
A comprehensive evaluation of forest land quality using multi tree site form index
LI Qingshun, JIN Wanzhou, WANG Dejun, SUN Jingmei, LI Hongtao
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2021, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (6) : 81-89.
A comprehensive evaluation of forest land quality using multi tree site form index
【Objective】 The site form index of three common tree species birch, poplar and Picea crassifolia in the Huangshui Large-scale Forest Farm in Qinghai Province was used to analyze the landform, aspect, slope, soil type, soil thickness, and annual average temperature, annual rainfall, annual solar radiation, and other factors of the growing area. The site quality evaluation of large-scale forest farms was carried out, and a comprehensive database of forestland quality evaluation was constructed to achieve the goal of guiding the scientific afforestation and management of forest farms and maximizing the value of forest land productivity and ecological services. 【Method】 First, according to the type of inventory data within the modeling area, the advantage of each plot was obtained, and the site form index of the plot was obtained. Following this, to analyze its relationship with landform, aspect, slope, soil type, soil thickness, annual average temperature, annual rainfall, annual solar radiation, and other factors, the factor analysis was used to select the dominant factors affecting the topographic index, and a regression model was established. According to the calculated average of the site form index of the three common tree species, the cluster analysis was carried out, and the forest land was divided into five grades: Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ, Ⅳ and Ⅴ, and the forest land quality distribution map was prepared. Finally, according to the classification, the results were verified, and corresponding management measures were proposed. 【Result】 Grade Ⅰ forest land area was 3 409.37 hm 2, accounting for 1.39% of the total forest land area; Grade Ⅱ forest land area was 38 765.07 hm 2, accounting for 15.77%; Grade Ⅲ forest land area was 78 989.17 hm 2, accounting for 32.14%; Grade Ⅳ forest land area was 77 102.74 hm 2, accounting for 31.38%; and Grade Ⅴ forest land area was 47 477.50 hm 2, accounting for 19.32%. Based on the overall classification results, the forest land quality grade of large-scale forest farms was low, mainly Ⅲ and Ⅳ forest land. The corrected rate of on-site verification quality grade was 88%, and the corrected rate was high. 【Conclusion】 It is feasible to obtain high advantages through the standard wood, sample wood bank, and sample base bank in the first type of inventory data. Following this, the topographic factors, soil factors, and meteorological factors can be selected as the evaluation factors. The introduction of multiple factors makes the evaluation results more objective and improves the accuracy of the evaluation. Using multi-tree species site form indexes for a comprehensive evaluation, especially the evaluation of site quality of non-forest land is a more effective method.
multi-tree species / site form index / site quality / management measure / comprehensive evaluation
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
郑聪慧, 贾黎明, 段劼, 等. 华北地区栓皮栎天然次生林地位指数表的编制[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(2):79-85.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
刘东兰, 周宁, 郑小贤. 杉木人工林地位指数表简捷编制方法研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2012(1):61-65.
|
[7] |
李斌成, 杜超群, 袁慧, 等. 基于理论模型及其差分方程的湖北省杉木立地指数表研制[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(7):56-64.
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
陈永富, 杨彦臣, 张怀清, 等. 海南岛热带天然山地雨林立地质量评价研究[J]. 林业科学研究, 2000, 13(2):134-140.
|
[12] |
魏志刚, 夏德安, 王瑞琪, 等. 小兴安岭带岭地区不同类型次生林下红松种源试验研究[J]. 森林工程, 2021, 37(3):1-11.
|
[13] |
李任君, 高懋芳, 李强, 等. 基于ANUSPLIN的降水空间插值方法研究[J]. 中国农业信息, 2019, 31(1):48-57.
|
[14] |
刘志红,
|
[15] |
钱永兰, 吕厚荃, 张艳红. 基于ANUSPLIN软件的逐日气象要素插值方法应用与评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2010, 26(2):7-15.
|
[16] |
王洪波. 中国林地现代管理模式关键问题研究与实践探索[D]. 北京:北京林业大学, 2012.
|
[17] |
卢志伟, 李清顺. 用林分生长模型更新松树小班平均胸径和树高因子研究[J]. 西南林学院学报, 2010, 30(4):6-10.
|
[18] |
黄国胜, 马炜, 王雪军, 等. 基于一类清查数据的福建省立地质量评价技术[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2014, 36(3):1-8.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
唐守正. 利用对偶回归和结构关系建立林分优势高和平均高模型[J]. 林业科学研究, 1991, 9(4):57-62.
|
[21] |
王高峰. 森林立地分类研究评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1986, 29(3):108-124.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |