
Effects of
GU Xu, TANG Yifan, SHEN Jianhua, ZHU Yongli
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 162-168.
Effects of
【Objective】 The biogas slurry is rich not only in N, but also in $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$. This study aimed to reveal the impact of $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ on the release of CO2. 【Mothed】 when the biogas slurry was applied in farmlands, by arranging and adding four types of culture mediums, namely, the original biogas slurry, original liquid for removing $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$, deionized water plus $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ and deionization water, designated as BS, BS-B, W+B and W treatments, respectively, to the paddy soil for a 30-day cultivation experiment. 【Result】 The soil CO2 release rates were observed. The results indicated that under the BS treatment, the soil CO2 release rates decreased rapidly from 36.6 mg/(kg·h) at 2 h to 2.7 mg/(kg·h) at 30 d, and those for the BS-B treatment decreased from the highest 9.3 mg/(kg·h) at 1 d to 1.9 mg/(kg·h) at 30 d. The CO2 release rates in the BS treatment were significantly higher than those in the BS-B. Within 30 d, the cumulative CO2 emission under the BS was 193.0 g/kg, while that in BS-B was only 97.8 g/kg. It was evident that the presence of $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ in the biogas slurry significantly increased the release of CO2 from the soil. In comparison, the CO2 release rate under the W+B treatment decreased from the highest value of 12.0 mg/(kg·h) to 0.6 mg/(kg·h) at 15 d, with a cumulative CO2 emission of 54.5 g/kg during the culture period. The CO2 release rate under W treatment varied from 0.2 to 1.6 mg/(kg·h) during the culture period, and the cumulative CO2 emission was only 34.4 g/kg. It is evident that the CO2 emission under the BS treatment was 1.6 times higher than that under BS-B and W+B treatments together. Further analysis indicated that the contribution of $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ to the CO2 release in the paddy soils mainly occurred in the overlying water layer, which was dominated by $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ hydrolysis and the reaction between $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ and H+ from $\mathrm{NH}_{4}^{+}$ oxidation. 【Conclusion】 With biogas slurry applying, the addition of a large amount of $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ was one of the main reasons for the acceleration and increase of soil CO2 release, which was not just a simple sum of contributions from HC and the other components of the biogas slurry, and there was a significant synergistic effect between the two.
biogas slurry / soil pH / $\mathrm{HCO}_{3}^{-}$ / CO2 release rate
[1] |
王桂良, 寇祥明, 张家宏, 等. 沼液替代化肥氮对水稻生长发育及稻米品质的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(9):2672-2679.
|
[2] |
徐莉, 周伟, 俞元春, 等. 沼液施用对杨树林地土壤性质及林分生长的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2015, 32(2):204-207.
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
郑学博, 樊剑波, 周静, 等. 沼液化肥配施对红壤旱地土壤养分和花生产量的影响[J]. 土壤学报, 2016, 53(3):675-684.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
汤逸帆, 汪玲玉, 吴旦, 等. 农田施用沼液的重金属污染评价及承载力估算:以江苏滨海稻麦轮作田为例[J]. 中国环境科学, 2019, 39(4):1687-1695.
|
[7] |
王小非, 沈仕洲, 尹高飞, 等. 沼液灌溉对冬小麦-夏玉米轮作农田CO2、N2O排放规律的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2017, 36(4):783-792.
|
[8] |
张玉铭, 胡春胜, 张佳宝, 等. 农田土壤主要温室气体(CO2、CH4、N2O)的源/汇强度及其温室效应研究进展[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2011, 19(4):966-975.
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[16] |
罗献宝, 周常茂, 李清, 等. 沼液施用及葡萄糖添加对赤红壤温室气体排放的影响[J]. 南方农业学报, 2018, 49(7):1311-1317.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
陈永杏, 董红敏, 陶秀萍, 等. 猪场沼液灌溉冬小麦对土壤质量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(3):154-158.
|
[25] |
朱金山, 张慧, 马连杰, 等. 不同沼灌年限稻田土壤微生物群落分析[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39(5):2400-2411.
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |