Research on characteristics of soil infiltration at different altitude gradients in Liziping Nature Reserve

doi:10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310013

JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (2): 143-152.doi: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202310013

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research on characteristics of soil infiltration at different altitude gradients in Liziping Nature Reserve

LU Qiwei¹(), TUO Yunfei¹^,^*(), ZHENG Yang², LUO Wei², DAI Qinlong², HE Xiahong¹

1. College of Soil and Water Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China
2. Sichuan Liziping National Nature Reserve Administration, Open Laboratory of Shimian Research Center of Giant Panda Small Population Conservation and Rejuvenation, Liziping Giant Panda’s Ecology and Conservation Observation and Research Station of Sichuan Province, Shimian 625499, China

Received:2023-10-11 Accepted:2024-04-12 Online:2025-03-30 Published:2025-03-28
Contact: TUO Yunfei E-mail:xnlyluqiwei@163.com;tyunfei@163.com

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】The purpose of this study was to explore how soil infiltration responds to different elevation gradients in Liziping National Nature Reserve, Sichuan. 【Method】Soil samples were collected from four elevation gradients (1 900, 2 100, 2 300, and 2 500 m) within the nature reserve. Soil infiltration characteristics at these gradients were measured using the ring knife method. Key factors affecting soil infiltration were identified through path and correlation analyses. Additionally, the suitability of infiltration models, including Kostiakov, Philip and Horton, was evaluated by fitting and analyzing the data. 【Result】Soil infiltration rates showed a highly significantly negative correlation with elevation (P < 0.01). Soil microbial biomass had a significant positive correlation with infiltration rates (P < 0.05), promoting water infiltration. In the first 20 min, soil infiltration rates decreased by about 50% at elevations of 1 900 and 2 100 m, and by 72% to 85% at elevations of 2 300 and 2 500 m. The rate of infiltration decreased at 2 300 and 2 500 m was significantly faster that than at 1 900 and 2 100 m, primarily due to differences in soil organic matter, aggregate grain structure, and microbial biomass. The model fitting showed that the R² values were 0.896-0.959 for the Kostiakov model, 0.874-0.965 for the Philip model, and 0.945-0.965 for the Horton model. Based on the R² values and the alignment between fitted and measured values, the Kostiakov model was found to be the most suitable for the study area. 【Conclusion】Elevation gradients significantly affect soil infiltration characteristics, primarily influenced by soil organic matter, aggregate grain structure, and microbial biomass.

Key words: elevation gradient, soil physical and chemical property, infiltration characteristic, model fitting, Liziping Nature Reserve, microbial biomass

CLC Number:

S714.7

LU Qiwei, TUO Yunfei, ZHENG Yang, LUO Wei, DAI Qinlong, HE Xiahong. Research on characteristics of soil infiltration at different altitude gradients in Liziping Nature Reserve[J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(2): 143-152.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Fig. 1

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Fig. 2

References 39

[1]	SCHWARTZ R C, SCHLEGEL A J, BELL J M, et al. Contrasting tillage effects on stored soil water,infiltration and evapotranspiration fluxes in a dryland rotation at two locations[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2019, 190:157-174.DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2019.02.013.
[2]	刘目兴, 杜文正, 张海林. 三峡库区不同林型土壤的入渗能力研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2013, 22(3):299-306.
	LIU M X, DU W Z, ZHANG H L. Research on the soil infiltration capacity of different forest types in the Three Gorges reservoir area[J]. Resour Environ Yangtze Basin, 2013, 22(3):299-306.
[3]	陈娟, 陈林, 宋乃平, 等. 荒漠草原不同土壤类型水分入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(4):18-23.
	CHEN J, CHEN L, SONG N P, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics of different soils types in desert steppe[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2018, 32(4):18-23.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2018.04.004.
[4]	周维, 张建辉. 金沙江支流冲沟侵蚀区四种土地利用方式下土壤入渗特性研究[J]. 土壤, 2006, 38(3):333-337.
	ZHOU W, ZHANG J H. Soil infiltration under different patterns of land use in gully erosion area of the Jinshajiang River basin[J]. Soils, 2006, 38(3):333-337.DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2006.03.017.
[5]	刘茜茹, 冯天骄, 王平, 等. 晋西黄土区长期植被恢复对土壤表层入渗与水分储量差异的影响[J]. 水土保持通报, 2023, 43(2):50-59.
	LIU X R, FENG T J, WANG P, et al. Effect of long-term vegetation restoration on surface soil water infiltration and water storage in loess area of western province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2023, 43(2):50-59.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.02.007.
[6]	赵洋毅, 王玉杰, 王云琦, 等. 渝北水源区水源涵养林构建模式对土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30(15):4162-4172.
	ZHAO Y Y, WANG Y J, WANG Y Q, et al. Effects of structures of plantation forests on soil infiltration characteristics in source water protect areas in northern Chongqing City[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2010, 30(15):4162-4172.
[7]	舒锟, 张家春, 张珍明, 等. 不同海拔梯度下梵净山土壤机械组成及养分特征[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2017, 35(1):52-59.
	SHU K, ZHANG J C, ZHANG Z M, et al. Soil mechanical composition and nutrient properties along an elevational gradient in Fanjing Mountain[J]. J Sichuan Agric Univ, 2017, 35(1):52-59.DOI: 10.16036/j.issn.1000-2650.2017.01.008.
[8]	JERÁBEK J, ZUMR D, DOSTÁL T. Identifying the plough pan position on cultivated soils by measurements of electrical resistivity and penetration resistance[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2017, 174:231-240.DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2017.07.008.
[9]	GAO L L, BECKER E, LIANG G P, et al. Effect of different tillage systems on aggregate structure and inner distribution of organic carbon[J]. Geoderma, 2017, 288:97-104.DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.11.005.
[10]	卢振启, 黄秋娴, 杨新兵. 河北雾灵山不同海拔油松人工林枯落物及土壤水文效应研究[J]. 水土保持学报, 2014, 28(1):112-116.
	LU Z Q, HUANG Q X, YANG X B. Research on hydrological effects of forest litters and soil of Pinus tabuliformis plantations in the different altitudes of Wuling Mountains in Hebei[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2014, 28(1):112-116.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2014.01.003.
[11]	胡晓聪, 黄乾亮, 金亮. 西双版纳热带山地雨林枯落物及其土壤水文功能[J]. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(1):55-63.
	HU X C, HUANG Q L, JIN L. Hydrological functions of the litters and soil of tropical montane rain forest in Xishuangbanna,Yunnan,China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2017, 28(1):55-63.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201701.018.
[12]	亢晨波, 郭汉清, 张垚, 等. 关帝山不同海拔和坡向土壤水分入渗特征[J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2022, 50(6):76-82.
	KANG C B, GUO H Q, ZHANG Y, et al. Infiltration characteristics of soil moisture at different altitudes and slopes of Guandi Mountain[J]. J Northeast For Univ, 2022, 50(6):76-82.DOI: 10.13759/j.cnki.dlxb.2022.06.018.
[13]	刘瑞, 夏卫生, 梁羽石, 等. 湖南省衡山不同海拔高度土壤的入渗特征[J]. 水土保持通报, 2019, 39(4):82-88.
	LIU R, XIA W S, LIANG Y S, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics at different altitudes in Hengshan Mountains of Hu’nan Province[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 39(4):82-88.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.04.013.
[14]	FU Y, LI G L, ZHENG T H, et al. Splash detachment and transport of loess aggregate fragments by raindrop action[J]. CATENA, 2017, 150:154-160.DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2016.11.021.
[15]	印家旺, 阿拉木萨, 苏宇航, 等. 科尔沁沙地不同土地利用类型土壤入渗特征比较研究[J]. 水土保持通报, 2022, 42(4):90-98.
	YIN J W, Alamusa, SU Y H, et al. Comparative study on soil infiltration characteristics of different land use types in Horqin sandy land[J]. Bull Soil Water Conserv, 2022, 42(4):90-98.DOI: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2022.04.012.
[16]	云慧雅, 毕华兴, 王珊珊, 等. 不同林分类型土壤理化特征及其对土壤入渗过程的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2021, 35(6):183-189.
	YUN H Y, BI H X, WANG S S, et al. Soil physical and chemical characteristics of different forest types and their effects on soil infiltration process[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2021, 35(6):183-189.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2021.06.025.
[17]	张利荣, 李惠通, 郑立津, 等. 不同林龄杉木人工林的林下植被与土壤理化特性[J]. 亚热带农业研究, 2021, 17(3):165-172.
	ZHANG L R, LI H T, ZHENG L J, et al. Undergrowth vegetation of Chinese fir plantations of different ages and soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Subtrop Agric Res, 2021, 17(3):165-172.DOI: 10.13321/j.cnki.subtrop.agric.res.2021.03.004.
[18]	李新星, 刘桂民, 吴小丽, 等. 马衔山不同海拔土壤碳、氮、磷含量及生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(3):758-765.
	LI X X, LIU G M, WU X L, et al. Elevational distribution of soil organic carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus contents and their ecological stoichiometry on Maxian Mountain[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2020, 39(3):758-765.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.202003.004.
[19]	韦慧, 邓羽松, 林立文, 等. 喀斯特生态脆弱区典型小生境土壤团聚体稳定性比较研究[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(7):2751-2762.
	WEI H, DENG Y S, LIN L W, et al. Comparative study on the stability of soil aggregates in typical microhabitats in Karst ecologically fragile areas[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2022, 42(7):2751-2762.DOI: 10.5846/stxb202103200736.
[20]	刘光崧. 土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M]. 北京: 中国标准出版社,1996.
	LIU G S. Soil physical and chemical analysis & description of soil profiles[M]. Beijing: Standards Press of China,1996.
[21]	鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 3版. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
	BAO S D. Soil and agricultural chemistry analysis[M]. 3rd ed. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2000.
[22]	刘艳娇, 刘庆, 贺合亮, 等. 亚高山粗枝云杉人工林土壤原核微生物群落结构与功能变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2023, 34(12):3279-3290.
	LIU Y J, LIU Q, HE H L, et al. Changes in the structure and function of soil prokaryotic communities in subalpine Picea asperata plantations[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2023, 34(12):3279-3290.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202312.031.
[23]	阿茹·苏里坦, 常顺利, 张毓涛. 天山林区不同群落土壤水分入渗特性的对比分析与模拟[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(24):9111-9118.
	Aru Sultan, CHANG S L, ZHANG Y T. Comparative analysis and simulation of soil moisture infiltration characteristics in different communities in the forests of Tianshan Mountains,China[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2019, 39(24):9111-9118. DOI:10.5846/stxb201810072160.
[24]	牛文全, 邹小阳, 刘晶晶, 等. 残膜对土壤水分入渗和蒸发的影响及不确定性分析[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(14):110-119.
	NIU W Q, ZOU X Y, LIU J J, et al. Effects of residual plastic film mixed in soil on water infiltration,evaporation and its uncertainty analysis[J]. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2016, 32(14):110-119.DOI: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.14.016.
[25]	郑健, 张彦宁, 王燕, 等. 沼液穴灌入渗特征及Philip入渗模型拟合[J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2019, 37(1):144-150.
	ZHENG J, ZHANG Y N, WANG Y, et al. Infiltration characteristics and Philip model fitting analysis of biogas slurry hole-irrigation[J]. Agric Res Arid Areas, 2019, 37(1):144-150.DOI: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2019.01.20.
[26]	曾江敏, 何丙辉, 李天阳, 等. 喀斯特槽谷区不同林草恢复模式下土壤入渗特征[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(4):58-64.
	ZENG J M, HE B H, LI T Y, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics under different forest and grass restoration models in Karst trough-valley region[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 33(4):58-64.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.04.009.
[27]	陆其伟, 脱云飞, 冯永钰, 等. 栗子坪自然保护区林分类型对土壤化学计量特征、微生物及其季节动态响应[J]. 水土保持学报, 2024, 38(5):285-295.
	LU Q W, TUO Y F, FENG Y Y, et al. Response of forest stand types to soil stoichiometric characteristics, microorganisms and their seasonal dynamics in Liziping Nature Reserve[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2024, 38(5):285-295. DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2024.05.035.
[28]	李志, 袁颖丹, 胡耀文, 等. 海拔及旅游干扰对武功山山地草甸土壤渗透性的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2018, 38(2):635-645.
	LI Z, YUAN Y D, HU Y W, et al. Effects of elevation and tourism disturbance on meadow soil infiltration on Wugong Mountain[J]. Acta Ecol Sin, 2018, 38(2):635-645.
[29]	石玉龙, 周晨霓, 王建峰, 等. 西藏色季拉山不同海拔梯度急尖长苞冷杉林土壤入渗特征研究[J]. 林业资源管理, 2015(4):98-103.
	SHI Y L, ZHOU C N, WANG J F, et al. Soil infiltration characteristics in Abies georgei var.smithii forest of Sygara Mountains in Tibet based on different elevations[J]. For Resour Manag, 2015(4):98-103.DOI: 10.13466/j.cnki.lyzygl.2015.04.017.
[30]	曹瑞, 吴福忠, 杨万勤, 等. 海拔对高山峡谷区土壤微生物生物量和酶活性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(4):1257-1264.
	CAO R, WU F Z, YANG W Q, et al. Effects of altitudes on soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity in alpine-gorge regions[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2016, 27(4):1257-1264.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201604.018.
[31]	丛静, 刘晓, 卢慧, 等. 神农架自然保护区土壤微生物生物量碳、氮沿海拔梯度的变化及其影响因素[J]. 生态学杂志, 2014, 33(12):3381-3387.
	CONG J, LIU X, LU H, et al. Changes of soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen along the altitude gradient and its influence factors in Shennongjia Natural Reserve,China[J]. Chin J Ecol, 2014, 33(12):3381-3387.DOI: 10.13292/j.1000-4890.2014.0303.
[32]	胡璟, 刘兴良, 胡宗达, 等. 川西亚高山典型灌丛土壤微生物量及其碳氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2024, 30(2):220-228.
	HU J, LIU X L, HU Z D, et al. Changes in soil microbial C∶N∶P stoichiometry in different shrub types in subalpine regions of western Sichuan Province,China[J]. Chin J Appl Environ Biol, 2024, 30(2):220-228.DOI: 10.19675/j.cnki.1006-687x.2023.05017.
[33]	胡嵩, 张颖, 史荣久, 等. 长白山原始红松林次生演替过程中土壤微生物生物量和酶活性变化[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24(2):366-372.
	HU S, ZHANG Y, SHI R J, et al. Temporal variations of soil microbial biomass and enzyme activities during the secondary succession of primary broadleaved-Pinus koraiensis forests in Changbai Mountains of northeast China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2013, 24(2):366-372.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0168.
[34]	王彦武, 罗玲, 张峰, 等. 河西绿洲荒漠过渡带梭梭林土壤保育效应[J]. 土壤学报, 2019, 56(3):749-762.
	WANG Y W, LUO L, ZHANG F, et al. Soil conservation effect of Haloxylon ammodendron bushes in Hexi oasis-desert ecotone[J]. Acta Pedol Sin, 2019, 56(3):749-762.DOI: 10.11766/trxb201806260176.
[35]	李秋嘉, 薛志婧, 周正朝. 宁南山区植被恢复对土壤团聚体养分特征及微生物特性的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(1):137-145.
	LI Q J, XUE Z J, ZHOU Z C. Effects of vegetation restoration on nutrient and microbial properties of soil aggregates with different particle sizes in the Loess Hilly regions of Ningxia,northwest China[J]. Chin J Appl Ecol, 2019, 30(1):137-145.DOI: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201901.022.
[36]	翟辉, 张海, 张超, 等. 黄土峁状丘陵区不同类型林分土壤微生物功能多样性[J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(12):84-91.
	ZHAI H, ZHANG H, ZHANG C, et al. Soil microbial functional diversity in different types of stands in the hilly-gully regions of Loess Plateau[J]. Sci Silvae Sin, 2016, 52(12):84-91.DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20161210.
[37]	ISLAM M U, JIANG F H, GUO Z C, et al. Does biochar application improve soil aggregation?A meta-analysis[J]. Soil Tillage Res, 2021,209:104926.DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104926.
[38]	冯娜, 刘冬冬, 赵荣存, 等. 岩溶山地植被恢复中碳酸盐岩红土入渗特征及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持学报, 2019, 33(6):162-169,175.
	FENG N, LIU D D, ZHAO R C, et al. Infiltration characteristics and influencing factors of carbonate laterite from Karst Mountain areas during vegetation restoration[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2019, 33(6):162-169,175.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2019.06.023.
[39]	郭海云, 王根绪, 孙守琴. 氮添加对亚高山针叶林土壤结构及水分入渗性能的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2023, 37(1):238-245.
	GUO H Y, WANG G X, SUN S Q. Effects of nitrogen addition on soil structure and water infiltration of subalpine coniferous forest[J]. J Soil Water Conserv, 2023, 37(1):238-245.DOI: 10.13870/j.cnki.stbcxb.2023.01.031.

Metrics

Comments

www.nldxb.njfu.edu.cn

Edited ＆ Published by Editorial Department of Nanjing Forestry University(Natural Sciences Edition)
Address： No.159 Longpan Road,Nanjing 210037 Jiangsu,P.R.China
E-mail ：xuebao@njfu.edu.cn , xuebao@njfu.com.cn
Telephone +86-25-85428247,85427076
Distributed by China International Book Trading Corporation P.O. Box 399, Beijing ,P.R. China

海拔/m altitude	林分类型 forest type	优势群落 dominant community	土壤类型 soil type	经度(E) longitude	纬度(N) latitude	郁闭度/% canopy
1 900	青冈-川杨阔叶混交林 Quercus glauca- Populus szechuanica broad-leaved mixed forest	青冈、川杨、木姜子(Litsea pungens)	山地黄棕壤	102°21'36″	28°52'58″	50~60
2 100	栓皮栎落叶阔叶林 Quercus variabilis deciduous broad-leaved forest	栓皮栎、槐(Styphnolobium japonicum)	山地棕壤	102°16'38″	29°02'56″	50~60
2 300	冷杉-云杉针叶混交林 Abies fabri-Picea asperata coniferous mixed forest	云杉、冷杉、白桦(Betula platyphylla )	山地棕壤	102°23'34″	29°00'07″	50~60
2 500	石棉玉山竹林 Yushania lineolata forest	石棉玉山竹 (Y. lineolata)	山地暗棕壤	102°24'15″	28°59'40″	60~70

海拔/m altitude	容重/ (g·cm^-3) bulk density	总孔隙度/% total porosity	含水率/% water content	毛管持水量/% capillary water holding capacity	毛管孔隙度/% capillary porosity	非毛管孔隙度/% non-capillary porosity	有机质质量分数/ (g·kg^-1) organic matter fraction
1 900	1.00±0.01 b	62.14±0.01 b	29.07±0.06 a	37.43±0.02 a	37.54±0.02 a	24.60±0.02 c	49.54±6.67 a
2 100	1.10±0.06 a	58.54±0.06 a	34.25±0.08 a	41.99±0.08 a	45.72±0.07 a	12.82±0.05 d	31.11±6.45 bc
2 300	1.00±0.03 b	62.15±0.03 b	13.10±0.02 b	15.77±0.02 b	15.59±0.01 b	46.56±0.01 a	37.45±2.37 b
2 500	1.17±0.04 a	55.93±0.04 a	12.29±0.04 b	16.74±0.04 b	19.46±0.05 b	36.47±0.07 b	25.10±7.26 c

海拔/m altitude	机械组成/% mechanical composition			团聚体粒径分布/% agglomerate distribution				微生物生物量碳质量分数/ (mg·kg^-1) MBC mass fraction	微生物生物量氮质量分数/ (mg·kg^-1) MBN mass fraction
海拔/m altitude	砂粒 sand	粉粒 silt	黏粒 clay	≥2.00 mm	[1.00,2.00) mm	[0.25,1.00) mm	<0.25 mm	微生物生物量碳质量分数/ (mg·kg^-1) MBC mass fraction	微生物生物量氮质量分数/ (mg·kg^-1) MBN mass fraction
1 900	25.89±7.84 a	62.16±6.37 a	10.49±1.94 a	37.39±6.05 a	19.64±5.98 a	25.4±3.54 a	16.47±3.32 a	0.94±0.28 a	0.058±0.018 a
2 100	23.10±13.87 a	56.39±14.25 a	17.12±5.84 a	30.47±10.20 a	21.74±5.59 a	32.31±9.12 a	14.66±4.80 a	0.44±0.16 b	0.040±0.013 b
2 300	29.04±7.42 a	54.54±8.21 a	12.62±1.68 a	29.91±3.60 a	26.57±1.80 a	30.83±4.70 a	12.32±1.02 a	0.32±0.07 b	0.033±0.010 bc
2 500	32.45±10.36 a	55.93±2.24 a	10.99±1.88 a	27.2±22.18 a	17.32±10.65 a	34.99±16.20 a	20.27±8.59 a	0.30±0.18 b	0.023±0.004 c

微生物 microbial	海拔/m altitude	ACE指数 ACE index	Chao1指数 Chao1 index	Simpson指数 Simpson index	Shannon指数 Shannon index	覆盖度 coverage
细菌 bacteria	1 900	1 473.20±417.83 a	1 470.07±418.19 a	0.996±0 a	9.21±0.52 a	0.999 8±0 a
	2 100	1 216.00±307.29 a	1 212.14±306.28 a	0.996±0 a	8.93±0.50 a	0.999 8±0 a
	2 300	1 317.23±90.60 a	1 312.54±89.10 a	0.997±0 a	9.24±0.15 a	0.999 7±0 a
	2 500	1 239.97±310.18 a	1 235.82±309.98 a	0.996±0 a	9.09±0.47 a	0.999 7±0 a
真菌 fungi	1 900	815.87±25.56 ab	811.25±26.53 ab	0.961±0 a	6.42±0.07 a	0.999 7±0 b
	2 100	518.39±75.44 b	516.56±74.74 b	0.886±0.040 a	5.46±0.51 a	0.999 9±0 a
	2 300	599.71±213.69 b	597.87±215.06 b	0.966±0.020 a	6.67±0.80 a	0.999 9±0 a
	2 500	1 141.87±303.42 a	1139.62±304.14 a	0.895±0.090 a	5.85±1.11 a	0.999 8±0 ab

海拔/m altitude	Kostiakov模型 Kostiakov model			Philip模型 Philip model			Horton模型 Horton model
海拔/m altitude	a	b	R²	S	A	R²	A₀	A	k	R²
1 900	7.01	0.39	0.937	10.89	1.66	0.915	7.91	1.11	0.34	0.984
2 100	6.14	0.34	0.896	8.76	1.87	0.874	6.80	2.38	0.20	0.967
2 300	5.75	0.42	0.931	9.77	0.89	0.934	7.53	2.51	0.48	0.945
2 500	1.44	0.62	0.959	2.28	0.31	0.965	2.02	0.73	0.62	0.980

Research on characteristics of soil infiltration at different altitude gradients in Liziping Nature Reserve

RichHTML

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 39

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

Author

Reader

Reviewer

因子 factor	DR	R	间接通径系数 indirect path coefficient												决策系数 coefficient	排序 sort
因子 factor	DR	R	X₁	X₂	X₃	X₄	X₅	X₆	X₇	X₈	X₉	X₁₀	X₁₁	IDR	决策系数 coefficient	排序 sort
X₁	-0.654	0.164		0.096	0.058	0.100	-0.016	0.224	0.034	0.109	-0.003	-0.113	0.330	0.819	-0.644	11
X₂	0.214	0.217	-0.293		0.065	0.096	-0.026	0.127	0.033	0.012	0.048	0.068	-0.127	0.003	0.173	4
X₃	0.208	0.257	-0.184	0.067		-0.051	-0.023	0.261	0.052	0.043	-0.018	0.106	-0.204	0.049	0.113	5
X₄	0.290	0.280	-0.226	0.071	-0.036		-0.041	-0.005	-0.018	0.035	0.023	-0.151	0.338	-0.010	0.188	3
X₅	0.058	-0.424	0.184	-0.095	-0.083	-0.204		-0.162	-0.029	0.046	-0.019	0.065	-0.186	-0.483	-0.030	9
X₆	0.861	0.857	-0.170	0.031	0.063	-0.002	-0.011		0.101	-0.020	0.055	-0.051	-0.001	-0.005	0.886	1
X₇	0.130	0.634	-0.169	0.054	0.083	-0.040	-0.013	0.672		-0.040	0.054	-0.006	-0.091	0.504	0.006	8
X₈	0.312	0.046	-0.228	0.009	0.028	0.032	0.008	-0.055	-0.017		-0.004	-0.011	-0.030	-0.268	0.055	6
X₉	-0.131	-0.678	-0.016	-0.079	0.029	-0.050	0.008	-0.361	-0.054	0.009		0.082	-0.116	-0.548	0.026	7
X₁₀	-0.310	0.336	-0.220	-0.047	-0.071	0.141	-0.012	0.140	0.003	0.011	0.035		0.686	0.666	-0.329	10
X₁₁	0.742	0.179	-0.291	-0.037	-0.057	0.132	-0.015	-0.002	-0.016	-0.012	0.021	-0.287		-0.564	0.551	2

[1]	LI Yang, ZHANG Yunqi, WEN Yue, ZHANG Suilin, CHEN Yonghao, QI Jianxun, ZHANG Junpei, HOU Zhixia. Correlation analysis and model construction of nut phenotype and kernel quality of early-fruiting walnuts (Juglans regia) [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2025, 49(1): 119-127.
[2]	ZHANG Miao, RUAN Honghua, SHEN Caiqin, DING Xuenong, CAO Guohua. Effects of long-term application of biogas slurry on soil carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus and their metering ratio in poplar plantations [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(6): 102-110.
[3]	CHEN Hui, WANG Gaiping, PENG Fangren, ZHU Yunfen, ZHANG Yu, WANG Han. Soil quality assessment for Carya illinoensis-Paeonia ostii under various patterns [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2024, 48(4): 177-183.
[4]	XIA Jie, CHEN Sheng, WU Yifan, ZHANG Wei, XIE Jinzhong. Dynamic changes of soil microbial biomass and microbial entropy after planting Dictyophora indusiata in Phyllostachys edulis forests [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(4): 127-134.
[5]	ZHAO Shuang, WANG Shaojun, YANG Bo, ZUO Qianqian, CAO Qianbin, WANG Ping, ZHANG Lulu, ZHANG Kunfeng, FAN Yuxiang. Responses of soil respiration to tropical forest secondary succession in Xishuangbanna [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2022, 46(2): 12-18.
[6]	GUO Chuanyang, LIN Kaimin, ZHENG Mingming, REN Zhengbiao, LI Mao, ZHENG Hong, YOU Yunfei, CHEN Zhiyun. Short-term effects of thinning on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a Cunninghamia lanceolata plantation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(5): 125-131.
[7]	FAN Hongwang, BUI Van Thang, TAO Xiao, GUAN Zhiwei, XU Kefu. Effects of spatial difference between urban and rural areas on soil active organic carbon in Quercus acutissima forests [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 151-158.
[8]	XU Menglu, WU Wei, YAN Zhengming, CAO Guohua, SHEN Caiqin, RUAN Honghua. Content and vertical distribution of soil labile organic carbons in different land use types in the tidal flat area [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2020, 44(4): 167-175.
[9]	WANG Guobing, WANG Rui, XU Jin, CAO Guohua, RUAN Honghua. Effects of biochar application on microbial biomass C, N, P and stoichiometry characteristics of poplar plantation soil [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2019, 43(02): 1-6.
[10]	ZHAO Youpeng, MENG Miaojing, ZHANG Jinchi, MA Jieyi, LIU Shenglong. Study on the composition and stability of soil aggregates of the main forest stands in Fengyang Mountain, Zhejiang Province [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2018, 42(05): 84-90.
[11]	SONG Lei, LIN Youwei, JIN Guangze. Effects of simulated nitrogen deposition on soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in a mixed broadleaf Korean pine forest [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(05): 7-12.
[12]	NI Xue, ZHANG Huanchao,YANG Xiulian,WANG Lianggui. Effects of mulching on soil property and microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2017, 41(01): 89-95.
[13]	ZHOU Zhidong, BU Xiaoli, WU Yongbo, XUE Jianhui. Research advances in biochar effects on soil microbial properties [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(06): 1-8.
[14]	XU Wenhuan, DENG Fangfang, FANG Shuiyuan, WANG Guobing, RUAN Honghua, CAO Guohua. Effect of biochar on soil microbial biomass and the diversity of carbon source metabolism in poplar plantation [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2016, 40(05): 14-20.
[15]	LU Xiaoqiang, YANG Wanxia, XI Yueming, DING Fangjun. Effects of different vegetation recovery types on soil chemical and microbial biomass properties in Maolan Karst region [J]. JOURNAL OF NANJING FORESTRY UNIVERSITY, 2015, 39(05): 73-80.