Analysis of global log trade network structure and crisis propagation simulation

ZHOU Yingying, CHENG Baodong, YOU Weijia, ZHENG Wendi

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 192-200.

PDF(2335 KB)
PDF(2335 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 192-200. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101040

Analysis of global log trade network structure and crisis propagation simulation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】The deepening of economic globalization has made trade relations between countries closer. To a certain extent, the speed and breadth of the spread of crises, such as political and economic crises in the trade network has increased. Clarifying the global log trade network structure and the path of crisis propagation can help countries avoid trade risks and optimize the log trade structure.【Method】This paper used social network analysis method and bootstrap percolation model to analyze the structural characteristics of the global log trade network in 2018 from the perspective of the whole-part-individual, and then simulated the impact of the global log trade network when countries experience trade crises under different scenarios.【Result】Results show that the global log trade network is loose as a whole while close for some parts with there being differences in the centrality of different countries. The “grouping” phenomenon for core countries makes the “club” effect in the network relatively pronounced. The impact of trade crises in different countries in the network can generally be divided into four categories, namely “fast and wide”, “fast and narrow”, “slow and wide”, and “slow and narrow”. Log import-dependent and export-dependent countries have different characteristics in terms of crisis transmission, and log important-dependent countries show a strong crisis influence. The influence of a country’s crisis depends on the country’s network structure and its trade structure. A bootstrap percolation model can effectively simulate the process of crisis propagation in the log trade network, with an approximately similar crisis propagation process. Meanwhile, the degree of influence on the network is different under different thresholds. A country with a higher dependence on trade is more likely to be affected by the crisis. 【Conclusion】For this reason, countries should focus on building more stable trade relations from an overall perspective, and continuously reduce the log trade dependence on a single country to diversify risks and optimize the global log trading network.

Key words

log trade network / crisis transmission / bootstrap percolation model / COVID-19 epidemic effect / economic globalization

Cite this article

Download Citations
ZHOU Yingying , CHENG Baodong , YOU Weijia , et al. Analysis of global log trade network structure and crisis propagation simulation[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(5): 192-200 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202101040

References

[1]
陈家新, 杨红强. 全球森林及林产品碳科学研究进展与前瞻[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):1-8.
CHEN J X, YANG H Q. Advances and frontiers in global forest and harvested wood products carbon science[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2018, 42(4):1-8.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201801035.
[2]
王越, 康萍, 赵英杰. 森林生态旅游发展路径的分析[J]. 森林工程, 2022, 38(3): 47-53.
WANG Y, KANG P, ZHAO Y J. Analysis of forest eco-tourism development path[J]. Forest Engineering, 2022, 38(3): 47-53. DOI:10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2022.03.002.
[3]
李进芳. 丝绸之路经济带国家林产品贸易现状及其合作前景分析:以俄罗斯、中国、印度、哈萨克斯坦等国为例[J]. 世界农业, 2017(4):75-83.
LI J F. Analysis on the current situation of forest products trade in silk road economic belt countries and its cooperation prospect-taking Russia,China,India,Kazakhstan and other countries as examples[J]. World Agric, 2017(4):75-83.DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2017.04.012.
[4]
范芷汀, 吴金卓, 马超. 全球供应链环境下的中国竹藤商品出口影响因素分析[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(5): 127-136, 144.
FAN Z T, WU J Z, MA C. Analysis on the factors influencing Chinese bamboo and rattan product export under the background of global supply chain[J]. Forest Engineering, 2021, 37(5): 127-136, 144. DOI:10.16270/j.cnki.slgc.2021.05.002.
[5]
CAMPI M, DUEÑAS M, FAGIOLO G. How do countries specialize in agricultural production? A complex network analysis of the global agricultural product space[J]. Environ Res Lett, 2020, 15(12):124006.DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/abc2f6.
[6]
李柔, 梅冬州, 岳云嵩. 金融危机与贸易波动[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2019(5):130-143.
LI R, MEI D Z, YUE Y S. Financial crisis and trade fluctuation[J]. J Int Trade, 2019(5):130-143.DOI:10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2019.05.010.
[7]
崔百胜, 姜逸菲. 欧洲主权债务危机的传染效应及空间传染渠道分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2015(9):133-144.
CUI B S, JIANG Y F. Research on spatial contagion effect and channel of contagion of European sovereign debt crisis[J]. J Int Trade, 2015(9):133-144.DOI:10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2015.09.012.
[8]
SCHWEITZER F, FAGIOLO G, SORNETTE D, et al. Economic networks: the new challenges[J]. Science, 2009, 325(5939):422-425.DOI:10.1126/science.1173644.
[9]
陈银飞. 2000-2009年世界贸易格局的社会网络分析[J]. 国际贸易问题, 2011(11):31-42.
CHEN Y F. Analysis on social network of world trade situation in 2000-2009[J]. J Int Trade, 2011(11):31-42.DOI:10.13510/j.cnki.jit.2011.11.005.
[10]
CHEN B, LI J S, WU X F, et al. Global energy flows embodied in international trade:a combination of environmentally extended input-output analysis and complex network analysis[J]. Appl Energy, 2018, 210:98-107.DOI:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.113.
[11]
CHEEWATRAKOOLPONG K, MANPRASERT S. Trade linkages and crisis spillovers[J]. Asian Econ Pap, 2014, 13(1):84-103.DOI:10.1162/asep_a_00253.
[12]
YAMAMOTO S. Transmission of US financial and trade shocks to Asian economies: implications for spillover of the 2007-2009 US financial crisis[J]. N Am N J Econ Finance, 2014, 27:88-103.DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2013.12.002.
[13]
张伯伟, 胡学文. 东亚区域生产网络的动态演变:基于零部件贸易产业链的分析[J]. 世界经济研究, 2011(3):81-86,89.
ZHANG B W, HU X W. The evolution of east Asian production network: an analysis based on parts and components industrial chain[J]. World Econ Study, 2011(3):81-86, 89.DOI:10.13516/j.cnki.wes.2011.03.005.
[14]
姚永玲, 李恬. 二十国集团贸易网络关系及其结构变化[J]. 国际经贸探索, 2014, 30(11):42-50.
YAO Y L, LI T. The international trade network and structural evolution of G20[J]. Int Econ Trade Res, 2014, 30(11):42-50.DOI:10.13687/j.cnki.gjjmts.2014.11.004.
[15]
李敬, 陈旎, 万广华, 等. “一带一路”沿线国家货物贸易的竞争互补关系及动态变化:基于网络分析方法[J]. 管理世界, 2017(4):10-19.
LI J, CHEN N, WAN G H, et al. Competitive complementarity and dynamic changes of goods trade among countries along “the Belt and Road initiative”-based on network analysis method[J]. Manag World, 2017(4):10-19.DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2017.04.002.
[16]
袁红林, 辛娜. 中国高端制造业的全球贸易网络格局及其影响因素分析[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(6):108-117.
YUAN H L, XIN N. Global trade network pattern and influencing factors of advanced manufacturing in China[J]. Econ Geogr, 2019, 39(6):108-117.DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.06.012.
[17]
马述忠, 任婉婉, 吴国杰. 一国农产品贸易网络特征及其对全球价值链分工的影响:基于社会网络分析视角[J]. 管理世界, 2016(3):60-72.
MA S Z, REN W W, WU G J. The characteristics of agricultural trade network and its effects on the global value chain division: a study based on social network analysis[J]. Manag World, 2016(3):60-72.DOI:10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2016.03.006.
[18]
王祥, 牛叔文, 强文丽, 等. 实物量与价值量加权的全球农产品贸易网络分析[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(4):164-173.
WANG X, NIU S W, QIANG W L, et al. Trade network of global agricultural products weighted by physical and value quantity[J]. Econ Geogr, 2019, 39(4):164-173.DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.04.020.
[19]
LIANG S, FENG Y, XU M. Structure of the global virtual carbon network:revealing important sectors and communities for emission reduction[J]. J Ind Ecol, 2015, 19(2):307-320.DOI:10.1111/jiec.12242.
[20]
SUEVIRIYAPAN N, SURIYAPRAPHADILOK U, SIEMANOND K, et al. Industrial wastewater treatment network based on recycling and rerouting strategies for retrofit design schemes[J]. J Clean Prod, 2016, 111:231-252.DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.101.
[21]
ASKARI M, SHIRAZI H, AGHABABAEI SAMANI K. Dynamics of financial crises in the world trade network[J]. Phys A Stat Mech Appl, 2018, 501:164-169.DOI:10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.153.
[22]
HEADEY D. Rethinking the global food crisis: the role of trade shocks[J]. Food Policy, 2011, 36(2):136-146.DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.10.003.
[23]
YUAN C Q, LIU S F, XIE N M. The impact on Chinese economic growth and energy consumption of the Global Financial Crisis: an input-output analysis[J]. Energy, 2010, 35(4):1805-1812.DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2009.12.035.
[24]
BRASS D J, GALASKIEWICZ J, GREVE H R. Taking stock of networks and organizations: a multilevel perspective[J]. Acad Manag J, 2004, 47(6):795-817.DOI:10.2307/20159624.
[25]
GRANOVETTER M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness[J]. Am J Sociol, 1985, 91(3):481-510.DOI:10.1086/228311.
[26]
GRANOVETTER M S. The strength of weak ties[J]. Am J Sociol, 1973, 78(6):1360-1380.DOI:10.1086/225469.
[27]
任素婷, 崔雪锋, 樊瑛. 国际贸易网络中的靴襻渗流模型[J]. 电子科技大学学报, 2015, 44(2):178-182.
REN S T, CUI X F, FAN Y. Bootstrap percolation model in international trade network[J]. J Univ Electron Sci Technol China, 2015, 44(2):178-182.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-0548.2015.02.06.
[28]
王雁斌, 赵正, 程宝栋, 等. 世界原木贸易的微观贸易模式及社区结构分析[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(2):1-6.
WANG Y B, ZHAO Z, CHENG B D, et al. Research on micro trade patterns and community structure of world log trade[J]. World For Res, 2018, 31(2):1-6.DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2018.0026.y.
[29]
WELLMAN B, BERKOWITE S D. Social structures: a network approach[J]. Am Polit Sci Rev, 1989, 83(4): 1404-1405.DOI:10.2307/1961708.
[30]
FREEMAN L C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification[J]. Soc Netw, 1978, 1(3):215-239.DOI:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
[31]
王璐, 刘曙光, 段佩利, 等. 丝绸之路经济带沿线国家农产品贸易网络结构特征[J]. 经济地理, 2019, 39(9):198-206.
WANG L, LIU S G, DUAN P L, et al. Network structure of agricultural product trade in countries of the silk road economic belt[J]. Econ Geogr, 2019, 39(9):198-206.DOI:10.15957/j.cnki.jjdl.2019.09.024.
PDF(2335 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/