
Simulation study on fire behavior on the China-Mongolia border in windless conditions
WANG Liming, WANG Ruotong, LI Yong, ZHANG Heng
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5) : 65-72.
Simulation study on fire behavior on the China-Mongolia border in windless conditions
【Objective】 The China-Mongolia border is prone to grassland fires in Erenhot, the East Ujimqin Banner and the New Barag Right Banner, threatening livelihoods and the local environment. Studying the parameters of fire behavior for grassland fuel on the China-Mongolia border in windless conditions can provide a theoretical basis for the grassland fuel management and grassland fire prevention. 【Method】Based on field investigations and sample collection, a combustion bed and thermocouple were used to simulate and measure the behavior of combustibles, and the fire behavior indexes were simulated and analyzed. 【Result】Simulations for windless conditions in Erenhot, the East Ujimqin Banner and the New Barag Right Banner, respectively, showed a fire intensity of 780.44, 805.80 and 1 195.60 kW/m; a spread rate of 0.61, 0.45, 0.67 m/min; an average flame height of 30.30, 35.53,33.90 cm; average flame temperature of 481.97, 529.33 and 389.93 ℃; heat radiation, 0.45, 1.20 and 1.44 kW/m2, and blocking time of combustibles, 28, 15 and 22 s. 【Conclusion】 Long periods of temperature fluctuation are observed for grassland fires in Erenhot, and the risk of fire is high. In the East Ujimqin Banner, the smoldering heat radiation of combustibles is close to flame heat radiation and the holding power of fires is strong, making grassland fires likely.
grasslands fines / windless condition / fire behavior simulation / China-Mongolia border
[1] |
张正祥, 张洪岩, 李冬雪, 等. 呼伦贝尔草原人为火空间分布格局[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(7):2023-2031.
|
[2] |
雒瑞森. 全球火格局的时空变异及其机理分析[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2013.
|
[3] |
张吉利, 刘礴霏, 褚腾飞, 等. 广义Rothermel模型预测平地无风条件下红松-蒙古栎林地表混合可燃物的火行为[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(6):1495-1502.
|
[4] |
郭平, 孙刚, 周道玮, 等. 草地火行为研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2001, 12(5):746-748.
在松嫩平原采用野外放火的方法,研究了草地火速度、火强度、火烈度、火形态、火烧迹地形状及其与气象因子、可燃物、可燃物床特性的关系.结果表明,风速是影响草地头火速度最主要的因子.除风速外,晴天时相对湿度对头火速度影响较大,降水后大气温度对头火速度影响较大.头火速度>侧翼火速度>尾火速度.风速与火强度、火深度、火烧迹地形状呈现显著正相关.采用逐步回归方法建立了草地头火速度、火强度、火烧迹地形状的预测模型.
Burning in field was adopted in Songnen Plain to study fire speed, fire intensit y, fire scorch, fire shape, shape of burning site and their relationships with c limatic factors, combustible, and combustible bed.Wind speed had the biggest ef fect on head fire speed. In addition to wind speed, relative humidity was the se cond significant influential factor for head fire speed in sunny days, and atmos phere temperature had significant influence after precipitation. The relation of fire speed was head fire speed>flank fire speed>back fire speed.Wind speed w as correlated tofire intensity,fire depth,and shape of burning site significa ntly and positively. A predictive model for head fire speed,fire intensity,and shape of burning site in grassland were established by step statistical method
|
[5] |
程渡, 崔鲜一, 彭玉梅. 草地火灾生成原因及火管理系统的研究[J]. 四川草原, 2002(3):15-17.
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
\nGrid-independent rate of spread results from a physics-based simulation are presented. Previously, such a numerical benchmark has been elusive owing to computational restrictions. The grid-converged results are used to systematically construct correlations between the rate of spread (RoS) and both wind speed and grass height, separately. The RoS obtained from the physics-based model is found to be linear with wind speed in the parameter range considered. When wind speed is varied, the physics-based model predicts faster RoS than the Mk III and V (McArthur) models (Noble et al. 1980) but slower than the CSIRO model (Cheney et al. 1998). When the grass height is varied keeping the bulk density constant, the fire front changes from a boundary layer flame mode to plume flame mode as the grass height increases. Once the fires are in plume mode, a higher grass height results in a larger heat release rate of the fire but a slower RoS.\n
|
[8] |
\n\nThe effect of grass fuel load on fire behaviour and fire danger has been a contentious issue for some time in Australia. Existing operational models have placed different emphases on the effect of fuel load on model outputs, which has created uncertainty in the operational assessment of fire potential and has led to end-user and public distrust of model outcomes. A field-based experimental burning program was conducted to quantify the effect of fuel load on headfire rate of spread and other fire behaviour characteristics in grasslands. A total of 58 experimental fires conducted at six sites across eastern Australia were analysed.\nWe found an inverse relationship between fuel load and the rate of spread in grasslands, which is contrary to current, untested, modelling assumptions. This result is valid for grasslands where fuel load is not a limiting factor for fire propagation. We discuss the reasons for this effect and model it to produce a fuel load effect function that can be applied to operational grassfire spread models used in Australia. We also analyse the effect of fuel load on flame characteristics and develop a model for flame height as a function of rate of fire spread and fuel load.\n
|
[9] |
Aspects of flammability of the major fuel arrays in a mallee shrubland community, and the basis for fire-spread in these discrete fuels, are examined and discussed. Relationships between plant size and weight of litter (shrubs and mallee eucalypts) or grass hummocks (Triodia irritans) were studied. Hummock mass was a function of hummock diameter and height. On ignition, maximum flame length was related to hummock height and diameter. For mallee eucalypts the mass of litter beneath individual plants was related to the diameter of the litter bed. Flame length was also related to litter bed diameter. In other species of shrubs, fires were not sustained independently. We hypothesize that T. irritans will play a major role in fire spread in communities because flames from hummocks will have the greatest ability to bridge gaps between fuel arrays (flames longer than in eucalypts). Size of hummocks will have an important bearing on propagation of fire across fuel-gaps. By contrast, the main role of eucalypts in fire-spread may be as a source of burning brands which initiate spot fires. There is scope to understand fire-spread in these communities on the basis of flame lengths (in conjunction with plant size) in relation to wind.
|
[10] |
郭平, 康春莉, 田卫, 等. 草地可燃物床特性与草地火行为的关系[J]. 干旱区研究, 2002, 19(4):13-16.
|
[11] |
玉山. 内蒙古草原火行为及其模拟研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2020.
|
[12] |
辛喆, 王顺喜, 云峰, 等. 基于火灾模拟软件(FDS)的草原火灾蔓延规律数值分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(11):156-163,F0004.
|
[13] |
李兴华. 内蒙古东北部森林草原火灾规律及预警研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2007.
|
[14] |
傅泽强. 内蒙古干草原火灾时空分布动态研究[J]. 内蒙古气象, 2001(1):28-30,35.
|
[15] |
曲炤鹏, 郑淑霞, 白永飞. 蒙古高原草原火行为的时空格局与影响因子[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(4):807-813.
|
[16] |
丽娜, 包玉龙, 银山, 等. 中蒙边境地区草原火时空分布特征分析[J]. 灾害学, 2016, 31(3):207-210.
|
[17] |
萨如拉, 张鑫, 韩霄, 等. 1981—2015年内蒙古自治区草原火灾时空动态研究[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2019, 38(3):421-425.
|
[18] |
李红颖, 刘果厚, 刘利红, 等. 二连浩特地区种子植物区系研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2016, 38(4):35-41
|
[19] |
杨胜利, 乌恩. 东乌珠穆沁旗草地资源现状调查研究[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2013, 19(9):101-103.
|
[20] |
何晓蕾, 赵萌莉, 刘通, 等. 新巴尔虎右旗草地生态系统的服务功能[J]. 草业科学, 2013, 30(10):1656-1663.
|
[21] |
骆介禹. 森林燃烧能量学[M]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学出版社,1992.
|
[22] |
郭继勋, 王若丹, 包国章. 东北羊草草原主要植物热值[J]. 植物生态学报, 2001, 25(6):746-750.
对羊草(Aneurolepidium chinense)草原55种植物热值进行分析,高热值植物占总数的20%,中热值植物占58.18%,低热值植物占21.82%,55种植物全株平均热值为17949.45J·g-1。因含能物质在各器官的分配不同,同一植物不同器官的热值也存在着差异。务器官的平均热值花19399.28J·g-1>茎18022.58J·g-1>叶17885.17J·g-1>根17206.05J·g-1。不同科植物全株和各器官平均热值存在较大差异,即使同属植物也存在一定差异。菊科、禾本科和豆科3大科植物全株平均热值无明显差异,但豆科植物根的热值明显高于禾本科和菊科根的热值。
|
[23] |
王小雪, 彭徐剑, 胡海清. 黑龙江省主要草本可燃物燃烧性分析Ⅰ:灰分含量及燃烧速度[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2013, 33(5):6-10.
|
[24] |
王秋华, 徐伟恒, 李世友, 等. 地盘松林地表可燃物的燃烧火行为[J]. 消防科学与技术, 2015, 34(3):281-284.
|
[25] |
张吉利, 刘礴霏, 邸雪颖, 等. 平地无风条件下蒙古栎阔叶床层的火行为Ⅱ:火焰长度和驻留时间影响因子分析与预测模型[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(11):3149-3156.
|
[26] |
张恒, 崔孟然, 单延龙, 等. 中蒙边境典型草原草本可燃物燃烧性研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(5): 171-177.
|
[27] |
张正祥. 基于地理信息系统和遥感的草地火状况研究[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2010.
|
[28] |
舒立福, 王明玉, 田晓瑞, 等. 关于森林燃烧火行为特征参数的计算与表述[J]. 林业科学, 2004, 40(3):179-183.
|
[29] |
刘桂香, 苏和, 李石磊. 内蒙古草原火灾概述[J]. 中国草地, 1999, 21(4):76-78.
|
[30] |
李兴华. 内蒙古草原火灾演变规律及影响因子研究[C]// 中国气象学会. 第34 届中国气象学会年会S11创新驱动智慧气象服务——第七届气象服务发展论坛论文集.中国气象学会, 2017:9.
|
[31] |
罗冰, 何芳, 高振强, 等. 生物质燃烧和阴燃过程对比[J]. 山东理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 27(1):21-24.
|
[32] |
An extensive set of experiments was carried out in order to collect data to validate fire propagation models being developed in the context of an European research project. The experiments were performed in a dedicated burning tray (2.0 m × 0.70 m working section), where wind velocity, fuel moisture content and slope were varied to study fire propagation in beds of Pinus pinaster needles. All the runs were videotaped and, from the recordings, information on flame geometry (i.e. flame height, flame length and flame angle) and rate of spread was obtained. Temperature measurements were also carried out by a small tower of six thermocouples at different heights above the fuel bed. Results show that headfire rate of spread increases steeply with wind speed for wind-driven fires but does not depend on wind speed for backing fire spread rates. Rate of spread increases slightly with slope for up-hill propagation, and is not slope dependent for down-hill cases. Rate of spread decreases when fuel moisture content increases. Flame angle and flame height are also dependent on wind velocity, slope, and fuel moisture content. The importance of temperature for fire propagation is discussed, emphasizing the role of radiation heat transfer in the process. Correlations between temperature and other indicators of fire behaviour (namely the rate of spread) are presented. Results are discussed and compared. The results obtained provide a good database for the assessment of fire propagation models.
|
[33] |
王秋华, 仝艳民, 李世友, 等. 滇中地区入侵紫茎泽兰的潜在火行为[J]. 福建林业科技, 2015, 42(2):29-33.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |