Niche and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous plants in the outer Qinhuai River,Nanjing City

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206025

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 203-210.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202206025

Previous Articles Next Articles

Niche and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous plants in the outer Qinhuai River,Nanjing City

LI Yuhan(), DING Yanfen(), ZHANG Changwei

College of Landscape Architecture, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2022-06-18 Revised:2023-02-01 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Exploring the ecological niche, interspecific association and community stability of dominant herbaceous plants in the Outer Qinhuai River will provide a theoretical basis and practical reference for the ecological restoration of vegetation and the construction of a river ecological corridor. 【Method】Based on community survey data, niche width, niche overlap, and niche similarity were used to analyze niche characteristics, total association analysis, χ² test, interspecific association coefficient (AC) value, common occurrence percentage (PC) value, Pearson’s correlation coefficient test, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test were used to analyze the characteristics of interspecific. 【Result】(1) A total of 124 species of herbaceous plants were identified in this survey. The niche width of Rumex acetosa was the largest. (2) The overall correlation among the dominant herbaceous species in the Outer Qinhuai River showed no significant positive association. (3) The χ²test, Pearson’s correlation coefficient test, and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient test showed that most species pairs were not significantly correlated and the correlation among species was weak. (4) The 18 pairs showed AC value ≥0.6 and five pairs showed PC value ≥0.7, indicating that the association between dominant species was weak. (5) M. Gordon’s stability analysis indicated that the coordinates of the intersection point and stable point deviated significantly, and the community was in an unstable state. 【Conclusion】Dominant species of herbaceous plant communities in the outer Qinhuai River, Nanjing City show a wide difference in niche. The overall correlation among the dominant herbaceous species did not show a significant positive association. The interspecific structure was loose, species independence was strong, and the community was in an unstable succession stage. To improve community stability, it is necessary to strengthen the ecological restoration of the Qinhuai River basin.

Key words: the outer Qinhuai River, importance value, niche width, niche overlap, population, interspecific association, community stability, Nanjing City

CLC Number:

Q948.1
S718

LI Yuhan, DING Yanfen, ZHANG Changwei. Niche and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous plants in the outer Qinhuai River,Nanjing City[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 203-210.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

Niche overlap index (left diagonal) and niche similarity index (right diagonal) of dominant plants in the outer Nanjing Qinhuai River"

植物编号 No.	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16	17	18	19	20
1		0.31	0.10	0.32	0.00	0.00	0.14	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.05	0.00	0.21	0.08	0.02	0.00	0.14	0.16	0.07	0.00
2	0.32		0.30	0.37	0.23	0.20	0.35	0.20	0.12	0.39	0.28	0.00	0.39	0.22	0.11	0.08	0.27	0.36	0.39	0.21
3	0.08	0.28		0.31	0.27	0.10	0.29	0.08	0.56	0.21	0.55	0.10	0.27	0.34	0.51	0.50	0.79	0.14	0.65	0.50
4	0.22	0.51	0.99		0.24	0.29	0.33	0.16	0.13	0.35	0.26	0.13	0.64	0.39	0.07	0.06	0.28	0.21	0.34	0.25
5	0.00	0.21	0.68	0.13		0.37	0.43	0.29	0.25	0.33	0.32	0.39	0.12	0.11	0.20	0.14	0.24	0.22	0.34	0.25
6	0.00	0.39	0.43	0.34	0.56		0.17	0.57	0.12	0.55	0.10	0.27	0.18	0.12	0.03	0.00	0.05	0.42	0.21	0.10
7	0.08	0.38	0.76	0.37	0.49	0.21		0.17	0.17	0.25	0.20	0.25	0.48	0.21	0.24	0.11	0.26	0.46	0.19	0.17
8	0.00	0.36	0.52	0.24	0.41	0.81	0.21		0.10	0.40	0.10	0.00	0.18	0.00	0.03	0.00	0.04	0.18	0.20	0.09
9	0.00	0.08	0.88	0.05	0.22	0.10	0.17	0.10		0.27	0.39	0.07	0.06	0.18	0.56	0.71	0.47	0.07	0.50	0.60
10	0.00	0.45	0.56	0.24	0.28	0.54	0.31	0.35	0.42		0.19	0.12	0.26	0.19	0.16	0.11	0.14	0.33	0.37	0.21
11	0.06	0.28	0.80	0.14	0.32	0.08	0.18	0.10	0.33	0.17		0.14	0.22	0.32	0.38	0.43	0.50	0.09	0.62	0.48
12	0.00	0.00	0.65	0.19	0.67	0.31	0.59	0.00	0.25	0.23	0.49		0.26	0.12	0.14	0.07	0.07	0.27	0.03	0.08
13	0.12	0.46	0.90	0.65	0.10	0.17	0.70	0.16	0.08	0.28	0.36	0.30		0.30	0.11	0.04	0.27	0.21	0.27	0.07
14	0.05	0.21	0.89	0.34	0.08	0.12	0.20	0.00	0.45	0.15	0.54	0.10	0.29		0.29	0.32	0.33	0.12	0.29	0.15
15	0.02	0.09	0.85	0.03	0.19	0.04	0.23	0.02	0.77	0.15	0.47	0.14	0.12	0.34		0.72	0.51	0.15	0.37	0.37
16	0.00	0.08	0.85	0.03	0.13	0.00	0.11	0.00	0.90	0.11	0.47	0.07	0.04	0.39	0.82		0.48	0.06	0.47	0.55
17	0.12	0.28	0.99	0.22	0.13	0.03	0.25	0.05	0.51	0.11	0.51	0.07	0.26	0.28	0.44	0.50		0.17	0.56	0.45
18	0.19	0.64	0.51	0.18	0.26	0.49	0.77	0.12	0.23	0.45	0.18	0.28	0.28	0.11	0.29	0.15	0.42		0.07	0.09
19	0.05	0.33	0.77	0.23	0.23	0.18	0.19	0.19	0.43	0.34	0.59	0.03	0.21	0.25	0.28	0.42	0.64	0.06		0.62
20	0.00	0.18	0.71	0.05	0.22	0.08	0.17	0.10	0.66	0.20	0.60	0.07	0.04	0.17	0.28	0.6	0.54	0.12	0.89

Table 2

Fig. 1

Table 3

Fig. 2

Fig.3

References 31

[1]	贾呈鑫卓, 李帅锋, 苏建荣, 等. 择伐对思茅松天然林乔木种间与种内关系的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(12):1296-1306.
	JIA C X Z, LI S F, SU J R, et al. Effects of selective logging on inter- and intra-specific interactions of trees in a natural Pinus kesiya forest[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(12):1296-1306.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00124.
[2]	李帅锋, 刘万德, 苏建荣, 等. 滇西北云南红豆杉群落物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 植物科学学报, 2012, 30(6):568-576.
	LI S F, LIU W D, SU J R, et al. Niche and interspecific association of species of Taxus yunnanensis communities in northwest Yunnan Province[J]. Plant Sci J, 2012, 30(6):568-576.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1142.2012.60568.
[3]	张琳, 陆兆华, 唐思易, 等. 露天煤矿排土场边坡植被组成特征及其群落稳定性评价[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(14):5764-5774.
	ZHANG L, LU Z H, TANG S Y, et al. Slope vegetation characteristics and community stability at different restoration years of open-pit coal mine waste dump[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(14):5764-5774.DOI:10.5846/stxb202007312000.
[4]	江焕, 张辉, 龙文兴, 等. 金钟藤入侵群落的种间联结及生态位特征[J]. 生物多样性, 2019, 27(4):388-399.
	JIANG H, ZHANG H, LONG W X, et al. Interspecific associations and niche characteristics of communities invaded by Decalobanthus boisianus[J]. Biodivers Sci, 2019, 27(4):388-399.DOI:10.17520/biods.2019007.
[5]	董静瑞, 水柏年, 胡成业, 等. 温州南部沿岸海域主要鱼类的生态位及种间联结性[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(5):1699-1706.
	DONG J R, SHUI B N, HU C Y, et al. Niche and interspecific association of the dominant fish in the south coastal waters of Wenzhou,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(5):1699-1706.DOI:10.13287/j.1001-9332.201705.028.
[6]	GLEASON H A. The individualistic concept of the plant association[J]. Bull Torrey Bot Club, 1926, 53(1):7.DOI:10.2307/2479933.
[7]	MACARTHUR R. Fluctuations of animal populations and a measure of community stability[J]. Ecology, 1955, 36(3):533.DOI:10.2307/1929601.
[8]	王加国, 李苇洁, 张红军, 等. 贵州百里杜鹃景区植物群落多样性与稳定性研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2020(2):120-125.
	WANG J G, LI W J, ZHANG H J, et al. Study on the diversity and stability of plant communities in Baili Rhododendron scenic area in Guizhou Province[J]. For Resour Manag, 2020(2):120-125.DOI:10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2020.02.018.
[9]	THEVATHASAN N V, GORDON A M. Ecology of tree intercropping systems in the north temperate region:experiences from southern Ontario,Canada[J]. Agrofor Syst, 2004, 61(1):257-268.DOI:10.1023/B:AGFO.0000029003.00933.6d.
[10]	曹加杰, 张梦凡. 基于语义分析法的城市滨水景观质量评价研究:以南京市秦淮河中华门段为例[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6):221-227.
	CAO J J, ZHANG M F. Evaluation of urban waterfront landscape quality based on semantic differential method:a case of Zhonghuamen section of Qinhuai River in Nanjing[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(6):221-227.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202009055.
[11]	石晓丹, 阮晓红, 吕学研. 南京外秦淮河河岸带原生植被初步调查[J]. 环境科学与管理, 2007, 32(3):84-88.
	SHI X D, RUAN X H, LV X Y. An preliminary study on the original vegetation in riparian zone of Qinhuai River in Nanjing[J]. Environ Sci Manag, 2007, 32(3):84-88.
[12]	王晓丹, 田如男. 南京堇菜属植物资源及其园林应用前景分析[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2014, 33(4):38-42.
	WANG X D, TIAN R N. Plant resources and landscape application prospects of Viola in Nanjing[J]. Chin Wild Plant Resour, 2014, 33(4):38-42.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2014.04.012.
[13]	李涵, 丁彦芬, 蔡慧, 等. 南京紫金山野生草本花卉群落数量分类与排序[J]. 中国野生植物资源, 2019, 38(6):14-21,26.
	LI H, DING Y F, CAI H, et al. Quantitative classification and ordination of wild herbaceous flower communities in Zijin Mountain,Nanjing[J]. Chin Wild Plant Resour, 2019, 38(6):14-21,26.DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9690.2019.06.003.
[14]	刘润红, 陈乐, 涂洪润, 等. 桂林岩溶石山青冈群落灌木层主要物种生态位与种间联结[J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(6):2057-2071.
	LIU R H, CHEN L, TU H R, et al. Niche and interspecific association of main species in shrub layer of Cyclobalanopsis glauca community in Karst hills of Guilin,southwest China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2020, 40(6):2057-2071.DOI:10.5846/stxb201904090689.
[15]	SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations,with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3):998-1005.DOI:10.2307/1938071.
[16]	刘瑞雪, 陈龙清. 水淹干扰对水库水滨带植物群落稳定性与种间关系的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(3):6566-6579.
	LIU R X, CHEN L Q. Effect of flooding disturbance on plant community stability and interspecific relationship in the riparian zone of reservoir[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(3):6566-6579.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201908011629.
[17]	郭佳琦, 陈俊辰, 黄旬, 等. 喜旱莲子草入侵群落主要物种生态位和种间联结研究[J]. 生态环境学报, 2021, 30(8):1607-1616.
	GUO J Q, CHEN J C, HUANG X, et al. Niche characteristics and interspecific associations of the dominant species of the communities invaded by Alternanthera philoxeroides[J]. Ecol Environ Sci, 2021, 30(8):1607-1616.DOI:10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2021.08.007.
[18]	张鹏, 王新杰, 凌威, 等. 北京鹫峰地区侧柏人工林草本层物种多样性及主要种种间关系研究[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 45(4):86-93.
	ZHANG P, WANG X J, LING W, et al. Plant diversity and interspecific relationship of main herb species in Platycladus orientalis plantation in Jiufeng Mountain,Beijing[J]. J Northwest A & F Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2017, 45(4):86-93.DOI:10.13207/j.cnki.jnwafu.2017.04.013.
[19]	徐满厚, 刘敏, 翟大彤, 等. 植物种间联结研究内容与方法评述[J]. 生态学报, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233.
	XU M H, LIU M, ZHAI D T, et al. A review of contents and methods used to analyze various aspects of plant interspecific associations[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2016, 36(24):8224-8233.DOI:10.5846/stxb201505311092.
[20]	郑元润. 森林群落稳定性研究方法初探[J]. 林业科学, 2000, 36(5):28-32.
	ZHENG Y R. Comparison of methods for studying stability of forest community[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2000, 36(5):28-32.DOI:10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2000.05.005.
[21]	何建源, 荣海, 吴焰玉, 等. 武夷山南方铁杉群落乔木层种间联结研究[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2010, 30(2):169-173.
	HE J Y, RONG H, WU Y Y, et al. Study on interspecific association of main populations in arborous layer of a Tsuga tchekiangensis community in Wuyishan National Nature Reserve of Fujian Province[J]. J Fujian Coll For, 2010, 30(2):169-173.DOI:10.13324/j.cnki.jfcf.2010.02.003.
[22]	俞筱押, 余瑞, 黄娟, 等. 贵州茂兰喀斯特森林四药门花群落优势种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(12):3470-3478.
	YU X Y, YU R, HUANG J, et al. Niche characteristics of dominant plant populations of Loropetalum subcordatum community in Maolan Karst forest,Guizhou[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2017, 36(12):3470-3478.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.201712.017.
[23]	李一凡, 甘先华, 张卫强, 等. 深圳市盐田区森林群落优势种生态位特征[J]. 中国水土保持科学, 2020, 18(5):144-151.
	LI Y F, GAN X H, ZHANG W Q, et al. Niche characteristics of dominant species in the forest community in Yantian District of Shenzhen City[J]. Sci Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 18(5):144-151.DOI:10.16843/j.sswc.2020.05.018.
[24]	尹才佳, 马龙, 朱大海, 等. 地震滑坡体自然恢复后次生植物群落物种组成及生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8):1525-1534.
	YIN C J, MA L, ZHU D H, et al. Species composition and niche characteristics of secondary plant communities on regenerated landslides after earthquake[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2022, 41(8):1525-1534.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.202208.010.
[25]	何忠伟, 胡仁传, 黄日波, 等. 广西银杉林主要树种种群生态位分析[J]. 林业科学研究, 2012, 25(6):761-766.
	HE Z W, HU R C, HUANG R B, et al. Niche of the major tree species populations in Cathaya argyrophylla forest in Guangxi[J]. For Res, 2012, 25(6):761-766.DOI:10.13275/j.cnki.lykxyj.2012.06.017.
[26]	铁军, 李燕芬, 金山, 等. 山西历山国家级自然保护区猕猴栖息地优势树种生态位特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3):634-641.
	TIE J, LI Y F, JIN S, et al. Niche characteristics of dominant tree species in Macaca mulatta habitat of Lishan National Nature Reserve,Shanxi[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2015, 34(3):634-641.DOI:10.13292/j.1000-4890.2015.0087.
[27]	赵阳, 曹家豪, 李波, 等. 洮河自然保护区大峪沟林区紫果云杉群落木本植物种群生态位特征[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(5):1865-1875.
	ZHAO Y, CAO J H, LI B, et al. Niche of woody plant populations of Picea purpurea community in Dayugou forest area,Taohe Nature Reserve,Gansu Province[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(5):1865-1875.
[28]	陈玉凯, 杨琦, 莫燕妮, 等. 海南岛霸王岭国家重点保护植物的生态位研究[J]. 植物生态学报, 2014, 38(6):576-584.
	CHEN Y K, YANG Q, MO Y N, et al. A study on the niches of the state’s key protected plants in Bawangling,Hainan Island[J]. Chin J Plant Ecol, 2014, 38(6):576-584.DOI:10.3724/SP.J.1258.2014.00053.
[29]	陈艳瑞, 尹林克. 人工防风固沙林演替中群落组成和优势种群生态位变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(5)1126-1133.
	CHEN Y R, YIN L K. Community composition and niche change characteristics of dominant species in the wind-breaking and sand-fixing forest,Xinjiang,China[J]. J Plant Ecol, 2008, 32(5):1126-1133.
[30]	陈龙涛, 石晓东, 高润梅. 山西陵川南方红豆杉群落种间联结与生态位特征研究[J]. 植物科学学报, 2016, 34(4): 521-529.
	CHEN L T, SHI X D, GAO R M. Interspecific association and niche characteristics of Taxus chinensis var. mairei communities in Lingchuan,Shanxi[J]. Plant Sci J, 2016, 34(4): 521-529. DOI: 10.11913/PSJ.2095-0837.2016.40521.
[31]	薛媛媛, 栾兆擎, 史丹, 等. 东北三江平原地区水位梯度对湿地植被群落生态特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(6): 39-47.
	XUE Y Y, LUAN Z Q, SHI D, et al. The influences of the hydraulic gradient on the ecological characteristics of wetland vegetation communities in Sanjiang Plain,northeast China[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(6): 39-47.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201912002.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

编号 No.	物种 species	重要值/% importance value	生态位宽度 niche width
编号 No.	物种 species	重要值/% importance value	Levins 生态位宽度 (B_L)	Shannon 生态位宽度 (B_S)
1	芦苇Phragmites australis	4.24	1.77	0.63
2	愉悦蓼Polygonum jucunda	2.97	6.96	2.01
3	酸模Rumex acetosa	2.22	18.54	3.00
4	钻叶紫菀Symphyotrichum subulatum	2.22	4.56	1.73
5	一年蓬Erigeron annuus	2.12	5.44	1.86
6	乌蔹莓Causonis japonica	2.11	3.76	1.35
7	龙葵Solanum nigrum	1.98	6.88	1.94
8	爵床Justicia procumbens	1.94	2.64	1.03
9	黄鹌菜Youngia japonica	1.90	11.15	2.58
10	狗尾草Setaria viridis	1.84	6.19	1.88
11	野豌豆Vicia sepium	1.83	11.38	2.59
12	牛膝Achyranthes bidentata	1.81	2.96	1.09
13	无芒稗Echinochloa crus-galli var. mitis	1.74	5.24	1.72
14	鸢尾Iris tectorum	1.73	6.04	1.87
15	鹅肠菜Stellaria aquatica	1.72	9.44	2.41
16	猪殃殃Galium spurium	1.72	10.34	2.48
17	蛇床Cnidium monnieri	1.68	14.89	2.75
18	藜Chenopodium album	1.68	4.43	1.55
19	野老鹳草Geranium carolinianum	1.67	15.88	2.86
20	阿拉伯婆婆纳Veronica persica	1.65	10.59	2.54

Niche and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous plants in the outer Qinhuai River,Nanjing City

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 31

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

检验方法 test methods	正联结(种对)positive association				负联结(种对)negative association
检验方法 test methods	极显著 distinctly significant (P<0.01)	显著 significant (P<0.05)	不显著 no significant (P>0.05)	合计 sum	极显著 distinctly significant (P<0.01)	显著 significant (P<0.05)	不显著 no significant (P>0.05)	合计 sum
χ²检验 χ² test	2	1	91	94	0	3	93	96
Pearson相关 Pearson’s correlation	15	13	58	86	21	20	63	104
Spearman秩相关 Spearman’s rank correlation	31	19	42	92	35	10	53	98

[1]	ZHU Yunfeng, WANG Hong, QIN Shuhong, YANG Yi, WANG Yicong. Research on the cooling effect of parks in Nanjing based on multi-source data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 285-294.
[2]	CHEN Ming, LIU Liang. Study on the effect of urban topsoil sampling interval on the variation pattern of magnetic susceptibility of soil profile [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 61-69.
[3]	XU Zhen, LI Mingke, CHEN Yan, ZHOU Zhenqi. Assessing the cycling catchment of large parks with online maps: a case study of Nanjing City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 219-226.
[4]	DA Ting, LI Yan, G Mathias Kondolf. Research on social connectivity of urban waterfront park based on place attachment [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 227-235.
[5]	LUO Qianqian, LI Fengqing, XIAO Deqing, DENG Zhangwen, WANG Jianhua, ZHOU Zhichun. Mating system analyses of two natural populations of Taxus wallichiana var. mairei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 80-86.
[6]	ZOU Pengjun, GUAN Qingwei, YUAN Zaixiang, GU Yuqing, WU Qian, NIU Yingying, CHEN Xia, JIN Xuemei. The population structure and dynamics of Liquidambar formosana on the southeast foothill of Zijin Mountain, Nanjing City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 157-163.
[7]	ZHANG Jinguang, SONG Anqi, XIA Tianyu, ZHAO Bing. Evaluating the urban park green space exposure from the perspective of the community life circle [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 191-198.
[8]	LI Hui, HAO Dejun, XU Tian, DAI Lulu. The effects of heat stress on herbivorous insects: an overview and future directions [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 215-224.
[9]	YE Daiquan. Performances and selections on a 12-year-old full-sib progeny testing from one of the candidate population for the 4th generation Chinese fir breeding [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(6): 240-250.
[10]	WANG Lei, YE Jianren, SHI Lina. A study on the use of saprophytic nematodes to accelerate the replacement of Bursaphelenchus xylophilus in infected trees [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 36-44.
[11]	LYU Feng, XIE Xiaoman, HAN Biao, LU Yizeng, WANG Lei, DONG Xin, WANG Yan, LU Lu, LIU Li, ZONG Shaoning, LI Wenqing. Genetic diversity analyses of Quercus acutissima based on SSR markers [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 109-116.
[12]	GE Dapeng, REN Yuan, ZHAO Jun, WANG Yuting, LIU Xueqing, YUAN Zhaohe. Genetic diversity among wild populations of pomegranate in Tibet by SSR analyses [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 127-133.
[13]	FEI Wenjun, ZHAO Mengqin. Construction of Nanjing green infrastructure network based on MSPA [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 50-56.
[14]	WANG Chunhui, CHEN Xin, WANG Benzhong, XU Zhanhong. Population structure and dynamics of Reevesia pubescens var. xuefengensis in the Gaowangjie National Nature Reserve of Hunan Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(3): 57-64.
[15]	XU Jingyuan, SHENG Qianqian, WANG Weixi, LIU Congzhe, ZHU Zunling. Modeling the degree of coupling relationship between plant community diversity and soil properties on typical urban roads in Nanjing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(6): 119-126.