
Effects of different irrigation methods on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil water transport of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)
LIU Yanan, LIU Yang, LAN Zaiping, TIE Niu, ZHANG Mengtao, WANG Chengde, LUO Qihui, ZHANG Chen
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (4) : 135-143.
Effects of different irrigation methods on growth, photosynthetic characteristics and soil water transport of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica)
【Objective】 The growth and soil water transport of Mongolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) were studied under three different drip treatments (drip irrigation, flood irrigation and control), and the responses of growth, photosynthesis, transpiration and water transport to the irrigation methods were discussed to provide a reference for efficient cultivation of P. sylvestris var. mongolica in arid and semi-arid areas. 【Method】 With P. sylvestris var. mongolica of the Daqingshan National Nature Reserve in Inner Mongolia as the research object, the growth (ground diameter, tree height, crown width, head sprouting length and biomass) and photosynthetic characteristics [photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), and water use efficiency (EWUE)] of P. sylvestris var. mongolica were compared under different irrigation methods based on One-way ANOVA; soil profile observation was used to compare the migration distance of soil water in horizontal and vertical directions under different irrigation methods and durations. 【Result】 (1) The ground diameter, tree height, crown width, head sprouting length and biomass parameters of P. sylvestris var. mongolica in the drip irrigation were 1.5 cm, 0.5 m, 10 cm, 5.9 cm and 11.5 kg higher, respectively, than those in the flood irrigation, and 3.4 cm, 0.9 m, 60.0 cm, 7.2 cm and 2.5 kg higher than those in the control, respectively. (2) The Pn, Tr, Gs and Ci values of samples under the drip irrigation were significantly higher than those under the flood irrigation and control (P < 0.05), and decreased in the following order: drip irrigation > flood irrigation > control. However, EWUE decreased in the following order: control > drip irrigation > flood irrigation, indicating P. sylvestris var. mongolica had the ability to tolerate drought under low soil water conditions. (3) After 2, 4 and 6 h irrigation, the vertical migration distance of soil moisture front and the final vertical migration distance after stopping the irrigation were deeper in the drip irrigation than in the flood irrigation. Under the two irrigation methods, the maximum horizontal migration distance of soil moisture front for the three different irrigation times in each soil layer was observed to be in the range of 0-20 cm. However, the vertical migration distance after stopping the irrigation decreased in the following order: drip irrigation > flood irrigation. (4) A few empirical models were used to simulate the profile of soil wetting body and the results confirmed that the optimal models for the drip irrigation and the flood irrigation were Polynomial (Eq.1) $M_{\mathrm{R} 1}=L_{\mathrm{MR}}\left[a_{1}\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}-1\right)+a_{2}\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}^{2}-1\right)+a_{3}\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}{ }^{3}-1\right)+a_{4}\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}^{4}-1\right)\right]$ and Baldwin and Peterson (Eq.4) $M_{\mathrm{R} 4}=a_{1}+\left[\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}-1\right) /\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}+1\right)\right]+a_{2}\left(R_{\mathrm{MH}}-1\right)$, respectively. Among them, is the horizontal movement distance of soil water at any position in the vertical direction; LMR is the maximum horizontal movement distance of soil water; RMH is the vertical movement of soil water at any position in the vertical direction relative distance; ai is the model parameter (i=1, 2, 3, 4).【Conclusion】 The drip irrigation was obviously better than the flood irrigation based on each evaluation index in the arid areas of the north China. After 2, 4 and 6 h irrigation, the final horizontal migration distance of soil water front above 60 cm soil layer in the drip irrigation was larger than that in the flood irrigation. The drip irrigation was beneficial to the root water absorption and the growth of P. sylvestris var. mongolica. The EWUE affects the photosynthetic characteristics of P. sylvestris var. mongolica and reasonable irrigation can improve the growth mechanisms.
Mogolian pine (Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica) / drip irrigation / flood irrigation / photosynthetic characteristics / tree growth / soil water transport / water transport simulation
[1] |
王显蕾, 肖璇, 李雄. 水资源综合利用问题探讨[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2015(12):16.
|
[2] |
贾黎明, 邢长山, 韦艳葵, 等. 地下滴灌条件下杨树速生丰产林生长与光合特性[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(2):61-67.
|
[3] |
韦艳葵, 贾黎明, 邢长山. 滴灌在林业上应用的研究与进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2003, 16(4):38-43.
|
[4] |
郭慧滨, 史群. 国内外节水灌溉发展简介[J]. 节水灌溉, 1998(5):23-25.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
车赛男. 关于工业废水污染治理途径与技术的研究[J]. 资源节约与环保, 2020(9):91-92.
|
[12] |
代永欣, 王林, 万贤崇. 干旱导致树木死亡机制研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(11):3228-3236.
|
[13] |
朱玲. 智能滴灌带来林业节水新变化[J]. 中国林业, 2017(22):44-45.
|
[14] |
傅建平, 兰再平, 孙尚伟, 等. 滴灌条件下杨树人工林土壤的水分运移[J]. 林业科学, 2013, 49(6):25-29.
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
韦庆钰, 黄海龙, 吴纯泽, 等. 3种倍性青杨扦插苗对覆膜滴肥的生长响应[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):93-101.
|
[19] |
白育英. 大青山水源涵养林生态效益的研究[J]. 内蒙古林业科技, 2000(2):16-19.
|
[20] |
庞晓燕. 内蒙古大青山自然保护区森林生态系统服务功能及其价值评估[J]. 内蒙古林业调查设计, 2017, 40(2):44-47.
|
[21] |
罗云建, 王效科, 逯非. 中国主要林木生物量模型手册[M]. 北京: 中国林业出版社, 2015.
|
[22] |
张正斌, 山仑. 作物水分利用效率和蒸发蒸腾估算模型的研究进展[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 1997(1):73-78.
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
马铁成. 寒旱区紫花苜蓿不同灌溉方式生长特性分析[J]. 水利科学与寒区工程, 2020, 3(4):15-18.
|
[28] |
张雅倩, 林琪, 刘家斌, 等. 干旱胁迫对不同肥水类型小麦旗叶光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报, 2011, 31(4):724-730.
|
[29] |
井大炜, 邢尚军, 杜振宇, 等. 干旱胁迫对杨树幼苗生长、光合特性及活性氧代谢的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(7):1809-1816.
|
[30] |
裴艳武, 黄来明, 贾小旭, 等. 黄土高原2种典型灌木地土壤水分有效性及其影响因素[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(3):627-637.
|
[31] |
陈金平, 兰再平, 杨慎骄, 等. 黄河故道不同灌水方式刺槐人工林幼树水分利用效率和生长特性[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(8):2529-2535.
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
郑强卿, 李铭, 李鹏程, 等. 滴灌条件下沙地肉苁蓉土壤水分空间分布特性研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2011, 39(30):18548-18550,18600.
|
[34] |
马蒙蒙, 林青, 徐绍辉. 不同因素影响下层状土壤水分入渗特征及水力学参数估计[J]. 土壤学报, 2020, 57(2):347-358.
|
[35] |
吴丹. 沙地樟子松人工林根系及土壤养分分布特征研究[D]. 阜新: 辽宁工程技术大学, 2020.
|
[36] |
李豆豆, 席本野, 唐连峰, 等. 砂壤土下滴灌毛白杨幼林土壤水分运移规律与模拟[J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(12):157-168.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |