
Inversion of tree height from GEDI and ICESat-2 spaceborne lidar
KONG Delun, XING Yanqiu
JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2) : 175-184.
Inversion of tree height from GEDI and ICESat-2 spaceborne lidar
【Objective】Global ecosystem dynamics investigation (GEDI) multibeam lidar and ice, cloud and land elevation satellite-2 (ICESat-2) photon clouds use different lidar technologies, resulting in differences in tree height extraction values between the two tasks. The purpose of this study is to compare the ability of two spaceborne lidar data to effectively invert forest height under different conditions. 【Method】By locating and filtering the GEDI L2A field information, and verifying the terrain elevation accuracy, the tree height of six algorithm groups was compared. The ICESat-2 data was denoised, a photonic cloud classification algorithm based on slope change was proposed, the ground photon line and the canopy top line inversion forest height were established, and the accuracy of GEDI and ICESat-2 in the study area was verified and compared by using the measured data and airborne lidar data. Finally, the differences of GEDI and ICESat-2 data in different terrain slopes, vegetation coverage and forest types were quantitatively analyzed. 【Result】According to the GEDI L2A product data, by comparing the optimal algorithms in GEDI L2A algorithm group from a1 to a6, the inversion accuracy of a4 was better: R2=0.94, root mean square error was 2.31 m, and mean absolute error was 1.27 m. For ICESat-2 data, R2=0.81, the root mean square error was 3.68 m, and the mean absolute error was 2.45 m, calculated using a 50 m window. Vegetation coverage had a greater impact on the tree height of the two spaceborne lidars compared to the terrain slope and forest type. 【Conclusion】Compared with ICESat-2 data, GEDI data showed a better evaluation accuracy standard for the more gentle and densely populated areas with coniferous forest types.
global ecosystem dynamics investigation(GEDI) / ice, cloud and land elevation satellite-2 (ICESat-2) / invert tree height / terrain slope / vegetation coverage / forest type / spaceborne LiDAR
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
胡艳, 王迪, 刘凌菲, 等. 利用大光斑激光雷达估测小兴安岭平均树高[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(15):4707-4709.
|
[8] |
董瀚元, 于颖, 范文义. 星载激光雷达GEDI数据林下地形反演性能验证[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(2):141-149.
|
[9] |
吴伟东. 联合卫星遥感影像与光子雷达数提取山林地区数字高程模型[D]. 广州: 广东工业大学, 2022.
|
[10] |
黄佳鹏. 基于ICESat-2/ATLAS光子计数LiDAR数据反演森林冠层高度研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2021.
|
[11] |
覃志刚, 尤号田, 黄元威, 等. 不同植被覆盖区ICESat-2和GF-7卫星地表高程信息对比研究[J]. 航天返回与遥感, 2023, 44(5):91-104.
|
[12] |
张少伟. 基于多源数据的内蒙古大兴安岭林区森林资源变化监测研究[D]. 北京: 中国林业科学研究院, 2019.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
陆大进, 黎东, 朱笑笑, 等. 基于卷积神经网络的ICESat-2光子点云去噪分类[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2021, 23(11):2086-2095.
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
陈雨莹, 王龑, 邹艳红, 等. 全球土地覆盖产品中森林类型数据在中国区域的质量评估[J]. 遥感技术与应用, 2023, 38(2):341-352.
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
韩明辉, 邢艳秋, 李国元, 等. GEDI不同算法组数据反演森林最大冠层高度和生物量精度比较[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2022, 42(10):72-82.
|
[22] |
秦磊. 基于ICESat-2星载激光雷达光子云数据反演森林冠层高度方法研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北林业大学, 2020.
|
[23] |
王丽, 李毅, 朱建军, 等. ICESat-2 ATL08地形和冠层高度产品精度评估[J]. 遥感信息, 2023, 38(4): 144-152.
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |