JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5): 201-212.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202106010
Previous Articles Next Articles
LI Chaohong(), WEI Wei, JIANG Yu()
Received:
2021-06-04
Revised:
2021-08-23
Online:
2022-09-30
Published:
2022-10-19
Contact:
JIANG Yu
E-mail:578656151@qq.com;dblyjy@126.com
CLC Number:
LI Chaohong, WEI Wei, JIANG Yu. Performance evaluation and obstacle factor screening of Natural Forest Protection Project area in Heilongjiang Province[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 201-212.
Table 1
Key indicators of Natural Forest Protection Project area in Heilongjiang Province from 1999 to 2019"
指标 indicator | 年份year | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
1999 | 2000 | 2010 | 2019 | |
木材产量 / m3 timber product output | 6 940 696 | 6 931 296 | 6 041 993 | 4 100 |
森林面积/×104 hm2 forest area | 1 760.31 | 1 797.50 | 1 962.13 | 1 990.46 |
林地面积/×104hm2 woodland area | 2 131.24 | 2 026.50 | 2 207.40 | 2 453.77 |
森林蓄积量/×104m3 forest stock | 141 069.30 | 137 502.31 | 164 487.01 | 184 704.09 |
年末实有封山育林面积/ hm2 area of closed forest at the end of the year for afforestation | 496 100 | 1 038 214 | 463 975 | 409 517 |
全部造林面积/ hm2 total afforestation area | 87 240 | 91 970 | 3 080 | 64 885 |
天保工程造林面积/ hm2 afforestation area of Natural Forest Protection Project | 46 200 | 43 058 | 3 080 | 44 416 |
实有森林管护面积/ hm2 actual forest management and protection area | 15 349 930 | 15 558 960 | 16 817 282 | 17 719 821 |
年末在册在岗职工人数 number of the on-the-job employees at the end of the year | 472 491 | 386 454 | 285 209 | 229 067 |
安置富余职工人数 resettlement of surplus employees | — | 60 441 | 9 044 | — |
林业产业总产值/×104元 gross output value of forest industry | 1 271 519 | 1 291 523 | 4 165 477 | 4 991 830 |
在岗职工年人均工资/元 average annual salary of on-the-job employees | 11 059 | 12 300 | 19 765 | 38 841 |
Table 2
Performance evaluation indicator system and entropy weight of Natural Forest Protection Project area in Heilongjiang Province"
维度层 dimension layer | 因子层 factor layer | 指标层 indicator layer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
维度 dimension | 熵权 entropy weight | 因子 factor | 熵权 entropy weight | 指标 indicator | 熵权 entropy weight | |
森林生态 维度 (DF) forest ecological dimension | 0.387 5 | S1资源存量水平 resource stock | 0.728 1 | I1 林地保有总量forest land stock | 0.337 6 | |
I2 森林保有总量forest area | 0.351 7 | |||||
I3 森林蓄积量forest stock | 0.310 7 | |||||
S2资源保护力度 resource protection strength | 0.271 9 | I4 生态建设与保护投资ecological construction and protection investment | 0.436 9 | |||
I5 自然保护区面积占比proportion of nature reserves area | 0.298 8 | |||||
I6 森林公园总面积占比proportion of forest park total area | 0.264 3 | |||||
产业经济 维度 (DI) industrial economic dimension | 0.252 8 | S3 产出水平 output level | 0.333 1 | I7 林业产业总产值gross output value of forestry industry | 0.061 6 | |
I8 第一产业涉林产业总产值gross output value of forestry industry involved in primary industry | 0.131 1 | |||||
I9 人造板制造产值gross output value of wood-based panel manufacturing industry | 0.070 3 | |||||
I10 林业旅游与休闲服务产值gross output value of forestry tourism and leisure service | 0.252 6 | |||||
I11 工程区木材产量timber output in project region | 0.093 4 | |||||
I12 人工林木材产量plantation wood output | 0.136 8 | |||||
I13 木材产品销售量wood product sales | 0.114 0 | |||||
I14 食用菌产量edible fungus production | 0.140 2 | |||||
S4 产业结构 industrial structure | 0.112 3 | I15 林业第一产业产值占林业总产值比重proportion of gross output value of forestry primary industry | 0.095 3 | |||
I16 林业第二产业产值占林业总产值比重proportion of gross output value of forestry secondary industry | 0.205 7 | |||||
I17 林业第三产业产值占林业总产值比重proportion of gross output value of forestry tertiary industry | 0.296 4 | |||||
I18 产业结构层次系数industrial structure hierarchy coefficient | 0.004 3 | |||||
I19 产业结构合理化指数industrial structure rationalization index | 0.398 3 | |||||
S5 产业投资 industrial investment | 0.554 6 | I20 林业产业发展投资总额total investment in forestry industry development | 0.837 4 | |||
I21林业支撑与保障投资总额total investment in forestry support and guarantee | 0.162 6 | |||||
社会稳定 维度 (DS) social stability dimension | 0.359 7 | S6 居民生活与 社会安全 residents' life and social security | 0.788 5 | I22 森工职工信访率letter and visit rate of forest employees | 0.256 0 | |
I23 家庭暴力发生率incidence of domestic violence | 0.253 2 | |||||
I24 公安机关查处治安案件数number of public security cases investigated by public security organs | 0.037 0 | |||||
I25 公安机关刑事案件立案数 number of criminal cases filed by public security organs | 0.254 5 | |||||
I26 人民检察院纠正违法总件次total number of illegal cases corrected by the People's Procuratorate | 0.056 4 | |||||
I27 人民法院审理一审案件数number of first-instance cases heard by the People's Courts | 0.142 9 | |||||
S7 职工收入和 社会保障 employee income and social security | 0.211 5 | I28 基本养老保险比proportion of basic old-age insurance | 0.123 1 | |||
I29 基本医疗保险比proportion of basic medical insurance | 0.124 6 | |||||
I30 在岗职工年均工资average annual salary of on-the-job employees | 0.155 9 | |||||
I31 当年离退休人员生活费current year retiree cost of living | 0.596 4 |
Table 3
Performance evaluation index and performance level of Natural Forest Protection Project area from 1997 to 2019"
年份 year | 森林生态维度 forest ecological dimension | 产业经济维度 industrial economic dimension | 社会稳定维度 social stability dimension | 工程区综合 project area summary | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
绩效指数 index | 绩效水平 level | 绩效指数 index | 绩效水平 level | 绩效指数 index | 绩效水平 level | 绩效指数 index | 绩效水平 level | |
1997 | 0.012 1 | 较差 | 0.013 4 | 较差 | 0.010 2 | 较差 | 0.011 5 | 较差 |
1998 | 0.013 9 | 较差 | 0.015 6 | 较差 | 0.011 5 | 较差 | 0.024 5 | 较差 |
1999 | 0.021 3 | 较差 | 0.013 2 | 较差 | 0.012 3 | 较差 | 0.088 7 | 较差 |
2000 | 0.022 4 | 较差 | 0.175 6 | 较差 | 0.013 3 | 较差 | 0.089 3 | 较差 |
2001 | 0.032 9 | 较差 | 0.183 4 | 较差 | 0.016 2 | 较差 | 0.095 4 | 较差 |
2002 | 0.042 2 | 较差 | 0.226 7 | 较差 | 0.051 1 | 较差 | 0.125 0 | 较差 |
2003 | 0.059 3 | 较差 | 0.172 6 | 较差 | 0.112 1 | 较差 | 0.131 3 | 较差 |
2004 | 0.096 2 | 较差 | 0.158 7 | 较差 | 0.132 4 | 较差 | 0.154 0 | 较差 |
2005 | 0.111 3 | 较差 | 0.173 1 | 较差 | 0.142 5 | 较差 | 0.171 6 | 较差 |
2006 | 0.122 5 | 较差 | 0.185 6 | 较差 | 0.156 9 | 较差 | 0.189 0 | 较差 |
2007 | 0.143 3 | 较差 | 0.180 9 | 较差 | 0.163 0 | 较差 | 0.202 8 | 较差 |
2008 | 0.155 2 | 较差 | 0.224 8 | 较差 | 0.191 3 | 较差 | 0.236 6 | 较差 |
2009 | 0.232 2 | 较差 | 0.237 1 | 较差 | 0.235 2 | 较差 | 0.309 3 | 中等 |
2010 | 0.251 2 | 较差 | 0.276 2 | 较差 | 0.352 6 | 中等 | 0.393 1 | 中等 |
2011 | 0.412 2 | 中等 | 0.532 6 | 中等 | 0.370 3 | 中等 | 0.563 4 | 中等 |
2012 | 0.435 3 | 中等 | 0.452 4 | 中等 | 0.423 2 | 中等 | 0.586 5 | 中等 |
2013 | 0.462 7 | 中等 | 0.543 1 | 中等 | 0.433 5 | 中等 | 0.630 3 | 良好 |
2014 | 0.565 0 | 中等 | 0.567 2 | 中等 | 0.503 1 | 中等 | 0.734 1 | 良好 |
2015 | 0.612 5 | 良好 | 0.622 3 | 良好 | 0.550 4 | 中等 | 0.738 4 | 良好 |
2016 | 0.622 2 | 良好 | 0.669 3 | 良好 | 0.596 4 | 中等 | 0.749 4 | 良好 |
2017 | 0.656 1 | 良好 | 0.702 1 | 良好 | 0.644 2 | 良好 | 0.751 2 | 良好 |
2018 | 0.662 9 | 良好 | 0.730 5 | 良好 | 0.730 3 | 良好 | 0.765 5 | 良好 |
2019 | 0.711 2 | 良好 | 0.765 5 | 良好 | 0.739 7 | 良好 | 0.799 7 | 良好 |
Table 4
Ranking of obstacle factors (obstacle index) from 1997 to 2019"
年份 year | 维度(障碍指数/%)排序 dimension (obstacle index) ranking | 指标(障碍指数/%)前5名 ranking top 5 indicators (obstacle indices) |
---|---|---|
1997 | DI(37.59) >DF(32.78) >DS(29.63) | I10(19.82) >I14(11.04) >I8(10.32) >I31(10.32) >I20(9.59) |
1998 | DI(41.13) >DF(33.20) >DS(25.67) | I10(20.09) >I14(11.16) >I31(10.45) >I8(10.37) >I20(9.36) |
1999 | DI(42.81) >DF(32.91) >DS(24.28) | I10(20.17) >I14(11.15) >I31(10.44) >I8(10.31) >I20(9.45) |
2000 | DI(43.53) >DF(32.54) >DS(23.93) | I10(20.38) >I14(11.23) >I8(10.58) >I31(10.56) >I20(9.00) |
2001 | DI(44.47) >DF(32.05) >DS(23.48) | I10(20.41) >I14(11.24) >I8(10.66) >I31(10.51) >I20(8.98) |
2002 | DI(43.50) >DF(32.10) >DS(24.40) | I10(21.23) >I14(11.65) >I8(10.99) >I31(10.73) >I20(8.43) |
2003 | DI(48.52) >DF(29.86) >DS(21.61) | I10(20.75) >I14(11.58) >I31(10.36) >I8(9.57) >I20(9.06) |
2004 | DI(50.87) >DF(28.42) >DS(20.71) | I10(23.00) >I14(11.94) >I31(11.41) >I8(10.44) >I20(10.03) |
2005 | DI(53.19) >DF(26.81) >DS(20.00) | I10(21.39) >I31(10.54) >I14(10.50) >I8(9.83) >I20(9.39) |
2006 | DI(53.45) >DF(26.13) >DS(20.42) | I10(21.72) >I31(10.92) >I20(9.95) >I8(9.72) >I12(8.79) |
2007 | DI(49.95) >DF(27.18) >DS(22.87) | I10(20.74) >I31(10.33) >I14(9.38) >I12(9.25) >I8(8.94) |
2008 | DI(52.88) >DF(25.32) >DS(21.80) | I10(22.04) > I31(10.84) >I14(10.33) >I20(9.85) >I12(9.81) |
2009 | DI(56.28) >DF(22.70) >DS(21.02) | I10(22.36) >I20(10.87) > I12(10.73) > I31(10.64) > I8(10.31) |
2010 | DI(58.60) >DF(20.71) >DS(20.68) | I10(23.90) > I20(12.82) > I31(11.47) > I8(11.33) > I14(8.66) |
2011 | DI(42.26) >DF(29.33) >DS(28.41) | I10(19.24) > I12(13.57) > I8(9.46) > I14(9.11) > I13(7.80) |
2012 | DI(49.85) >DS(25.96) >DF(24.19) | I10(15.79) > I12(13.84) > I8(9.39) > I31(9.29) > I13(9.07) |
2013 | DI(47.98) >DS(28.25) >DF(23.77) | I12(15.33) > I10(14.50) > I13(10.28) > I11(9.30) > I8(8.60) |
2014 | DI(46.72) >DS(29.44) >DF(23.84) | I12(15.19) > I10(11.61) > I13(11.04) > I11(9.84) > I8(8.96) |
2015 | DI(37.96) >DS(36.80) >DF(25.24) | I12(15.57) > I13(13.85) > I11(10.01) > I10(9.79) > I8(9.10) |
2016 | DI(37.15) >DS(33.76) >DF(29.09) | I12(16.83) > I13(14.77) > I11(10.96) > I8(9.78) > I14(9.22) |
2017 | DI(43.00) >DS(32.98) >DF(24.02) | I12(19.22) > I13(17.00) > I11(12.24) > I9(10.24) > I8(10.21) |
2018 | DI(39.25) >DS(32.84) >DF(27.91) | I12(27.00) > I13(22.50) > I11(18.41) > I9(13.55) > I21(4.67) |
2019 | DI(41.18) >DS(33.82) >DF(25.00) | I12(19.25) > I10(17.72) > I13(16.02) > I11(13.13) > I8(12.73) |
[1] | 刘永红, 倪嶷. 天保工程二期政策及相关问题解读[J]. 林业经济, 2011, 33(9):45-50. |
LIU Y H, NI Y. Nature Forest Protection Program phase Ⅱ and related issues in policy interpretation[J]. For Econ, 2011, 33(9):45-50.DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2011.09.011. | |
[2] | 国家林业局天然林保护工程管理中心. 权威解读:天然林资源保护工程二期政策[EB/OL].(2011-05-17)[2021-05-17]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm. |
Natural Forest Protection Project Management Centre of National Forestry Administration. Authoritative interpretation of the phase Ⅱ policy of the Natural Forest Resource Protection Project[EB/OL].(2011-05-17)[2021-05-17]. http://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2011-05/17/content_1865437.htm. | |
[3] | YU D Y, SHI P J, HAN G Y, et al. Forest ecosystem restoration due to a national conservation plan in China[J]. Ecol Eng, 2011, 37(9):1387-1397.DOI:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.03.011. |
[4] | 李朝洪, 韦唯, 刘舒欣. 国有林区天然林资源保护工程绩效评价:以黑龙江省重点国有林区为例[J]. 林业科学, 2021, 57(4):153-162. |
LI C H, WEI W, LIU S X. Performance evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in state-owned forest region: a case study of key state-owned forest region in Heilongjiang Province[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2021, 57(4):153-162.DOI:10.11707/j.1001-7488.20210416. | |
[5] | 方小宇. 宁夏原州区天然林资源保护工程实践与效果的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2005. |
FANG X Y. The practice and effect of the natural forest conservation in Yuanzhou District of Hui Autonomous Region of Ningxia[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2005. | |
[6] | 赵炳柱, 贾炜玮, 李凤日. 内蒙古大兴安岭森工企业天保工程实施效果评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2006, 34(2):84-86. |
ZHAO B Z, JIA W W, LI F R. Effect evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project for forestry enterprises in Daxing'anling of inner Mongolia[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2006, 34(2):84-86.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2006.02.032. | |
[7] | 李友华, 韦恒. 清河林区天保工程实施的绩效评价:清河林区天保工程调研报告[J]. 中国林业经济, 2008(6):34-37. |
LI Y H, WEI H. Performance evaluation of Qinghe forest implementing the project of Natural Forest Resources Protection: report of the investigation of the project of natural forest protection in Qinghe forest region[J]. China For Econ, 2008(6):34-37.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5919.2008.06.009. | |
[8] | 董彦华. 基于森林资源变化的忻州市天然林保护工程实施效果评价[D]. 太谷: 山西农业大学, 2013. |
DONG Y H. Effect evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project of the city of Xinzhou based on the change of forest resources[D]. Taigu: Shanxi Agricultural University, 2013. | |
[9] | 李娜娜. 山西省天然林资源保护工程经济效益评价[J]. 林业经济, 2018, 40(7):45-48,81. |
LI N N. The economic benefits evaluation of natural forest protection program in Shanxi Province[J]. For Econ, 2018, 40(7):45-48,81.DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2018.07.008. | |
[10] | 颜丽娟. 黑龙江大兴安岭地区“天保”工程一期生态效益分析[J]. 林业经济, 2015, 37(6):30-34. |
YAN L J. Analysis of ecological benefit during the first stage project of Natural Forest Protection in Daxing'anling region of Heilongjiang[J]. For Econ, 2015, 37(6):30-34.DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2015.06.006. | |
[11] | 刘梓田. 黑龙江省三维生态足迹的动态演变及驱动因子研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021. |
LIU Z T. Study on the dynamic evolution and driving factors of three dimensional ecological footprint in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2021. | |
[12] | 幸绣程, 支玲, 谢彦明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子法的西部天保工程区生态服务价值测算:以西部六省份为例[J]. 生态经济, 2017, 33(9):195-199. |
XING X C, ZHI L, XIE Y M, et al. Estimation of ecological service value in western Natural Forest Protection Project area based on equivalent factor approach of unit area value: taking six western provinces as an example[J]. Ecol Econ, 2017, 33(9):195-199. | |
[13] | 张逸如, 刘晓彤, 高文强, 等. 天然林保护工程区近20年森林植被碳储量动态及碳汇(源)特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(13):5093-5105. |
ZHANG Y R, LIU X T, GAO W Q, et al. Dynamic changes of forest vegetation carbon storage and the characteristics of carbon sink (source) in the Natural Forest Protection Project region for the past 20 years[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(13):5093-5105.DOI:10.5846/stxb202101200215. | |
[14] | 马永春. 陕西省天然林保护工程效益评价[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2010. |
MA Y C. Study on the efficiency of the Natural Forest Protection Project in Shannxi[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2010. | |
[15] | 李秀民. 延边林区天保工程实施效果评价体系的构建与实证研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2014. |
LI X M. Study on demonstration and construction of NFPP effect evaluation system in Yanbian forest region[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2014. | |
[16] | 马威, 董希斌, 毛波. 呼伦贝尔市地方林业天然林资源保护工程实施效果的评价[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(6):139-142,148. |
MA W, DONG X B, MAO B. Evaluation on the implementation effect of Natural Forest Protection Program in Hulunbuir local forestry[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2015, 43(6):139-142,148.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.20150604.001. | |
[17] | 夏启财. 青海省天然林资源保护工程绩效评价[J]. 陕西林业科技, 2019, 47(2):73-76,87. |
XIA Q C. Evaluation system of Natural Forest Resources Protection Project in Qinghai Province[J]. Shaanxi For Sci Technol, 2019, 47(2):73-76,87.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-2117.2019.02.017. | |
[18] | 范琳. 山西省天然林保护工程综合效益评价[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(3):265-272. |
FAN L. Comprehensive benefit assessment of Natural Forests Protection Project in Shanxi Province[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2019, 34(3):265-272.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.03.42. | |
[19] | 郭玉东. 根河林业局天然林资源保护工程效益评价[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2015. |
GUO Y D. The benefit evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in Genhe Forestry Bureau in inner Mongolia[D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2015. | |
[20] | 黄继红, 郭仲军, 刘永红, 等. 陕西省宁陕县天然林保护工程生态效益价值评估[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(1):298-303. |
HUANG J H, GUO Z J, LIU Y H, et al. Assessment on ecological benefits of Natural Forest Protection Project in Ningshan County,Shaanxi[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2016, 31(1):298-303.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.01.52. | |
[21] | 周少舟. 天然林资源保护工程效益评价[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2008. |
ZHOU S Z. Evaluation of effects of Natural Forest Protection Program[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2008. | |
[22] | 王谦. 基于平衡计分卡的天然林资源保护工程绩效评价指标体系研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2011. |
WANG Q. Research on the performance evaluation index system of Natural Forest Resources Protection Project based on BSC[D]. Harbin: Northeast Forestry University, 2011. | |
[23] | 郑树峰, 王丽萍, 臧淑英. 大兴安岭天保工程区生态系统服务变化研究[J]. 地理科学, 2021, 41(7):1295-1302. |
ZHENG S F, WANG L P, ZANG S Y. The change of ecosystem services of Natural Forest Protection Project regions in the Da Hinggan Mountains[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2021, 41(7):1295-1302.DOI:10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2021.07.020. | |
[24] | 朱洪革, 付玉竹, 张少鹏. 天保工程转移支付的森林生态效益及其影响机制[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(8):2663-2670. |
ZHU H G, FU Y Z, ZHANG S P. Ecological benefits of transfer payment of Natural Forest Protection Projects and their impact mechanisms[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2020, 31(8):2663-2670.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.202008.009. | |
[25] | 朱震锋, 刘向越, 曹玉昆. 要素投入、 资源经营与林业生态工程建设的过程绩效:基于我国天保工程灰色投入产出系统的实证研究[J]. 世界林业研究, 2018, 31(6):1-9. |
ZHU Z F, LIU X Y, CAO Y K. Factor input,resource management and process performance of forestry ecological project: an empirical analysis based on grey input-output system of Natural Forest Protection Program[J]. World For Res, 2018, 31(6):1-9.DOI:10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2018.0097.y. | |
[26] | 柯水发, 陈章纯, 陈建成, 等. 中国西部十省区天然林保护工程实施效率评价:基于DEA模型[J]. 林业经济, 2014, 36(4):65-71. |
KE S F, CHEN Z C, CHEN J C, et al. Evaluation on implementation efficiency of Natural Forest Protection Program in ten provinces of western China: based on DEA model[J]. For Econ, 2014, 36(4):65-71.DOI:10.13843/j.cnki.lyjj.2014.04.011. | |
[27] | WANG Y, ZHOU L H, YANG G J, et al. Performance and obstacle tracking to Natural Forest Resource Protection Project: a rangers' case of Qilian Mountain,China[J]. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020, 17(16):5672.DOI:10.3390/ijerph17165672. |
[28] | 秦利, 张铭轩. 天保工程二期政策实施绩效实证分析[J]. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41(5):455-463. |
QIN L, ZHANG M X. An empirical analysis on the implementation performance of the second phase of Natural Forest Protection Project[J]. Issues For Econ, 2021, 41(5):455-463.DOI:10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20200259. | |
[29] | 何尤刚, 孔凡斌. 天然林保护工程绩效评价:现状、问题与研究展望[J]. 生态经济, 2008, 24(2):147-150. |
HE Y G, KONG F B. Effectiveness evaluation on the Natural Forest Protection Project:status,problems and research prospects[J]. Ecol Econ, 2008, 24(2):147-150. | |
[30] | 余明龙. 天然林保护工程绩效评价现状问题与研究展望[J]. 农业与技术, 2016, 36(2):187. |
YU M L. Present situation,problems and research prospect of performance evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project[J]. Agric Technol, 2016, 36(2):187.DOI:10.11974/nyyjs.20160133159. | |
[31] | 曹玉昆, 黄显乔, 朱震锋. 中国天然林资源保护工程效益评价研究综述[J]. 生态经济, 2018, 34(1):107-111,179. |
CAO Y K, HUANG X Q, ZHU Z F. A summary of benefit evaluation of Natural Forest Protection Project in China[J]. Ecol Econ, 2018, 34(1):107-111,179. | |
[32] | 高星, 刘景洋. 黑龙江省正式启动重点国有林区天保二期工程[EB/OL]. (2011-09-02)[2021-07-22]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-09/02/content_1939306.htm. |
GAO X, LIU J Y. Heilongjiang Province officially launches the second phase of Natural Forest Protection Project in key state-owned forest areas[EB/OL].(2011-09-02)[2021-07-22]. http://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2011-09/02/content_1939306.htm. | |
[33] | 国家林业局. 东北、内蒙古国有林区天然林资源保护工程评价体系:LY/T 1759-2008[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. |
Natural Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China. Assessment system for Natural Forest Resource Protection Project in the national forestry areas of the Northeast and Inner Mongolia:LY/T 1759-2008[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2008. | |
[34] | 国家林业局. 天然林资源保护工程建设评价技术规程:LY/T 1818-2009[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2009. |
State Forestry Administration of the People's Republic of China. Technical procedures for evaluation of natural forest protection & construction program:LY/T 1818-2009[S]. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2009. | |
[35] | 李朝洪, 赵晓红. 黑龙江省森工国有林区生态建设与经济转型协调发展研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(2):144-152. |
LI C H, ZHAO X H. Study on the coordinated development of ecological construction and economic transformation in state-owned forest region of forest industry in Heilongjiang Province[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(2):144-152.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201804022. | |
[36] | 鲁春阳, 文枫, 杨庆媛, 等. 基于改进TOPSIS法的城市土地利用绩效评价及障碍因子诊断:以重庆市为例[J]. 资源科学, 2011, 33(3):535-541. |
LU C Y, WEN F, YANG Q Y, et al. An evaluation of urban land use performance based on the improved TOPSIS method and diagnosis of its obstacle indicators:a case study of Chongqing[J]. Resour Sci, 2011, 33(3):535-541. | |
[37] | 郑华伟, 胡锋. 基于农户满意度的农村环境整治绩效研究:以江苏省为例[J]. 南京工业大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 17(5):79-86. |
ZHENG H W, HU F. Study on performance of rural environment remediation based on farmers' satisfaction in Jiangsu Province[J]. J Nanjing Tech Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2018, 17(5):79-86.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7287.2018.05.010. | |
[38] | 李朝洪, 孙丹, 王志伟. 大小兴安岭国有林区产业转型绩效的驱动与障碍因素诊断[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2020, 48(5):133-138. |
LI C H, SUN D, WANG Z W. Driving and obstacle factors for industrial transition performance of state-owned forest areas in Daxing'an and Xiaoxing'an Mountains[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2020, 48(5):133-138.DOI:10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2020.05.026. | |
[39] | 国家林业局, 中华人民共和国财政部. 关于做好天然林保护工程区森工企业职工“四险”补助和混岗职工安置等工作的通知[J]. 国家林业局公报, 2006(2):36-41. |
NFA. Notice on doing a good job of “Four insurance” subsidies for employees of forest industry enterprises in Natural Forest Protection Project area and resettlement of mixed post employees[J]. National Forestry Administration Bulletin, 2006,(2): 36-41. | |
[40] | 袁泉. 黑龙江森工系统将上调企业职工工资[EB/OL]. (2010-01-27)[2021-06-27]. http://news.sohu.com/20100127/n269855449.shtml. |
YUAN Q. Heilongjiang forest industry system will raise the wages of enterprise employees[EB/OL]. (2010-01-27)[2021-06-27]. http://news.sohu.com/20100127/n269855449.shtml. | |
[41] | 财政部, 国家林业局. 关于印发《天然林资源保护工程财政专项资金管理办法(财农〔2011〕138号)》的通知[EB/OL].(2011-06-22)[2021-07-22]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-07/22/content_1911967.htm. |
NFA, MFC. Notice on printing and distributing ‘the measures for the administration of special financial funds for Natural Forest Protection Projects(No.138,2011, agriculture and economics department of the ministry of finance)’[EB/OL].(2011-06-22)[2021-07-22]. http://www.gov.cn/zwgk/2011-07/22/content_1911967.htm. |
[1] | ZENG Weizhong, CHENG Ying, YANG Fan. A evaluation index system of forest carbon sequestration poverty alleviation performance based on the CDM Forest Carbon Sequestration Project [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(04): 9-17. |
[2] | ZHAN Wei1, HE Liheng1,2, JIN Xiaobin1, YI Liqiang3, ZHOU Yinkang1. Performance evaluation for land consolation project using fuzzy comprehensive assessment method [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2009, 33(02): 145-. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||