Phylogenetic analysis of Sorbus ser. Folgnerianae (Rosaceae)

MA Jianhui, CHEN Xin, GENG Liyang, TANG Chenqian, WEI Xueyan

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4) : 25-36.

PDF(11845 KB)
南京林业大学学报（自然科学版）
PDF(11845 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (4) : 25-36. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205003

Phylogenetic analysis of Sorbus ser. Folgnerianae (Rosaceae)

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】To test whether Sorbus ser. Folgnerianae is a monophyletic group and to reconstruct the phylogenetic relationship among three species, S. dunnii, S. folgneri and S. hemsleyi.【Method】Morphological characteristics of leaves, flowers and fruits of Ser. Folgnerianae species were compared through specimen examination and field observation. Phylogenetic relationships within Ser. Folgnerianae were analyzed based on the comparison of the plastid genomes, repeat sequences, sequence variations of the five plastid genomes newly sequenced including three Ser. Folgnerianae species and S. megalocarpa from Sect. Aria, together with other plastid genomes available in this genus, using representatives of related genera in Rosaceae and Barbeya oleoides (Barbeyaceae) as the outgroups.【Result】Species of Ser. Folgnerianae can be easily distinguished from each other in the number of styles, color of anthers, fruit morphology and the persistence of calyx. Plastid genomes of five samples have a similar structure, gene content and organization. This sizes of plastid genomes range from 159 898 to 160 755 bp, with the GC contain range between 36.4% and 36.6%. All plastid genomes contain 113 unique genes (79 protein-coding genes, 30 tRNA genes and four ribosomal RNA genes). The IR region has two pseudogenes, rps19Ψand ycf1Ψ, with different extension lengths. 48-54 simple sequence repeats (SSRs), 36-49 long repeats sequences (LRSs) and 20 highly variable regions in the noncoding regions are identified as the most promising potentially variable makers for population genetics, species delimitation and phylogenetic studies. Phylogenetic analyses under ML/BI indicated that Sorbus is polyphyletic and the six sections within it are all monophyletic. Although, three sampled species of Ser. Folgnerianae are clustered in one group, S. Alnifolia of Ser. Alnifolia is more closely related to S. dunnii and S. folgneri than S. hemsleyi.【Conclusion】Sorbus ser. Folgnerianae is not monophyletic. Morphological characteristics and plastid genome analysis are effective in understanding the phylogenetic relationship in Ser. Folgnerianae.

Key words

Sorbus / morphology / plastid genome / phylogeny

Cite this article

EndNote

Ris (Procite)

Bibtex

Download Citations
MA Jianhui , CHEN Xin , GENG Liyang , et al . Phylogenetic analysis of Sorbus ser. Folgnerianae (Rosaceae)[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(4): 25-36 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202205003

References

List( Publishing order | Descend order by publishing year | Descend order by cited within ) Chart analysis
[1]
俞德浚, 陆玲娣. 绣线菊属, 牛筋条属, 栒子属, 花楸属, 木瓜海棠属中国植物志第36卷[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1974:283-344.
YU D J, LU L D. Spiraea, Dichotomanthes, Cotoneaster, Sorbus, Chaenomeles. Flora Republicae Popularis, Sinica:Vol. 36[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1974:283-344.
Cited in this article [1]
[2]
KAI K, TU L J, SUN H J, et al. Extraction and purification of anthocyanins from Sorbus pohuashanensis fruits[J]. Curr Top Nutraceutical Res, 2020, 18(4):319-324.DOI: 10.37290/ctnr2641-452x.18:319-324.
Cited in this article [1]
[3]
LU L T, SPONGBERG S A. Sorbus Linnaeus[M]// WU Z Y, RAVEN P H, HONG D Y. Flora of China: Vol. 9. Beijing: Science Press, 2003:144-170.
Cited in this article [1]
[4]
PHIPPS J B, ROBERTSON K R, SMITH P G, et al. A checklist of the subfamily maloideae (Rosaceae)[J]. Can J Bot, 1990, 68(10):2209-2269.DOI: 10.1139/b90-288.
Cited in this article [3]
[5]
DON G. A General history of the dichlamydeous plants:Vol.2[M]. London: J G and F Rivington, 1832: 875. https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/340686.
https://biodiversitylibrary.org/page/340686
Cited in this article [1]
[6]
GABRIELIAN E. The genus Sorbus L. in western Asia and the Himalayas[M]. Yerevan: Academy of Sciences of the Armenian SSR, 1978:264+62.
Cited in this article [3]
[7]
ALDASORO J J, AEDO C, GARMENDIA F M, et al. Revision of Sorbus subgenera Aria and Torminaria (Rosaceae-maloideae)[J]. Syst Bot Monogr, 2004, 69:1.DOI: 10.2307/25027918.
Cited in this article [3]
[8]
DECAISNE M J. Mémoirs sur la famille des Pomacées[J]. Nouv arch Mus hist nat, 1874, 10:113-192.
Cited in this article [1]
[9]
SPANCH E. Histoire naturelle des végétaux: phanerogames Ⅱ[M]. Paris: Librairie Encyclopédique de Roret, 1834:1-160.
Cited in this article [1]
[10]
俞德浚, 关克俭. 中国蔷薇科植物分类之研究(一)[J]. 植物分类学报, 1963, 8(3):202-234.
YU D J, GUAN K J. Taxa nova Rosacearum sinicarum(Ⅰ)[J]. J Syst Evol, 1963, 8(3):202-234.
Cited in this article [3]
[11]
CAMPBELL C S, EVANS R C, MORGAN D R, et al. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae,Rosaceae):limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history[J]. Plant Syst Evol, 2007, 266:119-145.DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0545-y.
Cited in this article [2]
[12]
POTTER D, ERIKSSON T, EVANS R C, et al. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae[J]. Plant Syst Evol, 2007, 266:5-43.DOI: 10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9.
Cited in this article [2]
[13]
LO E Y Y, DONOGHUE M J. Expanded phylogenetic and dating analyses of the apples and their relatives (Pyreae,Rosaceae)[J]. Mol Phylogenetics Evol, 2012, 63(2):230-243.DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2011.10.005.
Cited in this article [1]
[14]
ZHANG S D, JIN J J, CHEN S Y, et al. Diversification of Rosaceae since the Late Cretaceous based on plastid phylogenomics[J]. New Phytol, 2017, 214(3):1355-1367.DOI: 10.1111/nph.14461.
Cited in this article [1]
[15]
LI M, OHI-TOMA T, GAO Y D, et al. Molecular phylogenetics and historical biogeography of Sorbus sensu stricto (Rosaceae)[J]. Mol Phylogenetics Evol, 2017, 111:76-86.DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2017.03.018.
Cited in this article [1]
[16]
LIU B B, HONG D Y, ZHOU S L, et al. Phylogenomic analyses of the Photinia complex support the recognition of a new genus Phippsiomeles and the resurrection of a redefined Stranvaesia in Maleae (Rosaceae)[J]. J Syst Evol, 2019, 57(6):678-694.DOI: 10.1111/jse.12542.
Cited in this article [1]
[17]
ULASZEWSKI B, JANKOWSKA-WRÓBLEWSKA S, SWILO K, et al. Phylogeny of maleae (Rosaceae) based on complete chloroplast genomes supports the distinction of Aria,Chamaemespilus and Torminalis as separate Genera,different from Sorbus sp.[J]. Plants (Basel), 2021, 10(11):2534.DOI: 10.3390/plants10112534.
Cited in this article [3]
[18]
汤晨茜, 仇志欣, 檀超, 等. 陕甘花楸叶绿体基因组及其与爪瓣花楸的系统关系[J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(3):641-654.
TANG C Q, QIU Z X, TAN C, et al. Sorbus koehneana(Rosaceae):its complete chloroplast genome and phylogenetic relationship with S.unguiculata[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2022, 49(3):641-654.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2021-0040.
Cited in this article [3]
[19]
HUANG H, SHI C, LIU Y, et al. Thirteen Camellia chloroplast genome sequences determined by high-throughput sequencing:genome structure and phylogenetic relationships[J]. BMC Evol Biol, 2014, 14:151.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-151.
Cited in this article [1]
[20]
BARRETT C F, BAKER W J, COMER J R, et al. Plastid genomes reveal support for deep phylogenetic relationships and extensive rate variation among palms and other commelinid monocots[J]. New Phytol, 2016, 209(2):855-870.DOI: 10.1111/nph.13617.
Cited in this article [1]
[21]
BROCK J R, MANDÁKOVÁ T, MCKAIN M, et al. Chloroplast phylogenomics in Camelina (Brassicaceae) reveals multiple origins of polyploid species and the maternal lineage of C.sativa[J]. Hortic Res, 2022, 9:uhab050.DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab050.
Cited in this article [1]
[22]
JIN J J, YU W B, YANG J B, et al. Get Organelle:a fast and versatile toolkit for accurate de novo assembly of organelle genomes[J]. Genome Biol, 2020, 21(1):241.DOI: 10.1186/s13059-020-02154-5.
Cited in this article [1]
[23]
WICK R R, SCHULTZ M B, ZOBEL J, et al. Bandage:interactive visualization of de novo genome assemblies[J]. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(20):3350-3352.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv383.
Cited in this article [1]
[24]
QU X J, MOORE M J, LI D Z, et al. PGA:a software package for rapid,accurate,and flexible batch annotation of plastomes[J]. Plant Methods, 2019, 15:50.DOI: 10.1186/s13007-019-0435-7.
Cited in this article [1]
[25]
KEARSE M, MOIR R, WILSON A, et al. Geneious basic:an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data[J]. Bioinformatics, 2012, 28(12):1647-1649.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199.
Cited in this article [1]
[26]
GREINER S, LEHWARK P, BOCK R. Organellar GenomeDRAW (OGDRAW) version 1.3.1:expanded toolkit for the graphical visualization of organellar genomes[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019, 47(W1):59-64.DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz238.
Cited in this article [1]
[27]
BEIER S, THIEL T, MÜNCH T, et al. MISA-web:a web server for microsatellite prediction[J]. Bioinformatics, 2017, 33(16):2583-2585.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx198.
Cited in this article [1]
[28]
KURTZ S, CHOUDHURI J V, OHLEBUSCH E, et al. REPuter:the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale[J]. Nucleic Acids Res, 2001, 29(22):4633-4642.DOI: 10.1093/nar/29.22.4633.
Cited in this article [1]
[29]
MAYOR C, BRUDNO M, SCHWARTZ J R, et al. VISTA:visualizing global DNA sequence alignments of arbitrary length[J]. Bioinformatics, 2000, 16(11):1046-1047.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/16.11.1046.
Cited in this article [1]
[30]
AMIRYOUSEFI A, HYVÖNEN J, POCZAI P. IRscope:an online program to visualize the junction sites of chloroplast genomes[J]. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(17):3030-3031.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty220.
Cited in this article [1]
[31]
KATOH K, STANDLEY D M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7:improvements in performance and usability[J]. Mol Biol Evol, 2013, 30(4):772-780.DOI: 10.1093/molbev/mst010.
Cited in this article [1]
[32]
STAMATAKIS A. RAxML version 8:a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies[J]. Bioinformatics, 2014, 30(9):1312-1313.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033.
Cited in this article [1]
[33]
POSADA D, CRANDALL K A. MODELTEST:testing the model of DNA substitution[J]. Bioinformatics, 1998, 14(9):817-818.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/14.9.817.
Cited in this article [1]
[34]
RONQUIST F, TESLENKO M, van der MARK P, et al. MrBayes 3.2:efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space[J]. Syst Biol, 2012, 61(3):539-542.DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029.
Cited in this article [1]
[35]
WANG Q, NIU Z Y, LI J B, et al. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of the Chinese endemic species Sorbus setschwanensis (Rosaceae) and its phylogenetic analysis[J]. Nord J Bot, 2020, 38(2):e02532.DOI: 10.1111/njb.02532.
Cited in this article [2]
[36]
李倩, 郭其强, 高超, 等. 贵州威宁红花油茶的叶绿体基因组特征分析[J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(4):779-787.
LI Q, GUO Q Q, GAO C, et al. Characterization of complete chloroplast genome of Camellia weiningensis in Weining,Guizhou Province[J]. Acta Hortic Sin, 2020, 47(4):779-787.DOI: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2019-0410.
Cited in this article [1]
[37]
赵儒楠, 褚晓洁, 刘维, 等. 鹅耳枥属树种叶绿体基因组结构及变异分析[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 45(2):25-34.
ZHAO R N, CHU X J, LIU W, et al. Structure and variation analyses of chloroplast genomes in Carpinus[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2021, 45(2):25-34.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202009007.
Cited in this article [1]
[38]
MENEZES A P A, RESENDE-MOREIRA L C, BUZATTI R S O, et al. Chloroplast genomes of Byrsonima species (Malpighiaceae):comparative analysis and screening of high divergence sequences[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1):2210.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-20189-4.
Cited in this article [1]
[39]
KIMURA T, IKETANI H, KOTOBUKI K, et al. Genetic characterization of pear varieties revealed by chloroplast DNA sequences[J]. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, 2003, 78(2):241-247.DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2003.11511612.
Cited in this article [1]
[40]
ROH M S, CHEONG E J, CHOI I Y, et al. Characterization of wild Prunus yedoensis analyzed by inter-simple sequence repeat and chloroplast DNA[J]. Sci Hortic, 2007, 114(2):121-128.DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2007.06.005.
Cited in this article [1]
[41]
YAZBEK M, OH S-H. Peaches and almonds:phylogeny of Prunus subg. amygdalus (Rosaceae) based on DNA sequences and morphology[J]. Plant Syst Evol, 2013, 299(8):1403-1418.DOI: 10.1007/s00606-013-0802-1.
Cited in this article [1]
[42]
THODE V A, LOHMANN L G. Comparative chloroplast genomics at low taxonomic levels:a case study using Amphilophium (Bignonieae,Bignoniaceae)[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2019, 10:796.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00796.
Cited in this article [1]
[43]
WANG Y H, WANG S, LIU Y L, et al. Chloroplast genome variation and phylogenetic relationships of Atractylodes species[J]. BMC Genomics, 2021, 22(1):103.DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07394-8.
Cited in this article [1]
[44]
SUN J H, SHI S, LI J L, et al. Phylogeny of maleae (Rosaceae) based on multiple chloroplast regions:implications to genera circumscription[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2018, 2018:7627191.DOI: 10.1155/2018/7627191.
Cited in this article [1]
[45]
LI Q Y, GUO W, LIAO W B, et al. Generic limits of Pyrinae:insights from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences[J]. Bot Stud, 2012, 53(1):151-164.
Cited in this article [1]
[46]
QIU J, CHEN L, YI X G, et al. The complete chloroplast genome of Sorbus folgneri (C.K.Schneid.) Rehder (Rosaceae)[J]. Mitochondrial DNA B, 2019, 4(1):728-729.DOI: 10.1080/23802359.2018.1558127.
Cited in this article [1]
PDF(11845 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail
Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

Author

Reader

Reviewer

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

/

〈 〉