Protection policy impacts on landscape pattern changes and ecosystem service value responses in Fuxian Lake basin

LI Sirong, SU Tongxiang

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 145-154.

PDF(4637 KB)
PDF(4637 KB)
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3) : 145-154. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209024

Protection policy impacts on landscape pattern changes and ecosystem service value responses in Fuxian Lake basin

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】 Changes in landscape patterns and ecosystem service values (ESVs) in the Fuxian Lake basin are affected by the “Four Retreats and Three Returns” protection policy. Quantitatively understanding such changes can provide a reference for the protection of watershed landscapes. 【Method】 Four sets of remote sensing images taken from 2006 to 2021 (before and after the implementation of the “Four Retreats and Three Returns” protection policy) were selected for landscape classification, and the land use dynamics, transfer matrix and landscape pattern indices were calculated. The ESVs were evaluated using the equivalent factor method and the SPSS software package was used to analyze the correlations between the ESVs in the watershed and the landscape pattern indices. 【Result】 The results indicated that the forested and water system areas in the Fuxian Lake basin were small, while the construction land area was expanding before the implementation of the “Four Retreats and Three Returns” protection policy. The landscape pattern was also complicated and fragmented, with weak connectivity and low ESVs. After the policy was implemented, the forested area increased significantly, the expansion of construction land slowed significantly, and the rate of water system reduction decreased. The degree of fragmentation of the landscape pattern also decreased and the connectivity was enhanced. The ESVs in the basin increased significantly. (2) The ESVs in the Fuxian Lake basin were connected with the landscape pattern, and the total basin ESV was significantly positively correlated with CONTAGE and negatively correlated with SHDI and SHEI. Among the individual ESVs, supply services were significantly negatively correlated with LPI, regulation and support services were significantly positively correlated with CONTAGE and significantly negatively correlated with SHDI and SHEI, and cultural services were significantly positively correlated with CONTAGE. 【Conclusion】 Future studies should focus on the mechanism behind these changes and provide a reference for the next step in protecting and managing the Fuxian Lake basin.

Key words

ecosystem service value(ESV) / landscape pattern / ‘Four Retreats and Three Refunds’ policy / Fuxian Lake basin of Yunnan Province

Cite this article

Download Citations
LI Sirong , SU Tongxiang. Protection policy impacts on landscape pattern changes and ecosystem service value responses in Fuxian Lake basin[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY. 2024, 48(3): 145-154 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202209024

References

[1]
郭玉静, 王妍, 郑毅, 等. 滇西北高原湖泊剑湖流域景观时空演变特征[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2018, 35(4):695-704.
GUO Y J, WANG Y, ZHENG Y, et al. Temporal and spatial evolution of landscapes in Jianhu Lake basin of northwestern Yunnan Province[J]. J Zhejiang A & F Univ, 2018, 35(4):695-704.DOI: 10.11833/j.issn.2095-0756.2018.04.015.
[2]
谢高地, 张彩霞, 张雷明, 等. 基于单位面积价值当量因子的生态系统服务价值化方法改进[J]. 自然资源学报, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.
XIE G D, ZHANG C X, ZHANG L M, et al. Improvement of the evaluation method for ecosystem service value based on per unit area[J]. J Nat Resour, 2015, 30(8):1243-1254.DOI: 10.11849/zrzyxb.2015.08.001.
[3]
柳迪子, 杜守帅, 王晨旭. 旅游型乡村景观格局变化及生态系统服务价值响应:以江苏省无锡市太湖国家旅游度假区为例[J]. 水土保持通报, 2021, 41(5):264-275,286.
LIU D Z, DU S S, WANG C X. Landscape pattern change and its response to ecosystem services value in a rural tourism area:a case study at Taihu National Tourism Resort in Wuxi City of Jiangsu Province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 41(5):264-275,286.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2021.05.035.
[4]
朱颖, 王杉, 冯育青. 近30年太湖流域湿地生态系统服务价值对景观格局变化的响应:基于“退田还湖”工程的实施[J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(1):88-93.
ZHU Y, WANG S, FENG Y Q. Response of the value of wetland ecosystem service in Taihu basin to the change of landscape pattern in the past 30 years:based on the implementation of the Project of Restoring the Lake from the Land[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2022, 38(1):88-93.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2022.01.0088.
[5]
樊凯, 张建生, 裴文娟, 等. 云南省三大高原湖泊流域土地利用景观格局及其稳定性分析[J]. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31(8):1706-1711.
FAN K, ZHANG J S, PEI W J, et al. Land use landscape pattern and stability analysis of three plateau major lake basins in Yunnan Province[J]. Southwest China J Agric Sci, 2018, 31(8):1706-1711.DOI: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2018.8.026.
[6]
马小霞. 新时代中国高原湖泊流域保护治理的几点思考[J]. 中国国土资源经济, 2021, 34(7):14-19.
MA X X. Thoughts on the protection and management of plateau lake basin in new era in China[J]. Nat Resour Econ China, 2021, 34(7):14-19.DOI: 10.19676/j.cnki.1672-6995.000641.
[7]
鲁宏旺, 胡文敏, 佘济云, 等. 生态退杨对洞庭湖湿地景观格局变化影响研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(3): 171-178.
LU H W, HU W M, SHE J Y, et al. Study on the influence of Ecological Poplar Withdrawal on the landscape pattern of Dongting Lake wetland[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(3): 171-178.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201904008.
[8]
陈文波, 肖笃宁, 李秀珍. 景观指数分类、应用及构建研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(1):121-125.
CHEN W B, XIAO D N, LI X Z. Classification,application,and creation of landscape indices[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2002, 13(1):121-125.
[9]
MÜNCH Z. Global and local patterns of landscape change accuracy[J]. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens, 2020, 161:264-277.DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.01.027.
[10]
DADASHPOOR H, AZIZI P, MOGHADASI M. Land use change,urbanization,and change in landscape pattern in a metropolitan area[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2019, 655:707-719.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.267.
[11]
杨婉清, 杨鹏, 孙晓, 等. 北京市景观格局演变及其对多种生态系统服务的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(16):6487-6498.
YANG W Q, YANG P, SUN X, et al. Changes of landscape pattern and its impacts on multiple ecosystem services in Beijing[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(16):6487-6498.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202107272042.
[12]
王双, 刘永强. 浙江省土地景观格局演变及其生态服务价值效应分析[J]. 上海国土资源, 2021, 42(3):63-70.
WANG S, LIU Y Q. Analysis of the evolution of land use landscape pattern and value effect of ecological services in Zhejiang Province[J]. Shanghai Land & Resources, 2021, 42(3):63-70.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1329.2021.03.012.
[13]
王圳峰, 王欣珂, 谢香群, 等. 基于GWR模型的福建省绿色空间景观格局演变影响因素及其空间差异[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2022, 37(5):242-250.
WANG Z F, WANG X K, XIE X Q, et al. Evolution of landscape pattern of green space in Fujian Province:influencing factors and spatial differences based on GWR model[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2022, 37(5):242-250.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2022.05.35.
[14]
王春晓, 黄舒语, 苗菁, 等. 珠三角基塘景观格局演变特征及驱动因素研究:以佛山顺德区为例[J]. 中国园林, 2022, 38(6):75-80.
WANG C X, HUANG S Y, MIAO J, et al. Characteristics and driving factors of landscape pattern evolution of dike-ponds in the Pearl River delta:a case study of Shunde District,Foshan[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2022, 38(6):75-80.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2022.06.0075.
[15]
HASSAN R M, SCHOLES R, ASH N. Ecosystems and human well-being[M]. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2005.
[16]
COSTANZA R, D’ARGE R, DE GROOT R, et al. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital[J]. Ecol Econ, 1998, 25(1):3-15.DOI: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2.
[17]
DAILY G C. Nature's services:societal dependence on natural ecosystems[M]. Washington,DC: Island Press, 1997.
[18]
侯鹏, 高吉喜, 陈妍, 等. 中国生态保护政策发展历程及其演进特征[J]. 生态学报, 2021, 41(4):1656-1667.
HOU P, GAO J X, CHEN Y, et al. Development process and characteristics of China’s ecological protection policy[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2021, 41(4):1656-1667.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202002260345.
[19]
林琰, 董加云. 森林生态保护政策中多元利益共生的实现路径[J]. 林业经济问题, 2021, 41(3):271-277.
LIN Y, DONG J Y. The path to realize the symbiosis of multiple benefits in the policy of forest ecological protection[J]. News For Econ, 2021, 41(3):271-277.DOI: 10.16832/j.cnki.1005-9709.20200161.
[20]
牛远, 胡小贞, 王琳杰, 等. 抚仙湖流域山水林田湖草生态保护修复思路与实践[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2019, 9(5):482-490.
NIU Y, HU X Z, WANG L J, et al. Ideas and practice of ecological protection and restoration of mountain-river-forest-farmland-lake-grassland system in Lake Fuxian basin[J]. J Environ Eng Technol, 2019, 9(5):482-490.DOI: 10.12153/j.issn.1674-991X.2019.08.010.
[21]
尹娟, 资本飞, 阳利永, 等. 抚仙湖流域生态用地时空演变及其驱动因素[J]. 水土保持通报, 2020, 40(6):228-235,331.
YIN J, ZI B F, YANG L Y, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of ecological land use in Fuxian Lake basin[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 40(6):228-235,331.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2020.06.033.
[22]
赵筱青, 李思楠, 谭琨, 等. 基于功能空间分类的抚仙湖流域“3类空间”时空格局变化[J]. 水土保持研究, 2019, 26(4):299-305,313.
ZHAO X Q, LI S N, TAN K, et al. Spatial-temporal pattern change of Town-agriculture-ecological space in Fuxian Lake basin based on functional space classification[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 26(4):299-305,313.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2019.04.045.
[23]
李思楠, 赵筱青, 谭琨, 等. 基于GIS的抚仙湖流域土地利用时空变化研究[J]. 人民长江, 2019, 50(6):63-69,87.
LI S N, ZHAO X Q, TAN K, et al. Spatial-temporal change of land use in Fuxian Lake basin based on GIS from 2005 to 2015[J]. Yangtze River, 2019, 50(6):63-69,87.DOI: 10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2019.06.013.
[24]
李石华, 周峻松, 王金亮. 1974—2014年抚仙湖流域土地利用/覆盖时空变化与驱动力分析[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2017, 29(4):132-139.
LI S H, ZHOU J S, WANG J L. Spatio-temporal LUCC and driving force in Fuxian Lake watershed from 1974 to 2014[J]. Remote Sens Land Resour, 2017, 29(4):132-139.DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2017.04.20.
[25]
刘娇, 张超, 余哲修, 等. 基于Landsat影像的抚仙湖流域土地利用变化及预测研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报(自然科学), 2020, 40(3):131-138.
LIU J, ZHANG C, YU Z X, et al. Landsat images based simulations of land use change in Fuxian Lake basin[J]. J Southwest For Univ (Nat Sci), 2020, 40(3):131-138.
[26]
杨娅楠, 王金亮, 陈光杰, 等. 抚仙湖流域土地利用格局与水质变化关系[J]. 国土资源遥感, 2016, 28(1):159-165.
YANG Y N, WANG J L, CHEN G J, et al. Relationship between land use pattern and water quality change in Fuxian Lake basin[J]. Remote Sens Land Resour, 2016, 28(1):159-165.DOI: 10.6046/gtzyyg.2016.01.23.
[27]
赵筱青, 苗培培, 普军伟, 等. 抚仙湖流域土地利用变化及其生态系统生产总值影响[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(2):291-299.
ZHAO X Q, MIAO P P, PU J W, et al. Land use change and its impact on the gross ecosystem product in Fuxian Lake basin[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 27(2):291-299.DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.02.041.
[28]
孔维琳, 王余舟, 向伶, 等. 抚仙湖流域植被景观格局分析[J]. 云南大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(4):468-475.
KONG W L, WANG Y Z, XIANG L, et al. An analysis on the landscape pattern of the vegetation in Fuxian Lake basin in Yunnan[J]. J Yunnan Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2012, 34(4):468-475.
[29]
王秀兰, 包玉海. 土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J]. 地理科学进展, 1999, 18(1):81-87.
WANG X L, BAO Y H. Study on the methods of land use dynamic change research[J]. Prog Geogr, 1999, 18(1):81-87. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-6301.1999.01.012.
[30]
杨静, 庄家尧, 张金池. 基于RS和GIS的徐州市20年间土地利用变化研究[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 37(2): 85-91.
YANG J, ZHUANG J Y, ZHANG J C. Study on the change of land use in the Xuzhou city based on RS and GIS[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2013, 37(2): 85-91. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2013.02.015.
[31]
朱会义, 李秀彬. 关于区域土地利用变化指数模型方法的讨论[J]. 地理学报, 2003, 58(5):643-650.
ZHU H Y, LI X B. Discussion on the index method of regional land use change[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2003, 58(5):643-650.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2003.05.001.
[32]
岑晓腾. 土地利用景观格局与生态系统服务价值的关联分析及优化研究:以杭州湾南岸区域为例[D]. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2016.
CEN X T. Correlation analysis and optimization between land use landscape patterns and ecosystem service values[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang University, 2016.
[33]
谢高地, 鲁春霞, 冷允法, 等. 青藏高原生态资产的价值评估[J]. 自然资源学报, 2003, 18(2):189-196.
XIE G D, LU C X, LENG Y F, et al. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. J Nat Resour, 2003, 18(2):189-196.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2003.02.010.
[34]
王朋冲, 于强, 裴燕如, 等. 翁牛特旗景观格局尺度效应分析[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(5):223-231,181.
WANG P C, YU Q, PEI Y R, et al. Scale effect analysis of landscape pattern in Wengniute Banner[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Mach, 2020, 51(5):223-231,181.DOI: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2020.05.025.
PDF(4637 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/