Joint analysis of growth and wood property of 38-year-old Pinus massoniana from 55 provenances

HU Xingfeng, WU Fan, SUN Xiaobo, CHEN Houping, YIN Anzheng, JI Kongshu

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 203-212.

PDF(2859 KB)
PDF(2859 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (3) : 203-212. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202104044

Joint analysis of growth and wood property of 38-year-old Pinus massoniana from 55 provenances

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】The growth provenance and wood property variation of mature masson pine (Pinus massoniana) are studied, revealing the variation rules for different traits at the level of geographical provenance, and screening suitable provenances for Lu’an City in Anhui Province and similar geographical areas.【Method】We selected the state-owned forest tree seed field in Yu’an District, Lu’an City, Anhui Province as the experimental site. 55 provenances were selected for 38-year-old (mature forest) P. massoniana as the test material. The tree height, diameter at breast height(DBH) volume, length and width of tracheid, basic density and microfibril angle are combined to analyze the growth and material properties.【Result】It was found that the diameter at breast height, tree height, volume, tracheid length, tracheid width, microfibril angle and basic density all showed highly significant differences at the provenance level (P < 0.01). The variation range of the phenotypic coefficients of variation and the genetic variation coefficients of each trait are 3.02%-58.61% and 5.56%-28.16%, respectively. The provenance heritability of the DBH, tree height, volume, tracheid length, tracheid width, basic density and microfibril angle are 0.665 7, 0.558 9, 0.616 9, 0.996 3, 0.965 6, 0.739 3 and 0.823 3, respectively. Growth traits are significantly negatively correlated with latitude, and are not significantly different from longitude. Wood properties at different latitude and longitude are both insignificantly different, but show local variation. In the correlation study, it was found that the correlation between growth traits is higher than that between growth and wood properties. The microfibril angle from the medulla core to the bark decreases with increase in age. The basic wood density, tracheid length and width from the pith to the bark increases with the gradual increase in age class, and the range of change decreases with the increase in age class. Through the comprehensive index, five provenances were selected with excellent comprehensive traits. The average genetic gains of DBH, tree height, volume, tracheid length and width, basic density and microfibril angle were 3.69%, 5.72%, 15.12%, 7.05%,-1.12%, 0.17% and -6.46%.【Conclusion】There is abundant genetic variation among the provenances of P. massoniana in mature forests, and growth characteristics show a variation law that gradually decreases from south to north, with wood properties not being related to latitude and longitude. The joint selection of pulp material growth and material properties provides a reliable basis for the selection of fine varieties of pulp material in P. massoniana.

Key words

masson pine (Pinus massoniana) / provenance / basic density / tracheid / microfibril angle / wood property

Cite this article

Download Citations
HU Xingfeng , WU Fan , SUN Xiaobo , et al . Joint analysis of growth and wood property of 38-year-old Pinus massoniana from 55 provenances[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(3): 203-212 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202104044

References

[1]
秦国峰, 周志春. 中国马尾松优良种质资源[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2012.
QIN G F, ZHOU Z C. Germplasm resources of Chinese masson pine[M]. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 2012.
[2]
谭健晖, 冯源恒, 贾婕, 等. 马尾松半同胞家系纤维形态遗传变异及纸浆材优良家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 36(6): 8-12.
TAN J H, FENG Y H, JIA J, et al. Study on the genetic variation of wood fiber morphology in a half-sib mason pine family and the selection of fine paper pulp making family[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2012, 36(6): 8-12. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2012.03.017.
[3]
卢翠香, 项东云, 陈健波, 等. 人工林马尾松管胞形态特征及其变异[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2012, 29(4): 588-594.
LU C X, XIANG D Y, CHEN J B, et al. Fiber characteristics and variation patterns of Pinus massoniana[J]. J Zhejiang A & F U, 2012, 29(4): 588-594. DOI: cnki:sun:zjlx.0.2012-04-018.
[4]
张波. 马尾松木材管胞形态及微力学性能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2007.
ZHANG B. Morphology and micromechanics of masson pine tracheids[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2007.
[5]
黄振英. 马尾松正常木与应压木生长应力及材性的比较研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2004.
HUANG Z Y. Comparative study on the growth stresses and the properties of normal wood and compression wood in masson pine[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2004.
[6]
CHEN L, JIANG Z H, ZHAO R J, et al. Study situation of properties and modification of masson pine in China[J]. Chinese Forestry Science and Technology, 2009, 8(1): 29-35.
[7]
庄尔奇, 刘强, 高方彬, 等. 湖北省马尾松产区区划研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 1997, 16(1): 81-87.
ZHUANG E Q, LIU Q, GAO F B, et al. Studies on productive region division of Masson pine(Pinus massoniana) in Hubei Province[J]. J Huazhong Agri Univ, 1997, 16(1): 81-87.
[8]
江西省马尾松产区区划、 立地分类与评价及经营数表编制协作组. 江西省马尾松产区区划立地分类与评价及经营数表编制(总报告)[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 1987, 9(3): 1-8.
Division of Pinus massoniana Production Area, Site Classification and Evaluation, and Establishment of Management Data Table in Jiangxi Province. Masson pine of the division site classification and evaluation of the number of operators and Jiangxi prepared (general report)[J]. Acta Agriculture Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 1987, 9(3): 1-8.
[9]
杨宗武, 郑仁华, 傅忠华, 等. 马尾松工业用材优良家系选择的研究[J]. 林业科学, 2003, 39(S1): 74-80.
YANG Z W, ZHENG R H, FU Z H, et al. Study on selection of excellent families for industrial wood of Pinus massoniana[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2003, 39(S1): 74-80.
[10]
徐慧兰, 谭健晖, 范歌, 等. 3个马尾松种源材性差异及相关性[J]. 广西林业科学, 2017, 46(1):17-20.
XU H L, TAN J H, FAN G, et al. The differences and correlation in wood properties of three provenances of Pinus massoniana[J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2017, 46(1):17-20.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2017.01.004.
[11]
冯源恒, 杨章旗, 李火根, 等. 不同时期广西马尾松优良种源的遗传多样性变化趋势[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(5):41-46.
FENG Y H, YANG Z Q, LI H G, et al. A study on changes of genetic diversity for nearly 50 years in superior provenances of Pinus massoniana in Guangxi[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2016, 40(5):41-46.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2016.05.007.
[12]
张明慧, 陈虎, 何长虹, 等. 马尾松改良代种子园不同家系苗期生长差异分析[J]. 广西林业科学, 2017, 46(1):21-26.
ZHANG M H, CHEN H, HE C H, et al. Growth variance analysis of different families seedling in advanced seed orchard of Pinus massoniana[J]. Guangxi For Sci, 2017, 46(1):21-26.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2017.01.005.
[13]
陈虎, 张明慧, 卢开成, 等. 修剪强度对马尾松成年种子园母树的影响[J]. 福建林业科技, 2017, 44(1):38-42.
CHEN H, ZHANG M H, LU K C, et al. Effect of different pruning intensity in the seed orchard of Pinus massoniana L.trees[J]. J Fujian For Sci Technol, 2017, 44(1):38-42.DOI: 10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2017.01.009.
[14]
吴晓刚, 陈佩珍, 韦蔷, 等. 马尾松PmCOMT基因的克隆及实时定量表达分析[J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(3):789-795.
WU X G, CHEN P Z, WEI Q, et al. Cloning and real-time quantitative expression analysis on PmCOMT gene from Pinus massoniana[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2019, 17(3):789-795.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.017.000789.
[15]
周紫晶, 范付华, 尚先文, 等. 马尾松大小径材miRNA的差异表达分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2020, 56(10):2111-2120.
ZHOU Z J, FAN F H, SHANG X W, et al. Differential expression analysis of miRNA between large diameter wood and small diameter wood of Pinus massoniana[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2020, 56(10):2111-2120.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2020.0247.
[16]
毛桃. 马尾松优树子代测定林生长和材质的遗传分析及联合选择[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2007.
MAO T. Genetic analysis and combined selection for growth and wood quality of half-sib family of masson pine[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[17]
林景泉. 18年生马尾松种子园自由授粉子代速生优质家系选择[J]. 三明学院学报, 2015, 32(2):7-11.
LIN J Q. Family selection of fast growth and high quality in the 18-year-old open pollination progenies of Pinus massoniana seed orcard[J]. J Sanming Univ, 2015, 32(2):7-11.DOI: 10.14098/j.cn35-1288/z.2015.02.002.
[18]
谭健晖, 黄永利, 冯源恒, 等. 马尾松家系木材管胞形态特征的年龄变异[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2012, 32(3):80-83.
TAN J H, HUANG Y L, FENG Y H, et al. Age variation of wood tracheid morphology of Pinus massoniana families[J]. J Southwest For Coll, 2012, 32(3):80-83.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1914.2012.03.017.
[19]
张水生. 马尾松种源地理变异规律的初步研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 1999, 21(4):597-601.
ZHANG S S. A preliminary study on the law of geographic variation on the Pinus massoniana[J]. Acta Agric Univ Jiangxiensis, 1999, 21(4):597-601.
[20]
林思京. 25年生马尾松生长和木材基本密度家系变异与选择[J]. 林业科学研究, 2010, 23(6):804-808.
LIN S J. Growth and wood density of 25-year-old masson’s pine:inter-family variation and selection[J]. For Res, 2010, 23(6):804-808.DOI: 10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2010.06.005.
[21]
金国庆, 秦国峰, 刘伟宏, 等. 不同林龄马尾松的种源选择效果[J]. 林业科学, 2011, 47(2):39-45.
JIN G Q, QIN G F, LIU W H, et al. Provenance selection effect at different stand age of Pinus massoniana[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2011, 47(2):39-45.
[22]
武紫娟. 马尾松半同胞子代测定林变异分析及优良家系选择[D]. 雅安: 四川农业大学, 2016.
WU Z J. Variation analysis and superior families selection on half-sib progeny tested forests of Pinus massoniana[D]. Yaan: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2016.
[23]
林能庆. 闽西马尾松优树子代测定及优良单株选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(5):31-34.
LIN N Q. Plus tree selection and progenies test of Pinus massoniana in western Fujian Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013, 37(5):31-34.
[24]
季孔庶, 毛桃, 康建诚, 等. 马尾松材性遗传改良研究进展[J]. 林业科技开发, 2011, 25(5):1-6.
JI K S, MAO T, KANG J C, et al. Research progress on genetic improvement of masson pine wood properties[J]. Journal of Forestry Engineering, 2011, 25(5): 1-6.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8101.2011.05.001.
[25]
SMITH D M. Maximum moisture content method for determining specific gravity of small wood samples:rept. No. 2014[J]. Wisconsin:Forest Products Laboratory, Forest Service, US Department of Agriculture, 1954.
[26]
李光友, 徐建民, 陆钊华, 等. 尾叶桉二代测定林家系的综合评选[J]. 林业科学研究, 2005, 18(1):57-61.
LI G Y, XU J M, LU Z H, et al. Studies on index selections of Eucalyptus urophylla families[J]. For Res, 2005, 18(1):57-61.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2005.01.011.
[27]
孙戴妍, 尚旭岚, 洑香香, 等. 青钱柳胸径生长和木材密度的地理变异规律[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(4):1-5.
SUN D Y, SHANG X L, FU X X, et al. Regularity on geographic variation in DBH growth and wood density of Cyclocarya paliurus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 41(4):1-5.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201610005.
[28]
刘青华. 马尾松生长与材性的遗传变异、基因作用方式及环境影响[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2010.
LIU Q H. Genetic variation,gene control pattern and environment effect of growth and wood property in Pinus massoniana[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2010.
[29]
骆秀琴, 姜笑梅, 殷亚方, 等. 人工林马尾松木材性质的变异[J]. 林业科学研究, 2002, 15(1):28-33.
LUO X Q, JIANG X M, YIN Y F, et al. Variations in wood properties of masson pine (Pinus massoniana L.) plantation[J]. For Res, 2002, 15(1):28-33.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-1498.2002.01.005.
[30]
周亮, 刘盛全, 田根林, 等. 欧美杨107杨木材解剖特性的径向变异[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(10):1-4.
ZHOU L, LIU S Q, TIAN G L, et al. Radial variation of anatomical properties of poplar clone 107(Populus × euramericana cv.‘Neva’)[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2010, 38(10):1-4.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2010.10.023.
[31]
郑仁华, 陈国金, 俞白楠, 等. 马尾松家系木材基本密度遗传变异的研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2001, 16(4):6-9.
ZHENG R H, CHEN G J, YU B N, et al. On genetic variations of wood basic density in masson pine family[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2001, 16(4):6-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2001.04.002.
[32]
徐立安, 陈天华, 王章荣, 等. 马尾松种源子代材性变异与制浆造纸材优良种源选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报, 1997, 21(2):1-6.
XU L, CHEN T H, WANG Z R, et al. Variation of provenance progenies in wood property and provenance selection for pulpwood of masson pine[J]. J Nanjing For Univ, 1997, 21(2):1-6.
[33]
范林元, 赖焕林, 季孔庶, 等. 马尾松实生种子园建园家系遗传值估算与优良家系评选[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2004, 32(4):3-5,11.
FAN L Y, LAI H L, JI K S, et al. Breeding value estimation and family selection for seedling seed orchard of masson’s pine[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2004, 32(4):3-5,11.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2004.04.002.
[34]
王明庥. 林木育种学概论[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 1989.

安徽省林木种苗总站原站长张晓渡高级工程师,安徽省六安市裕安区林木良种场原副场长胡世荣、技术员王志宽等,中国林业科学研究院亚热带林业研究所秦国峰研究员等对该地理种源试验林营建所做出了贡献。

PDF(2859 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/