Planning of recreational scenic roads abundant region in southwest Zhejiang nature reserve based on GIS-AHP and longitudinal view section analysis

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302045

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 221-232.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202302045

Previous Articles Next Articles

Planning of recreational scenic roads abundant region in southwest Zhejiang nature reserve based on GIS-AHP and longitudinal view section analysis

TANG Xiaolan(), ZHANG Jie, ZHOU Mingjie, SONG Tianrui

College of Landscape Architecture, Academy of Chinese Ecological Progress and Forestry Development Studies, Nanjing Forestry University,Nanjing 210037, China

Received:2023-02-28 Accepted:2023-06-02 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-28

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】This study addresses the construction of scenic trails, aligning with the trend of resource integration in abundant region of nature reserves and the growth of global tourism. It begins with the recreational resources of abundant region of nature reserves and puts forward a comprehensive set of methods for selecting and planning recreational scenic trails from a regional perspective. This is intended to fill gaps in existing theoretical research on scenic trails at both the resource and regional levels within nature reserves. 【Method】Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and ArcGIS spatial analysis, potential scenic roads were preliminarily screened. Combined with the natural and human geographical characteristics of the study area, comprehensive evaluations of potential scenic roads were conducted. Key features of these roads were then summarized using visual field sections. 【Result】GIS spatial analysis yielded evaluations of each potential scenic road. After considering the current conditions and conducting overlay analysis, 23 potential scenic roads were identified. The comprehensive assessment of factors influencing route selection revealed 10 optimal scenic roads, including G205, G235, S222, among others. Furthermore, recreational scenic roads in southwestern Zhejiang were classified into three levels, with the distinct characteristics of each level described intuitively. 【Conclusion】The recreational scenic roads in the southwest of Zhejiang Province are meticulously planned according to a “2+6+7+N” construction pattern. This involves two national parks serving as core areas, six primary scenic roads functioning as communication corridors, and seven ecological recreation areas being interconnected in a series. Additionally, numerous branch corridors are prominently displayed. Concurrently, a visual area section analysis of these main recreational scenic roads has been designed, offering a theoretical foundation and data support for the scientific selection of scenic road routes in southwest Zhejiang.

Key words: geographic information system-analytic hierarchy process (GIS-AHP) method, longitudinal view section analysis, scenic road, recreational resources, southwest Zhejiang, abundatn region of nature reserve

TANG Xiaolan, ZHANG Jie, ZHOU Mingjie, SONG Tianrui. Planning of recreational scenic roads abundant region in southwest Zhejiang nature reserve based on GIS-AHP and longitudinal view section analysis[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 221-232.

Figures/Tables 12

Fig. 1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig. 2

Table 3

Fig. 3

Table 4

Fig. 4

Table 5

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

References 30

[1]	余青, 樊欣, 刘志敏, 等. 国外风景道的理论与实践[J]. 旅游学刊, 2006, 21(5):91-95.
	YU Q, FAN X, LIU Z M, et al. On the principle and applicaions of scenic byways abroad[J]. Tour Tribune, 2006, 21(5):91-95.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5006.2006.05.024.
[2]	MOORE R L, DRIVER B L. Introduction to outdoor recreation:providing and managing natural resourcebased opportunities[M]. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing, 2005.
[3]	张朝枝, 曹静茵, 罗意林. 旅游还是游憩?我国国家公园的公众利用表述方式反思[J]. 自然资源学报, 2019, 34(9):1797-1806.
	ZHANG C Z, CAO J Y, LUO Y L. Tourism or recreation?Rethink the expression of the public use in Chinese national parks[J]. J Nat Resour, 2019, 34(9):1797-1806.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20190901.
[4]	张圆刚, 陈希, 余润哲, 等. 线型旅游体验空间:风景道的体验性逻理嬗变[J]. 自然资源学报, 2020, 35(2):284-296.
	ZHANG Y G, CHEN X, YU R Z, et al. The logic transformation of the scenic byway system to the linear experience space transformation[J]. J Nat Resour, 2020, 35(2):284-296.DOI: 10.31497/zrzyxb.20200204.
[5]	侯琳, 张丹, 李磊峰. 浅析成德区域骑游绿道选线建设[J]. 云南地理环境研究, 2017, 29(3):35-40.
	HOU L, ZHANG D, LI L F. Route selection and construction of the Chengdu & Deyang regional greenway[J]. Yunnan Geogr Environ Res, 2017, 29(3):35-40.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7852.2017.03.006.
[6]	BRIGANTI C M, HOEL L A. Transportation system design and information requirements for travel and tourism needs on scenic byways (Report No.VTRC95-R1)[R]. Virginia, USA: Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville,Va,1994.
[7]	EBY D W, MOLNAR L J. Importance of scenic byways in route choice:a survey of driving tourists in the United States[J]. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract, 2002, 36(2):95-106.DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(00)00039-2.
[8]	CLAY G R, SMIDT R K. Assessing the validity and reliability of descriptor variables used in scenic highway analysis[J]. Landsc Urban Plan, 2004, 66(4):239-255.DOI: 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00114-2.
[9]	吴必虎, 李咪咪. 小兴安岭风景道旅游景观评价[J]. 地理学报, 2001, 56(2):214-222.
	WU B H, LI M M. EDVAET:a linear landscape evaluation technique: a case study on the Xiaoxinganling scenery drive[J]. Acta Geogr Sin, 2001, 56(2):214-222.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0375-5444.2001.02.010.
[10]	魏遐, 白梅, 鞠远江. 基于景观评价的高速公路风景道旅游规划:以福宁高速风景道为例[J]. 经济地理, 2007, 27(1):161-165,156.
	WEI X, BAI M, JU Y J. Tourism planning for the scenic speedway based on landscape evaluation: a case study on Funing scenic speedway[J]. Econ Geogr, 2007, 27(1):161-165,156.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8462.2007.01.036.
[11]	崔晨. 基于地理热力图的风景道景观评价:以北京市延庆区百里画廊为例[J]. 文化月刊, 2019(8):132-137.
	CUI C. Landscape evaluation of scenic roads based on geographical heat map: a case study of Baili gallery in Yanqing District,Beijing[J]. Cult Mon, 2019(8):132-137.
[12]	姚朋, 孙一豪, 奚秋蕙, 等. 耦合多元价值的生态风景道规划研究:以乌兰察布四横交通带风景道为例[J]. 中国园林, 2019, 35(4):101-106.
	YAO P, SUN Y H, XI Q H, et al. Research on ecological scenic byways planning coupled with multiple values: taking Ulanqab Four Horizontal Traffic Belt as an example[J]. Chin Landsc Archit, 2019, 35(4):101-106.DOI: 10.19775/j.cla.2019.04.0101.
[13]	李果, 钟静玲. 全域旅游背景下长株潭地区风景道开发潜力评价[J]. 公路, 2021, 66(12):288-295.
	LI G, ZHONG J L. Development potential evaluation of scenic byway in Changsha-Zhuzhou-Xiangtan area under the background of all-for-one tourism[J]. Highway, 2021, 66(12):288-295.
[14]	叶文, 马有明, 杨殷迪. 绿色通道在保护地游憩规划中的应用研究:以西双版纳热带雨林国家公园绿道规划设计为例[J]. 旅游研究, 2011, 3(1):32-36.
	YE W, MA Y M, YANG Y D. Applied research on green channel theory in recreation planning of protected areas:taking Xishuangbanna Tropical Rainforest National Park as an example[J]. Tour Res, 2011, 3(1):32-36.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5841.2011.01.006.
[15]	朱高儒, 衷平, 程逸楠, 等. 四川康定“川藏木雅” 风景道景观规划设计[J]. 交通标准化, 2014(3):11-15.
	ZHU G R, ZHONG P, CHENG Y N, et al. Landscape planning and design of Sichuan-Tibet MUYA scenic byway in Kangding of Sichuan Province[J]. Transp Stand, 2014(3):11-15.DOI: 10.16503/j.cnki.2095-9931.2014.03.006.
[16]	唐晓岚, 刘小涵, 刘政. 基于GIS-AHP的皖南山区风景道选线研究[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 41(5):25-31.
	TANG X L, LIU X H, LIU Z. Scenic byway selection in southern Anhui mountain area based on GIS-AHP analysis[J]. J Inn Mong Agric Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 41(5):25-31.DOI: 10.16853/j.cnki.1009-3575.2020.05.005.
[17]	余青, 宫连虎. 风景道游憩服务设施建设研究:以美国蓝岭风景道为例[J]. 中外公路, 2010, 30(3):14-19.
	YU Q, GONG L H. Study on the construction of recreational service facilities in scenic roads: taking the blue ridge scenic roads in the United States as an example[J]. J China Foreign Highw, 2010, 30(3):14-19.DOI: 10.14048/j.issn.1671-2579.2010.03.074.
[18]	胡传东, 李露苗, 罗尚焜. 基于网络游记内容分析的风景道骑行体验研究:以318国道川藏线为例[J]. 旅游学刊, 2015, 30(11):99-110.
	HU C D, LI L M, LUO S K. Cycling tourists' experience of scenic byways based on content analysis of travel blogs:a case study of the Sichuan-Tibet section of national highway 318[J]. Tour Tribune, 2015, 30(11):99-110.
[19]	朱高儒, 衷平, 徐洪磊, 等. 试论中国国家风景道体系的构建[J]. 公路, 2015, 60(9):156-162.
	ZHU G R, ZHONG P, XU H L, et al. Construction of national scenic byway system in China[J]. Highway, 2015, 60(9):156-162.
[20]	孙盼盼, 余青. 基于政策文本量化分析的我国风景道政策演进特征研究[J]. 公路交通科技, 2021, 38(2):146-158.
	SUN P P, YU Q. Study on evolution characteristics of Chinese scenic byway policies based on quantitative analysis on policy texts[J]. J Highw Transp Res Dev, 2021, 38(2):146-158.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2021.02.019.
[21]	徐颖, 张淑萍. 论全域旅游背景下我国旅游风景道的建设发展[J]. 齐齐哈尔大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2022(2):68-71.
	XU Y, ZHANG S P. On the construction and development of scenic byways in China under the background of global tourism[J]. J Qiqihar Univ (Philos Soc Sci Ed), 2022(2):68-71.DOI: 10.13971/j.cnki.cn23-1435/c.2022.02.010.
[22]	李磊, 徐婷, 王涵, 等. 风景道的交通文化价值:挖掘、整合与重构:以哈密东天山风景道规划为例[J]. 公路交通科技, 2020, 37(S1):96-102.
	LI L, XU T, WANG H, et al. Traffic cultural value of scenic byway:excavation,integration and reconstruction: taking HAMI east Tianshan scenic byway planning for example[J]. J Highw Transp Res Dev, 2020, 37(S1):96-102. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0268.2020.S1.020.
[23]	钟其. 浙西南山区城镇化发展路径研究[J]. 浙江学刊, 2015(5):213-218.
	ZHONG Q. Study on the development path of urbanization in Nanshan District of southwest Zhejiang Province[J]. Zhejiang Acad J, 2015(5):213-218. DOI:10.16235/j.cnki.33-1005/c.2015.05.028.
[24]	肖练练, 钟林生, 虞虎, 等. 功能约束条件下的钱江源国家公园体制试点区游憩利用适宜性评价研究[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(4):1375-1384.
	XIAO L L, ZHONG L S, YU H, et al. Assessment of recreational use suitability of Qianjiangyuan National Park Pilot under the zoning constraints[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(4):1375-1384.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201808241811.
[25]	陈尚超. 城市仿真:一种交互式规划和公众参与的创新工具[J]. 城市规划, 2001, 25(8):34-36.
	CHEN S C. City simulation:an interactive tool for public participation[J]. City Plan Rev, 2001, 25(8):34-36.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-1329.2001.08.009.
[26]	王颖, 王云, 孔亚平, 等. 基于层次分析法和模糊数学的中巴喀喇昆仑公路沿线景观综合评价[J]. 生态科学, 2014, 33(6):1106-1113.
	WANG Y, WANG Y, KONG Y P, et al. Landscape evaluation of Karakorum Highway based on analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy mathematics[J]. Ecol Sci, 2014, 33(6):1106-1113.DOI: 10.14108/j.cnki.1008-8873.2014.06.012.
[27]	张颖, 杨志耕. 江西省三清山森林游憩资源价值评价[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境, 2011, 21(S2):221-225.
	ZHANG Y, YANG Z G. Valuation of Sanqingshan forest recreation resources in Jiangxi Province based on contingent value method[J]. China Popul Resour Environ, 2011, 21(S2):221-225.
[28]	刘润, 李巍, 尹秀, 等. 藏区大尺度同质景观格局背景下风景道的建构研究:以甘南藏族自治州为例[J]. 开发研究, 2012(1):109-112.
	LIU R, LI W, YIN X, et al. Study on the construction of scenic roads under the background of large-scale homogeneous landscape pattern in Tibetan areas: a case study of Gannan Tibetan autonomous prefecture[J]. Res Dev, 2012(1):109-112.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4161.2012.01.026.
[29]	马坤, 唐晓岚, 王奕文, 等. 小尺度丘陵山地风景区游览路线的规划与优化[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(1):163-170.
	MA K, TANG X L, WANG Y W, et al. Planning and optimization of small-scale mountain landscape sightseeing routes[J]. J Nanjing For Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 44(1):163-170.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201811022.
[30]	李东和, 吴润华, 张莹. 我国风景道研究综述[J]. 资源开发与市场, 2018, 34(2):292-296.
	LI D H, WU R H, ZHANG Y. Review research on scenic byway in China[J]. Resour Dev Mark, 2018, 34(2):292-296.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2018.02.025.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

目标层 target layer	准则层 criterion layer	因子评价层 factor evaluation layer		因子内涵 factor connotation
研究区游憩资源评价 A	游憩资源质量 B1	观赏资源价值 C1	生态环境D1	结合区域整体的温度、湿度、空气质量、水、土壤等条件,以及区域内的植被覆盖率、植物种类丰富度、环境保护度等条件来打分,反映该区域生态环境状况
			周边环境D2	对游憩资源周边环境的优劣度进行打分,如基础设施、建筑物保存与道路等状况
			景观奇特性D3	从美学的角度,自然景观资源的奇特性方面评价
			景观多样性D4	从景观、生物多样性等方面评价
			美景度D5	从植被覆盖度、水体美感度方面评价
		文化艺术价值 C2	文化价值D6	对游憩资源本身所具有的历史关联性、人文价值广泛度以及对当地文化的影响程度进行评价
			保护完整度D7	从文化景观的保存质量角度,分为完好、破损以及毁坏3个级别
			保护等级与开发度D8	文化景观的保护等级与公众开放度
		休闲游憩价值 C3	可游范围D9	游憩区域提供休闲游憩活动的空间范围
			体验丰富度D10	从区域提供游憩活动项目内容丰富程度方面评价
			休闲游憩项目D11	提供的游憩项目是否能够体现出区域特色和满足游人休闲需求
	开发利用条件 B2	知名度 C4		公众对游憩资源的认知度
		适游期 C5		保护地在1年中可以接纳游客观赏和使用的天数 (<100 d、[100~200) d、>200 d) 3个等级
		游憩设施建设 C6		游憩设施建设完善程度
		内部交通可达性 C7		游憩景点间的连接度

影响因子 influence factor	特征描述 feature description	筛选评价标准 screening evaluation criteria
自然保护地资源整合度 resource integration of nature reserves	潜在风景道沿线资源点数量越多,聚集度越强;离道路的距离越近,则整合度越好	游憩资源评价分为5级
景观类型丰富度 abundance of landscape types	风景道所处区域景观类型的丰富程度,沿线不同景观类型所呈现的特征对游人的视觉审美方面有不同的影响,景观类型越丰富,带给游客的视觉体验就越好	中山林地景观— 草地景观分数递减
道路等级 road grade	道路的行政等级,包括道路的宽度、连通度	一级公路,以时速 60~80 km/h为最佳
道路坡度 road slope	地形地貌大部分以山地丘陵为主,且风景道多由国道、省道、县道组成,道路坡度过大会降低安全性,坡度过小会影响游客的驾驶体验	6°~12°,南坡最优
植被覆盖度 vegetation coverage	风景道选线要尽量避免植被覆盖度过高与过低的区域	40%~60%为最佳
游憩服务点连接度 connectivity of recreational service points	外部交通完善,内部游憩服务设施丰富的场所,风景道串联游憩服务点的等级越高、数量越多,则连接度越好	游憩服务点链接等级与数量

编号 No.	公路名称 name	长度/km length	起点 starting point	终点 end point
R1	G205国道	81.02	开化齐溪镇	G205与G320交点
R2	G205国道	81.14	G205与G320交点	廿八都镇
R3	G320国道	110.19	龙游横山镇	常山白石镇
R4	G528国道	59.48	龙游东华街道	遂昌市妙高街道
R5	G528国道	102.03	遂昌市妙高街道	龙泉西街街道
R6	G528国道	72.07	龙泉市剑池街道	庆元县安南乡
R7	G322国道	56.19	龙泉市剑池街道	云和县元和街道
R8	G235国道	48.29	云和县元和街道	景宁县东坑镇
R9	G330国道	75.82	莲都区紫金街道	青田县鹤城街道
R10	G330国道	40.29	仙都县五云街道	莲都区紫金街道
R11	S305省道	53.30	衢江区上方镇	柯城区荷花街道
R12	S221省道	39.20	常山县辉埠镇	江山市清湖镇
R13	S315省道	46.20	衢江区樟潭街道	江山市新塘边镇
R14	S315省道	30.29	衢江区廿里镇	衢江区高家镇
R15	S227省道	81.26	遂昌市妙高街道	龙泉市剑池街道
R16	S222省道	80.36	遂昌市妙高街道	莲都区白云街道
R17	S219省道	38.90	缙云县新建镇	缙云县壶镇
R18	S328省道	60.52	莲都区岩泉街道	云和县凤凰山街道
R19	S329省道	77.61	庆元县竹口镇	庆元县江根镇
R20	X623县道	14.48	开化县上村	开化县后山湾
R21	X603+X604+ X411+X401县道	89.62	江山市清湖镇	遂昌县焦滩乡
R22	X605+X211县道	56.62	衢江区高家镇	遂昌县大柘镇
R23	X802县道	77.70	庆元县五大堡乡	景宁县东坑镇

道路编号 road No.	自然保护地资源整合度 resource integration of nature reserves	景观类型丰富度 abundance of landscape types	道路等级 road grade	道路坡度 road slope	植被覆盖度 vegetation coverage	游憩服务点连接度 connectivity of recreational service points	综合得分 comprehensive score
R2	15.20	7.00	1.60	0.36	0.76	1.70	26.62
R8	14.44	7.50	0.64	0.41	0.64	1.20	24.83
R3	11.40	6.50	1.60	0.48	0.60	2.80	23.38
R16	12.16	6.50	0.96	0.14	0.64	1.80	22.20
R7	11.40	7.00	1.28	0.48	0.52	1.40	22.08
R1	10.64	6.50	1.60	0.43	0.72	2.10	21.99
R10	8.36	6.50	1.60	0.48	0.76	1.20	18.90
R18	9.88	4.50	1.28	0.43	0.52	2.80	17.41
R15	6.84	7.00	0.96	0.43	0.64	1.40	17.27
R4	6.84	6.50	1.60	0.48	0.72	1.10	17.24
R22	7.60	6.00	0.32	0.31	0.72	1.00	15.95
R11	8.36	4.50	1.28	0.36	0.72	0.50	15.72
R9	6.84	4.50	1.60	0.55	0.60	1.10	15.19
R6	6.84	4.50	1.28	0.53	0.56	0.80	14.51
R5	3.04	7.00	1.28	0.50	0.36	1.10	13.28
R12	4.56	3.00	0.96	0.46	0.80	1.10	12.40
R21	3.80	6.00	0.64	0.58	0.64	0.20	11.86
R23	3.04	6.00	0.64	0.41	0.52	0.80	11.41
R17	4.56	2.50	1.28	0.48	0.72	0.90	10.44
R19	0.76	6.00	1.28	0.36	0.52	1.00	9.92
R20	3.80	3.50	0.64	0.55	0.76	0.20	9.45
R14	0.76	4.50	1.60	0.26	0.52	0.80	8.44
R13	0.76	2.50	1.60	0.46	0.64	1.00	6.96

等级 grade	特征描述 feature description	实际路线 actual route
一级 the first level	构建浙西南风景道网络的主体骨架,其综合评分高;串联不同市县重要的自然保护地资源;沿线资源对于市域有重要的生态、游憩价值;沿线经过多处旅游城镇	R2、R8、R3、R16、R7、R1、 R10、R18、R15、R4
二级 the second level	市级风景道的支线,主要串联起县域内、距离市级风景道稍远的自然保护地资源。起到整合区域内分散的资源,构建不同资源点之间的联系通道,提高风景道网络的组织性,加大浙西南自然保护地游憩体验的规模,满足游客多样化游憩需求的作用	R22、R11、R9、R6、R5、R12
三级 the third level	一级、二级风景道之间形成衔接的道路,一般其沿线的自然保护地游憩资源较为单一,可供游客自行选择,能够对一、二级风景道的分流起到一定的作用	R21、R23、R17、R19、R20、R14、R13

Planning of recreational scenic roads abundant region in southwest Zhejiang nature reserve based on GIS-AHP and longitudinal view section analysis

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 12

References 30

Related Articles 0

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer