Recent advances in molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation in plant tissue culture

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302020

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2023, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (6): 1-8.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302020

Previous Articles Next Articles

Recent advances in molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation in plant tissue culture

GUO Ying(), YANG Ganggui(), WU Yuhan, HE Jie, HE Yujie, LIAO Haoran, XUE Liangjiao()

State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Jiangsu Key Laboratory for Poplar Germplasm Enhancement and Variety Improvement, College of Forestry and Grassland, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2023-02-18 Revised:2023-06-21 Online:2023-11-30 Published:2023-11-23

Abstract

Abstract:

Exerting remarkable cell totipotence, plants are able to regenerate tissues/organs and even individuals from differentiated cells activated by wound stress and/or hormonal cues. Based on the theory of plant cell totipotency, techniques of plant tissue culture have been widely used in rapid propagation, germplasm conservation, and plant breeding as a type of conserved epigenetic modification. However, the understanding of how plant cells retain both differentiated status and developmental plasticity is still obscure, especially at the epigenetic level. DNA methylation is an evolutionarily conserved epigenetic modification that can intricately coordinate cell fate transition and pluripotency establishment during the plant regenerate process. In the work, the recent progress in the regulation of plant regeneration through DNA methylation was summarized, starting from the formation of callus and somatic embryogenesis during tissue culture. Firstly, the change patterns of DNA methylation in different plant regeneration processes were analyzed, showing that both explants type and regeneration phase had an effect on DNA methylation levels. The role of some DNA methyltransferase in plant regeneration was studied, such as DNA Methyltransferase1 (MET1), whose deletion can lead to increased WUS expression and promote shoot regeneration. RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) is the main molecular pathway responsible for de novo DNA methylation in all contexts and is believed to play an important role in plant regeneration. Meanwhile, we analyzed the molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation on the expression of regenerative genes, such as BBM (baby boom), WOX (wuschel-related homeobox), WIN (wound induced dedifferentiation), etc. Finally, we discussed the future research directions of DNA methylation in the field of plant regeneration. The combination of tissue culture and genetic engineering will provide opportunities for efficient reproduction and precise cultivation of agricultural and forestry crops. Further, the regeneration-related genes reported in this study will provide candidates for plant regeneration research of genetic and molecular mechanisms.

Key words: plant tissue culture, DNA methylation, callus, somatic embryogenesis

CLC Number:

Q943
S722

GUO Ying, YANG Ganggui, WU Yuhan, HE Jie, HE Yujie, LIAO Haoran, XUE Liangjiao. Recent advances in molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation in plant tissue culture[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 1-8.

Figures/Tables 2

Fig. 1

Table 1

Effects of DNA methylation on key genes of plant regeneration during plant tissue culture and development"

序号 No.	基因名称 gene symbol	功能 function	物种 species
1	ARR3 (arabidopsis response regulator 3)	参与细胞分裂素调节;5-azaC处理后基因表达上调,发生低甲基化促进桃叶片愈伤组织诱导	桃 Prunus persica^[45]
2	BBM (baby boom)	影响体细胞胚胎发生;表达量升高,甲基化水平降低促进胚胎发生(胚性愈伤组织中高表达)	凹唇姜 Boesenbergia rotunda^[14]
3	CRY1 (cryptochrome 1)	调节细胞分裂素信号,促进芽再生器官的新生	拟南芥 Arabidopsis thaliana^[46]
4	CCD1 (carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases 1)	降解类胡萝卜素;5-azaC处理导致全基因组去甲基化,类胡萝卜素含量降低	柑橘 Citrus paradisi^[47]
5	CMT2/CMT3 (chromomethylase 2/chromomethylase 3)	参与mCHG维持;5-azaC处理抑制了叶外植体愈伤组织的形成和不定芽再生	草莓 Fragaria vesca^[9]
6	CMT3 (chromomethylase 3)	维持DNA甲基化;5-azaC处理后基因表达显著下调,DNA甲基化降低促进桃叶片愈伤组织诱导	桃 P. persica^[45]
		维持DNA甲基化;表达量升高DNA甲基化水平降低,促进体细胞胚胎的发生和再生	凹唇姜 B. rotunda^[48]
7	DRM2 (domains rearranged methyltransferase)	维持CHH甲基化	毛果杨 Populus trichocarpa^[49]
		表达量升高DNA甲基化水平降低,促进体细胞胚胎的发生和再生	凹唇姜 B. rotunda^[48]
8		维持CG甲基化;低甲基化,met1-3突变体芽再生能力更高	拟南芥 A. thaliana^[46]
	MET1 (methyltransferase 1)	维持DNA甲基化;表达量升高DNA甲基化水平降低,促进体细胞胚胎的发生和再生	凹唇姜 B. rotunda^[48]
		维持DNA甲基化;幼苗和嫩叶中偏好表达	柑橘 C. paradisi^[47]
9	ROS1 (repressor of silencing 1)	DNA甲基化水平降低,促进球状胚形成	龙眼 Dimocarpus longan^[30]
10	SERK (somatic embryogenesis receptor-like kinase)	影响体细胞胚胎发生;表达量升高,甲基化水平降低促进胚胎发生(胚性愈伤组织中高表达)	凹唇姜 B. rotunda^[14]
11	WIN (wound-induced)	诱导细胞去分化和增殖;发生去甲基化,基因表达上调促进愈伤组织形成	草莓 F. nilgerrensis^[50]
12	WOX (wuschel-related homeobox)	参与顶端分生组织发生;发生去甲基化,基因表达上调促进愈伤组织形成	草莓 F. nilgerrensis^[50]
13	WUS (wuschel-related homeobox)	调控植物再生;低甲基化激活了生长素和WUS相关基因表达,提高植物再生能力	棉花 Gossypium hirsutum^[51]
		影响体细胞胚胎发生;表达量升高,甲基化水平降低促进胚胎发生(分生组织中表达最高,其次是胚性愈伤)	凹唇姜 B. rotunda^[14]

Table 1

References 61

[1]	赵翔宇. 植物组织培养在林木遗传育种中的应用[J]. 河南农业, 2022(11):51-52.
	ZHAO X Y. Application of plant tissue culture in forest genetic breeding[J]. Agric Henan, 2022(11):51-52.DOI: 10.15904/j.cnki.hnny.2022.11.011.
[2]	巩振辉, 申书兴. 植物组织培养[M]. 3版. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2022:12-17.
	GONG Z H, SHEN S X. Plant tissue culture[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2022:12-17.
[3]	SIVANESAN I, NAYEEM S, VENKIDASAMY B, et al. Genetic and epigenetic modes of the regulation of somatic embryogenesis:a review[J]. Biol Futur, 2022, 73(3):259-277.DOI: 10.1007/s42977-022-00126-3.
[4]	樊龙江. 植物基因组学[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2020:68-69.
	FAN L J. Plant genomics[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2020:68-69.
[5]	HE X J, CHEN T P, ZHU J K. Regulation and function of DNA methylation in plants and animals[J]. Cell Res, 2011, 21(3):442-465.DOI: 10.1038/cr.2011.23.
[6]	LEE K, SEO P J. Dynamic epigenetic changes during plant regeneration[J]. Trends Plant Sci, 2018, 23(3):235-247.DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.11.009.
[7]	ZHANG H M, LANG Z B, ZHU J K. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants[J]. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 2018, 19(8):489-506.DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0016-z.
[8]	LEE K, PARK O S, SEO P J. JMJ30-mediated demethylation of H3K9me3 drives tissue identity changes to promote callus formation in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant J, 2018, 95(6):961-975.DOI: 10.1111/tpj.14002.
[9]	LIU D C, MU Q, LI X Y, et al. The callus formation capacity of strawberry leaf explant is modulated by DNA methylation[J]. Hortic Res, 2022, 9:uhab073.DOI: 10.1093/hr/uhab073.
[10]	GHOSH A, IGAMBERDIEV A U, DEBNATH S C. Detection of DNA methylation pattern in thidiazuron-induced blueberry callus using methylation-sensitive amplification polymorphism[J]. Biol Plant, 2017, 61(3):511-519.DOI: 10.1007/s10535-016-0678-3.
[11]	KRIZOVA K, FOJTOVA M, DEPICKER A, et al. Cell culture-induced gradual and frequent epigenetic reprogramming of invertedly repeated tobacco transgene epialleles[J]. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149(3):1493-1504.DOI: 10.1104/pp.108.133165.
[12]	VINING K, POMRANING K R, WILHELM L J, et al. Methylome reorganization during in vitro dedifferentiation and regeneration of Populus trichocarpa[J]. BMC Plant Biol, 2013, 13:92.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-92.
[13]	IKEUCHI M, SUGIMOTO K, IWASE A. Plant callus:mechanisms of induction and repression[J]. Plant Cell, 2013, 25(9):3159-3173.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.113.116053.
[14]	KARIM R, TAN Y S, SINGH P, et al. Expression and DNA methylation of SERK,BBM,LEC2 and WUS genes in in vitro cultures of Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) Mansf[J]. Physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2018, 24(5):741-751.DOI: 10.1007/s12298-018-0566-8.
[15]	GAO Y, RAN L, KONG Y, et al. Assessment of DNA methylation changes in tissue culture of Brassica napus[J]. Genetika, 2014, 50(11):1338-1344.DOI: 10.7868/s001667581410004x.
[16]	ZAKRZEWSKI F, SCHMIDT M, VAN LIJSEBETTENS M, et al. DNA methylation of retrotransposons,DNA transposons and genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.)[J]. Plant J, 2017, 90(6):1156-1175.DOI: 10.1111/tpj.13526.
[17]	STROUD H, DING B, SIMON S A, et al. Plants regenerated from tissue culture contain stable epigenome changes in rice[J]. eLife, 2013, 2:e00354.DOI: 10.7554/eLife.00354.
[18]	SMITH J, SEN S, WEEKS R J, et al. Promoter DNA hypermethylation and paradoxical gene activation[J]. Trends Cancer, 2020, 6(5):392-406.DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.02.007.
[19]	MA Q X, ZHOU W Z, ZHANG P. Transition from somatic embryo to friable embryogenic callus in cassava:dynamic changes in cellular structure,physiological status,and gene expression profiles[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2015, 6:824.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00824.
[20]	ZENG F S, SUN F K, LIANG N S, et al. Dynamic change of DNA methylation and cell redox state at different micropropagation phases in birch[J]. Trees, 2015, 29(3):917-930.DOI: 10.1007/s00468-015-1174-7.
[21]	LIN W Q, XIAO X O, ZHANG H N, et al. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing reveals a role for DNA methylation in variants from callus culture of pineapple (Ananas comosus L.)[J]. Genes, 2019, 10(11):877.DOI: 10.3390/genes10110877.
[22]	LIZAMORE D, BICKNELL R, WINEFIELD C. Elevated transcription of transposable elements is accompanied by het-siRNA-driven de novo DNA methylation in grapevine embryogenic callus[J]. BMC Genomics, 2021, 22(1):676.DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07973-9.
[23]	SHIM S, LEE H G, PARK O S, et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation occur in TE regions and affect cell proliferation during leaf-to-callus transition in Arabidopsis[J]. Epigenetics, 2022, 17(1):41-58.DOI: 10.1080/15592294.2021.1872927.
[24]	ALI SHAIKH A, CHACHAR S, CHACHAR M, et al. Recent advances in DNA methylation and their potential breeding applications in plants[J]. Horticulturae, 2022, 8(7):562.DOI: 10.3390/horticulturae8070562.
[25]	BARTELS A, HAN Q, NAIR P, et al. Dynamic DNA methylation in plant growth and development[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2018, 19(7):2144.DOI: 10.3390/ijms19072144.
[26]	GAO Y R, SUN J C, SUN Z L, et al. The MADS-box transcription factor CmAGL11 modulates somatic embryogenesis in Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume)[J]. J Integr Agric, 2020, 19(4):1033-1043.DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63157-4.
[27]	LUAN A P, CHEN C J, XIE T, et al. Methylation analysis of CpG islands in pineapple SERK1 promoter[J]. Genes, 2020, 11(4):425.DOI: 10.3390/genes11040425.
[28]	SALAÜN C, LEPINIEC L, DUBREUCQ B. Genetic and molecular control of somatic embryogenesis[J]. Plants, 2021, 10(7):1467.DOI: 10.3390/plants10071467.
[29]	DE ARAÚJO S I M, GOMES A C M M, SCHERWINSKI-PEREIRA J E. Cellular responses of oil palm genotypes during somatic embryogenesis involve participation of procambial cells,DNA demethylation,and auxin accumulation[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2022, 41(9):1875-1893.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-022-02898-3.
[30]	CHEN X H, XU X P, SHEN X, et al. Genome-wide investigation of DNA methylation dynamics reveals a critical role of DNA demethylation during the early somatic embryogenesis of Dimocarpus longan Lour[J]. Tree Physiol, 2020, 40(12):1807-1826.DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa097.
[31]	GUO H H, FAN Y J, GUO H X, et al. Somatic embryogenesis critical initiation stage-specific^m CHH hypomethylation reveals epigenetic basis underlying embryogenic redifferentiation in cotton[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2020, 18(8):1648-1650.DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13336.
[32]	GARCIA C, DE FURTADO ALMEIDA A A, COSTA M, et al. Single-base resolution methylomes of somatic embryogenesis in Theobroma cacao L.reveal epigenome modifications associated with somatic embryo abnormalities[J]. Sci Rep, 2022, 12(1):15097.DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18035-9.
[33]	OSORIO-MONTALVO P, DE-LA-PEÑA C, OROPEZA C, et al. A peak in global DNA methylation is a key step to initiate the somatic embryogenesis of coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L)[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2020, 39(10):1345-1357.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-020-02568-2.
[34]	DU X, YANG Z L, XIE G H, et al. Molecular basis of the plant ROS1-mediated active DNA demethylation[J]. Nat Plants, 2023, 9(2):271-279.DOI: 10.1038/s41477-022-01322-8.
[35]	CHEN R Z, CHEN X H, HUO W, et al. Transcriptome analysis of azacitidine (5-AzaC)-treatment affecting the development of early somatic embryogenesis in Longan[J]. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, 2021, 96(3):311-323.DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2020.1847695.
[36]	SANTOS D, FEVEREIRO P. Loss of DNA methylation affects somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula[J]. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2002, 70(2):155-161.DOI: 10.1023/A:1016369921067.
[37]	WÓJCIKOWSKA B, GAJ M D. Expression profiling of auxin response factor genes during somatic embryogenesis induction in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Cell Rep, 2017, 36(6):843-858.DOI: 10.1007/s00299-017-2114-3.
[38]	GRZYBKOWSKA D, MORONCZYK J, WÓJCIKOWSKA B, et al. Azacitidine (5-AzaC)-treatment and mutations in DNA methylase genes affect embryogenic response and expression of the genes that are involved in somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis[J]. Plant Growth Regul, 2018, 85(2):243-256.DOI: 10.1007/s10725-018-0389-1.
[39]	GAO Y, CUI Y, ZHAO R R, et al. Cryo-treatment enhances the embryogenicity of mature somatic embryos via the lncRNA-miRNA-mRNA network in white spruce[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2022, 23(3):1111.DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031111.
[40]	CASTANDER-OLARIETA A, PEREIRA C, SALES E, et al. Induction of Radiata pine somatic embryogenesis at high temperatures provokes a long-term decrease in DNA methylation/hydroxymethylation and differential expression of stress-related genes[J]. Plants, 2020, 9(12):1762.DOI: 10.3390/plants9121762.
[41]	PACHOTA K A, ORŁOWSKA R. Effect of copper and silver ions on sequence and DNA methylation changes in triticale regenerants gained via somatic embryogenesis[J]. J Appl Genet, 2022, 63(4):663-675.DOI: 10.1007/s13353-022-00717-9.
[42]	SHEMER O, LANDAU U, CANDELA H, et al. Competency for shoot regeneration from Arabidopsis root explants is regulated by DNA methylation[J]. Plant Sci, 2015, 238:251-261.DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.06.015.
[43]	SHIBUKAWA T, YAZAWA K, KIKUCHI A, et al. Possible involvement of DNA methylation on expression regulation of carrot LEC1 gene in its 5'-upstream region[J]. Gene, 2009, 437(1/2):22-31.DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2009.02.011.
[44]	DAI X H, WANG J, SONG Y G, et al. Cytosine methylation of the FWA promoter promotes direct in vitro shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis thaliana[J]. J Integr Plant Biol, 2021, 63(8):1491-1504.DOI: 10.1111/jipb.13156.
[45]	LIU X, ZHU K,& XIAO J. Recent advances in understanding of the epigenetic regulation of plant regeneration[J]. aBioTech, 2023, 4(1): 31-46.DOI:10.1007/s42994-022-00093-2.
[46]	SHIM S, LEE H G, SEO P J. MET1-dependent DNA methylation represses light signaling and influences plant regeneration in Arabidopsis[J]. Mol Cells, 2021, 44(10):746-757.DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2021.0160.
[47]	XU J, WANG X, CAO H, et al. Dynamic changes in methylome and transcriptome patterns in response to methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacytidine treatment in citrus[J]. DNA Res, 2017, 24:509-522.DOI:10.1093/dnares/dsx021.
[48]	KARIM R, TAN Y S, SINGH P, et al. Expression and DNA methylation of SERK,BBM,LEC2 and WUS genes in in vitro cultures of Boesenbergia rotunda (L.) Mansf[J]. Physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2018, 24(5):741-751.DOI: 10.1007/s12298-018-0566-8.
[49]	VININ K, POMRANING K R, WILHELM L J, et al. Methylome reorganization during in vitro dedifferentiation and regeneration of Populus trichocarpa[J]. BMC plant biology, 2013, 13:1-15.DOI:10.1186/1471-2229-13-92.
[50]	CAO Q, FENG Y X, DAI X W, et al. Dynamic changes of DNA methylation during wild strawberry (Fragaria nilgerrensis) tissue culture[J]. Front Plant Sci, 2021, 12:765383.DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.765383.
[51]	LI J Y, WANG M J, LI Y J, et al. Multi-omics analyses reveal epigenomics basis for cotton somatic embryogenesis through successive regeneration acclimation process[J]. Plant Biotechnol J, 2019, 17(2):435-450.DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12988.
[52]	LAW J A, JACOBSEN S E. Establishing,maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2010, 11(3):204-220.DOI: 10.1038/nrg2719.
[53]	LI W, LIU H, CHENG Z J, et al. DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate de novo shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis by modulating WUSCHEL expression and auxin signaling[J]. PLoS Genet, 2011, 7(8):e1002243.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002243.
[54]	LIU H, ZHANG H, DONG Y X, et al. DNA Methyltransferase 1-mediated shoot regeneration is regulated by cytokinin-induced cell cycle in Arabidopsis[J]. New Phytol, 2018, 217(1):219-232.DOI: 10.1111/nph.14814.
[55]	YAARI R, KATZ A, DOMB K, et al. RdDM-independent de novo and heterochromatin DNA methylation by plant CMT and DNMT3 orthologs[J]. Nat Commun, 2019, 10(1):1613.DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09496-0.
[56]	GAO Y, CHEN X Y, CUI Y, et al. Effects of medium supplements on somatic embryo maturation and DNA methylation in Pseudotsuga gaussenii Flous,a species under protection[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(2):288.DOI: 10.3390/f13020288.
[57]	ERDMANN R M, PICARD C L. RNA-directed DNA methylation[J]. PLoS Genet, 2020, 16(10):e1009034.DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009034.
[58]	JI L X, MATHIONI S M, JOHNSON S, et al. Genome-wide reinforcement of DNA methylation occurs during somatic embryogenesis in soybean[J]. Plant Cell, 2019, 31(10):2315-2331.DOI: 10.1105/tpc.19.00255.
[59]	GIRI C C, SHYAMKUMAR B, ANJANEYULU C. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology to trees: an overview[J]. Trees, 2004, 18:115-135. DOI 10.1007/s00468-003-0287-6.
[60]	BARGHCHI M, ALDERSON P G. The control of shoot tip necrosis in Pistacia vera L. in vitro[J]. Plant growth regulation, 1996, 20:31-35.
[61]	GUTIERREZ-ARCELU, MARI, LAPPALATNEN T, et al. Passive and active DNA methylation and the interplay with genetic variation in gene regulation[J]. elife, 2013, 2: e00523.DOI:10.7554/eLife.00523.001.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

Recent advances in molecular regulatory mechanisms of DNA methylation in plant tissue culture

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 2

References 61

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

[1]	HUANG Biyun, ZHUO Renying, QIAO Guirong. Comparative analysis of different types of callus in moso bamboo [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 141-149.
[2]	WANG Ji, FANG Shengzuo. Effects of different anti-browning agents on enzyme activity and growth in callus of Cyclocarya paliurus [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 167-174.
[3]	CHENG Fang, SUN Tingyu, YE Jianren. Induction of embryogenic callus from immature zygotic embryos of Pinus elliottii resistant to brown spot needle blight (pathogen: Lecanosticta acicola) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2023, 47(6): 175-182.
[4]	MA Juanjuan, WU Qinxia, CHEN Ying, WANG Ruimin, YUAN Binling, HU Yuchen, CAO Fuliang. The relationship between physiological metabolism changes and embryogenic competence of endosperm in Ginkgo biloba at different developmental stages [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 68-76.
[5]	GAO Yan, MO Jianbin, FU Yanru, FENG Shucheng. Tissue culture and plant regeneration of Clematis ‘Julka’ [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2021, 45(3): 109-116.
[6]	SHE Lulu, WANG Weijuan, SONG Jingjing, LU Cunfu, CHEN Yuzhen. Effect of cold acclimation on freezing tolerance and antioxidant enzyme activities of callus of Tibet Saussurea laniceps Hand.-Mazz [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(5): 181-186.
[7]	CHEN Tingting,YE Jianren,WU Xiaoqin,SHEN Liyuan,ZHU Lihua. Somatic embryogenesis and plantlet regeneration of disease-resistant Pinus massoniana Lamb. [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(03): 1-8.
[8]	SUN Yonglian, DAI Xiaogang, LI Xiaoping, CHEN Yingnan. Plant regeneration of Salix suchowensis through tissue culture [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(02): 31-37.
[9]	YAN Pan, PENG Fangren, ZHANG Rui, CAO Mingmin, ZHAI Min, LIU Zhuangzhuang. Histo-cytological observation on the graft union formation in Carya illinoinensis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(02): 202-206.
[10]	CHENG Tielong, MENG Yan,CHEN Jinhui,SHI Jisen. Effects of methyl jasmonic acid on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron hybrid [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(06): 41-46.
[11]	GAO Fang, SHEN Hailong, LIU Chunping, WANG Yi, ZHANG Peng, YANG Ling. Optimization of culture conditions and selection of suitable explants for callus induction from mature embryo of Pinus koraiensis [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(03): 43-50.
[12]	XU Jianxiu,WU Jing, YE Jianren, WU Xiaoqin. Maintenance and proliferation of embryogenic callus in nematode-resistant Pinus densiflora [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(01): 49-54.
[13]	DONG Jing, SHI Jisen, XU Jin. Callus induction and plant regeneration from zygotic embryos of Cryptomeria fortunei [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 181-186.
[14]	LU Lu, LU Ye, SHENG Yu, ZHENG Chen, SHI Jisen, CHEN Jinhui. Effects of different activated carbon on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron hybrids [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(02): 59-64.
[15]	HAN Shan, ZHU Tianhui, QIAO Tianmin, LI Shujiang, WANG Ju, ZHANG Boyang. Resistance responses of Castanea mollissima callus to Cp-toxin under Cryphonectria parasitica stress [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(05): 1-6.