Garden in the National Southern Medicinal Plant Expo Garden as an example[J]. Xiandai Hortic, 2020, 43(12):103-104.DOI: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2020.12.052. doi: 10.14051/j.cnki.xdyy.2020.12.052

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

调查项目 item	类别 category	比例/ % ratio	调查项目 item	类别 category	比例/ % ratio	调查项目 item	类别 category	比例/ % ratio	调查项目 item	类别 category	比例/ % ratio
性别 gender	男性	48.1	游憩意愿 recreation willingness	没考虑过	1.0	出游人数 number	7人以上	3.2	持续时间 duration	每天	25.8
	男性	48.1		没考虑过	1.0		7人以上	3.2		5 h以上	0.6
	女性	51.9		不愿意	0		3~6人	31.0		5 h以上	0.6
	女性	51.9		不愿意	0		3~6人	31.0		3~5 h	14.2
年龄结构 age structure	青少年	9.8		一般	18.5		2人	43.8		3~5 h	14.2
	青少年	9.8		一般	18.5		2人	43.8		1~2 h	74.1
	青年	31.3		愿意	52.3		1人	22.0		1~2 h	74.1
	青年	31.3		愿意	52.3		1人	22.0		0.5 h左右	11.1
	中年	24.1		非常愿意	28.2	出行方式 travel mode	自行车	7.8		0.5 h左右	11.1
	中年	24.1		非常愿意	28.2		自行车	7.8	游憩空间 recrea- tion space	儿童游乐设施	5.5
	老年	34.8	游憩频率 recreation frequency	不定期	16.2		自驾	11.1		儿童游乐设施	5.5
	老年	34.8		不定期	16.2		自驾	11.1		林下空间	31.1
文化程度 education level	高中及以下	41.1		1年2~3次	6.0		出租车	4.9		林下空间	31.1
	高中及以下	41.1		1年2~3次	6.0		出租车	4.9		健身器材区	10.2
	大专或本科	50.9		1月2~3次	22.5		公交、地铁	27.5		健身器材区	10.2
	大专或本科	50.9		1月2~3次	22.5		公交、地铁	27.5		景观亭、廊等构筑物	29.3
	研究生及以上	8.0		1周2~3次	29.5		步行	50.7
广场空间	23.9

成分 PC	初始特征值 initial eigenvalue
成分 PC	总计 total	方差百分比/% percentage variance	累积/% accumulate
1	3.951	30.395	30.395
2	3.298	25.370	55.764
3	1.931	14.855	70.619
4	1.581	12.158	82.778
5	0.973	7.486	90.264
6	0.733	5.642	95.906
7	0.337	2.592	98.498
8	0.154	1.186	99.684
9	0.041	0.316	100.000
10	0.000	0.000	100.000
11	0.000	0.000	100.000
12	0.000	0.000	100.000
13	0.000	0.000	100.000

指标 index	主成分 PC
指标 index	1	2	3	4
靠近水面空间near surface space	0.374	0.507	0.479	0.476
直接接触水面direct contact with water	0.193	0.203	-0.054	-0.943
开敞空间open space	-0.768	0.541	-0.048	0.074
封闭空间enclosed space	0.196	-0.487	-0.472	0.124
半开敞半私密空间semi open and semi private space	0.753	0.112	0.362	0.175
与出入口距离>80 m distance from entrance and exit >80 m	0.184	-0.847	0.387	-0.115
与主要园路距离>15 m distance from main garden road > 15 m	0.397	0.113	0.654	0.172
步行道宽度>3 m walkway width > 3 m	-0.913	0.016	-0.012	0.113
景观设施 landscape facilities	0.289	0.679	0.167	-0.433
公共服务设施 public service facilities	0.772	0.405	-0.449	0.053
草地占区域面积比>0.5 area proportion of grassland > 0.5	-0.772	-0.405	0.449	-0.053
树冠占区域面积比>0.5 area ratio of tree crown > 0.5	0.454	-0.700	-0.419	0.213
硬质铺装占区域面积比>0.5 area ratio of hard pavement > 0.5	-0.270	0.669	-0.397	0.347

Recreational preferences among different open spaces in a ring city park of Hefei

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 20

Related Articles 7

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	ZHU Yunfeng, WANG Hong, QIN Shuhong, YANG Yi, WANG Yicong. Research on the cooling effect of parks in Nanjing based on multi-source data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 285-294.
[2]	SHI Ke, ZU Guoliang, HU Haihui. Evaluation on aesthetic quality of plant color landscape in urban parks of Harbin based on public aesthetic [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(1): 233-240.
[3]	WANG Zhipeng, WANG Wei, XING Siyi. A study on the relationship between the characteristics and usage of urban park green space and population health [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(5): 223-231.
[4]	CAO Jiajie, WANG Jie, WU Xiangchong, DING Changhui, WANG Weixi, WANG Hao. Post⁃evaluation of urban river open space landscape restoration：a case study of the eastern part of the Inner Qinhuai River in Nanjing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(3): 195-201.
[5]	BI Chen, ZHANG Jinguang, Lü Mengzhu, ZHAO Bing. Measurement of service capacity of urban recreational public open space: taking the central urban area of Nanjing as an example [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(04): 117-124.
[6]	CHEN Di^{1, 2}, QIU Bing, LIU Binyi. Organic renewal model for city park based on hierarchical thinking: a case study of the transformation program in Shanghai Huangxing Park [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(04): 153-157.
[7]	HAN Lingyun, XU Zhen, WANG Lianggui. Open space morphology and research framework with multi-perspectives [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2014, 38(01): 83-89.