Simulation and prediction of habitat quality in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202211025

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2024, Vol. 48 ›› Issue (3): 135-144.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202211025

Special Issue: 自然保护地体系下景观设计理论与实践研究

Previous Articles Next Articles

Simulation and prediction of habitat quality in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve

ZHANG Ying(), WANG Ranghui^*(), LIU Chunwei, ZHOU Limin

School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, 210044, China

Received:2022-11-18 Revised:2023-03-27 Online:2024-05-30 Published:2024-06-14

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 To explore the potential problems and conflicts of habitat quality in the Qilianshan Nature Reserve as per future land use changes; to respond to the regional ecological environmental protection policy per the concept of “Mountain, Water, Forest, Field, Lake, Grass, and Sand”, and to provide a scientific basis for regional ecological management and sustainable development. 【Method】 Based on five phases of land use data from 2000 to 2020, the PLUS model was used to simulate land use under different scenarios in the future through 2030. The InVEST model was coupled to assess and predict the current and future habitat quality of the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve. 【Results】 Land use in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve was dominated by grassland, forest land, and unused land, and an increase in the area of ecological land. The increase in the area of ecological land under the ecological protection scenario was significantly higher than under the natural development scenario for 2030. Habitat quality showed a spatial distribution pattern of “low in the northwest and high in the southeast,” with the mean value of habitat quality from 2000 to 2020 as follows: 0.656 2, 0.656 3, 0.665 8, 0.664 6, and 0.665 7, respectively. This showed a fluctuating trend of increasing, decreasing, and increasing values. The average value of habitat quality in 2030 was 0.667 9 under the ecological protection scenario and 0.665 6 under the natural development scenario. The total habitat contribution under the ecological protection scenario was greater than that under the natural development scenario. The degree of habitat degradation increased and then decreased from 2000 to 2030, showed a spatial distribution from weak to strong circles from the center outwards, with the most degraded areas located at the edges of grassland adjacent to unused land—the areas most affected by human activities. 【Conclusion】 The habitat quality of the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve is developing in a positive direction; the habitat quality under the future ecological protection scenario is significantly better than that under the natural development scenario; strengthening the protection of ecological land such as woodland and grassland is conducive to the improvement of habitat quality.

Key words: habitat quality, land use, PLUS model, InVEST model, the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve

CLC Number:

S759.9
X826

ZHANG Ying, WANG Ranghui, LIU Chunwei, ZHOU Limin. Simulation and prediction of habitat quality in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(3): 135-144.

Figures/Tables 10

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Table 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

References 26

[1]	王建华, 田景汉, 吕宪国. 挠力河流域河流生境质量评价[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(2):481-486.
	WANG J H, TIAN J H, LYU X G. Assessment of stream habitat quality in Naoli River watershed,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(2):481-486.
[2]	钟莉娜, 王军. 基于InVEST模型评估土地整治对生境质量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(1):250-255.
	ZHONG L N, WANG J. Evaluation on effect of land consolidation on habitat quality based on InVEST model[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2017, 33(1):250-255.DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.01.034.
[3]	吴健生, 毛家颖, 林倩, 等. 基于生境质量的城市增长边界研究:以长三角地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37(1):28-36.
	WU J S, MAO J Y, LIN Q, et al. Urban growth boundary based on the evaluation of habitat quality:taking the Yangtze River delta as an example[J]. Sci Geogr Sin, 2017, 37(1):28-36.DOI: 10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.01.004.
[4]	郑宇, 张蓬涛, 汤峰, 等. 基于InVEST模型的昌黎县土地利用变化对生境质量的影响研究[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2018, 39(7):121-128.
	ZHENG Y, ZHANG P T, TANG F, et al. The effects of land use change on habitat quality in Changli County based on InVEST model[J]. Chin J Agric Resour Reg Plan, 2018, 39(7): 121-128.DOI: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20180718.
[5]	GOMES E, BANOS A, ABRANTES P, et al. Future land use changes in a peri-urban context:local stakeholder views[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2020, 718:137381.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137381.
[6]	HUANG W J, AN Y T, PAN Y, et al. Predicting transient particle transport in periodic ventilation using Markov chain model with pre-stored transition probabilities[J]. Build Environ, 2022, 211:108730.DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108730.
[7]	MOKARRAM M, PHAM T M. CA-Markov model application to predict crop yield using remote sensing indices[J]. Ecol Indic, 2022, 139:108952.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108952.
[8]	褚琳, 张欣然, 王天巍, 等. 基于CA-Markov和InVEST模型的城市景观格局与生境质量时空演变及预测[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(12):4106-4118.
	CHU L, ZHANG X R, WANG T W, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution and prediction of urban landscape pattern and habitat quality based on CA-Markov and InVEST model[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2018, 29(12):4106-4118.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.013.
[9]	VERBURG P H, SOEPBOER W, VELDKAMP A, et al. Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use:the CLUE-S model[J]. Environ Manage, 2002, 30(3):391-405.DOI: 10.1007/s00267-002-2630-x.
[10]	LIANG X, LIU X P, LI X, et al. Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2018, 177:47-63.DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016.
[11]	陈霆, 徐伟铭, 吴升, 等. 国土空间规划视角下的城镇开发边界划定和空间管控体系构建[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2022, 24(2):263-279.
	CHEN T, XU W M, WU S, et al. Delimitation of urban development boundary and construction of space control system from the perspective of territorial spatial planning[J]. J Geo Inf Sci, 2022, 24(2):263-279.DOI: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2022.210552.
[12]	LIANG X, GUAN Q F, CLARKE K C, et al. Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model:a case study in Wuhan,China[J]. Comput Environ Urban Syst, 2021, 85:101569.DOI: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569.
[13]	VAN HORNE B. Density as a misleading indicator of habitat quality[J]. J Wildl Manag, 1983, 47(4):893-901.DOI: 10.2307/3808148.
[14]	XU J, XIE G D, XIAO Y, et al. Dynamic analysis of ecological environment quality combined with water conservation changes in national key ecological function areas in China[J]. Sustainability, 2018, 10(4): 1202.DOI: 10.3390/su10041202.
[15]	徐洁, 谢高地, 肖玉, 等. 国家重点生态功能区生态环境质量变化动态分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(9):3039-3050.
	XU J, XIE G D, XIAO Y, et al. Dynamic analysis of ecological environmental quality changes in national key ecological function areas in China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(9):3039-3050.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201806011227.
[16]	王让会, 赵文斐, 彭擎, 等. 气候变化及景观格局与生态系统碳储存的耦合关系:以祁连山为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2022, 39(1):250-257.
	WANG R H, ZHAO W F, PENG Q, et al. The relationship of climate change and landscape pattern with ecosystem carbon storage:a case study from the Qilian Mountains[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2022, 39(1):250-257.DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2022.01.24.
[17]	LI C, WU Y M, GAO B P, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of ecosystem service value for optimization of land use in the Sichuan-Yunnan ecological barrier,China[J]. Ecol Indic, 2021, 132:108328.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108328.
[18]	AHMAD KURNIA A, RUSTIADI E, FAUZI A, et al. Understanding industrial land development on rural-urban land transformation of Jakarta megacity’s outer suburb[J]. Land, 2022, 11(5):670.DOI: 10.3390/land11050670.
[19]	张大川, 刘小平, 姚尧, 等. 基于随机森林CA的东莞市多类土地利用变化模拟[J]. 地理与地理信息科学, 2016, 32(5):29-36,127.
	ZHANG D C, LIU X P, YAO Y, et al. Simulating spatiotemporal change of multiple land use types in Dongguan by using random forest based on cellular automata[J]. Geogr Geo Inf Sci, 2016, 32(5):29-36,127.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-0504.2016.05.005.
[20]	PRASAD P, LOVESON V J, CHANDRA P, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the earth observing sensors in land cover/land use studies using machine learning algorithms[J]. Ecol Inform, 2022, 68:101522.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101522.
[21]	CHEN X, YU L, DU Z R, et al. Distribution of ecological restoration projects associated with land use and land cover change in China and their ecological impacts[J]. Sci Total Environ, 2022, 825:153938.DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153938.
[22]	XUE CL, ZHANG H Q, WU S M, et al. Spatial-temporal evolution of ecosystem services and its potential drivers:a geospatial perspective from Bairin Left Banner,China[J]. Ecol Indic, 2022, 137:108760.DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108760.
[23]	张学儒, 周杰, 李梦梅. 基于土地利用格局重建的区域生境质量时空变化分析[J]. 地理学报, 2020, 75(1):160-178.
	ZHANG X R, ZHOU J, LI M M. Analysis on spatial and temporal changes of regional habitat quality based on the spatial pattern reconstruction of land use[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2020, 75(1):160-178.DOI: 10.11821/dlxb202001012.
[24]	包玉斌, 刘康, 李婷, 等. 基于InVEST模型的土地利用变化对生境的影响:以陕西省黄河湿地自然保护区为例[J]. 干旱区研究, 2015, 32(3):622-629.
	BAO Y B, LIU K, LI T, et al. Effects of land use change on habitat based on InVEST model: taking Yellow River Wetland Nature Reserve in Shaanxi Province as an example[J]. Arid Zone Res, 2015, 32(3):622-629.DOI: 10.13866/j.azr.2015.03.29.
[25]	李潇, 杨加猛, 陈禹衡, 等. 基于土地利用变化的江苏盐城湿地自然保护区生境质量评估[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 46(5): 169-176.
	LI X, YANG JM, CHEN Y H, et al. Evaluations of habitat quality of Jiangsu Yancheng Wetland National Nature Rare Bird Reserve based on land use changes[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2022, 46(5): 169-176.DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202105002.
[26]	和娟, 师学义, 付扬军, 等. 汾河源头区域土地利用及生境质量时空演变的多情景模拟[J]. 水土保持研究, 2020, 27(5):250-258.
	HE J, SHI X Y, FU Y J, et al. Multi-scenario simulation of spatiotemporal evolution of land use and habitat quality in the source area of Fenhe River basin[J]. Res Soil Water Conserv, 2020, 27(5): 250-258. DOI: 10.13869/j.cnki.rswc.2020.05.033.

Related Articles 15

[1]	YANG Yuping, CHEN Caihong, SHE Jiyun, LIN Chuxuan, XIAO Fen, CHEN Chulin. Prediction of the spatiotemporal evolution of county habitat quality under multi-scenario simulation: a case of Taoyuan County [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 201-209.
[2]	LÜ Chengxiang, HU Xiuyan, WU Yang, YIN Qiqi, ZHANG Zhifei, QIN Wendong, WANG Junxiao, ZHOU Shenglu. Ecological optimization zoning and management based on the spatial coupling of supply and demand accessibility in Jintan District,Changzhou City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 210-216.
[3]	ZHAO Xiaoyu, WANG Yiming, HE Xu, LIU Xiaoyan, ZHANG Jiamin, DENG Yi, FENG Yao, CHU Lei, ZHANG Zengxin. Changing features of habitat quality in Wuxi City based on InVEST model [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(5): 165-172.
[4]	ZHAO Zhiqiang, FANG Hao, YUAN Qing, WU Yan. Research on the construction of ecological corridor habitat network in Songhua River [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 261-270.
[5]	ZHANG Jiamin, LIU Xiaoyan, DENG Yi, FENG Yao, ZHU Bin, CHU Lei, ZHANG Zengxin. Changing features and influencing factors of small and micro wetlands in Wuxi City [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(2): 27-36.
[6]	LUAN Chunfeng, GUO Xinran. Research on land use conflict identification from the perspective of ecological security pattern [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 156-164.
[7]	LIANG Zi’ao, WANG Xiangfu, WANG Weifeng, YAN Ke, LI Yuanhui, DONG Wenting, WANG Rongnü. Evaluation of soil conservation benefit of the Natural Forest Protection Project in Qinghai Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 181-188.
[8]	FAN Boqing, LIU Dongyun, WANG Siyuan, Muhammad·Amir·Siddique . Spatio-temporal evolution of surface temperature in urban green space: a case study within the Sixth Ring Road in Beijing [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 197-204.
[9]	LI Changai, LIU Ling, QIU Bing, NI Cunming, NING Lili, LI Yaliang, WANG Hui, LIU Xingyu, YANG Suhui. Spatial-temporal change and driving factors of land use/cover in Anhui Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(5): 213-223.
[10]	YANG Yuping, HU Wenmin, JIA Guanyu, LI Guo, LI Yi. Scenario simulation integrating the ANN-CA model with the InVEST model to investigate land-based carbon storage in the Dongting Lake area [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 175-184.
[11]	QI Liping, LUAN Zhaoqing, WEI Mian, YAN Dandan, LI Jingtai, YAO Xiuying, LIU Yao, XIE Siying, SHENG Yufeng. Spatial and temporal variations of ecosystem service values in Jiangsu Province based on land-use change [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(4): 200-208.
[12]	ZHU Zhihong, ZHOU Benzhi, WANG Yixiang, QI Jun, LI Aibo, HUANG Runxia. Spatio-temporal variations and influencing factors of water yield in the Thousand-Island Lake basin in the past 30 years [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(3): 111-119.
[13]	ZHANG Yucheng, HAN Nianlong, HU Ke, YU Miao, LI Xingqiang. The impact of land-use changes on the spatio-temporal variation of carbon storage in the central mountainous area of Hainan Island [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(2): 115-122.
[14]	LI Xiao, YANG Jiameng, CHEN Yuheng, MAO Lingfeng, GE Zhiwei. Evaluations of habitat quality of Jiangsu Yancheng Wetland National Nature Rare Bird Reserve based on land use changes [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 169-176.
[15]	XU Enyin, NIE Ying, RUI Xiaodong. Analysis on the forest land use efficiency changes based on forest resource inventory data [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(5): 213-220.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

数据类型 data type	数据名称 data name	因素 factor	分辨率 resolution	数据源 data source
基础数据basic data	土地利用数据	2000—2020年5期土地利用数据	30 m	中国科学院资源环境科学与数据中心
驱动因子 driving factor	气候和环境数据	气温	1 km	中国气象科学共享服务网
		降水量	1 km
		高程	30 m	地理空间数据云
		坡度	30 m
		到河流的距离		全国地理信息资源目录服务系统
		土壤类型	1 km	中国科学院资源与环境数据中心
	社会经济数据	GDP	1 km
		人口	1 km
		到道路的距离		全国地理信息资源目录服务系统

用地类型 land use type	自然发展情景natural development scenario						生态保护情景ecological protection scenario
用地类型 land use type	耕地 CL	林地 FL	草地 GL	水域 WA	建设用地 ConL	未利用地 UL	耕地 CL	林地 FL	草地 GL	水域 WA	建设用地 ConL	未利用地 UL
耕地CL	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1
林地FL	1	1	1	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	0	0
草地GL	1	1	1	1	1	1	0	1	1	1	0	0
水域WA	0	0	0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1	0	0
建设用地ConL	1	1	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	0	1	0
未利用地UL	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1	1

年份 year		各质量等级生境面积/km² habitat area of each quality level					各等级生境面积占比/% proportion of different habitat areas
年份 year		低 lower	较低 low	中等 medium	较高 high	高 higher	低 lower	较低 low	中等 medium	较高 high	高 higher
2000		748.09	20 503.70	159.57	1 010.41	27 742.58	1.49	40.87	0.32	2.01	55.30
2005		747.91	20 501.38	160.13	1 011.11	27 744.90	1.49	40.87	0.32	2.02	55.31
2010		761.98	19 803.88	167.22	1 681.19	27 750.08	1.52	39.48	0.33	3.35	55.32
2015		761.16	19 890.56	166.57	1 594.94	27 751.12	1.52	39.65	0.33	3.18	55.32
2020		756.90	19 802.28	166.09	1 789.25	27 649.27	1.51	39.48	0.33	3.57	55.12
2030	自然发展natural development	818.98	19 732.38	164.73	1 891.53	27 556.17	1.63	39.34	0.33	3.77	54.93
2030	生态保护ecological protection	750.71	19 643.31	165.06	2 018.31	27 586.40	1.50	39.16	0.33	4.02	54.99

地类转移 land transfer	自然发展情景 natural development		生态保护情景 ecological protection
地类转移 land transfer	转移面积/km² transfer area	贡献率/% contribution rate	转移面积/km² transfer area	贡献率/% contribution rate
草地转林地GL to FL	30.87	0.04	56.25	0.03
草地转建设用地 GL to ConL	4.38	-3.01	—	—
草地转水域GL to WA	96.27	-6.57	171.45	-4.31
耕地转水域CL to WA	0.12	0.03	0.05	0.01
耕地转林地CL to FL	1.01	0.35	0.82	0.10
耕地转草地CL to GL	0.03	0.01	—	—
耕地转建设用地 CL to ConL	0.01	0	0.01	0
建设用地转草地 ConL to GL	2.91	2.00	—	—
未利用地转草地 UL to GL	—	—	96.74	19.60
未利用地转建设用地UL to ConL	0.02	0	0.07	0
未利用地转林地 UL to FL	3.14	1.73	11.19	2.27
未利用地转水域 UL to WA	6.28	3.03	57.06	10.13

Simulation and prediction of habitat quality in the Qilian Mountain Nature Reserve

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 10

References 26

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

用地类型 land use type	生境适宜度 habitat suitability	敏感度 sensitivity
用地类型 land use type	生境适宜度 habitat suitability	耕地 CL	道路 road	建设用地 ConL	未利用地 UL
CL	0.5	0.3	0.6	0.6	0.4
FL	1.0	0.7	0.7	0.8	0.6
GL	0.8	0.5	0.5	0.6	0.6
WA	0.9	0.6	0.6	0.7	0.4
ConL	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.1
UL	0.2	0.6	0.2	0.4	0.0