Study on photosynthetic characteristics of four pecan cultivars

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202104040

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 67-74.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202104040

Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on photosynthetic characteristics of four pecan cultivars

TIAN Mengyang¹(), DOU Quanqin²^,^*(), XIE Yinfeng¹^,^*(), TANG Wenhua¹, JI Yanhong¹

1. Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, College of Biology and the Environment, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2. Jiangsu Academy of Forestry, Nanjing 210014, China

Received:2021-04-23 Revised:2021-06-16 Online:2022-09-30 Published:2022-10-19
Contact: DOU Quanqin,XIE Yinfeng E-mail:13803819054@163.com;douqq2008@163.com;xxyyff@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The photosynthetic and growth characteristics of four pecan cultivars ‘Mochou’ ‘Caddo’ ‘Shaoxing’ and ‘Wichita’ were investigated to provide a scientific basis for their breeding and popularization. 【Method】Diurnal changes in photosynthesis, the light response curve, chlorophyll fluorescence and the growth parameters of five years old plants from the four grafted cultivars were investigated, and the degree of correction for these factors was analyzed.【Result】In late July, the diurnal changes in photosynthesis for the four cultivars showed single peak changes. The peak and average values for the net photosynthetic rate (P_n) of ‘Shaoxing’ were significantly higher than those of the other three cultivars. The main factors affecting P_n were found to be photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), the transpiration rate (T_r) and stomatal conductance (G_s). Analysis of the light response parameters showed that the maximum net photosynthetic rate (P_{n, max}) and the light saturation point (P_LSP) of ‘Shaoxing’ were significantly higher than for the other three cultivars, while the light compensation point (P_LCP) and the respiration rate (R_d) were lower than the other cultivars. The PSⅡ of ‘Shaoxing’ had the highest photochemical quantum yield (F_v/F_m) and potential photochemical activity (F_v/F₀), followed by ‘Mochou’. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant correlation between the fluorescence parameters and the characteristic parameters for the light response curve. F_v/F_m and F_v/F₀ were significantly correlated with P_{n, max}, and the ground diameter was highly significantly correlated with P_{n, max}.【Conclusion】All four pecan cultivars have a strong ability to adapt to strong light and high temperatures. ‘Shaoxing’ has the strongest growth adaptability, followed by ‘Mochou’. There is an strong positive correlation between the growth and photosynthetic performance during summer. The better photosynthetic performance of ‘Shaoxing’ is mainly manifested in its high photochemical efficiency and wide light intensity use ability.

Key words: pecan (Carya illinoinensis), photosynthetic characteristics, light response curves, chlorophyll fluorescence, growth parameter

CLC Number:

S718

TIAN Mengyang, DOU Quanqin, XIE Yinfeng, TANG Wenhua, JI Yanhong. Study on photosynthetic characteristics of four pecan cultivars[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 67-74.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Table 1

Fig.3

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 24

[1]	李晓锐, 刘壮壮, 孔德仪, 等. 薄壳山核桃不同品种光响应过程及模型拟合[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2019, 39(5):42-48.
	LI X R, LIU Z Z, KONG D Y, et al. Light response in different pecan cultivars and model fitting of the process[J]. J Central South Univ For Technol, 2019, 39(5):42-48.DOI:10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2019.05.007.
[2]	李剑威, 晏舒蕾, 黄元城, 等. 薄壳山核桃幼苗对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(10):2326-2334.
	LI J W, YAN S L, HUANG Y C, et al. Physiological and biochemical responses of pecan seedlings to drought stress[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2020, 34(10):2326-2334.DOI:10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.10.2326.
[3]	王曼, 宁德鲁, 李贤忠, 等. 薄壳山核桃研究概况[J]. 中国林副特产, 2010(2):84-86.
	WANG M, NING D L, LI X Z, et al. The survey research and development trends of Carya illinoensis[J]. For Prod Speciality China, 2010(2):84-86.DOI:10.13268/j.cnki.fbsic.2010.02.030.
[4]	郑小琴, 陈文静, 曹凡, 等. 配方施肥对薄壳山核桃苗期养分含量及光合作用的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(5):169-174.
	ZHENG X Q, CHEN W J, CAO F, et al. Effects of the proportional fertilization on the nutrient content and photosynthesis of young grafted pecan seedlings[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(5):169-174.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811045.
[5]	彭方仁, 李永荣, 郝明灼, 等. 我国薄壳山核桃生产现状与产业化发展策略[J]. 林业科技开发, 2012, 26(4):1-4.
	PENG F R, LI Y R, HAO M Z, et al. The status and development strategy of Carya illinoensis industrial in China[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2012, 26(4):1-4.
[6]	XU Q Y, WU J F, CAO Y R, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of leaves and fruits of Hickory (Carya cathayensis Sarg.) and Pecan (Carya illinoensis K.Koch) during fruit development stages[J]. Trees, 2016, 30(5):1523-1534.DOI:10.1007/s00468-016-1386-5.
[7]	李健, 凌骅, 杨先裕, 等. 美国引进的6个薄壳山核桃品种光合生理特性比较[J]. 安徽农业大学学报, 2018, 45(2):258-262.
	LI J, LING H, YANG X Y, et al. Comparison of the photosynthetic physiological characteristics of six pecan cultivars introduced from the United States[J]. J Anhui Agric Univ, 2018, 45(2):258-262.DOI:10.13610/j.cnki.1672-352x.20180427.005.
[8]	汤文华, 窦全琴, 潘平平, 等. 不同薄壳山核桃品种光合特性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3):81-88.
	TANG W H, DOU Q Q, PAN P P, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafted plants of different Carya illinoinensis varieties[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(3):81-88.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201903004.
[9]	李力, 张祥星, 郑睿, 等. 夏玉米光合特性及光响应曲线拟合[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(12):1310-1318.
	LI L, ZHANG X X, ZHENG R, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics and photosynthesis-light response curve models of summer maize[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2016, 40(12):1310-1318.DOI:10.17521/cjpe.2016.0082.
[10]	杜祥备, 王家宝, 刘小平, 等. 减氮运筹对甘薯光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(4):1253-1260.
	DU X B, WANG J B, LIU X P, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction management on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of sweetpotato[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(4):1253-1260.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201904.012.
[11]	潘平平, 窦全琴, 谢寅峰, 等. 薄壳山核桃15个家系子代苗期生长和荧光特性比较[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2019, 41(3):454-463.
	PAN P P, DOU Q Q, XIE Y F, et al. Comparison of growth and fluorescence characteristics of the progeny seedlings of 15 families of Carya illinoensis[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 2019, 41(3):454-463.DOI:10.13836/j.jjau.2019054.
[12]	何海洋, 彭方仁, 张瑞, 等. 不同品种美国山核桃嫁接苗光合特性比较[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(4):19-25.
	HE H Y, PENG F R, ZHANG R, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics of grafting plants of different pecan varieties[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2015, 39(4):19-25.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2015.04.004.
[13]	陈晓英, 李翠, 郭晓云, 等. 3种紫堇属植物叶片光合特性研究[J]. 植物资源与环境学报, 2020, 29(1):1-7.
	CHEN X Y, LI C, GUO X Y, et al. Study on leaf photosynthetic characteristics of three species in Corydalis DC[J]. J Plant Resour Environ, 2020, 29(1):1-7.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-7895.2020.01.01.
[14]	张迎辉, 王雪梅, 连巧霞. 5个彩叶树种光响应曲线特性研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(9):1737-1741.
	ZHANG Y H, WANG X M, LIAN Q X. Light response curve of photosynthesis of five colored-leaf trees[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2019, 40(9):1737-1741.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2019.09.010.
[15]	王佳, 莫惠芝, 蔡静如, 等. 10种常见垂直绿化植物光响应曲线特性分析[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(33):23-26,39.
	WANG J, MO H Z, CAI J R, et al. Analysis on light response curve characteristics of ten common vertical greening plants[J]. J Anhui Agric Sci, 2015, 43(33):23-26,39.DOI:10.13989/j.cnki.0517-6611.2015.33.008.
[16]	吴志庄, 高贵宾, 熊德礼, 等. 9个主要丛生竹种光响应曲线的研究[J]. 竹子研究汇刊, 2013, 32(2):16-20.
	WU Z Z, GAO G B, XIONG D L, et al. A study on light response curve of photosynthesis of nine sympodial bamboo species[J]. J Bamboo Res, 2013, 32(2):16-20.
[17]	赵琴, 潘静, 曹兵, 等. 气温升高与干旱胁迫对宁夏枸杞光合作用的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(18):6016-6022.
	ZHAO Q, PAN J, CAO B, et al. Effects of elevated temperature and drought stress on photosynthesis of Lycium barbarum[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(18):6016-6022.DOI:10.5846/stxb201401090073.
[18]	张锐, 张琦, 陈加利, 等. 水肥耦合对核桃光合特性与品质的影响[J]. 果树学报, 2015, 32(6):1170-1178.
	ZHANG R, ZHANG Q, CHEN J L, et al. Effect of water and fertilizer coupling on photosynthetic characteristics and quality in walnut[J]. J Fruit Sci, 2015, 32(6):1170-1178.DOI:10.13925/j.cnki.gsxb.20150128.
[19]	原向阳, 郭平毅, 黄洁, 等. 缺磷胁迫下草甘膦对抗草甘膦大豆幼苗光合作用和叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(1):221-228.
	YUAN X Y, GUO P Y, HUANG J, et al. Effect of glyphosate on photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves of glyphosate-resistant soybean[Glycine max(L.) Merr.]seedlings under phosphorus deficiency stress[J]. J Plant Nutr Fertil, 2014, 20(1):221-228.DOI:10.11674/zwyf.2014.0125.
[20]	闫小莉, 王德炉. 遮荫对苦丁茶树叶片特征及光合特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2014, 34(13):3538-3547.
	YAN X L, WANG D L. Effects of shading on the leaves and photosynthetic characteristics of Ligustrum robustum[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2014, 34(13):3538-3547.DOI:10.5846/stxb201306241761.
[21]	刘晓嘉, 范爱淇, 安佰义, 等. 玉带草光合特性的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(15):2893-2896,2901.
	LIU X J, FAN A Q, AN B Y, et al. Study on photosynthetic characteristics in leaf of Phalaris arundinacea var.picta[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2017, 56(15):2893-2896,2901.DOI:10.14088/j.cnki.issn0439-8114.2017.15.024.
[22]	吴爱姣, 徐伟洲, 郭亚力, 等. 不同水肥条件下达乌里胡枝子的光合-光响应曲线特征[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(4):785-792.
	WU A J, XU W Z, GUO Y L, et al. Photosynthetic light-response curves of Lespedeza davurica under different water and fertilization conditions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2015, 23(4):785-792.DOI:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.04.018.
[23]	王晨光, 郝兴宇, 李红英, 等. CO₂浓度升高对大豆光合作用和叶绿素荧光的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(8):1583-1588.
	WANG C G, HAO X Y, LI H Y, et al. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO₂ concentration on soybean photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters[J]. J Nucl Agric Sci, 2015, 29(8):1583-1588.
[24]	刘军, 齐广平, 康燕霞, 等. 不同灌溉处理下紫花苜蓿光合特性、叶绿素荧光参数及生物量的变化[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6):1569-1576.
	LIU J, QI G P, KANG Y X, et al. Photosynthetic characteristics,chlorophyll fluorescence parameters and biomass of alfalfa under different irrigation treatments[J]. Acta Agrestia Sin, 2019, 27(6):1569-1576.DOI:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.06.014.

Related Articles 15

[1]	MA Julin, QIU Lingling, XIE Yinfeng, LÜ Qian, MA Yingli, LIANG Wenchao. Physiological regulation of 6-BA on late growth of Pseudostellaria heterophylla [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(1): 137-144.
[2]	WANG Wanjun, YU Ying, YANG Xiguang. Chlorophyll content estimation based on chlorophyll fluorescence [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 157-165.
[3]	LI Ximei, ZHAO Junjing, HUI Yi, HUANG Xin, GAO Chunyu, NIU Yaxuan, LIAO Xiaoyu, YU Chenyi. A study on photosynthetic characteristics and influencing factors of four kinds of garden trees in Zhengzhou [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 105-112.
[4]	LI Panting, DU Manyi, WANG Yue, PEI Shunxiang, XIN Xuebing. The growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Acer truncatum seedlings in response to soil water and fertilizer coupling [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 113-122.
[5]	WU Changfeng, GUO Jing, WANG Guibin. Morphological and physiological responses of male and female Ginkgo biloba to temperature changes [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 150-158.
[6]	YANG Hao, LIU Chao, ZHUANG Jiayao, ZHANG Shutong, ZHANG Wentao, MAO Guohao. Effects of different carrier bacterial fertilizers on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil nutrients of Amorpha fruticosa [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 81-89.
[7]	WANG Gaiping, ZHANG Lei, CAO Fuliang, DING Yanpeng, ZHAO Qun, ZHAO Huiqin, WANG Zheng. Effect of red and blue light quality on growth physiological and flavonoid content of Ginkgo biloba seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 105-112.
[8]	ZHAO Xiaolong, SHEN Jiayi, LIU Tao, WU Jiasheng, HU Yuanyuan. Seasonal variations in photosynthetic efficiency and antioxidant characteristics of the current and one year-old leaves in Torreya grandis‘Merrillii’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 45-50.
[9]	TIAN Mengyang, ZHU Shulin, DOU Quanqin, JI Yanhong. The effects of intercropping of Carya illinoinensis and Camellia sinensis ‘Anjibaicha’ on photosynthetic characteristics of C. sinensis tree during rapid growth period [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 86-96.
[10]	WEI Jing, TAN Xing, WANG Changsheng, YAN Rui, LI Linke, NING Yue, LIU Yun. Comparison of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of introduced Acer rubrum on two purple soils [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(1): 97-105.
[11]	LIANG Wenchao, BU Xing, LUO Siqian, XIE Yinfeng, HU Jialing, ZHANG Wangxiang. Effects of fertilization on the leaf growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Chaenomeles speciosa ‘Changshouguan’ after processing of warming in the post floral stage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 114-120.
[12]	JIA Ruirui, ZHU Yanyan, YANG Xiulian, FU Yu, YUE Yuanzheng, WANG Lianggui. Effects of different rootstocks on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of grafted seedlings of Catalpa bungei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 97-106.
[13]	ZHANG Yinfeng, CAI Hongyue, PENG Jingen, LIU Xuejun, XIE Lijuan, ZHANG Hua, WANG Yanmei. Effects of different planting environments on the growth of Rhododendron moulmainense in Shenzhen urban parks [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 197-204.
[14]	LI Zhenshuang, WANG Qian, ZHU Yuan, YANG Fucheng, LIANG Junfeng, LU Junkun. Effects of exogenous signal substances on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of Santalum album seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 271-278.
[15]	LIU Yanan, LIU Yang, LAN Zaiping, TIE Niu, ZHANG Mengtao, WANG Chengde, LUO Qihui, ZHANG Chen. Effects of different irrigation methods on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil water transport of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 135-143.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

品种 cultivar	G_s	C_i	T_r	T_a	光合有效辐射 PAR	H_R	C_a
‘莫愁’‘Mochou’	0.412	0.301	0.668	0.292	0.315	0.245	0.267
‘卡多’‘Caddo’	0.262	0.254	0.420	0.294	0.308	0.242	0.254
‘绍兴’‘Shaoxing’	0.564	0.284	0.548	0.287	0.299	0.257	0.320
‘威奇塔’‘Wichita’	0.363	0.303	0.399	0.274	0.287	0.298	0.282

品种 cultivar	η_AQY/ (mol·mol^-1)	P_LSP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	P_LCP/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	P_n,max/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)	R_d/ (μmol·m^-2·s^-1)
‘莫愁’‘Mochou’	0.044±0.004 a	988.000±26.026 a	44.329±4.978 ab	9.681±0.342 ab	1.986±0.230 b
‘卡多’‘Caddo’	0.018±0.001 b	680.000±58.287 b	51.714±0.333 a	6.183±0.174 c	2.554±0.069 a
‘绍兴’‘Shaoxing’	0.050±0.002 a	1 177.333±218.004 a	37.425±4.055 b	10.660±0.297 a	1.914±0.043 b
‘威奇塔’‘Wichita’	0.027±0.008 b	748.000±20.000 b	56.322±2.667 a	7.455±0.925 bc	2.260±0.216 ab

品种cultivar	F₀	F_m	F_v/F_m	F_v/F₀
‘莫愁’‘Mochou’	333.000±10.440 c	1 954.333±80.603 b	0.825±0.003 a	4.715±0.106 a
‘卡多’‘Caddo’	443.000±6.429 a	2 231.000±41.861 a	0.801±0.004 b	4.026±0.109 b
‘绍兴’‘Shaoxing’	351.667±9.770 c	2 155.667±111.469 ab	0.829±0.003 a	4.840±0.090 a
‘威奇塔’‘Wichita’	409.000±2.887 b	2 135.083±55.210 ab	0.815±0.008 ab	4.432±0.241 ab

参数 parameter	F_v/F_m	F_v/F₀	η_AQY	P_LSP	P_LCP	P_n,max	R_d
F_v/F_m	1
F_v/F₀	0.998^**	1
η_AQY	0.885^**	0.887^**	1
P_LSP	0.635^**	0.645^**	0.807^**	1
P_LCP	-0.671^*	-0.684^*	-0.782^**	-0.772^*	1
P_n,max	0.761^**	0.767^**	0.736^**	0.776^*	-0.539	1
R_d	-0.768^**	-0.762^**	-0.667^*	-0.624^*	0.370	-0.578^*	1

品种 cultivar	苗高/m seedling height	地径/cm ground diameter
‘莫愁’‘Mochou’	5.067±0.033 b	10.900±0.436 a
‘卡多’‘Caddo’	5.000±0.058 b	8.567±0.371 b
‘绍兴’‘Shaoxing’	5.833±0.203 a	11.067±0.176 a
‘威奇塔’‘Wichita’	5.500±0.173 ab	9.333±0.120 b

Study on photosynthetic characteristics of four pecan cultivars

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 24

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

参数 parameter	地径 ground diameter	苗高 seedling height	P_n,max	η_AQY	P_LSP	P_LCP	R_d
地径 ground diameters	1
苗高 seedling height	0.388	1
P_{n, max}	0.898^**	0.519	1
η_AQY	0.749^**	0.297	0.736^**	1
P_LSP	0.763^**	0.528	0.766^**	0.807^*	1
P_LCP	-0.468	-0.354	-0.539	-0.782^**	-0.772^*	1
R_d	-0.742^**	-0.226	-0.578^*	-0.667^*	-0.624^*	0.370	1