
Soil stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in water source area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project
XU Zihan, WANG Lei, CUI Ming, LIU Yuguo, ZHAO Ziqing, LI Jiahao
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3) : 173-181.
Soil stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in water source area of South-to-North Water Diversion Project
【Objective】The purpose of this study was to investigate the soil nutrient and stoichiometry characteristics of different vegetation restoration modes in the context of Karst landscapes within the water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project and to evaluate the soil nutrient supply status of woodland habitats at the northern edge of the contiguous southern Karst distribution area, with the aim of providing a theoretical basis for the forest management, restoration and reconstruction of degraded ecosystems, and rock desertification management in the water-supporting area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project. 【Method】The soil under Quercus variabilis natural secondary forest, Platycladus orientalis plantation, and Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation in the Karst area of Xichuan County of Henan Province was investigated in this study. Soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), total potassium (TK), available nitrogen (AN), available phosphorus (AP) and available potassium (AK) contents were determined through laboratory experiments, and the stoichiometric ratios of each element were calculated to analyze the soil nutrient balance in forest habitats with different restoration modes. 【Result】The contents of SOC, TN and TP in different vegetation restoration modes in Karst area ranged from 10.23 to 28.99 g/kg, 0.89 to 2.42 g/kg and 0.43 to 0.77 g/kg, respectively; the mean values of soil stoichiometric ratios as C∶N, C∶P and N∶P were 10.41 to 11.89, 13.69 to 80.00 and 0.18 to 6.61, respectively. The soil nutrient contents and stoichiometric ratios were influenced by vegetation types and soil depth, and were higher in the surface soil (0-10 cm) than in the subsoil (>10-30 cm). Except for TP content, the soil nutrient content of the natural secondary forests was higher than that of the artificial forests. The correlation analysis showed that there were significant correlations among SOC, TN and TP contents under different vegetation restoration modes, indicating that the spatial distribution of the three had a more consistent variation pattern. 【Conclusion】In the water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, the naturally restored Q. variabilis secondary forest is an ideal vegetation restoration model, and all three stands were limited by nitrogen or phosphorus during the growth process. In the future stand management, nitrogen supplementation should be moderately strengthened for natural forests, phosphorus fertilizers should be applied to plantation forests, and the nutrient uptake efficiency of vegetation should be improved through measures such as inter-cultivation to promote coordinated development among vegetation soils.
water source area of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project / vegetation restoration / soil nutrient / stoichiometric characteristics
[1] |
|
[2] |
贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1):2-6.
|
[3] |
刘立斌, 钟巧连, 倪健. 贵州高原型喀斯特次生林 C、N、P 生态化学计量特征与储量[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(22): 8606-8614.
|
[4] |
章广琦, 张萍, 陈云明, 等. 黄土丘陵区刺槐与油松人工林生态系统生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(4): 1328-1336.
|
[5] |
吴鹏, 崔迎春, 赵文君, 等. 喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2019, 41(3): 80-92.
|
[6] |
王芳芳, 余凤荣, 童晨, 等. 河南省新安县郁山林区土壤速效养分分析[J]. 生态科学, 2021, 40(2): 67-73.
|
[7] |
王璐, 喻阳华, 邢容容, 等. 喀斯特高原山地区主要人工林土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(8): 1388-1394.
|
[8] |
王磊, 崔明, 周梦玲, 等. 河南省淅川县岩溶区不同恢复年限天然次生林植物群落特征[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2020, 37(4): 720-728.
|
[9] |
刘哲. 南水北调中线水源区淅川县石质荒漠化特征及防治技术研究[D]. 郑州: 华北水利水电大学, 2018.
|
[10] |
顾汪明, 周金星, 武建宏, 等. 南水北调中线渠首淅川县石漠化治理现状与人工造林技术[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(3): 44-48.
|
[11] |
勇毫, 郭占胜, 杨朝兴, 等. 丹江口库区石漠化现状及治理措施研究:以河南省淅川县为例[J]. 河北农业科学, 2012, 16(2): 75-77.
|
[12] |
张君, 蔡德宝, 杨树琼, 等. 丹江口库区不同坡度对土壤肥力特征的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021(2): 32-38.
|
[13] |
鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
庞圣江, 张培, 贾宏炎, 等. 桂西北不同森林类型土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 中国农学通报, 2015, 31(1): 17-23.
|
[18] |
庞圣江, 杨保国, 刘士玲, 等. 桂西北喀斯特山区4种森林表土土壤有机碳含量及其养分分布特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2018, 38(4): 60-64+71.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
杨慧, 朱同彬, 王修华, 等. 云南断陷盆地高原面典型小流域土壤元素含量特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(5): 859-865.
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
康冰, 刘世荣, 蔡道雄, 等. 南亚热带不同植被恢复模式下土壤理化性质[J]. 应用生态学报, 2010, 21(10): 2479-2486.
|
[23] |
王霖娇, 汪攀, 盛茂银, 等. 西南喀斯特典型石漠化生态系统土壤养分生态化学计量特征及其影响因素[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(18): 6580-6593.
|
[24] |
彭晓, 方晰, 喻林华, 等. 中亚热带4种森林土壤碳、氮、磷化学计量特征[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2016, 36(11): 65-72.
|
[25] |
胡小燕, 段爱国, 张建国, 等. 广西大青山杉木人工林碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(4): 1207-1218.
|
[26] |
张忠华, 胡刚, 祝介东, 等. 喀斯特森林土壤养分的空间异质性及其对树种分布的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(10): 1038-1049.
|
[27] |
曾昭霞, 王克林, 刘孝利, 等. 桂西北喀斯特区原生林与次生林鲜叶和凋落叶化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(7): 1907-1914.
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
杨慧, 涂春艳, 李青芳, 等. 岩溶区次生林地不同地貌部位土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 南方农业学报, 2015, 46(5): 777-781.
|
[30] |
王振宇, 王涛, 邹秉章, 等. 不同生长阶段杉木人工林土壤C∶N∶P化学计量特征与养分动态[J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(11):3597-3604.
|
[31] |
黄昌勇. 土壤学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 33-49.
|
[32] |
贾宇, 徐炳成, 李凤民, 等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区苜蓿人工草地土壤磷素有效性及对生产力的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2007, 27(1):42-47.
|
[33] |
吴丽芳, 王妍, 刘云根, 等. 岩溶石漠化区人工植被类型对土壤团聚体生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2021, 49(6): 63-69.
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
俞月凤, 彭晚霞, 宋同清, 等. 喀斯特峰丛洼地不同森林类型植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报, 2014, 25(4): 947-954.
|
[36] |
刘兴诏, 周国逸, 张德强, 等. 南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1): 64-71.
|
[37] |
张雨鉴, 王克勤, 宋娅丽, 等. 滇中亚高山5种林型土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(1): 73-82.
|
[38] |
朱秋莲, 邢肖毅, 张宏, 等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报, 2013, 33(15): 4674-4682.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |