Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (2): 155-165.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202203017

Previous Articles Next Articles

Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot

ZHU Yanyan(), JIA Ruirui, FU Yu, CHANG Lin, YUE Yuanzheng, YANG Xiulian, WANG Lianggui^*()

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University,Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Landscape Architecture,Nanjing 210037,China

Received:2022-03-06 Revised:2022-04-19 Online:2024-03-30 Published:2024-04-08

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To investigate the differences in resistance to Phytophthora nicotianae (strain QS.1) infestation by Catalpa bungei cultivars and breeding methods, providing basis for C. bungei introduction and cultivation and disease resistance breeding. 【Method】 The annual seedlings of ‘Jinsiqiu’ (JSQ),‘Qiuza 1 hao’ (QZ),‘Yuqiu 1 hao’ (YQ),‘Luoqiu 1 hao’ (LQ-Z)tissue cultured seedlings,and cutting seedling‘Luoqiu 1 hao’(LQ-Q),‘Qiu5-8’(Q5-8), ‘Qiu 8-1’(Q8-1),six C. bungei cultivars were used as experimental materials and infested with P. nicotianae strain QS.1 to determine relevant osmotic substance content,protective enzyme activity and photosynthetic gas parameters. 【Result】 After infection 2-4 d by strain QS.1,all C. bungei cultivars tested were susceptible to the disease and in the case of seedlings ‘Qiuza 1 hao’ and ‘Yuqiu 1 hao’ had the weakest resistance to the disease caused by the strain QS.1,while ‘Jinsiqiu’ had the strongest resistance to the disease; as far as the cuttings of C. bungei cultivars were concerned,Q5-8 and Q8-1 were more resistant to the infection of strain QS.1; ‘Luoqiu 1 hao’ cuttings were more resistant to the disease than the histoculture seedlings,and the cuttings of other species had stronger resistance to QS.1 infection than the histoculture seedlings,except for‘JSQ’.【Conclusion】 There were differences in infection pathogenesis among different C. bungei cultivars after inoculation. The pathogenic ability of different C. bungei cultivars against P. nicotianae strain QS.1 is related to the maintenance of photosynthetic performance and the regulation of defense-related enzyme activities.

Key words: Catalpa bungei cultivars, Phtophthora nicotianae (strain QS.1), resistance difference, physiological index, propagation method

CLC Number:

S763.7

ZHU Yanyan, JIA Ruirui, FU Yu, CHANG Lin, YUE Yuanzheng, YANG Xiulian, WANG Lianggui. Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 155-165.

Figures/Tables 18

Fig. 1

Table 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Fig. 8

Fig. 9

Fig. 10

Fig. 11

Fig. 12

Fig. 13

Fig. 14

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

References 29

[1]	HUANG W L, YE N L, XIAN B H. Investigation of stem base rot of sweetpotato and the pathogeny identification[J]. Chinese Agri Cultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(18):135141.
[2]	CHANG L, LIU K, WANG L G, et al. First report of Phytophthora nicotianae causing stem canker of Catalpa bungei (Chinese Catalpa) in China[J]. Plant Dis, 2022, 106(4):1309.DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-08-21-1778-PDN.
[3]	CLINE E T, FARR D F, ROSSMAN A Y. A synopsis of Phytophthora with accurate scientific names,host range,and geographic distribution[J]. Plant Heath Prog, 2008, 9(1):32.DOI: 10.1094/php-2008-0318-01-rs.
[4]	BAI G, YANG D H, CHAO P J, et al. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of NtbHLH gene family in tobacco (Ni-cotiana tabacum) and the role of NtbHLH86 in drought adaptation[J]. Plant Divers, 2021, 43(6):510-522.DOI: 10.1016/j.pld.2020.10.004.
[5]	BOUGHALLEB-M’HAMDI N, BENFRADJ N, MIGLIORINI D, et al. Phytophthora nicotianae and P.cryptogea causing gummosis of citrus crops in Tunisia[J]. Trop Plant Pathol, 2018, 43(1):36-48.DOI: 10.1007/s40858-017-0180-2.
[6]	林霞. 樱桃抗茎腐病机理与效应因子PnAvh241功能初步研究[D]. 烟台: 烟台大学, 2019.
	LIN X. Study on the cherry resistance mechanism of stem rot disease and the function of the RxLR effector PnAvh241[D]. Yantai: Yantai University, 2019.
[7]	陈瑞泰, 朱贤朝, 王智发, 等. 全国16个主产烟省(区)烟草侵染性病害调研报告[J]. 中国烟草科学, 1997, 18(4):1-7.
	CHEN R T, ZHU X C, WANG Z F, et al. A report of investigating and studying tobacco infectious diseases of 16 main tobacco producing provinces(regions)in China[J]. Chin Tob Sci, 1997, 18(4):1-7.
[8]	PANABI R F, GUL S, ALI G, et al. Phytophthora nicotianae diseases worldwide: new knowledge of a long-recognised pathogen[J]. Phytopathol Mediterr, 2016, 55(1):20-40.DOI: 10.14601/Phytopathol_Mediterr-16423.
[9]	ZHANG C S, FENG C, ZHENG Y F, et al. Root exudates metabolic profiling suggests distinct defense mechanisms between resistant and susceptible tobacco cultivars against black shank di-sease[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2020, 11:559775.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.559775.
[10]	李合生, 孙群, 赵世杰. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000.
	LI H S, SUN Q, ZHAO S J. Principles and techniques of plant physiological and piochemical pxperiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000.
[11]	杨兰芳, 庞静, 彭小兰, 等. 紫外分光光度法测定植物过氧化氢酶活性[J]. 现代农业科技, 2009(20):364-366.
	YANG L F, PANG J, PENG X L, et al. Measurement of catalase activity in plants by ultraviolet spectrophotometry[J]. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2009(20):364-366.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2009.20.247.
[12]	DODDS P N, RATHJEN J P. Plant immunity:towards an integrated view of plant-pathogen interactions[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(8):539-548.DOI: 10.1038/nrg2812.
[13]	赵小虎, 陈翠莲, 焦春香, 等. 不同油菜品种对油菜菌核病敏感性差异的生理生化特性研究[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2006, 25(5):488-492.
	ZHAO X H, CHEN C L, JIAO C X, et al. Physiological and biochemical reaction responses to Sclerotium blight inoculation among different rapeseed varieties[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2006, 25(5):488-492.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2006.05.007.
[14]	李赤, 于莉, 刘付东标, 等. 富贵竹中可溶性糖、蛋白质含量与细菌性茎腐病的关系[J]. 吉林农业大学学报, 2007, 29(6):620-622.
	LI C, YU L, LIU F D B, et al. Relation between contents of soluble sugar and protein in Dracaena sanderiana Virens and bacterial stem rot[J]. J Jilin Agric Univ, 2007, 29(6):620-622.DOI: 10.13327/j.jjlau.2007.06.011.
[15]	杨汉波, 曹广黎, 韩珊, 等. 核桃对炭疽病菌抗性相关的生理生化响应差异研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(4):463-470.
	YANG H B, CAO G L, HAN S, et al. Study on the difference in physiological and biochemical response of walnut (Juglans spp.) to anthracnose resistance[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2020, 38(4):463-470.DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2020.04.012.
[16]	ALI S, KHAN A S, ANJUM M A, et al. Effect of postharvest oxalic acid application on enzymatic browning and quality of lotus (Nelumbo nucifera Gaertn.) root slices[J]. Food Chem, 2020, 312:126051.DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126051.
[17]	朱学明, 史祥鹏, 雍道敬, 等. 内生放线菌A-1诱导苹果对炭疽叶枯病的抗性[J]. 植物生理学报, 2015, 51(6):949-954.
	ZHU X M, SHI X P, YONG D J, et al. Induction of resistance against Glomerella cingulata in apple by endophytic actinomycetes strain A-1[J]. Plant Physiol J, 2015, 51(6):949-954.DOI: 10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.0129.
[18]	王莎莎, 盛业龙, 马文广, 等. 抗氧化系统参与不同抗性烟草品种幼苗对干旱和低温综合抗性的形成[J]. 生物技术通报, 2014(1):132-142.
	WANG S S, SHENG Y L, MA W G, et al. Involvement of antioxidant defense system in drought and chilling comprehensive resistance formation in different resistant varieties of tobacco seedlings[J]. Biotechnol Bull, 2014(1):132-142.DOI: 10.13560/j.cnki.biotech.bull.1985.2014.01.025.
[19]	刘杜玲, 张博勇, 孙红梅, 等. 早实核桃不同品种抗寒性综合评价[J]. 园艺学报, 2015, 34(3):967-974.
	LIU D L, ZHANG B Y, SUN H M, et al. Comprehensive evaluation on cold resistance of early fruiting walnut cultivars[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2015, 34(3):967-974.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2014-0917.
[20]	张燕梅, 李栋梁, 李俊峰, 等. 烟草疫霉侵染后剑麻H.11648叶片细胞超微结构和防御酶活性研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(6):1161-1165.
	ZHANG Y M, LI D L, LI J F, et al. Changes in ultrastructure and activities of defense-related enzymes in leaves of sisal H.11648 after Phytophthora nicotianae Breda infection[J]. Chin J Trop Crops, 2018, 39(6):1161-1165.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2018.06.018.
[21]	MAGBANUA Z V, DE MORAES C M, BROOKS T D, et al. Is ca-talase activity one of the factors associated with maize resistance to Aspergillus flavus?[J]. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2007, 20(6):697-706.DOI: 10.1094/MPMI-20-6-0697.
[22]	YANG H, LUO P G. Changes in photosynthesis could provide important insight into the interaction between wheat and fungal pathogens[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(16):8865.DOI: 10.3390/ijms22168865.
[23]	MOHSENZADEH S, MALBOOBI M A, RAZAVI K, et al. Physiological and molecular responses of Aeluropus lagopoides (Poaceae) to water deficit[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2006, 56(3):314-322.DOI: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.03.008.
[24]	BERGER S, SINHA A K, ROITSCH T. Plant physiology meets phytopathology:plant primary metabolism and plant-pathogen interactions[J]. J Exp Bot, 2007, 58(15/16):4019-4026.DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erm298.
[25]	KRETSCHMER M, DAMOO D, DJAMEI A, et al. Chloroplasts and plant immunity:where are the fungal effectors?[J]. Pathogens, 2019, 9(1):19.DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9010019.
[26]	马迎莉, 高雨, 袁婷婷, 等. 重金属铬胁迫对髯毛箬竹光合特性的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 43(1):54-60.
	MA Y L, GAO Y, YUAN T T, et al. Effects of heavy metal chromium stress on the photosynthetic characteristics of Indocalamus barbatus McClure[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2019, 43(1):54-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201712013.
[27]	STEWART J D, ZINE EL ABIDINE A, BERNIER P Y. Stomatal and mesophyll limitations of photosynthesis in black spruce seedlings during multiple cycles of drought[J]. Tree Physiol, 1995, 15(1):57-64.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/15.1.57.
[28]	FARQUHAR G D, SHARKEY T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis[J]. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33:317-345.DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pp.33.060182.001533.
[29]	WAHID A, GELANI S, ASHRAF M, et al. Heat tolerance in plants:an overview[J]. Environ Exp Bot, 2007, 61(3):199-223.

Related Articles 15

[1]	SONG Zejun, LI Peipei, YUAN Lanfang, GUO Xiaolan, WANG Delu. Effects of soil water content on leaf physiology and fruit quality of blueberry [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 147-156.
[2]	CHEN Juyan, DENG Lunxiu, LI He, LONG Haiyan, XU Chaoran. Effects of shading on growth, development and physiology of two golden camellia species origined in Guizhou Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 83-90.
[3]	WANG Rui, CHEN Longsheng, WANG Xiangnan, TANG Wei, PENG Yinghe, ZHANG Zhen, LI Anliang, CHEN Yongzhong. Effects of different proportion of nitrogen forms on the growth and physiological characteristics of Camellia oleifera seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(04): 26-32.
[4]	LU Lu, ZHANG Jingbo, CHEN Jinhui, ZHOU Yanwei, CHENG Tielong. Drought resistance analysis of Nitraria billardieri seedlings [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(06): 51-55.
[5]	YAN Shaopeng, YANG Ruihua, WANG Qiuyu. Physiological influence of low temperature stress on hybrid clones of Populus tremula×P.tremuloides [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(06): 161-164.
[6]	LI Yuanyuan，YANG Guang，WEI Rui，SUN Yanshuang，GUO Yuhua, ZHANG Ruiping，LIU Guifeng*. TabZIP transferred Betula platyphylla generation and salt tolerance analysis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(05): 6-12.
[7]	LIU Yilin, WAN Fuxu, LOU Xiaorui. Effects of salt stress on physiological and biochemical index of ten provenances of Cupressus lusitanica [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2013, 37(04): 29-33.
[8]	WANG Shufeng, SUN Haijing, CHEN Yitai, YUAN Yuan. Analysis of physiological indexes of Quercus virginiana under drought stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2011, 35(06): 6-10.
[9]	LI Naiwei, SHU Xiaochun, ZHANG Mingxia, XIA Bing, PENG Feng*. Effects of soil moisture on taxol content and related physiological indexes of Taxus media cv. Hicksii [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2011, 35(03): 14-.
[10]	MO Zhaozhan1, CAO Fuliang2, OU Zulan2. Effects of lanthanum nitrate on growth of Dendrobium fimbriatum tube seedling [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2009, 33(04): 158-161.
[11]	YANG Feng1,2, HU Jing-jiang1* , LI Jian-long1*, WU Wei-jing3. Effects of chitosan on some physiological indices of apple seedlings under drought stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2008, 32(06): 61-64.
[12]	XIA Shang-guang1, ZHANG Jin-chi1, LIANG Shu-ying1,2. Relationship between drought resistance and physiological change of three elm trees seedling under water stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2008, 32(03): 131-134.
[13]	ZAI Xue-ming1,3, WU Guo-rong1, QIN Pei1, WANG Guang1. Effects of Ca2+ on Heat Tolerance of Peanut Seedling [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2006, 30(03): 47-50.
[14]	WAN Jin1,2, SHI Lei1*, ZHANG Jin-zheng1, TANG Geng-guo2. Effects of Salt Stress on Some Physiological Indexes in Iris Leaves [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2006, 30(01): 57-60.
[15]	. A Study on the Physiological Indexes of Droughtresistance to Seedlings of Seven Afforestation Tree Species in the South of China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 1999, 23(04): 13-16.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

繁殖方式 propagation methods	楸树品种 varieties	发病率/% incidence rate	感病指数/% disease infected index	抗病评价 resistance evaluation
组培 tissue culture	JSQ	16.67	8.58±0.54 c	高抗
	QZ	70.37	62.04±0.80 a	高感
	YQ	68.96	61.76±0.66 a	高感
	LQ-Z	60.00	44.49±0.50 b	中抗
扦插 cutting	LQ-Q	28.00	9.51±0.64 c	高抗
	Q5-8	55.00	41.36±0.74 a	中抗
	Q8-1	44.00	38.36±0.79 b	中抗

相关因子 correlation factors	CAT	SOD	POD	Pro	SS	SP	REC	Chla	Chlb	Ci	Gs	Pn	Tr
CAT	1
SOD	0.662^**	1
POD	0.711^**	0.647^**	1
Pro	-0.040	-0.324	0.002	1
SS	0.461^*	0.298	0.605^**	0.340	1
SP	0.555^**	0.403^*	0.381^*	0.107	0.280	1
REC	-0.267	-0.578^**	-0.252	0.104	-0.184	-0.050	1
Chla	0.398^*	0.487^**	0.253	-0.384^*	0.097	0.512^**	-0.122	1
Chlb	0.391^*	0.496^**	0.253	-0.329	0.175	0.549^**	-0.104	0.952^**	1
Ci	0.155	0.281	0.194	0.128	0.221	0.256	-0.351	-0.115	0.003	1
Gs	0.273	0.451^*	0.021	-0.194	-0.160	0.560^**	-0.427^*	0.572^**	0.585^**	0.160	1
Pn	0.227	0.365	-0.102	-0.200	-0.228	0.411^*	-0.358	0.643^**	0.606^**	-0.136	0.879^**	1
Tr	0.213	0.433^*	0.060	-0.315	-0.132	0.309	-0.377^*	0.540^**	0.549^**	0.016	0.755^**	0.735^**	1

相关因子 correlation factors	因子载荷load
相关因子 correlation factors	1	2	3	4
CAT	0.822	-0.149	0.382	0.013
SOD	0.817	-0.207	0.411	-0.064
POD	0.802	-0.373	-0.247	0.287
Pro	0.779	0.328	-0.196	-0.344
SS	0.745	-0.524	-0.086	0.212
SP	0.726	-0.403	-0.198	0.017
REC	0.673	0.221	0.221	0.493
Chla	0.643	0.539	0.148	-0.078
Chlb	0.203	0.797	0.161	0.102
Ci	0.457	0.745	0.133	-0.249
Gs	-0.475	-0.150	0.727	0.176
Pn	0.169	0.420	-0.575	0.228
Tr	-0.309	0.392	-0.041	0.753
特征值eigenvalue	5.142	2.630	1.436	1.221
贡献率/% contribution rate	39.556	30.229	11.048	9.392
累计贡献率/% cumulative contribution rate	39.556	69.785	80.833	90.225

品种 species	各因子得分 score of each factor				综合得分 compre- hensive score	排序 sorting
品种 species	1	2	3	4	综合得分 compre- hensive score	排序 sorting
JSQ	0.991	1.645	1.196	-0.269	0.831	2
QZ	-1.964	-0.894	0.907	0.338	-0.827	6
YQ	-2.654	-0.434	0.325	0.663	-1.041	7
LQ-Z	0.795	-1.330	-0.567	0.596	0.040	4
LQ-Q	2.683	-0.538	-0.603	0.443	0.929	1
Q5-8	-0.048	-0.111	-1.174	-0.152	-0.185	5
Q8-1	0.198	1.663	-0.085	-1.619	0.253	3

Differences in resistance of Catalpa bungei cultivars to stem rot

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 18

References 29

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer