The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference

HUANG Shuo, ZHNEG Yu, CHENG Linli, JI Chunyue, WANG Shan, DONG Jianwen

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 221-228.

PDF(1950 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(1950 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2022, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (5) : 221-228. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】Affected by the new crown pneumonia epidemic, people have put forward higher requirements for the health functions of urban parks. Landscape preference is the result of the interaction between people and the chosen environment, and is closely related to the construction of landscape elements. It is of great significance for studying the construction of healthy landscapes in urban parks. 【Method】Taking the Xihu Park of Fuzhou City as an example, this research used location big data methods, questionnaire survey methods, qualitative grounding methods and structural equation model construction to explore the evaluation mechanism of urban park landscape health benefits based on landscape preference. 【Result】 (1) Compared with the period of the epidemic, the preference for landscape elements of structures and facilities increased by 4.918%, the preforence for space and atmosphere decreased by 4.996%. Relatively speaking, regardless of whether there were any changes in various landscape environments before and after the epidemic, natural elements have always been a very important part of the selection. Tourists preferred the environment with more natural elements. (2) In the reflection characteristics of landscape preferences, the revised legibility (0.45) and mystery (0.59) can effectively reflect landscape preference, in which mystery had the largest influence coefficient. (3) The eliminating fatigue (0.70), focusing (0.67), rejuvenating (0.62) and calming mood (0.56) can effectively reflect the health benefit evaluation, among which the influence coefficient of eliminating fatigue maximum. (4) Landscape preference showed a certain positive impact on the evaluation of health benefits, but the impact coefficient was not significant, and it had an indirect impact through landscape elements.【Conclusion】The qualitative analysis combined with the evaluation results of the structural equation model among landscape elements, landscape preferences and health benefits can provide a certain direction for the improvement of the health benefits of urban parks, then carried out targeted development, protection, transformation and improvement, afterwards improve the effectiveness of the park.

Key words

new crown pneumonia epidemic / landscape preference / health benefit / urban park / Xihu Park / Fuzhou City

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
HUANG Shuo , ZHNEG Yu , CHENG Linli , et al . The impact mechanism of urban park health benefit evaluation based on landscape preference[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2022, 46(5): 221-228 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202107020

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
[1]
VAN DEN BERG A E, KOOLE S L, VAN DER WULP N Y. Environmental preference and restoration:how are they related?[J]. J Environ Psychol, 2003, 23(2):135-146.DOI:10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1.
Cited in this article [1]
[2]
谭少华, 郭剑锋, 赵万民. 城市自然环境缓解精神压力和疲劳恢复研究进展[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2010, 29(4):55-60.
TAN S H, GUO J F, ZHAO W M. Research progress on the relief of mental stress and fatigue recovery in urban natural environment[J]. Regional Res Development, 2010, 29(4):55-60.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-2363.2010.04.012.
Cited in this article [1]
[3]
HANSMANN R, HUG S M, SEELAND K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2007, 6(4):213-225.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004.
Cited in this article [1]
[4]
宋立民, 鲁苗. 景观偏好的差异性探究[J]. 设计, 2016(21):27-29.
SONG L M, LU M. The study of the difference of landscape preference[J]. Design, 2016(21):27-29.
Cited in this article [1]
[5]
GOBSTER P, CHENOWETH R E. The dimensions of aesthetic preference:a quantitative analysis[J]. J Environ Manag, 1989, 29(1):47-72.
Cited in this article [1]
[6]
ZUCKERMAN M, ULRICH R S, MCLAUGHLIN J. Sensation seeking and reactions to nature paintings[J]. Pers Individ Differ, 1993, 15(5):563-576.DOI:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90340-9.
Cited in this article [1]
[7]
陈云文, 胡江, 王辉. 景观偏好及栽植空间景观偏好研究回顾[J]. 山东林业科技, 2004, 34(4):54-56.
CHEN Y W, HU J, WANG H. Review on landscape preference and landscape preference of planting space[J]. J Shandong For Sci Technol, 2004, 34(4):54-56.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-2724.2004.04.041.
Cited in this article [1]
[8]
KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S, BROWN T. Environmental preference[J]. Environ Behav, 1989, 21(5):509-530.DOI:10.1177/0013916589215001.
Cited in this article [1]
[9]
KAPLAN R, KAPLAN S. A psychological perspective[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Cited in this article [1]
[10]
BARROSO F L, PINTO-CORREIA T, RAMOS I L, et al. Dealing with landscape fuzziness in user preference studies: photo-based questionnaires in the Mediterranean context[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2012, 104(3/4):329-342.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.11.005.
Cited in this article [1]
[11]
YU K J. Cultural variations in landscape preference: comparisons among Chinese sub-groups and western design experts[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 1995, 32(2):107-126.DOI:10.1016/0169-2046(94)00188-9.
Cited in this article [1]
[12]
周春玲, 张启翔, 孙迎坤. 居住区绿地的美景度评价[J]. 中国园林, 2006, 22(4):62-67.
ZHOU C L, ZHANG Q X, SUN Y K. Scenic beauty estimation of residential quarter green area[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2006, 22(4):62-67.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6664.2006.04.015.
Cited in this article [1]
[13]
郑哲. 基于精神病人行为改善作用的庭园康复功能研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2014.
ZHENG Z. Research on rehabilitation effects of garden through psychiatric patients' behavior improvement[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Forestry, 2014.
Cited in this article [1]
[14]
唐佳薇. 基于旅游照片的湖南省国家森林公园游客景观偏好研究[D]. 长沙: 中南林业科技大学, 2018.
TANG J W. Hunan beautiful forest research on tourist landscape preference based on tourist photos in national forest park of Hunan Province[D]. Changsha: Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2018.
Cited in this article [1]
[15]
柯鑫, 韩雪, 许建强. 植物景观健康效益的发展及其应用探究[J]. 城市建筑, 2020, 17(33):139-142.
KE X, HAN X, XU J Q. Research on the development and application of plant landscape health benefit[J]. Urban Archit, 2020, 17(33):139-142.DOI:10.19892/j.cnki.csjz.2020.33.39.
Cited in this article [1]
[16]
NIELSEN T S, HANSEN K B. Do green areas affect health?Results from a Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators[J]. Health Place, 2007, 13(4):839-850.DOI:10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.02.001.
Cited in this article [1]
[17]
张彩红, 薛伟, 辛颖, 等. 基于层次分析法的贵州玉舍国家森林公园休养地适宜度评价[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(2):215-219.
ZHANG C H, XUE W, XIN Y, et al. Suitability evaluation of rest and recuperation sites in Guizhou Yushe National Forest Park by analythic hierarchy process CAHP[J]. J Nanjing For U (Nat Sci Edi), 2020, 44(2): 215-219. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201812009.
Cited in this article [1]
[18]
HANSMANN R, HUG S M, SEELAND K. Restoration and stress relief through physical activities in forests and parks[J]. Urban For Urban Green, 2007, 6(4):213-225.DOI:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.08.004.
Cited in this article [1]
[19]
王晓易. 2017大众点评吃货节开启亿元基金打造内容生态体系[N]. 南方都市报,2015-05-12(2).
Cited in this article [1]
[20]
GRIMM L G, YARNOLD P R. Reading and Understanding more Multivariate Statistics[M]. Washington DC: American Psychological Association, 2000.
Cited in this article [1]
[21]
黄章展, 黄芳铭, 周先捷. 环境偏好与环境恢复性知觉关系之研究--以山景景观为例[J]. 户外游憩研究, 2008, 21(1):1-25.
HUANG Z Z, HUANG F M, ZHOU X J. The relationship between environmental preference and restorative perception of environment:a case study of mountain landscape[J]. Outdoor Recreation Study, 2008, 21(1):1-25.
Cited in this article [2]
[22]
PESCHARDT K K, STIGSDOTTER U K. Associations between park characteristics and perceived restorativeness of small public urban green spaces[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 112:26-39.DOI:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.12.013.
Cited in this article [2]
[23]
SUN M H, RYAN C, PAN S. Assessing tourists' perceptions and behaviour through photographic and blog analysis: the case of Chinese bloggers and New Zealand holidays[J]. Tour Manag Perspect, 2014, 12:125-133.DOI:10.1016/j.tmp.2014.09.007.
Cited in this article [1]
[24]
STEPCHENKOVA S, ZHAN F Z. Visual destination images of Peru:comparative content analysis of DMO and user-generated photography[J]. Tour Manag, 2013, 36:590-601.DOI:10.1016/j.tourman.2012.08.006.
Cited in this article [1]
[25]
王志鹏, 王薇, 邢思懿. 城市公园绿地特征和使用方式与人群健康关系研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5):223-231.
WANG Z P, WANG W, XING S Y. Relationship between the characteristics and usage patterns of urban park green space and population health[J]. J Nanjing For Univ(Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(5):223-231.DOI:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202006004.
Cited in this article [1]
[26]
ÜLENGIN F, KABAK Ö, ÖNSEL Ş, et al. A problem structuring model for analyzing transportation environment relationships[J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2010, 200(3):844-859.DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.01.023.
Cited in this article [1]
[27]
刘群阅, 陈烨, 张薇, 等. 游憩者环境偏好、恢复性评价与健康效益评估关系研究:以福州国家森林公园为例[J]. 资源科学, 2018, 40(2):381-391.
LIU Q Y, CHEN Y, ZHANG W, et al. Tourists' environmental preferences,perceived restoration and perceived health at Fuzhou National Forest Park[J]. Resour Sci, 2018, 40(2):381-391.DOI:10.18402/resci.2018.02.14.
Cited in this article [1]
[28]
柯惠新, 沈浩. 调查研究中的统计分析法[M]. 2版. 北京: 中国传媒大学出版社, 2005.
KE H X, SHEN H. Statistics in survey research[M]. 2nd ed. Beijing: Communication University of China Press, 2005.
Cited in this article [1]
[29]
O'LEARY-KELLY S W, J VOKURKA R. The empirical assessment of construct validity[J]. J Oper Manag, 1998, 16(4):387-405.DOI:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00020-5.
Cited in this article [1]
[30]
CHEN Y S, LIN L S. Structural equation based latent growth curve modeling of watershed attribute-regulated stream sensitivity to reduced acidic deposition[J]. Ecol Model, 2010, 221(17):2086-2094.DOI:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.05.010.
Cited in this article [1]
[31]
KUPPAM A R, PENDYALA R M. A structural equations analysis of commuters' activity and travel patterns[J]. Transportation, 2001, 28(1):33-54.DOI:10.1023/A:1005253813277.
Cited in this article [1]
PDF(1950 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉