Study on genetic variation of half-sib family and superior families selection of Keteleeria fortunei

GAO Nan, TANG Xinghao, HE Wenguang, LIN Huazhang, WU Yishu, YU Mengyang, XIAO Xiangxi

Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 145-150.

PDF(1783 KB)
PDF(1783 KB)
Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) ›› 2025, Vol. 49 ›› Issue (6) : 145-150. DOI: 10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403001

Study on genetic variation of half-sib family and superior families selection of Keteleeria fortunei

Author information +
History +

Abstract

【Objective】This study aims to evaluate the genetic variation in growth traits of 28 eight-year-old half-sib families of Keteleeria fortunei in Datian, Fujian Province, screen superior families, and estimate their genetic gains, thereby providing a basis for breeding and popularizing superior germplasm of K. fortunei.【Method】Key growth traits, including diameter at breast height (DBH), tree height, and individual volume, were measured in the progeny forest of 28 half-sib families. Genetic parameters (heritabilities) were calculated. Variance analysis was used to test the significance of trait differences among families, and systematic cluster analysis was employed to classify the families into the excellent, intermediate and poor types.【Result】There was abundant variation in growth traits among the families. The average DBH, tree height and individual volume were 8.45 cm, 6.21 m and 0.022 8 m3, with coefficient of variation ranges of 4.96%-43.03%, 1.93%-33.44% and 9.16%-97.70%, respectively. Variance analysis indicated extremely significant differences (P<0.01) in DBH, tree height and individual volume among families. The family heritabilities for tree height, DBH and individual volume were 0.690 1, 0.665 9 and 0.636 8, respectively, indicating moderate to strong genetic control of these traits. Systematic cluster analysis categorized the 28 families into three types: excellent, intermediate, and poor. The excellent-type families had average DBH, tree height and individual volume of 10.00 cm, 7.04 m and 0.0323 m3, which were 18.35%, 13.35% and 41.68% higher than the overall mean, coefficients of variation were 21.71%, 26.22% and 48.23% higher than the control population, respectively. Within the excellent-type families, families 7, 16, 4, 6 and 14 had average genetic gains exceeding 15% and were identified as superior families.【Conclusion】The growth traits of K. fortunei half-sib families exhibit rich genetic variation and extremely significant differences among families, indicating substantial potential for genetic improvement. Five superior families (7, 16, 4, 6 and 14) were selected based on heritability, cluster analysis and genetic gain evaluation. Their growth traits were significantly superior to the population mean and the control, with high genetic gains, making them suitable for declaration popularization and application as improved germplasm of K. fortunei.

Key words

Keteleeria fortunei / half-sib family / genetic variation / genetic gain / improved variety breeding

Cite this article

Download Citations
GAO Nan , TANG Xinghao , HE Wenguang , et al . Study on genetic variation of half-sib family and superior families selection of Keteleeria fortunei[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition). 2025, 49(6): 145-150 https://doi.org/10.12302/j.issn.1000-2006.202403001

References

[1]
何文广. 江南油杉优树子代家系苗期遗传变异与早期选择[J]. 广西林业科学, 2016, 45(3):242-247.
HE W G. Genetic variation of plus trees progeny of Keteleeria cyclolepis and early selection at seedling stage[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2016, 45(3):242-247.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2016.03.002.
[2]
何应会, 蒋燚, 黄荣林, 等. 不同种源江南油杉球果种子品质差异[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37(11):38-41,83.
HE Y H, JIANG Y, HUANG R L, et al. Differences of seed quality in Keteleeria cyclolepis flous from different provenances[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2017, 37(11):38-41,83.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2017.11.007.
[3]
邓文剑, 王润辉, 郑会全, 等. 江南油杉种源家系早期生长分析[J]. 林业与环境科学, 2017, 33(5):6-9.
DENG W J, WANG R H, ZHENG H Q, et al. Analyses for early growth of provenances and families of Keteleeria cyclolepis[J]. Forestry and Environmental Science, 2017, 33(5):6-9.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4427.2017.05.002.
[4]
LIU X S, XIAO Y F, WANG Y, et al. The in vitro germination and storage characteristics of Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis pollen provide a reference for cross breeding[J]. Protoplasma, 2020, 257(4):1221-1230.DOI: 10.1007/s00709-020-01509-w.
[5]
肖祥希, 高楠, 何文广, 等. 油杉表型差异分析及优树选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2015, 35(7):1-6.
XIAO X X, GAO N, HE W G, et al. Analysis on phenotypic variations of Keteleeria fortunei and plus tree selection[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2015, 35(7):1-6.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2015.07.001.
[6]
黄荣林, 刘雄盛, 蒋琳, 等. 黄冕林场江南油杉优树子代林测定[J]. 广西林业科学, 2019, 48(4):460-465.
HUANG R L, LIU X S, JIANG L, et al. Test of plus tree progeny of Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis in Huangmian Forest Farm[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2019, 48(4):460-465.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2019.04.007.
[7]
李晖, 王福生, 杨海军. 林业调查规划实用技术手册[M]. 长沙: 湖南科学技术出版社, 2008.
LI H, WANG F S, YANG H J. Practical technical manual of forestry investigation and planning[M]. Changsha: Hunan Science & Technology Press, 2008.
[8]
王云鹏, 张蕊, 周志春, 等. 10年生木荷生长和材性性状家系变异及选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5):85-92.
WANG Y P, ZHANG R, ZHOU Z C, et al. A variation and selection of growth and wood traits for 10-year-old Schima superba[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(5):85-92.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.202003086.
[9]
彭洋, 陆跃堂, 赵杨, 等. 棕榈半同胞子代家系苗期测定及优良家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 44(5):78-84.
PENG Y, LU Y T, ZHAO Y, et al. A half-sib progeny test and juvenile selection of Trachycarpus fortunei[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2020, 44(5):78-84.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201908002.
[10]
洪舟, 刘福妹, 张宁南, 等. 降香黄檀生长性状家系间变异与优良家系初选[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 42(4):106-112.
HONG Z, LIU F M, ZHANG N N, et al. Growth traits variation among families and preliminary selection of superior families in Dalbergia odorifera T.Chen[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2018, 42(4):106-112.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201711017.
[11]
杜林峰, 陈勇, 柯尊发, 等. 马尾松半同胞家系子代林遗传增益分析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2010, 29(6):772-777.
DU L F, CHEN Y, KE Z F, et al. Genetic gain of analysis on half-sib progenies family of Pinus massoniana[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2010, 29(6):772-777.DOI: 10.13300/j.cnki.hnlkxb.2010.06.020.
[12]
覃敏, 尹光天, 杨锦昌, 等. 米老排种源家系生长性状变异分析及早期选择[J]. 植物研究, 2017, 37(1):139-146.
QIN M, YIN G T, YANG J C, et al. Growth traits variation and early selection of Mytilaria laosensis provenances and families[J]. Bulletin of Botanical Research, 2017, 37(1):139-146.DOI:10.7525/j.issn.1673-5102.2017.01.018.
[13]
申文辉, 朱积余, 刘秀, 等. 红锥种源区域试验与优良种源选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2014, 34(3):11-17.
SHEN W H, ZHU J Y, LIU X, et al. Regional testing and superior provenance selection of Castanopsis hystrix provenances[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2014, 34(3):11-17.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2014.03.009.
[14]
黄秋燕. 江南油杉半同胞子代家系早期生长分析[J]. 福建林业科技, 2017, 44(1):34-37.
HUANG Q Y. Early growth analysis of half-sib families of Keteleeria cyclolepis[J]. Journal of Fujian Forestry Science and Technology, 2017, 44(1):34-37.DOI: 10.13428/j.cnki.fjlk.2017.01.008.
[15]
黄荣林, 蒋琳, 刘雄盛, 等. 江南油杉半同胞家系子代测定及早期选择[J]. 广西林业科学, 2020, 49(4):498-504.
HUANG R L, JIANG L, LIU X S, et al. Progeny testing and early selection of half-sib families of Keteleeria fortunei var. cyclolepis[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2020, 49(4):498-504.DOI: 10.19692/j.cnki.gfs.2020.04.004.
[16]
邓宗杰. 江南油杉半同胞家系生长及遗传特性评价[J]. 广西林业科学, 2022, 51(6):841-844.
DENG Z J. Evaluation on growth and genetic characteristics of half-sib families of Keteleeria cyclolepis[J]. Guangxi Forestry Science, 2022, 51(6):841-844.DOI: 10.19692/j.issn.1006-1126.20220616.
[17]
谭健晖, 冯源恒, 黄永利, 等. 26年生马尾松初级种子园半同胞子代变异及家系选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 41(3):189-192.
TAN J H, FENG Y H, HUANG Y L, et al. Open pollination progeny test and family selection of 26-year-old Pinus massoniana Lamb.seed orchard[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2017, 41(3):189-192.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.201507061.
[18]
尹绍鹏, 赵国辉, 夏辉, 等. 长白落叶松半同胞子代测定研究[J]. 西南林业大学学报, 2016, 36(1):63-68.
YIN S P, ZHAO G H, XIA H, et al. Stacly on progeny test of half-sibs families in Larix olgensis[J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry University, 2016, 36(1):63-68.DOI: 10.11929/j.issn.2095-1914.2016.01.011.
[19]
曹汉洋. 杉木第2代种子园半同胞子代测定及早期选择[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 35(1):19-23.
CAO H Y. Half-sib progeny test and early selection of the 2nd generation seed orchard for Cunninghamia lanceolata[J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2011, 35(1):19-23.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2006.2011.01.005.
[20]
黄信金. 柳杉半同胞子代遗传变异与优良遗传型选择[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2010, 30(7):50-54.
HUANG X J. Genetic variation and selection of Cryptomehia fortunei half-sib progeny[J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2010, 30(7):50-54.DOI: 10.14067/j.cnki.1673-923x.2010.07.026.
[21]
邢学丁, 王莉, 徐冰, 等. 华北落叶松优树半同胞家系的子代测定[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2019, 34(2):129-133.
XING X D, WANG L, XU B, et al. Half-sib progeny test of Larix principis-rupprechtii plus tree[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2019, 34(2):129-133.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2019.02.20.
[22]
郑仁华. 福建柏优树子代测定及早期选择[J]. 福建林学院学报, 2005, 25(1):22-26.
ZHENG R H. The progeny testing and early selection to plus-trees of Fokienia hodginsii[J]. Journal of Fujian College of Forestry, 2005, 25(1):22-26.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-389X.2005.01.006.
[23]
陈建中, 李悦, 李国锋, 等. 油松优树半同胞家系子代遗传变异与选择[J]. 河南农业大学学报, 2006, 40(2):146-151,160.
CHEN J Z, LI Y, LI G F, et al. Study on the genetic variations of half-sib progeny testing and advanced selections of Pinus taburaeformis[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural University, 2006, 40(2):146-151,160.DOI: 10.16445/j.cnki.1000-2340.2006.02.009.
PDF(1783 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended
The full text is translated into English by AI, aiming to facilitate reading and comprehension. The core content is subject to the explanation in Chinese.

/