Income effect and heterogeneity analysis of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural households’ land

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208064

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 272-280.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202208064

Previous Articles Next Articles

Income effect and heterogeneity analysis of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural households’ land

FU Tianqin(), JI Xing, ZHANG Hongxiao()

College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2022-08-29 Revised:2022-10-10 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】At the current stage of exploring how to achieve common prosperity, it is of great significance to analyze whether the flow of industrial and commercial capital into farmers’ land effectively increases farmers’ income, and whether its income effect is heterogeneous.【Method】Based on the theoretical analysis of the heterogeneity of the income increase of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural areas to farmers’ land, and the heterogeneity of the income increase effect, the income effect and heterogeneity of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural land from rural areas to rural areas were empirically analyzed by using the unbalanced panel data from China Labor Force Dynamics Survey(CLDS) from 2014,2016,2018 and using a two-way fixed effect model.【Result】The inflow of industrial and commercial capital into farmers’ land has a significant income effect, which can increase farmers’ income and optimize the income structure of farmers. The flow of industrial and commercial capital into rural areas to farmers’ land has a stronger effect on the income of low-income farmers than on high-income farmers. The flow of industrial and commercial capital into the land of peasant households in the countryside has a weaker effect on the income of peasant households in the eastern region than on the income of peasant households in the central and western regions.【Conclusion】Inflow of industrial and commercial capital to the countryside has different effects on increasing the income of farmers in the eastern and western regions and high and low-income households. Therefore, relevant departments can issue relevant classification policies on the basis of protecting the rights and interests of farmers to promote industrial and commercial capital to go to the countryside. Better drive farmers to increase their income.

Key words: industrial and commercial capital to the countryside, farmer income, land transfer, fixed effects model, quantile method

CLC Number:

F323.8

FU Tianqin, JI Xing, ZHANG Hongxiao. Income effect and heterogeneity analysis of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural households’ land[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 272-280.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

References 28

[1]	高晓燕, 任坤. 工商资本下乡对农民收入的影响[J]. 江汉论坛, 2020(7):31-38.
	GAO X Y, REN K. Influence of industrial and commercial capital going to the countryside on farmers’ income[J]. Jianghan Tribune, 2020(7):31-38. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-854X.2020.07.005.
[2]	冯娟. 工商资本参与乡村振兴的内涵与路径[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(5):1-9.
	FENG J. The connotation and path of industrial and commercial capital participating in rural revitalization[J]. J Northwest A&F Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2021, 21(5):1-9.DOI: 10.13968/j.cnki.1009-9107.2021.05.01.
[3]	孟祥丹, 丁宝寅. “资本下乡”后留守妇女的生计变迁及其对性别关系的影响[J]. 中国农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 37(4):124-133.
	MENG X D, DING B Y. The changes of livelihoods of left-behind women after “capital penetration into agriculture” and its impact on gender relations[J]. J China Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2020, 37(4):124-133.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2563.2015.05.002.
[4]	杨洁莹, 张京祥. 基于法团主义视角的“资本下乡”利益格局检视与治理策略:江西省婺源县H村的实证研究[J]. 国际城市规划, 2020, 35(5):98-105.
	YANG J Y, ZHANG J X. Rethinking capital in rural governance from a corporatism perspective:empirical research in village H Jiangxi Province[J]. Urban Plan Int, 2020, 35(5):98-105. DOI: 10.19830/j.upi.2019.158.
[5]	陈义媛. 资本下乡的社会困境与化解策略:资本对村庄社会资源的动员[J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(8):128-144.
	CHEN Y Y. Social dilemma of capital going to the countryside and its solution strategies: mobilization of village social resources by capital[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2019(8):128-144.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2016.05.007.
[6]	胡新艳, 陈文晖, 罗必良. 资本下乡如何能够带动农户经营:基于江西省绿能模式的分析[J]. 农业经济问题, 2021(1):69-81.
	HU X Y, CHEN W H, LUO B L. How can capital going to the countryside drive farmers to operate: based on the analysis of green energy model in Jiangxi Province[J]. Issues Agric Econ, 2021(1):69-81.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-2938.2018.03.012.
[7]	陈柏峰, 孙明扬. 资本下乡规模经营中的农民土地权益保障[J]. 湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 37(3):42-50,2
	CHEN B F, SUN M Y. Protecting the land rights of farmers in large-scale operations of capital to the countryside[J]. J Hubei Univ Natl (Philos Soc Sci), 2019, 37(3):42-50,2.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-941X.2019.03.007.
[8]	望超凡. 资本下乡的行政逻辑:表现形式、形成机制与实践影响[J]. 农林经济管理学报, 2022, 21(1):103-110.
	WANG C F. Administrative logic of capital going to countryside:manifestation,formation mechanism and practical consequences[J]. J Agro For Econ Manag, 2022, 21(1):103-110.
[9]	何毅. 资本下乡与经营“脱嵌”[J]. 南京农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2021, 21(3):118-126.
	HE Y. Capital to the countryside and“de-embedding”of operation[J]. J Nanjing Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2021, 21(3):118-126. DOI: 10.19714/j.cnki.1671-7465.2021.0043.
[10]	张义博. 工商资本下乡的用地问题研究[J]. 宏观经济管理, 2019(4):53-59.
	ZHANG Y B. Research on land use of industrial and commercial capital in rural areas[J]. Macroecon Manag, 2019(4):53-59.DOI: 10.19709/j.cnki.11-3199/f.2019.04.012.
[11]	丁建军, 吴学兵, 余海鹏. 资本下乡:村庄再造与共同体瓦解——湖北荆门W村调查[J]. 地方财政研究, 2021(2):98-105.
	DING J J, WU X B, YU H P. Capital goes to the countryside:village reconstruction and community disintegration:a survey of W village in Jingmen,Hubei Province[J]. Sub Natl Fiscal Res, 2021(2):98-105.
[12]	都阳, 朴之水. 迁移与减贫:来自农户调查的经验证据[J]. 中国人口科学, 2003(4):56-62.
	DU Y, PIAO Z S. Migration and poverty reduction:empirical evidence from rural household survey[J]. Chin J Popul Sci, 2003(4):56-62.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7881.2003.04.013.
[13]	郭君平, 曲颂, 夏英, 等. 农村土地流转的收入分配效应[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2018, 28(5):160-169
	GUO J P, QU S, XIA Y, et al. Research on income distributive effects of farmland circulation[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2018, 28(5):160-169.DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20180124.
[14]	刘魏, 张应良, 李国珍, 等. 工商资本下乡、要素配置与农业生产效率[J]. 农业技术经济, 2018(9):4-19.
	LIU W, ZHANG Y L, LI G Z, et al. Industrial and commercial capital going to the countryside,factor allocation and agricultural production efficiency[J]. J Agrotech Econ, 2018(9):4-19.DOI: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdsk.2015.04.006.
[15]	邵帅, 范美婷, 杨莉莉. 资源产业依赖如何影响经济发展效率?——有条件资源诅咒假说的检验及解释[J]. 管理世界, 2013(2):32-63.
	SHAO S, FAN M T, YANG L L. How resource industry dependence affects economic development efficiency?Testing and interpretation of conditional resource curse hypothesis[J]. Manag World, 2013(2):32-63. DOI: 10.19744/j.cnki.11-1235/f.2013.02.005.
[16]	任晓娜, 孟庆国. 工商资本进入农村土地市场的机制和问题研究:安徽省大岗村土地流转模式的调查[J]. 河南大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 55(5):53-60
	REN X N, MENG Q G. Mechanism and trap study of business capital into the rural land market:a survey from dagang village government-led model in Anhui Province[J]. J Henan Univ (Soc Sci), 2015, 55(5):53-60.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-2382.2013.08.007.
[17]	李兰冰, 姚彦青, 张志强. 农村劳动力跨部门流动能否缩小中国地区收入差距?[J]. 南开经济研究, 2020(4):127-143.
	LI L B, YAO Y Q, ZHANG Z Q. Can cross-departmental mobility of rural labor force narrow the income gap in China?[J]. Nankai Econ Stud, 2020(4):127-143.DOI: 10.14116/j.nkes.2020.04.007.
[18]	杜鑫. 当前中国农村居民收入及收入分配状况:兼论各粮食功能区域农村居民收入水平及收入差距[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(7):84-99.
	DU X. Current income and income distribution of rural residents in China: also on the income level and income gap of rural residents in various grain functional areas[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2021(7):84-99.DOI: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2017.0054.
[19]	徐章星, 张兵, 尹鸿飞, 等. 工商资本下乡促进了农地流转吗?——来自CLDS的经验证据[J]. 农业现代化研究, 2020, 41(1):144-153.
	XU Z X, ZHANG B, YIN H F, et al. Does industrial and commercial capital go to the countryside promote the circulation of agricultural land? Empirical evidence from CLDS[J]. Agricultural Modernization Research, 2020, 41(1): 144-153. DOI: 10.13872/j.1000-0275.2019.0103.
[20]	江光辉, 胡浩. 工商资本下乡会导致农户农地利用 “非粮化” 吗?来自CLDS的经验证据[J]. 财贸研究, 2021, 32(3):41-51.
	JIANG G H, HU H. Will industrial and commercial capitals investing in agriculture lead to “non-grain” use of farmers’ Land?Empirical evidence from the CLDS data[J]. Finance Trade Res, 2021, 32(3):41-51.DOI: 10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2021.03.004.
[21]	陈飞, 翟伟娟. 农户行为视角下农地流转诱因及其福利效应研究[J]. 经济研究, 2015, 50(10):163-177.
	CHEN F, ZHAI W J. Study on the inducement and welfare effect of farmland transfer from the perspective of farmers’ behavior[J]. Econ Res J, 2015, 50(10):163-177.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8158.2007.05.009.
[22]	许彩华, 余劲. “三权分置” 背景下土地流转的收入效应分析:基于粮食主产区3省10县的农户调查[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(1):18-27,162.
	XU C H, YU J. Analysis on the income effect of land circulation under the background of “Separation of Three Powers”Based on the survey of farmers in 10 counties of 3 major grain producing areas[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2020(1):18-27, 162.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2020.01.003.
[23]	张珩, 罗剑朝, 王磊玲. 农地经营权抵押贷款对农户收入的影响及模式差异:实证与解释水[J]. 中国农村经济, 2018(9):79-93.
	ZHANG H, LUO J C, WANG L L. The impact of mortgage loan of farmland management right on farmers’ income and the mode difference:empirical analysis and explanation of water[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2018(9):79-93.DOI: 10.19337/j.cnki.34-1093/f.2017.07.003.
[24]	徐翠萍, 史清华, WANG H. 税费改革对农户收入增长的影响:实证与解释——以长三角15村跟踪观察农户为例[J]. 中国农村经济, 2009(2):22-33.
	XU C P, SHI Q H, WANG H. The impact of tax and fee reform on farmer’s income growth:evidence and explanation: taking the follow-up and observation of farmers in 15 villages in the Yangtze River Delta as an example[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2009(2):22-33.
[25]	KOENKER W, BASSETT G. Regression quantile[J]. Econometrica, 1978, 46(1): 33-50.
[26]	杨丹, 王晓丽, 唐羽. 农业补贴、农户增收与收入不平等[J]. 华中农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2020(5):60-70,171.
	YANG D, WANG X L, TANG Y. Agricultural subsidies,farmers’ income increase and income inequality[J]. J Huazhong Agric Univ (Soc Sci Ed), 2020(5):60-70, 171.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnwkxb.2020.05.007.
[27]	邱子迅, 周亚虹. 电子商务对农村家庭增收作用的机制分析:基于需求与供给有效对接的微观检验[J]. 中国农村经济, 2021(4):36-52.
	QIU Z X, ZHOU Y H. Mechanism analysis of the effect of E-commerce on rural households’ income increase:based on the micro-test of the effective docking of demand and supply[J]. Chin Rural Econ, 2021(4):36-52.DOI: 10.12062/cpre.20170348.
[28]	张乐柱, 许兰壮, 伍茜蓉. 正规信贷约束对农户收入影响的异质性研究[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2022, 38(5):63-71.
	ZHANG L Z, XU L Z, WU Q R. Heterogeneity research of the effect of formal credit constraints on farmers’ income[J]. Rev Econ Manag, 2022, 38(5):63-71.DOI: 10.13962/j.cnki.37-1486/f.2022.05.005.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

变量名 variable	变量说明 variable description	均值 mean	标准差 SD	样本量 sample size
工商资本下乡urban capital inflow	农户所在村存在工商资本下乡流入农户土地=1,不存在=0	0.45	0.49	19 199
总收入gross income	家庭人均总收入,取对数	8.20	2.23	20 687
工资性收入wage income	家庭人均工资性收入,取对数	4.14	4.45	20 847
农业经营性收入agricultural income	家庭人均农业经营性收入,取对数	4.17	3.91	20 848
非农经营性收入non-farm income	家庭人均非农经营性收入,取对数	0.99	2.80	20 845
财产性收入rent income	家庭人均财产性收入,取对数	0.46	1.80	20 858
年龄age	主事者年龄/岁	55.19	12.78	20 603
受教育程度educational level	主事者受教育年限/a	2.57	1.23	20 631
健康状况health status	1~5等分分别为非常不健康—非常健康	2.48	1.04	20 760
经营土地面积inland area for farming	家庭经营土地面积/km²	1.13	8.57	19 176
劳动力数labour force	家庭劳动力数/人	3.11	1.74	20 872
家庭负担family burden	家庭老人和小孩数除以劳动力数	0.65	0.73	19 212
居住户数number of households	村庄居住户数/户	756.55	810.31	20 808
村庄地势topography of a village	平原=1,丘陵=2,山区=3	1.80	0.83	19 128
距县城的距离distance from the county	村庄距县城的距离/km	27.26	23.96	19 669
村庄农用地面积agricultural land area of a village	村庄农业用地面积/km²	7.64	15.30	19 087
常住劳动力permanent labour force	村庄常住劳动力数/×10³人	1.37	2.36	19 142

分组 grouping	样本量 sample size	工商资本下乡 urban capital inflow	人均年收入/元 annual income per capita	同组占比/% proportion of the same group
东部eastern	4 227	是	14 280.38	55.32
	3 415	否	10 923.35	44.68
中部central	2 060	是	8 868.94	35.58
	3 729	否	7 943.22	64.42
西部westward	2 254	是	8 190.84	40.21
	3 352	否	6 379.12	59.79
高收入组 high-income	3 321	是	22 936.66	54.27
	2 798	否	21 940.76	46.73
中等收入组 middle-income	3 321	是	6 214.46	48.76
	3 489	否	6 012.44	51.24
低收入组 low-income	2 391	是	1 410.97	36.22
	4 209	否	1 397.73	63.78

项目 item	家庭总收入 gross income	农业经营收入 agricultural income	非农经营收入 non-farm income	工资收入 wage income	财产收入 rent income
工商资本下乡 urban capital inflow	0.182^***	0.257^**	0.227^***	0.400^***	0.140^***
	(0.058)	(0.102)	(0.080)	(0.140)	(0.054)
年龄age	-0.005	0.011	-0.001	-0.019^**	-0.005
	(0.004)	(0.007)	(0.005)	(0.009)	(0.004)
受教育程度educational level	0.081^**	0.086	0.024	0.121^*	0.022
	(0.032)	(0.059)	(0.051)	(0.073)	(0.031)
健康状况health status	-0.115^***	-0.062	-0.054	-0.012	0.011
	(0.030)	(0.049)	(0.036)	(0.062)	(0.024)
经营土地面积inland area for farming	0.003^***	0.211^**	0.002^***	0.001	0.401^***
	(0.023)	(0.006)	(0.001)	(0.003)	(0.010)
劳动力数labour force	-0.105^**	-0.225^***	-0.015	0.175^*	0.026
	(0.046)	(0.075)	(0.065)	(0.103)	(0.044)
家庭负担family burden	-0.217^***	-0.555^***	-0.069	-0.152	-0.013
	(0.068)	(0.106)	(0.078)	(0.133)	(0.048)
居住户数number of households	-0.001	-0.020	-0.064^**	-0.005^*	-0.002
	(0.002)	(0.026)	(0.005)	(0.008)	(0.070)
村庄地势topography of a village	-0.229^***	-0.329^***	-0.120	-0.065	-0.070
	(0.061)	(0.109)	(0.078)	(0.137)	(0.055)
距县城的距离distance from the county	0.005^**	0.003	0.006^**	0.015^***	-0.000
	(0.002)	(0.003)	(0.002)	(0.004)	(0.002)
村庄农用地面积agricaltural land area	-0.316^*	0.019	0.182^**	-0.061^*	0.026^**
	(0.023)	(0.005)	(0.010)	(0.003)	(0.001)
村庄常住劳动力permanent labour of village	-0.020	0.143	-0.011	-0.400^***	-0.038
	(0.054)	(0.092)	(0.078)	(0.123)	(0.046)
常数项constant terms	9.499^***	5.268^***	1.275^***	4.640^***	0.564^*
	(0.322)	(0.574)	(0.449)	(0.744)	(0.300)
有效样本valid samples	14 185	14 283	14 276	14 281	14 286
R²	0.020	0.018	0.011	0.014	0.017

项目 item	低收入组 low- income	中等收入组 median income	高收入组 high income
工商资本下乡 urban capital inflow	0.399^**	0.177^***	0.013^*
	(0.157)	(0.024)	(0.043)
年龄age	-0.012	0.002	-0.002
	(0.010)	(0.002)	(0.003)
受教育程度 educational level	-0.080	0.023	0.059^***
	(0.119)	(0.015)	(0.016)
健康状况health status	-0.067	-0.028^**	0.029
	(0.074)	(0.011)	(0.020)
经营土地面积 inland area for farming	-0.028	0.020	0.003
	(0.002)	(0.040)	(0.034)
劳动力数labour force	0.052	-0.024	-0.153^***
	(0.113)	(0.017)	(0.032)
家庭负担family burden	0.177	-0.090^***	-0.225^***
	(0.158)	(0.028)	(0.059)
居住户数 number of households	-0.005^*	0.010	-0.003
	(0.000)	(0.056)	(0.045)
村庄地势 topography of a village	-0.241	0.001	-0.061
	(0.201)	(0.023)	(0.041)
距县城的距离 distance from the county	0.004	0.002^**	0.002
	(0.005)	(0.001)	(0.001)
村庄农用地面积agricultural land area of avillage	0.040	-0.005	-0.004
	(0.042)	(0.058)	(0.021)
村庄常住劳动力 permanent labour of force	0.021	-0.010	-0.000
	(0.138)	(0.022)	(0.032)
常数项constant terms	7.738^***	8.633^***	10.273^***
	(0.978)	(0.134)	(0.183)
有效样本valid samples	4 667	4 961	4 557
R²	0.033	0.059	0.132

项目 item	西部 westward	中部 central	东部 eastern
工商资本下乡 urban capital inflow	0.316^***	0.213^*	0.001
	(0.083)	(0.119)	(0.121)
年龄age	-0.003	-0.005	-0.007
	(0.007)	(0.007)	(0.008)
受教育程度 educational level	0.008	0.190^***	0.059
	(0.040)	(0.073)	(0.050)
健康状况health status	-0.083^*	-0.178^***	-0.073
	(0.049)	(0.057)	(0.047)
经营土地面积 inland area for farming	0.018	0.006^**	0.005
	(0.028)	(0.047)	(0.018)
劳动力数labour force	-0.189^***	-0.150	-0.049
	(0.072)	(0.097)	(0.069)
家庭负担family burden	-0.179^*	-0.302^**	-0.271^**
	(0.096)	(0.129)	(0.128)
居住户数 number of households	0.004^**	-0.003	0.031
	(0.077)	(0.056)	(0.045)
村庄地势 topography of a village	-0.228^***	-0.257^**	-0.141
	(0.088)	(0.109)	(0.107)
距县城的距离 distance from the county	0.004	0.006^*	-0.002
	(0.003)	(0.003)	(0.004)
村庄农用地面积agricultural land area of a village	-0.042	-0.025	-0.020
	(0.030)	(0.032)	(0.043)
村庄常住劳动力 permanent labour of force	0.061	0.038	-0.010
	(0.096)	(0.110)	(0.098)
常数项constant terms	9.188^***	9.644^***	9.627^***
	(0.459)	(0.571)	(0.617)
有效样本valid samples	4 465	4 428	5 292
R²	0.028	0.029	0.026

Income effect and heterogeneity analysis of industrial and commercial capital flowing into rural households’ land

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 28

Related Articles 2

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

项目item	Q_0.10	Q_0.25	Q_0.50	Q_0.75	Q_0.90
工商资本下乡urban capital inflow	0.399^***	0.255^***	0.237^***	0.204^***	0.073^***
	(0.056)	(0.034)	(0.023)	(0.023)	(0.026)
常数项constant terms	10.01^***	10.12^***	10.15^***	10.19^***	10.63^***
	(0.163)	(0.105)	(0.076)	(0.071)	(0.076)
有效样本valid samples	14 185	14 185	14 185	14 185	14 185

[1]	ZHOU Lixia, CAI Zhijian, WANG Jie, QIN Xi. Impacts of risk aversion and social networks on the contract period of land transfer [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 217-223.
[2]	WANG Xiangyu, ZHANG Hongxiao, XU Jingwen, HE Wenjian. An impact of contracts and their duration on household income of farmers involved in land transfer [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 205-214.