Effects of soil different preservation time on the soil animals separation results of Oribatida and Collembola by low temperature storage

DU Zhiqi, MENG Qingfan, FENG Lichao, GE Jiarong, HUANG Jinbin, SHI Jingjing, LI Hongrui, CEN Zucai

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 213-218.

PDF(1397 KB)
PDF(1397 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2) : 213-218. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202112042

Effects of soil different preservation time on the soil animals separation results of Oribatida and Collembola by low temperature storage

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 This research aims to explore the effects of different storage time on the separation effects of soil animals under the condition of soil low temperature storage, so as to provide a reference for a large number of collection and separation of soil animals.【Method】 On October 6, 2018, the natural Mongolian oak (Quercus mongolica) forest in Songhua Lake Nature Reserve, Jilin City, the soil at different depths was drilled by the five point sampling method, brought back to the laboratory and stored in the indoor 4 ℃ refrigerator. The Berlese-Tullgren method was used to separate the soil animal samples of Oribatida and Collembola on the same day, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days later. The species and genera of Oribatida and Collembola were determined according to the morphological characteristics under the microscope.【Result】 With the increase of preservation time, the individual number and the number of species of soil animals of Oribatida and Collembola showed a downward trend; Under the same preservation time and different depths, the species of Oribatida and Collembola had significant differences with other depths (P<0.05), and showed a downward trend. The number of species of Oribatida and Collembolan collected in litter layer was significantly different from that in 5, 10 and 15 cm soil layers (P<0.05), and also showed a downward trend.【Conclusion】 Increasing the soil preservation time under cold storage will reduce the separation efficiency of medium-sized soil animals. The separation effect of Oribatida is the best on the day of soil collection, and the isolation of Collembola was not affected by soil storage time. Oribatida and Collembola animals were mainly collected in the litter layer. The soil depth increased while the soil animals decreased.

Key words

low temperature storage / forest soil / soil animal / preservation time / Oribatida / Collembola

Cite this article

Download Citations
DU Zhiqi , MENG Qingfan , FENG Lichao , et al . Effects of soil different preservation time on the soil animals separation results of Oribatida and Collembola by low temperature storage[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2023, 47(2): 213-218 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202112042

References

[1]
GILLER P S. The diversity of soil communities, the ‘Poor man’s tropical rainforest’[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation, 1996, 5(2): 135-168. DOI:10.1007/BF00055827.
[2]
BEST M L, WELSH J. The trophic role of a forest salamander: impacts on invertebrates, leaf litter retention, and the humification process[J]. Ecosphere, 2014, 5(2): 1-19. DOI:10.1890/ES13-00302.1.
[3]
VARGO D L. Soil invertebrates of American Samoa[J]. Micronesica, 2000, 33: 1-10.
[4]
贺纪正, 陆雅海, 傅伯杰. 土壤生物学前沿[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2015.
HE J Z, LU Y H, FU B J. Frontier of soil biology[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
[5]
尹文英. 土壤动物学研究的回顾与展望[J]. 生物学通报, 2001, 36(8): 1-3.
YIN W Y. Review and prospect of soil zoology research[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 2001, 36(8): 1-3. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2001.08.001
[6]
黄红英, 李栋. 干漏斗实验装置的改进与创新[J]. 生物学通报, 2018, 53(1): 57-58.
HUANG H Y, LI D. The improvement and innovation of Tullgren[J]. Bull Biol, 2018, 53(1): 57-58. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2018.01.019.
[7]
IRMLER U. Changes in the fauna and its contribution to mass loss and N release during leaf litter decomposition in two deciduous forests[J]. Pedobiologia, 2000, 44(2): 105-118. DOI:10.1078/S0031-4056(04)70032-3.
[8]
殷秀琴, 马祝阳. Tullgren法对土壤动物的分离效率[J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2002, 34(2): 84-91.
YIN X Q, MA Z Y. Segregate efficiency of Tullgren method to middle-small-sized soil animal[J]. J Northeast Norm Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2002, 34(2): 84-91. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-1832.2002.02.017.
[9]
魏雪, 吴鹏飞. 土壤松紧度对Tullgren法分离小型节肢动物的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2014, 27(3): 1136-1142.
WEI X, WU P F. Influence of soil compactness on extraction of soil microarthropods by tullgren method[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2014, 27(3):1136-1142. DOI:10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2014.03.015.
[10]
铁烈华, 张林成, 冯茂松, 等. 烘虫温度和时间对中小型土壤动物烘虫分离效果的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2015, 33(1): 45-50.
TIE L H, ZHANG L C, FENG M S, et al. Baking temperature and time on the effect of soil meso-and micro-fauna separation results[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2015, 33(1): 45-50. DOI:10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2015.01.008.
[11]
CARTER M, GREGORICH E. Soil sampling and methods of analysis[M].2nd Ed. Roca Rat: Lewis Publishing House, 2007.
[12]
ANDRIUZZI W S, ADAMS B J, BARRETT J E, et al. Observed trends of soil fauna in the Antarctic dry valleys: early signs of shifts predicted under climate change[J]. Ecology, 2018, 99(2):312-321.DOI:10.1002/ecy.2090.
[13]
尹文英. 中国亚热带土壤动物[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1992.
YIN W Y. Subtropical soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1992.
[14]
李春鸣. 土壤样品的采集和处理[J]. 西北民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 24(3): 74-75.
LI C M. Collection and treatment of soil samples[J]. J Northwest Minor Univ Natl (Nat Sci), 2003, 24(3): 74-75. DOI:10.14084/j.cnki.cn62-1188/n.2003.03.020.
[15]
吾玛尔·阿布力孜. 土壤螨类的采集与玻片标本的制作[J]. 生物学通报, 2012, 47(1): 57-59.
Omar·Abliz. Collection of soil mites and preparation of slide specimens[J]. Microbiol China, 2012, 47(1): 57-59. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.0006-3193.2012.01.022.
[16]
尹文英. 中国土壤动物检索图鉴[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1998.
YIN W Y. Pictorical keys to soil animals of China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1998.
[17]
青木淳一. 日本产土壤动物检索[M]. 东京: 东海大学出版会, 1993.
[18]
李东育, 陈晓露, 韩大勇, 等. 不同管理模式下苹果园昆虫群落物种组成及其多样性[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2021, 37(3):589-596.
LI D Y, CHEN X L, HAN D Y, et al. Species composition and diversity of insect community in apple orchards with different management modes[J]. Jiangsu J Agr Sci, 2021, 37(3):589-596. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2021.03.006.
[19]
勾影波, 苏永春. 土壤温度和含水量对螨类和弹尾类动物数量的影响[J]. 常熟理工学院学报, 2007(2): 57-62.
GOU Y B, SU Y C. Effects of temperature and water content in soil on the quantity of Acarina and Collembola[J]. J Chang Inst Technol, 2007, 21(2): 57-62. DOI:10.16101/j.cnki.cn32-1749/z.2007.02.013.
[20]
邱军, 傅荣恕. 土壤温湿度对甲螨和跳虫数量的影响[J]. 山东师大学报(自然科学版), 2004, 19(4): 72-74.
QIU J, FU R S. The effects of temperature and soil water content for the number of oribatida and Collembola[J]. J Shandong Norm Univ (Nat Sci), 2004, 19(4): 72-74. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-4748.2004.04.021.
[21]
马辰. 长白山地森林土壤跳虫的分布格局及其对环境变化的响应[D]. 长春: 东北师范大学, 2019.
MA C. The responses of soil Collembolan’s distribution pattern to environmental changes in the forests of Changbai Mountains[D]. Changchun: Northeast Normal University, 2019.
[22]
牙克甫·艾散江, 吾玛尔·阿布力孜, 买尔旦·艾斯卡尔, 等. 新疆7种微生境的土壤甲螨多样性特征[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2020, 32(4): 696-704.
Yakup·Hasnjan, Omar·Abliz, Mardan·Askra, et al. Diversity characteristics of soil Oribatid mites in 7 microenvironments in Xinjiang[J]. Acta Agric Zhejiangensis, 2020, 32(4): 696-704. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1524.2020.04.17
[23]
NIELSEN U N, OSLER G H R, VAN DER WAL R, et al. Soil pore volume and the abundance of soil mites in two contrasting habitats[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 2008, 40(6): 1538-1541. DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2007.12.029.
PDF(1397 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/