Growth and physiological response of Salix matsudana × alba to salt-flooding stress

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305034

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 57-66.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202305034

Previous Articles Next Articles

Growth and physiological response of Salix matsudana × alba to salt-flooding stress

REN Jiahui¹(), GAO Handong¹^,^*(), CHEN Zhenan¹, LI Hao¹, LIU Qiang², CHEN Pengjun²

1. College of Forestry and Grassland, Nanjing Forestry University, Southern Tree Seed Inspection Center, National Forestry and Grassland Administration, Co-Innovation Center for the Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing 210037,China
2. Institute of Geochemical Exploration and Marine Geological Survey, Jiangsu Nonferrous Metals East China, Nanjing 210007,China

Received:2023-05-28 Accepted:2024-09-13 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-28
Contact: GAO Handong E-mail:1634069991@qq.com;gaohd@njfu.edu.cn

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】 This study aimed to examine the effects of salt and flooding interactions on the growth and physiological responses of Salix hybrid, focusing on the physiological mechanisms underlying its tolerance to salt-flooding stress. 【Method】One-year-old Salix hybrid cuttings were subjected to two water conditions—normal watering and flooding—and four salinity levels (0%, 0.2%, 0.4%, and 0.6% mass fraction of NaCl), with normal water without salt serving as the control. Samples were collected at six time points (3, 10, 17, 24, 41, and 60 days post-treatment) to measure seedling height, root collar diameter, biomass, and physiological indicators, including superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD) activities, malondialdehyde (MDA), soluble sugar (SS), soluble protein (SP), proline (Pro) content, root vigor, and chlorophyll content. These parameters were analyzed to evaluate the effect of salt-flooding interactions on the growth and physiology of the Salix hybrid. 【Result】Low salinity under flooding conditions promoted seedling elongation, whereas high salinity under flooding inhibited growth. Relative electrical conductivity and MDA levels exhibited a continuous increase under combined salt and flooding stress. Antioxidant enzyme activity was more pronounced under the combined stress than under individual stress conditions, with SOD activity responding more rapidly than POD activity. Compared to salt stress alone, SS content significantly decreased on 24 days, SP content increased significantly on 17 days, and Pro content showed an initial increase, followed by a decline and subsequent recovery. Root vigor was higher under salt-flooding stress than that under salt stress alone, while chlorophyll content decreased significantly and remained lower than that under single salt stress.【Conclusion】The Salix hybrid demonstrated a robust osmoregulatory and protective enzyme system in response to salt-flooding stress, which played a critical role in its adaptive capacity. Biomass, MDA levels, and root vigor were identified as key indicators for assessing water and salt tolerance. The salinity tolerance threshold was determined to be 0.65% (111.22 mmol/L) under normal water conditions and 0.42% (71.87 mmol/L) under flooded conditions, indicating the Salix hybrid’s strong salinity tolerance. This study provides theoretical and practical insights into the physiological mechanisms of the Salix hybrid under salt-flooding stress, offering valuable guidance for its cultivation in saline and waterlogged environments.

Key words: Salix matsudana ×, alba, salt and flooded stress, tolerance thresholds, growth and physiological response

CLC Number:

S718

REN Jiahui, GAO Handong, CHEN Zhenan, LI Hao, LIU Qiang, CHEN Pengjun. Growth and physiological response of Salix matsudana × alba to salt-flooding stress[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 57-66.

Figures/Tables 13

Table 1

Fig. 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Fig. 6

Fig. 7

Table 5

Table 6

References 27

[1]	龚蔚霞, 张虹鸥, 钟肖健. 海陆交互作用生态系统下的滨海开发模式研究[J]. 城市发展研究, 2015, 22(1):79-85.
	GONG W X, ZHANG H O, ZHONG X J. Research on the development mode of coastal area basing on ecosystem of sea-land interaction[J]. Urban Dev Stud, 2015, 22(1):79-85.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-3862.2015.01.013.
[2]	李晶, 雷茵茹, 崔丽娟, 等. 我国滨海滩涂湿地现状及研究进展[J]. 林业资源管理, 2018(2):24-28,137.
	LI J, LEI Y R, CUI L J, et al. Current status and research progress of coastal tidal flat wetlands in China[J]. For Resour Manag, 2018(2):24-28,137.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2018.02.005.
[3]	吴薇. 杂交新美柳的盐胁迫响应及外源NO处理的调节作用[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2008.
	WU W. Response to salt stress and regulation effect of exogenous NO treatment on hybrid Xinmeiliu[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2008.
[4]	张燕飞. 杂交新美柳扦插苗NaCl胁迫及组织培养研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2007.
	ZHANG Y F. Study on NaCl stress and tissue culture of cutting seedlings of hybrid new willow[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2007.
[5]	方芳, 洪晓玲, 刘玲玲, 等. 指数施肥对杂交新美柳幼苗生长及生物量积累的影响[J]. 四川林业科技, 2023, 44(1):47-51.
	FANG F, HONG X L, LIU L L, et al. Effects of exponential fertilization on growth and biomass accumulation of hybrid Salix matsudana × alba seedlings[J]. J Sichuan For Sci Technol, 2023, 44(1):47-51.DOI: 10.12172/202203110001.
[6]	蔡伟建, 高捍东, 崔春梅. 杂交新美柳幼苗年生长节律研究[J]. 江苏林业科技, 2009, 36(2):1-4,14.
	CAI W J, GAO H D, CUI C M. Studies on annual growth rhythm of Salix matsudana × alba seedlings[J]. J Jiangsu For Sci Technol, 2009, 36(2):1-4,14.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7380.2009.02.001.
[7]	蔡伟建, 高捍东, 白士杰. 杂交新美柳幼苗光合特性[J]. 浙江林学院学报, 2010, 27(3):340-346.
	CAI W J, GAO H D, BAI S J. Photosynthetic characteristics of Salix matsudana × alba seedlings[J]. J Zhejiang For Coll, 2010, 27(3):340-346.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2010.03.004.
[8]	吴薇, 高捍东, 魏树强. 水培盐碱胁迫对杂交新美柳生根特性的影响[J]. 林业科技开发, 2008, 22(3):32-34.
	WU W, GAO H D, WEI S Q. Effects of salt-alkali stress on rooting properties of Salix hybrid by the method of solution culture[J]. China For Sci Technol, 2008, 22(3):32-34.
[9]	胡涛, 张鸽香, 郑福超, 等. 植物盐胁迫响应的研究进展[J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(9):3006-3015.
	HU T, ZHANG G X, ZHENG F C, et al. Research progress in plant salt stress response[J]. Mol Plant Breed, 2018, 16(9):3006-3015.DOI: 10.13271/j.mpb.016.003006.
[10]	张阳, 李瑞莲, 张德胜, 等. 涝渍对植物影响研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2011, 25(4):420-424.
	ZHANG Y, LI R L, ZHANG D S, et al. Research progress on the influence of waterlogging on plants[J]. Crop Res, 2011, 25(4):420-424.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2011.04.30.
[11]	JIA W T, MA M H, CHEN J L, et al. Plant morphological,physiological and anatomical adaption to flooding stress and the underlying molecular mechanisms[J]. Int J Mol Sci, 2021, 22(3):1088.DOI: 10.3390/ijms22031088.
[12]	李合生. 现代植物生理学[M]. 3版. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2012.
	LI H S. Modern plant physiology[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2012.
[13]	XU Z, ZHOU J, REN T, et al. Salt stress decreases seedling growth and development but increases quercetin and kaempferol content in Apocynum venetum[J]. Plant Biol, 2020, 22(5):813-821.DOI: 10.1111/plb.13128.
[14]	LI H, WANG H, WEN W J, et al. The antioxidant system in Suaeda salsa under salt stress[J]. Plant Signal Behav, 2020, 15(7):1771939.DOI: 10.1080/15592324.2020.1771939.
[15]	WANG S W, XU F F, GUO L J, et al. Different responses of the halophyte Carex pumila to salt stress[J]. Biologia Plant, 2020, 64:519-528.DOI: 10.32615/bp.2020.075.
[16]	吴欣明, 王运琦, 刘建宁, 等. 羊茅属植物耐盐性评价及其对盐胁迫的生理反应[J]. 草业学报, 2007, 16(6):67-73.
	WU X M, WANG Y Q, LIU J N, et al. The research of physiological response and evaluation salt tolerance at seeding stage Festuca[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sin, 2007, 16(6):67-73.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5759.2007.06.010.
[17]	潘澜, 薛立. 植物淹水胁迫的生理学机制研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2012, 31(10):2662-2672.
	PAN L, XUE L. Plant physiological mechanisms in adapting to waterlogging stress:a review[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2012, 31(10):2662-2672.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2012.0393.
[18]	吴麟, 张伟伟, 葛晓敏, 等. 植物对淹水胁迫的响应机制研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2012, 25(6):27-33.
	WU L, ZHANG W W, GE X M, et al. A review of the response mechanisms of plants to waterlogging stress[J]. World For Res, 2012, 25(6):27-33.DOI: 10.13348/j.cnki.sjlyyj.2012.06.009.
[19]	王荣, 胡海清, 支博. 火烧处理对幼树叶片质膜透性和保护酶活性的影响[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(4):176-181.
	WANG R, HU H Q, ZHI B. Effects of burning on the cell membrane permeability and protective enzyme activity of the saplings of three tree species[J]. J Northwest For Univ, 2016, 31(4):176-181.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.04.30.
[20]	伍江波, 金晓玲, 汪晓丽, 等. 盐胁迫对杜仲幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(2):17-21.
	WU J B, JIN X L, WANG X L, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological characteristics of Eucommia ulmoides seedlings[J]. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2015, 42(2):17-21.DOI: 10.16768/j.issn.1004-874x.2015.02.014.
[21]	朱蕊. 盐碱胁迫对柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)的生长生理影响研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2021.
	ZHU R. Effects of saline-alkali stress on growth physiology of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2021.
[22]	IMAHORI Y, TAKEMURA M, BAI J H. Chilling-induced oxidative stress and antioxidant responses in mume (Prunus mume) fruit during low temperature storage[J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2008, 49(1):54-60.DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2007.10.017.
[23]	朱金方, 刘京涛, 陆兆华, 等. 盐胁迫对中国柽柳幼苗生理特性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2015, 35(15):5140-5146.
	ZHU J F, LIU J T, LU Z H, et al. Effects of salt stress on physiological characteristics of Tamarix chinensis Lour.seedlings[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2015, 35(15):5140-5146.DOI: 10.5846/stxb201312182981.
[24]	韩阳, 邱漫莉, 孟靖, 等. 碱胁迫对紫花苜蓿抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 辽宁大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 47(3):193-199,188.
	HAN Y, QIU M L, MENG J, et al. Effect of alkali stress on antioxidant enzymes of alfalfa[J]. J Liaoning Univ (Nat Sci Ed), 2020, 47(3):193-199,188.DOI: 10.16197/j.cnki.lnunse.2020.03.001.
[25]	PERRI S, ENTEKHABI D, MOLINI A. Plant osmoregulation as an emergent water-saving adaptation[J]. Water Resour Res, 2018, 54(4):2781-2798.DOI: 10.1002/2017WR022319.
[26]	刘介坤, 史锋厚, 管军, 等. NaCl胁迫对小叶栎生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2023, 43(2):46-56.
	LIU J K, SHI F H, GUAN J, et al. Effects of NaCl stress on the growth and physiological characteristics of Quercus chenii Nakai[J]. J Cent South Univ For Technol, 2023, 43(2):46-56.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2023.02.006.
[27]	陈泽平, 史晓敏, 王瑞, 等. 盐胁迫下不同葡萄砧木的渗透调节及抗氧化能力[J]. 西北植物学报, 2022, 42(11):1880-1891.
	CHEN Z P, SHI X M, WANG R, et al. Osmotic regulation and antioxidant capacity of different grapevine rootstocks under salt stress[J]. Acta Bot Boreali Occidentalia Sin, 2022, 42(11):1880-1891.

Related Articles 15

[1]	XIAO Liangjun, TAN Minshan, MA Ting, NING Delu. Relationship between canopy structure characteristics and fruit yield of ‘Yangpao’ walnut at different tree ages [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 129-136.
[2]	SONG Chenggong, WANG Keqin, SONG Yali, ZHANG Naimu. Effects of nitrogen deposition on soil respiration in zonal forests in the central Yunnan Plateau [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 14-24.
[3]	ZHAO Wei, WANG Haoyu, ZHU Mingwei, XU Zhibiao, HUANG Tao, SUN Liyong, HOU Jing, LI Shuxian. Physiological response of Quercus texana seeds during dehydration [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 144-152.
[4]	HOU Xuanzhu, LI Nan. Variation and trade-offs of twig and leaf traits among different broadleaved life form plants in the primitive broadleaved-Korean pine forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 163-171.
[5]	SANG Qingtian, WANG Yu, LI Yiding, ZHANG Hao, LIU Longchang, PAN Qingmin, LIU Wei, YUAN Wenping. Effects of air humidification and soil water addition on the microclimate of plant growth in semi-arid areas in Inner Mongolia [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 172-180.
[6]	WANG Zijie, GUO Huan, TANG Lixia, WU Wenli, LIAO Lala. Effect of Pyracantha fortuneana and Amorpha fruticosa root epidermis on root pulling friction [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 181-189.
[7]	JIANG Mingyue, HUANG Qingyang, YANG Fan, XIE Lihong, CAO Hongjie, SHA Gang. Response of soil humification degree in Wudalianchi kipuka to the decomposition of foliar litter in the home-field advantage [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 190-196.
[8]	WANG Wei, MU Hongna, YANG Huimin, SUN Taoze. The influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) inoculation on the growth status and photosynthetic characteristics of Leucojum aestivum [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 205-212.
[9]	LIN Chuhang, MA Yini, HE Jiaxin, HUANG Yanbo. Salvia ‘Chendan Yuebai’: a new cultivar in Salvia [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 265-266.
[10]	ZHANG Chunhong, WU Yaqiong, LYU Lianfei, WANG Xiaomin, WU Wenlong, LI Weilin. Vaccinium corymbosum ‘Zhongzhi 3’ and ‘Zhongzhi 4’: two new blueberry cultivars [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 267-269.
[11]	LI Xueling, LIU Ying, WU Wenlong, LYU Lianfei, ZHANG Chunhong, LI Weilin, CAO Fuliang. Characteristics of fruit set and fruit sensory quality of blueberry hybrids with different ploidy level [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 41-51.
[12]	ZHAO Fengyi, FAN Sufan, ZHAO Huifang, LIU Hongxia, LYU Lianfei, WU Wenlong, WU Yaqiong, LI Weilin. A comparison of fruit quality of ten high-anthocyanin blueberry cultivars [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(3): 63-72.
[13]	CONG Mingzhu, LIU Qijing, SUN Zhen, DONG Chunchao, QIAN Nipeng. Interpretation of environmental factors affecting β diversity and its components in plant communities on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 99-106.
[14]	CAO Lili, RUAN Honghua, LI Yuanyuan, NI Juanping, WANG Guobing, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin, XU Yaming. Variations of surface soil macrofauna in different aged Metasequoia glyptostroboides plantations [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 91-98.
[15]	ZHANG Yiting, XIA Nianhe, LIN Shuyan, DING Yulong. Spatial distribution characteristics and influencing factors of Chimonobambusa in China [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 107-114.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

处理 treatment	水分状况 water condition	NaCl质量分数/% NaCl content
CK	正常水分	0
SS₁	正常水分	0.2
SS₂	正常水分	0.4
SS₃	正常水分	0.6
WM	淹水	0
WS₁	淹水	0.2
WS₂	淹水	0.4
WS₃	淹水	0.6

处理 treatment	受害程度damage degree						保存率/% preservation rate
处理 treatment	3 d	10 d	17 d	24 d	41 d	60 d	3 d	10 d	17 d	24 d	41 d	60 d
CK	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	正常	100	100	100	100	100	100
SS₁	正常	正常	一级	一级	一级	一级	100	100	100	100	100	100
SS₂	正常	一级	二级	二级	三级	四级	100	100	100	100	83	56
SS₃	一级	二级	二级	二级	四级	五级	100	100	100	94	72	28
WM	正常	正常	一级	一级	二级	三级	100	100	100	100	94	83
WS₁	正常	正常	一级	二级	三级	四级	100	100	100	94	89	61
WS₂	正常	一级	二级	三级	四级	五级	100	100	94	89	61	28
WS₃	一级	一级	三级	四级	四级	五级	100	100	89	78	50	0

指标 indicators	F
指标 indicators	淹水胁迫 flooding stress	盐胁迫 salt stress	盐涝交互 flooding× salt stress
苗高seedling height	26.641^**	52.489^**	18.475^**
地径root collar diameter	1.528	10.548^**	3.461
生物量biomass	71.089^**	36.589^**	18.479^**
叶片水分亏缺RWC	55.061^**	53.163^**	7.721^**
相对电导率REC	3.912^*	3.907^*	1.946
丙二醛含量MDA content	10.280^**	3.244^*	0.046
叶绿素含量chlorophyll content	21.956^**	20.822^**	3.259^*
可溶性蛋白含量SP content	9.029^**	2.840^*	0.724
可溶性糖含量SS content	0.508	1.577^**	5.411^**
脯氨酸含量Pro content	10.499^**	3.442^*	0.138
SOD活性SOD activity	0.840	11.900^**	6.113^**
POD活性POD activity	32.944^**	12.674^**	3.836^*
根系活力root vigor	20.221^**	15.970^**	4.854^*

处理 treatment	苗高/cm seedling height	地径/mm root collar diameter	生物量/g biomass	R_WC/%
CK	100.3±5.03 bc	3.94±0.26 b	7.25±0.83 c	12.44±0.71 cd
SS₁	94.5±3.53 c	4.21±0.36 a	7.35±0.59 bc	17.00±0.62 b
SS₂	88.5±3.67 d	3.58±0.86 c	6.84±0.48 d	18.82±0.58 b
SS₃	81.6±3.29 de	3.43±0.51 d	6.74±0.81 d	21.3±1.15 a
WM	114.2±5.05 a	3.90±0.48 b	7.68±0.71 a	10.74±0.77 d
WS₁	105.6±4.31 b	3.45±0.21 c	7.48±0.73 b	14.56±0.40 c
WS₂	84.3±3.76 d	3.48±0.66 cd	7.10±0.89 c	18.45±0.50 b
WS₃	77.9±6.01 e	3.33±0.41 d	6.83±0.70 d	20.93±1.31 a

指标 index	苗高 seedling height	地径 root collar diameter	生物量 biomass	叶片水分亏缺 RWC	根系活力 root vigor	叶绿素含量 Chl content	REC	MDA含量 MDA content	SOD活性 SOD activity	POD活性 POD activity	SP含量 SP content	SS含量 SS content
地径root collar diameter	0.225
生物量biomass	0.437^*	0.307
RWC	-0.870^**	-0.279	-0.357
根系活力root vigor	0.610^**	0.342	0.327	-0.590^**
叶绿素含量Chl content	0.682^**	0.469^*	0.201	-0.731^**	0.363
相对电导率REC	-0.604^**	-0.477^*	-0.210	0.721^**	-0.279	-0.853^**
丙二醛含量MDA	-0.097	-0.416^*	0.116	0.245	0.042	-0.640^**	0.639^**
SOD活性SOD activity	0.495^*	0.191	0.243	-0.294	0.397	0.521^**	-0.336	-0.106
POD活性POD activity	0.308	0.160	0.194	-0.091	0.599^**	0.054	0.096	0.203	0.740^**
可溶性蛋白含量SP content	-0.295	-0.374	-0.038	0.401	-0.071	-0.625^**	0.793^**	0.585^**	-0.048	0.457
可溶性糖含量SS content	0.426^*	0.487^*	0.067	-0.571^**	0.016	0.695^**	-0.759^**	-0.525^**	-0.018	-0.379	-0.727^**
游离脯氨酸含量Pro content	-0.524^**	-0.403	-0.032	0.630^**	-0.322	-0.868^**	0.808^**	0.589^**	-0.463	0.079	0.691^**	-0.630^**

Growth and physiological response of Salix matsudana × alba to salt-flooding stress

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 13

References 27

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

指标 index	主成分principal component
指标 index	1	2	3	4
苗高seedling height	0.745	0.446	0.312	-0.251
地径root collar diameter	0.570	0.018	-0.146	0.736
生物量biomass	0.296	0.437	0.506	0.472
叶片水分亏缺RWC	-0.816	-0.223	-0.377	0.236
根系活力root activity	0.469	0.672	0.087	0.031
叶绿素含量Chl content	0.945	-0.015	-0.141	-0.104
相对电导率REC	-0.932	0.181	0.008	0.031
丙二醛含量MDA content	-0.601	0.464	0.430	-0.122
SOD酶活SOD activity	0.442	0.629	-0.478	-0.116
POD酶活POD activity	0.057	0.885	-0.395	0.065
可溶性蛋白含量SP content	-0.724	0.482	0.005	-0.025
可溶性糖含量SS content	0.758	-0.460	0.178	0.062
游离脯氨酸含量Pro content	-0.867	0.159	0.168	0.181